|
Germany2687 Posts
On December 10 2012 03:48 Talin wrote:
The thing is that using their current IDs conflicts with TLPD, FPL, Live Reports, and even official TL articles (so far), which is really where most people that would want to look up a player get their information from.
Although I can see how it becomes even more inconvenient if (now English) casters also use the new IDs. =/
This topic was / is being discussed many times before. And I think there is still no final stance on this.
TL articles often use their current IDs, at least for the "bigger" players (ie: INnoVation). But LR threads and TLPD seems to differ much more (FPL = TLPD).
One big point for using current IDs is, that new spectators don't know them by their old BW-IDs because they weren't around then.
|
Sweden5554 Posts
On December 10 2012 03:48 Talin wrote:
The thing is that using their current IDs conflicts with TLPD, FPL, Live Reports, and even official TL articles (so far), which is really where most people that would want to look up a player get their information from.
Although I can see how it becomes even more inconvenient if (now English) casters also use the new IDs. =/
Yeah, uhm, I don't think there's a good option, just two kinda annoying ones. ... I guess the best option would be send someone over to korea to slap them whenever they change their IDs.... :x
|
On December 10 2012 07:44 salle wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 03:48 Talin wrote:
The thing is that using their current IDs conflicts with TLPD, FPL, Live Reports, and even official TL articles (so far), which is really where most people that would want to look up a player get their information from.
Although I can see how it becomes even more inconvenient if (now English) casters also use the new IDs. =/ Yeah, uhm, I don't think there's a good option, just two kinda annoying ones. ... I guess the best option would be send someone over to korea to slap them whenever they change their IDs.... :x
On the job.
|
I did my first edit today. Hopefully the first of many 
|
Germany2687 Posts
On December 11 2012 14:01 ILuMiNaTe wrote:I did my first edit today. Hopefully the first of many
We hope so too! Welcome
|
Hello, I was browsing through the OSL results table and found out that the R&S link for the 2011 JinAir OSL pointed to a thread concerning grand finals and Jangbi instead of the actual R&S page.
That made me register here and fix the link for sake of consistency :-)
|
Germany2687 Posts
On December 12 2012 20:23 ugla wrote:
Hello, I was browsing through the OSL results table and found out that the R&S link for the 2011 JinAir OSL pointed to a thread concerning grand finals and Jangbi instead of the actual R&S page.
That made me register here and fix the link for sake of consistency :-)
Thats the spirit, awesome!
|
|
|
I can review your edits if you'd like, though obviously I cant guarantee they'll all be accepted. I'll do the same for anyone who asks, by the way.
|
|
|
Germany2687 Posts
The fastest way to get your edits reviewed is by joining us in our Quakenet channel: #liquipedia.
|
|
|
Ok, I fixed it for you. When you created your round robin page you created it with a page name that was a full url, when you create a page just use what's after the "dota2" part of the address. Let me know if you have any other questions.
|
Ok thanks. If I try something like that again I´ll keep that in mind ^^
Edit: Actually I still have the question why it says "Save page" instead of "Submit changes". Because I made the page?
And is it ok that I made that Tab? In Season 2 there was a tab for each week (7), since it´s 11 weeks this season it would imo become very cluttered.
This single Round Robin tab is used Starladder Season 4 and imo that´s a simple and clear way to post all match results.
|
No worries, not like you can really break something that can't be fixed. :D
|
Hello, i've been working on a big liquipedia entry for a local Lan tournament because it's gotten bigger and bigger in the past months and with players like Mondragon attending we thought we should document this.
I'm still a bit overwhelmed by the opportunities and things i have to consider when editing our entries. Could someone tell me how i can make the sign go away that says "This page has been moved to your Userspace because it does not meet Liquipedia's standards for inclusion in the main article space.", or tell me what the articles are still lacking to move them out from my userspace?
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Munich_Starcraft_Tournament
Can you tell me if there's anything i should change to make the entries better and more fitting to the style of liquipedia?
|
It's the {{LERev}} tag that gives you that message. I removed it for MST6 and approved the page. Very thorough work!
You could still add some more info into the infobox. For example, like it's been done on  2012 MLG Pro Circuit/Winter/Championship, with server, startdate, enddate etc.
|
I was wondering if it was possible to implement a button who will show all the games / brackets. I'm especially referring to the OSL/GSL qualifiers where you have to click 10 - 15 times on "Show" to view all the brackets and the Proleague page too.
|
I was updating the Dota2 wiki to reflect Zeus's 6.77 changes (strength gain increased from 1.8 to 2.3). I ran into some confusion trying to update the stats for Zeus at levels 1/15/25 (right now, they are unchanged from whatever they were before 6.77 hit). Basically, I'm not sure what the level 15/25 hp should be. Level 1 hp should be unchanged. Here's the problem:
Each point of strength increases hp by 19. Zeus's level 1 hp of 511, and level 1 strength of 19 suggest a base hp of 150 (511-19*19 = 150). However, I tried to check and see if this formula was right by verifying the level 15 hp listed on the wiki for patch 6.76. Calculating 150 + 19*19 + 1.8*15*19 = 1024hp, while the wiki lists 990. So I don't know to calculate hp values.
To add to my confusion, the listed hp for a Zeus at level 25 was different on liquipedia and dota2wiki (pre-6.77).
|
You are multipling 1.8 times 15, while to get 15th level you level up only 14 times.
150 + 19*19 + 1.8*14*19 = 990
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
