|
On September 19 2010 01:36 TBO wrote:Show nested quote +On September 19 2010 01:19 HuK wrote:On September 19 2010 01:18 AmiPolizeiFunk wrote:I hope we can get some 5min delay technology for streams or something. 'Cause as soon as the Ro16 came up, there was this massive dead space, delays, confusions. As a spectator I basically lost interest and tuned out. Plus you've been updating the brackets before the casters get a chance to show the replays, which is massive fail. 5 minute delay isn't enough, and to me that small sacrifice is nothing compared to guaranteed no cheating via livestream I am pretty sure 5 minutes is enough in 99,9% of the cases and I honestly don't expect anyone to have a cheat setup ready for this totally rare situations. And If 5 minutes is not enough, just have it 8.
i am pretty sure ur wrong and many other top players have agreed with me 5 minutes is not enough, 15 minutes is probably enough 99% of the tiem
|
On September 19 2010 01:39 ZapRoffo wrote:Haypro vs. qxc game starting now on wolf's stream. + Show Spoiler +
GOGOGOGOGO QXC!!!!
|
On September 19 2010 01:40 HuK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 19 2010 01:36 TBO wrote:On September 19 2010 01:19 HuK wrote:On September 19 2010 01:18 AmiPolizeiFunk wrote:I hope we can get some 5min delay technology for streams or something. 'Cause as soon as the Ro16 came up, there was this massive dead space, delays, confusions. As a spectator I basically lost interest and tuned out. Plus you've been updating the brackets before the casters get a chance to show the replays, which is massive fail. 5 minute delay isn't enough, and to me that small sacrifice is nothing compared to guaranteed no cheating via livestream I am pretty sure 5 minutes is enough in 99,9% of the cases and I honestly don't expect anyone to have a cheat setup ready for this totally rare situations. And If 5 minutes is not enough, just have it 8. i am pretty sure ur wrong and many other top players have agreed with me 5 minutes is not enough, 15 minutes is probably enough 99% of the tiem
Actually by many you mean IdrA.
Edit: On second thought I'm not debating this shit anymore.
|
|
|
Who is nony?(I mean what nick is he usin)
|
On September 19 2010 01:48 FrostNixon wrote: Who is nony?(I mean what nick is he usin)
I believe he is using tyler
|
Weird. Wonder what happened there...
|
On September 19 2010 01:48 FrostNixon wrote: Who is nony?(I mean what nick is he usin) Tyler.
|
Go Go Haypro! Cheering for the home team!
epic transfuse!
|
tyler only playing against toss, must feel kinda bored :>
|
On September 19 2010 01:49 smekz wrote: tyler only playing against toss, must feel kinda bored :>
Or maybe lucky? Since he is skilled mirror match should be pretty easy.
|
Ohoo, ret and sen visited Dr. Kiwikaki, and painuser < huk < qxc. Quite interesting. (:
|
Pity that replays will be casted and that most zergs are so... unlucky. However i appreciate, there arent 20 people who are obsing in one game.
|
The problem is that the casters often interact with the viewers. So really the technology would send the game from the players to the casters after a delay (5min, 8min, 15min, whatever is necessary). This would solve all problems, and the experience would be exactly like live for both casters and viewers. I know it's starting to sound like watching replays, but the difference is that nobody has to do any labor. Sending replays between games must be a huge pain in the ass for players, who naturally would rather concentrate on the task at hand.
|
Hope Haypro will win, gogo !
|
can I sign up as a backup player? I didnt see the registration for this T_T
|
Not saying its not important to keep games cheat free. But the reason people are playing in this tournament is the prize pool, The reason there is a prize pool is because of sponsors, and the reason there is sponsors is because of the viewers. So having as many viewers as possible is pretty important for everyone, including the players. Depending on the loss of viewers streaming replays compared too not streaming one could definatly make a case for it being beneficial for the players themselves to have games streamed and risk a 2-3% chance of being cheated or whatever the percentage is. I think of the high level who have a chance of winning this there arent many cheaters. (Obv this might change for some though when there are money on the line. Idk. ANyone who is actually good though its not worth risking reputation/being banned from all future tourneys)
|
On September 19 2010 01:52 HasHe201 wrote: can I sign up as a backup player? I didnt see the registration for this T_T
Kinda late for now...
|
With the zerg thing, if it's one tournament it's luck, but few zergs left in GSL, 1 zerg left here, no zergs made it far in MLG, hardly any zergs make it far in any of the weekly online tournaments, the top of the ladders all are thin on zerg: it shows it's a systematic thing and nothing really to do with luck.
People want to assign any given tournament to luck, but looking at the whole picture there is something seriously off.
Although Haypro fighting!
|
|
|
|