|
On February 23 2017 05:45 LegalLord wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 03:45 xDaunt wrote: Maybe you haven't noticed, but a majority of the thread's posts have been shit posts and troll posts this month. Within the past two weeks, to be precise. Since February 8. I find your attempt to place the blame on those returning from ban bets pretty funny considering how much you've been trolling with sarcastic posts, and shitposting in general, in the thread.
|
On February 23 2017 05:51 kwizach wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 05:45 LegalLord wrote:On February 23 2017 03:45 xDaunt wrote: Maybe you haven't noticed, but a majority of the thread's posts have been shit posts and troll posts this month. Within the past two weeks, to be precise. Since February 8. I find your attempt to place the blame on those returning from ban bets pretty funny considering how much you've been trolling with sarcastic posts, and shitposting in general, in the thread. Second this.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Want a serious discussion? Start one. Want to follow me around like a troll with random stupid remarks that add nothing? Make low content posts like Twitter spam on useless topics? You will get less serious replies in return.
I'm going to leave it at that because I'm not up for another meta-politics discussion. I have had way too many of those. Nevertheless, I did notice a precipitous decline in discussion quality right after my above comment, so I stick to that interpretation.
|
you're the one starting the trolling legal, as such you should stop it.
|
You're the one that for some obvious reason keeps targeting LL when there are almost everyone else doing the exact same thing that you keep ignoring.
|
Hyrule18982 Posts
well since there's no worthwhile discussion going on we may as well lock the thread and ban political discussion completely, right?
|
On February 23 2017 06:29 Sermokala wrote: You're the one that for some obvious reason keeps targeting LL when there are almost everyone else doing the exact same thing that you keep ignoring. false charge; just because I notice LL doing it more than most doesn't mean I don't notice others doing it as well, and wouldn't favor actions against those others. I don't need to call out every infractor in order to complain about a specific infractor. please keep your facts straight.
tofu, what's needed is more warnings for the frequent infractions, and some bans if necessary. but if it's too hard to moderate a shutdown may be better.
|
Talk about airing of grievances. Singling out LegalLord out of pages of shitpost city is just zlefin's political leanings on display.
On February 23 2017 06:06 zlefin wrote: you're the one starting the trolling legal, as such you should stop it. I like this raw take for what it symbolizes.
|
On February 23 2017 06:33 tofucake wrote: well since there's no worthwhile discussion going on we may as well lock the thread and ban political discussion completely, right?
TL, consistently holding itself to a higher standard than the entirety of the US government.
|
On February 23 2017 06:41 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 06:29 Sermokala wrote: You're the one that for some obvious reason keeps targeting LL when there are almost everyone else doing the exact same thing that you keep ignoring. false charge; just because I notice LL doing it more than most doesn't mean I don't notice others doing it as well, and wouldn't favor actions against those others. I don't need to call out every infractor in order to complain about a specific infractor. please keep your facts straight. tofu, what's needed is more warnings for the frequent infractions, and some bans if necessary. but if it's too hard to moderate a shutdown may be better. If the conversation isn't up to my standards then there shouldn't be a conversation at all.
If it wasn't a false charge you'd go after anyone else after we've hit you time after time for oddly going just after LL.
|
On February 23 2017 06:33 tofucake wrote: well since there's no worthwhile discussion going on we may as well lock the thread and ban political discussion completely, right? I'm not exactly opposed at this point.
|
On February 23 2017 07:59 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 06:41 zlefin wrote:On February 23 2017 06:29 Sermokala wrote: You're the one that for some obvious reason keeps targeting LL when there are almost everyone else doing the exact same thing that you keep ignoring. false charge; just because I notice LL doing it more than most doesn't mean I don't notice others doing it as well, and wouldn't favor actions against those others. I don't need to call out every infractor in order to complain about a specific infractor. please keep your facts straight. tofu, what's needed is more warnings for the frequent infractions, and some bans if necessary. but if it's too hard to moderate a shutdown may be better. If the conversation isn't up to my standards then there shouldn't be a conversation at all. If it wasn't a false charge you'd go after anyone else after we've hit you time after time for oddly going just after LL. since you choose to misrepresent my stance in your first paragraph, I decline to engage more with you. please be more careful in your use of logic.
you really need to be more careful in exactly what your claiming. I forget the exact fallacies you're using, and I don't feel like looking them up to explain to you, maybe someone else remembers the precise one.
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On February 23 2017 06:33 tofucake wrote: well since there's no worthwhile discussion going on we may as well lock the thread and ban political discussion completely, right? I second this. Maybe we should lock it for a short period of time etc...
|
On February 23 2017 08:58 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 06:33 tofucake wrote: well since there's no worthwhile discussion going on we may as well lock the thread and ban political discussion completely, right? I second this. Maybe we should lock it for a short period of time etc... if you need time to review for warnings, then of course. from what I can see, the time where a temp threadlock can allow stuff to cool usefully seems to have passed; stuff has already cooled off some.
|
On February 23 2017 08:50 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 07:59 Sermokala wrote:On February 23 2017 06:41 zlefin wrote:On February 23 2017 06:29 Sermokala wrote: You're the one that for some obvious reason keeps targeting LL when there are almost everyone else doing the exact same thing that you keep ignoring. false charge; just because I notice LL doing it more than most doesn't mean I don't notice others doing it as well, and wouldn't favor actions against those others. I don't need to call out every infractor in order to complain about a specific infractor. please keep your facts straight. tofu, what's needed is more warnings for the frequent infractions, and some bans if necessary. but if it's too hard to moderate a shutdown may be better. If the conversation isn't up to my standards then there shouldn't be a conversation at all. If it wasn't a false charge you'd go after anyone else after we've hit you time after time for oddly going just after LL. since you choose to misrepresent my stance in your first paragraph, I decline to engage more with you. please be more careful in your use of logic. you really need to be more careful in exactly what your claiming. I forget the exact fallacies you're using, and I don't feel like looking them up to explain to you, maybe someone else remembers the precise one. Beacuse we don't agree on what my stance is I am going to declare the high ground and leave.
Then I'm going to act confused and lazy about the logical falacy you're using.
|
On February 23 2017 10:23 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 08:50 zlefin wrote:On February 23 2017 07:59 Sermokala wrote:On February 23 2017 06:41 zlefin wrote:On February 23 2017 06:29 Sermokala wrote: You're the one that for some obvious reason keeps targeting LL when there are almost everyone else doing the exact same thing that you keep ignoring. false charge; just because I notice LL doing it more than most doesn't mean I don't notice others doing it as well, and wouldn't favor actions against those others. I don't need to call out every infractor in order to complain about a specific infractor. please keep your facts straight. tofu, what's needed is more warnings for the frequent infractions, and some bans if necessary. but if it's too hard to moderate a shutdown may be better. If the conversation isn't up to my standards then there shouldn't be a conversation at all. If it wasn't a false charge you'd go after anyone else after we've hit you time after time for oddly going just after LL. since you choose to misrepresent my stance in your first paragraph, I decline to engage more with you. please be more careful in your use of logic. you really need to be more careful in exactly what your claiming. I forget the exact fallacies you're using, and I don't feel like looking them up to explain to you, maybe someone else remembers the precise one. Beacuse we don't agree on what my stance is I am going to declare the high ground and leave. Then I'm going to act confused and lazy about the logical falacy you're using. more to the point: you are persistently unsound and/or uncivil, therefore I will not discuss with you.
|
On February 23 2017 10:54 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 10:23 Sermokala wrote:On February 23 2017 08:50 zlefin wrote:On February 23 2017 07:59 Sermokala wrote:On February 23 2017 06:41 zlefin wrote:On February 23 2017 06:29 Sermokala wrote: You're the one that for some obvious reason keeps targeting LL when there are almost everyone else doing the exact same thing that you keep ignoring. false charge; just because I notice LL doing it more than most doesn't mean I don't notice others doing it as well, and wouldn't favor actions against those others. I don't need to call out every infractor in order to complain about a specific infractor. please keep your facts straight. tofu, what's needed is more warnings for the frequent infractions, and some bans if necessary. but if it's too hard to moderate a shutdown may be better. If the conversation isn't up to my standards then there shouldn't be a conversation at all. If it wasn't a false charge you'd go after anyone else after we've hit you time after time for oddly going just after LL. since you choose to misrepresent my stance in your first paragraph, I decline to engage more with you. please be more careful in your use of logic. you really need to be more careful in exactly what your claiming. I forget the exact fallacies you're using, and I don't feel like looking them up to explain to you, maybe someone else remembers the precise one. Beacuse we don't agree on what my stance is I am going to declare the high ground and leave. Then I'm going to act confused and lazy about the logical falacy you're using. more to the point: you are persistently unsound and/or uncivil, therefore I will not discuss with you. I previously said that I wouldn't argue with you but I feel that I should discredit you somehow then state again that I'm not going to argue with you. I don't understand at all what you are doing so I think repeating the same shitty debate tactic will make me look good to people that normally agree with me.
|
On February 23 2017 05:51 kwizach wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2017 05:45 LegalLord wrote:On February 23 2017 03:45 xDaunt wrote: Maybe you haven't noticed, but a majority of the thread's posts have been shit posts and troll posts this month. Within the past two weeks, to be precise. Since February 8. I find your attempt to place the blame on those returning from ban bets pretty funny considering how much you've been trolling with sarcastic posts, and shitposting in general, in the thread. LegalLord's overall posting record is solid. the signal-to-noise ratio of his posts is above the site average.
On February 23 2017 06:06 zlefin wrote: you're the one starting the trolling legal, as such you should stop it. i learn new things from LL's posts. i probably agree with LL 50% of the time. if he wants to joke around sometimes.. so be it. if he wants to make fun of me ( which he never has ) when he doesn't agree with me ... i don't care.
if i've known someone more than 6 months and they've never offended me... i don't trust them. i wonder ... what is this person trying to sell?
too many people in the US Politics thread are wandering around waiting to be offended. its lame.
|
On February 24 2017 06:55 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2017 06:52 Amui wrote:On February 24 2017 04:48 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: WTF....
He has to get his ego stroked by everybody he meets. Just a way to lift spirits, nothing more. He's a pretty obvious cunt. In the land of alternative facts, this post is quite refreshing.
plansix often posts like the thread is his personal twitter. i guess i need to make it more obvious. annoying!
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On February 24 2017 06:58 IgnE wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2017 06:55 Plansix wrote:On February 24 2017 06:52 Amui wrote:He has to get his ego stroked by everybody he meets. Just a way to lift spirits, nothing more. He's a pretty obvious cunt. In the land of alternative facts, this post is quite refreshing. plansix often posts like the thread is his personal twitter. i guess i need to make it more obvious. annoying! Well this enhanced my thread-reading experience. Thanks a bunch.
|
|
|
|