| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
ffz
United States490 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=201812 <-- CJ thread. Before the announcement it was basically the same type of thread. Edit: I noticed the op for the IGN thread basically just quoted 2 lines and then wrote 2 more of his own. I can understand closing the thread because of that. | ||
|
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
it is not my homework. im jsut curious if this topic doesnt give a solution, im totally fine with it | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
That's my take on it, you can try private messaging the staff member for a more direct clarification (the above is only my opinion). | ||
|
Brotkrumen
Germany193 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=215307 I planned to play around with logical fallacies a bit, but it got closed. Before that I searched the forum and there is a thread on directional wiping and about the folding/crumbling controversy. If I oversaw a thread, I'm sorry. If there is none and the reason is that the subject of the thread does not adhere to TL.net posting standards, I can accept that too. If though the subject matter was found to be of no interest, I'd rather that the visitors decide and that the thread would just die on its own. | ||
|
Matharos
Canada211 Posts
So many zergs are complaining about lack of scouting options, I thought it would be useful to show how good overlords are..... I really don;t think I'm saying one race is better, I'm trying to say that zerg scouting is better then everyone thinks... | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
When in reality, they are vastly different and could not be compared. Apples and Oranges, they're both sources of vitamis (like scans and overlords are sources of scouting), but they're different in terms of cost (lose supply/lose energy + MULE) and cost (100 minerals and potentially supply-capped/lose mining of a potential mule), etc. etc. That's my understanding. | ||
Chill
Calgary25995 Posts
On May 13 2011 23:18 Matharos wrote: Hi I would like to know why this thread was closed. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=222573 So many zergs are complaining about lack of scouting options, I thought it would be useful to show how good overlords are..... I really don;t think I'm saying one race is better, I'm trying to say that zerg scouting is better then everyone thinks... It's a pretty low level discussion that doesn't further anything. It's like saying an 18-wheeler is better than a car because it's more expensive and bigger. You've completely ignored all the other factors involved in the discussion (risk analysis, lost production, vulnerability to early timings, even how to get your overlords in position to be sacrifised, etc.). You tried to turn it into apples to apples, which isn't possible. | ||
|
Matharos
Canada211 Posts
On May 14 2011 00:50 Chill wrote: It's a pretty low level discussion that doesn't further anything. It's like saying an 18-wheeler is better than a car because it's more expensive and bigger. You've completely ignored all the other factors involved in the discussion (risk analysis, lost production, vulnerability to early timings, even how to get your overlords in position to be sacrifised, etc.). You tried to turn it into apples to apples, which isn't possible. Ok Thanks | ||
|
MASSivezTV
United States289 Posts
would LOVE to know why this was closed with in 5 minutes of it being up. Seems like TL mods have been shitty recently (dont take offense even though you should) and dont give me the "not enough effort" shit. There was a replay and everything. | ||
|
MASSivezTV
United States289 Posts
save the response, dont want one User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
MinoMino
Norway1103 Posts
On May 17 2011 01:05 MASSivezTV wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=223715 would LOVE to know why this was closed with in 5 minutes of it being up. Seems like TL mods have been shitty recently (dont take offense even though you should) and dont give me the "not enough effort" shit. There was a replay and everything. The "this" on your blog that got closed was a link to this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=210370 Basically, you failed to tag your thread correctly, thus, the thread got closed. You failed to meet one of the most basic requirements, it's as simple as that. | ||
|
MASSivezTV
United States289 Posts
| ||
Ares[Effort]
DEMACIA6550 Posts
This is the guidelines [H] Help threads. Post a replay, give your own analysis, get help! The classic “Why did I lose this game?”. For these threads it is absolutely required that you post a replay. No exceptions. Nobody is going to be able to help you if you won’t post a replay. Additionally, first put some thought into what happened in the game, and include your own analysis into the thread. It might be wrong, but try your best. It doesn’t have to be long, a few point form lines is enough to give people a starting point to give you advice. Your thread won’t last if you won’t put any effort in it. If you have specific questions, ask them along with your analysis. It’s always easier to reply if we know what exactly you need help with. | ||
|
Try
United States1293 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=225343 I posted basically this exact same thread awhile ago, but mine was closed. My thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=133083 I was curious why mine was closed, while the other one is allowed to stay open. Thanks. | ||
|
hacklebeast
United States5090 Posts
I'm not a fan of the guy, but I'm curious why the thread got closed and the op got nuked. I know he cheated for tsl2, but that didn't stop Dimaga from getting a fan club. He's BM, but no more BM than some other big names. Is it a combination of the two that no one else has, or is there part of the story I'm not aware of? | ||
|
Levolent
United States59 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=227627 | ||
|
Marradron
Netherlands1586 Posts
On May 29 2011 18:36 joe7dust wrote: Why was this thread closed just 30 seconds after I made it? I know I only have 6 posts, but I've been on here since 2004 and I think it is a legitimate question for the Starcraft 2 Strategy subforum... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=227627 The standards for the strategy forum are kept quite high. Did you read the guideline at the top of the forum ? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=113479 A few things missing. Tags, replays, in dept anaylisis. People cant help your gameplay if you dont show it. Nor should you expect them to if you dont provide a good analysis yourself. Though I'm not a mod this is how I would feel about your post. | ||
|
Levolent
United States59 Posts
| ||
|
Zaphid
Czech Republic1860 Posts
On May 29 2011 23:04 joe7dust wrote: I saw that, I'm not asking for an in depth analysis of my play. I want to know the top 3 TvZ players, to study them. All the ones I've seen so far seem to lose most of the time. Is there a better subforum to ask? Best players are usually from Korea and good luck getting their replays, you are better off checking some replay site and just grabbing 10-100 TvZ replays regardless of whether they win or lose and practice the opening, there is strategy that wins 100% of the time. Judging by your post, a lot of the high level play would be over your head at this point too. | ||
|
Edmon
United Kingdom259 Posts
I worry that if I explain the joke here it might no longer be funny  . Sad that it's locked though. | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Team League
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Patches Events
BSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
