|
Go QQ whine in the regular QQ whining thread if you must.
|
On March 08 2017 13:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2017 12:47 Simberto wrote:On March 08 2017 12:14 On_Slaught wrote:
Oh man... if they haven't repealed and replaced by 2018 elections it's going to be a blood bath. Their own constituents will either turn on them or not show up. They have had 6 years to come up with a replacement. So far, there has been nothing. (Which is incredibly silly and i still can't get over the fact that they managed to get elected on "Obamacare is horrible, we are going to repeal and replace it with something better, but so far we haven't managed to figure out anything close to a good idea of a replacement plan") Their first attempt to replace is apparently bound to fail completely, because it is horribly bad. They can't even manage to get their own party behind their plan. And i really don't see them coming up with that amazing healthcare plan that totally solves all problems for free that they have been promising over the next two years. I see four ways that this can go. -They do nothing and hopefully don't get reelected (I really don't trust the american voters anymore though, so they might still get reelected) -They replace it with a wonderful republican plan, and suddenly loads of people have no healthcare whatsoever. I hope this leads to them not getting reelected, but once again, see above -They replace one single small thing somewhere, claim that they totally changed everything and everything stays basically the same. Depending on how good they are at convincing the voters that they did indeed totally change everything, they might get reelected. -Some random shit happens, and everyone forgets about it for some reason. Or they just blame everything on Obama. Never underestimate how stupid the American voter is.
Seriously?
Mod, can't report.
|
Mods can you at least say which side reports the most? Good data to know who gets offended the easiest.
|
United States44439 Posts
On March 08 2017 13:47 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2017 13:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:On March 08 2017 12:47 Simberto wrote:On March 08 2017 12:14 On_Slaught wrote:
Oh man... if they haven't repealed and replaced by 2018 elections it's going to be a blood bath. Their own constituents will either turn on them or not show up. They have had 6 years to come up with a replacement. So far, there has been nothing. (Which is incredibly silly and i still can't get over the fact that they managed to get elected on "Obamacare is horrible, we are going to repeal and replace it with something better, but so far we haven't managed to figure out anything close to a good idea of a replacement plan") Their first attempt to replace is apparently bound to fail completely, because it is horribly bad. They can't even manage to get their own party behind their plan. And i really don't see them coming up with that amazing healthcare plan that totally solves all problems for free that they have been promising over the next two years. I see four ways that this can go. -They do nothing and hopefully don't get reelected (I really don't trust the american voters anymore though, so they might still get reelected) -They replace it with a wonderful republican plan, and suddenly loads of people have no healthcare whatsoever. I hope this leads to them not getting reelected, but once again, see above -They replace one single small thing somewhere, claim that they totally changed everything and everything stays basically the same. Depending on how good they are at convincing the voters that they did indeed totally change everything, they might get reelected. -Some random shit happens, and everyone forgets about it for some reason. Or they just blame everything on Obama. Never underestimate how stupid the American voter is. Seriously? Mod, can't report.
Not sure which part of that is meant to be controversial.
|
On March 08 2017 17:09 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2017 13:47 Danglars wrote:On March 08 2017 13:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:On March 08 2017 12:47 Simberto wrote:On March 08 2017 12:14 On_Slaught wrote:
Oh man... if they haven't repealed and replaced by 2018 elections it's going to be a blood bath. Their own constituents will either turn on them or not show up. They have had 6 years to come up with a replacement. So far, there has been nothing. (Which is incredibly silly and i still can't get over the fact that they managed to get elected on "Obamacare is horrible, we are going to repeal and replace it with something better, but so far we haven't managed to figure out anything close to a good idea of a replacement plan") Their first attempt to replace is apparently bound to fail completely, because it is horribly bad. They can't even manage to get their own party behind their plan. And i really don't see them coming up with that amazing healthcare plan that totally solves all problems for free that they have been promising over the next two years. I see four ways that this can go. -They do nothing and hopefully don't get reelected (I really don't trust the american voters anymore though, so they might still get reelected) -They replace it with a wonderful republican plan, and suddenly loads of people have no healthcare whatsoever. I hope this leads to them not getting reelected, but once again, see above -They replace one single small thing somewhere, claim that they totally changed everything and everything stays basically the same. Depending on how good they are at convincing the voters that they did indeed totally change everything, they might get reelected. -Some random shit happens, and everyone forgets about it for some reason. Or they just blame everything on Obama. Never underestimate how stupid the American voter is. Seriously? Mod, can't report. Not sure which part of that is meant to be controversial.
It's politically incorrect and Danglar has always been saying we should ban and silence politically incorrect people.
Oh wait...
|
On March 08 2017 17:09 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2017 13:47 Danglars wrote:On March 08 2017 13:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:On March 08 2017 12:47 Simberto wrote:On March 08 2017 12:14 On_Slaught wrote:
Oh man... if they haven't repealed and replaced by 2018 elections it's going to be a blood bath. Their own constituents will either turn on them or not show up. They have had 6 years to come up with a replacement. So far, there has been nothing. (Which is incredibly silly and i still can't get over the fact that they managed to get elected on "Obamacare is horrible, we are going to repeal and replace it with something better, but so far we haven't managed to figure out anything close to a good idea of a replacement plan") Their first attempt to replace is apparently bound to fail completely, because it is horribly bad. They can't even manage to get their own party behind their plan. And i really don't see them coming up with that amazing healthcare plan that totally solves all problems for free that they have been promising over the next two years. I see four ways that this can go. -They do nothing and hopefully don't get reelected (I really don't trust the american voters anymore though, so they might still get reelected) -They replace it with a wonderful republican plan, and suddenly loads of people have no healthcare whatsoever. I hope this leads to them not getting reelected, but once again, see above -They replace one single small thing somewhere, claim that they totally changed everything and everything stays basically the same. Depending on how good they are at convincing the voters that they did indeed totally change everything, they might get reelected. -Some random shit happens, and everyone forgets about it for some reason. Or they just blame everything on Obama. Never underestimate how stupid the American voter is. Seriously? Mod, can't report. Not sure which part of that is meant to be controversial.
Not sure how you defend that one liner. Is that where you want the debate? But this is more for comment from the actual moderation staff of thread. If that passes muster, so be it.
|
On March 08 2017 16:42 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Mods can you at least say which side reports the most? Good data to know who gets offended the easiest.
Number of reports wouldn't tell you that. Not even number of actioned reports would tell you that.
|
Ghostcom what?
If I'm reporting 50% of the posts (an example), then there is a problem. How is the number of reports not going to tell me anything? Especially if you're tying the number of reports to how many a user made within a certain time frame.
Plansix = Reported 320 people
xDaunt = Reported 50 people
That won't tell you anything? I'd just assume Plansix is easy to be trolled, he's mad of just the way the thread is going, and should have the reporting feature some what removed because it's only creating more work for mods since he doesn't agree with others...
It's a US Politic thread, people are going to argue, and call each other names, it's normal. What isn't normal is when a person tells another person they should go die, kill themselves, and/or something that obviously isn't tolerated. Not when people like StealthBlue called some one stupid that isn't even part of the thread.
|
i can tell you how many reports i have
|
On March 09 2017 04:09 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Ghostcom what?
If I'm reporting 50% of the posts (an example), then there is a problem. How is the number of reports not going to tell me anything? Especially if you're tying the number of reports to how many a user made within a certain time frame.
Plansix = Reported 320 people
xDaunt = Reported 50 people
That won't tell you anything? I'd just assume Plansix is easy to be trolled, he's mad of just the way the thread is going, and should have the reporting feature some what removed because it's only creating more work for mods since he doesn't agree with others...
It's a US Politic thread, people are going to argue, and call each other names, it's normal. What isn't normal is when a person tells another person they should go die, kill themselves, and/or something that obviously isn't tolerated. Not when people like StealthBlue called some one stupid that isn't even part of the thread.
I agree with Igne here. That is completely useless information.
|
On March 09 2017 04:23 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2017 04:09 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Ghostcom what?
If I'm reporting 50% of the posts (an example), then there is a problem. How is the number of reports not going to tell me anything? Especially if you're tying the number of reports to how many a user made within a certain time frame.
Plansix = Reported 320 people
xDaunt = Reported 50 people
That won't tell you anything? I'd just assume Plansix is easy to be trolled, he's mad of just the way the thread is going, and should have the reporting feature some what removed because it's only creating more work for mods since he doesn't agree with others...
It's a US Politic thread, people are going to argue, and call each other names, it's normal. What isn't normal is when a person tells another person they should go die, kill themselves, and/or something that obviously isn't tolerated. Not when people like StealthBlue called some one stupid that isn't even part of the thread. I agree with Igne here. That is completely useless information.
Maybe for you? And as for "telling me how many reports you have" that's about transparency, and how much are you willing to bend the truth. I feel like this would benefit the mods much more since it's their time in checking the reports. Having data isn't useless - it's what you do with it.
|
TL sends out a PM for every 25 reports that you make, right? If so, I haven't even hit 25 yet.
|
On March 08 2017 13:47 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2017 13:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:On March 08 2017 12:47 Simberto wrote:On March 08 2017 12:14 On_Slaught wrote:
Oh man... if they haven't repealed and replaced by 2018 elections it's going to be a blood bath. Their own constituents will either turn on them or not show up. They have had 6 years to come up with a replacement. So far, there has been nothing. (Which is incredibly silly and i still can't get over the fact that they managed to get elected on "Obamacare is horrible, we are going to repeal and replace it with something better, but so far we haven't managed to figure out anything close to a good idea of a replacement plan") Their first attempt to replace is apparently bound to fail completely, because it is horribly bad. They can't even manage to get their own party behind their plan. And i really don't see them coming up with that amazing healthcare plan that totally solves all problems for free that they have been promising over the next two years. I see four ways that this can go. -They do nothing and hopefully don't get reelected (I really don't trust the american voters anymore though, so they might still get reelected) -They replace it with a wonderful republican plan, and suddenly loads of people have no healthcare whatsoever. I hope this leads to them not getting reelected, but once again, see above -They replace one single small thing somewhere, claim that they totally changed everything and everything stays basically the same. Depending on how good they are at convincing the voters that they did indeed totally change everything, they might get reelected. -Some random shit happens, and everyone forgets about it for some reason. Or they just blame everything on Obama. Never underestimate how stupid the American voter is. Seriously? Mod, can't report.
Meh, it's a kinda low-content statement but worse goes unactioned in that thread, so it's hard to care.
|
On March 09 2017 04:50 LegalLord wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2017 13:47 Danglars wrote:On March 08 2017 13:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:On March 08 2017 12:47 Simberto wrote:On March 08 2017 12:14 On_Slaught wrote:
Oh man... if they haven't repealed and replaced by 2018 elections it's going to be a blood bath. Their own constituents will either turn on them or not show up. They have had 6 years to come up with a replacement. So far, there has been nothing. (Which is incredibly silly and i still can't get over the fact that they managed to get elected on "Obamacare is horrible, we are going to repeal and replace it with something better, but so far we haven't managed to figure out anything close to a good idea of a replacement plan") Their first attempt to replace is apparently bound to fail completely, because it is horribly bad. They can't even manage to get their own party behind their plan. And i really don't see them coming up with that amazing healthcare plan that totally solves all problems for free that they have been promising over the next two years. I see four ways that this can go. -They do nothing and hopefully don't get reelected (I really don't trust the american voters anymore though, so they might still get reelected) -They replace it with a wonderful republican plan, and suddenly loads of people have no healthcare whatsoever. I hope this leads to them not getting reelected, but once again, see above -They replace one single small thing somewhere, claim that they totally changed everything and everything stays basically the same. Depending on how good they are at convincing the voters that they did indeed totally change everything, they might get reelected. -Some random shit happens, and everyone forgets about it for some reason. Or they just blame everything on Obama. Never underestimate how stupid the American voter is. Seriously? Mod, can't report. Meh, it's a kinda low-content statement but worse goes unactioned in that thread, so it's hard to care.
Sure worse gets unactioned, but these low content digs from hammers I think deserves comment from thread moderators.
|
United States13132 Posts
|
Ah, okay. I saw that page, but didn't realize that you could mouse over the pie chart to get details. So I have 20 reports total.
|
Hyrule19268 Posts
just keep in mind that Other Action and Thread Closed have only been around for a couple years, so if you have a lot of reports from before that your No Action will be skewed.
|
I only have 1. Lol - and I knew this data was around somewhere.
|
On March 09 2017 07:11 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2017 04:50 LegalLord wrote:On March 08 2017 13:47 Danglars wrote:On March 08 2017 13:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:On March 08 2017 12:47 Simberto wrote:On March 08 2017 12:14 On_Slaught wrote:
Oh man... if they haven't repealed and replaced by 2018 elections it's going to be a blood bath. Their own constituents will either turn on them or not show up. They have had 6 years to come up with a replacement. So far, there has been nothing. (Which is incredibly silly and i still can't get over the fact that they managed to get elected on "Obamacare is horrible, we are going to repeal and replace it with something better, but so far we haven't managed to figure out anything close to a good idea of a replacement plan") Their first attempt to replace is apparently bound to fail completely, because it is horribly bad. They can't even manage to get their own party behind their plan. And i really don't see them coming up with that amazing healthcare plan that totally solves all problems for free that they have been promising over the next two years. I see four ways that this can go. -They do nothing and hopefully don't get reelected (I really don't trust the american voters anymore though, so they might still get reelected) -They replace it with a wonderful republican plan, and suddenly loads of people have no healthcare whatsoever. I hope this leads to them not getting reelected, but once again, see above -They replace one single small thing somewhere, claim that they totally changed everything and everything stays basically the same. Depending on how good they are at convincing the voters that they did indeed totally change everything, they might get reelected. -Some random shit happens, and everyone forgets about it for some reason. Or they just blame everything on Obama. Never underestimate how stupid the American voter is. Seriously? Mod, can't report. Meh, it's a kinda low-content statement but worse goes unactioned in that thread, so it's hard to care. Sure worse gets unactioned, but these low content digs from hammers I think deserves comment from thread moderators.
Attacks on the populace as a whole are probably easier to get away with than personal attacks on a particular poster. If the former was actionable, the thread would have like 3+ bans just from today, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
