|
Canada11355 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:07 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok uhm we can lynch Templar because he is scum
We can lynch bats because he is scum
We can lynch kita because where the fuck is he
We can lynch sicklucker because he is reading but not interacting kthxbai
I'd lynch templar because his posts, while long, are full of more fluff than slam's.
idk who kita is but it's still early so give him a break
I'd lynch sicklucker because I wanted to plynch him last game and he was scum.
|
On December 09 2014 10:07 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok uhm we can lynch Templar because he is scum
We can lynch bats because he is scum
We can lynch kita because where the fuck is he
We can lynch sicklucker because he is reading but not interacting kthxbai
Anti-xmas blue says go. Who listens? Because he is scum, because he is scum.
Logic return policy in full force. Money back please?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Who has slam as semi/tentative/half chub town.
nb, dam... Who else
|
On December 09 2014 10:12 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:07 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok uhm we can lynch Templar because he is scum
We can lynch bats because he is scum
We can lynch kita because where the fuck is he
We can lynch sicklucker because he is reading but not interacting kthxbai I'd lynch templar because his posts, while long, are full of more fluff than slam's. idk who kita is but it's still early so give him a break I'd lynch sicklucker because I wanted to plynch him last game and he was scum.
do you not like slam? please splain to me brochacho
|
On December 09 2014 10:11 sicklucker wrote:
Glowing Bear im very disappointed in you my child.
Agree with the silly glowing blue bear on one thing...
You are not acting like you.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:09 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax had the same train of thought. Like even more elaborated. He wasn't mentioned at all. I'm pretty sure I elaborated I didnt care about him over nb either but im not mentioned. Although that might have been later (he has made no return which is annoying), i think damd said something too maybe.
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. i gave you and bats as town right my ff read isn't an easy read at all. so I'm not throwing out easy reads at all. Anyway I explained bats did the analysis on hts and it felt towny to me. Plus his manner feels like the other town games bats has played
You gave me a town read based on meta that is incomplete and didn't really factor in any game info other than "pressuring" which when you couple with my actual meta would mean nothing at all. Yet, when I say otherwise you somehow know it's still "town" Holyflare pressure rather than mafia.
Your bats read as I explained to anyone looking critically does not make any sense at all but he's still a d1 town list. I can see you making an analysis point on him but what about the stuff I just explained? Why was he still a town read after I pointed out he was picking and choosing who scum were based on absolutely nothing (he even just admitted it)!
|
On December 09 2014 10:14 KelsierSC wrote:
Who has slam as semi/tentative/half chub town.
nb, dam... Who else
i have slam as full fledged town
|
On December 09 2014 10:11 sicklucker wrote:
Glowing Bear im very disappointed in you my child.
WHARRGABRL
|
On December 09 2014 10:15 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:14 KelsierSC wrote:
Who has slam as semi/tentative/half chub town.
nb, dam... Who else i have slam as full fledged town
Why?
And what does Kelsier think of slam?
|
On December 09 2014 10:17 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:15 ritoky wrote:On December 09 2014 10:14 KelsierSC wrote:
Who has slam as semi/tentative/half chub town.
nb, dam... Who else i have slam as full fledged town Why? And what does Kelsier think of slam?
On December 09 2014 09:52 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 09:49 Damdred wrote:On December 09 2014 09:48 ritoky wrote:On December 09 2014 09:40 The_Templar wrote:On December 09 2014 09:37 GlowingBear wrote:On December 09 2014 09:34 The_Templar wrote:Santa, upon arriving in America, noted the return of several people to their youthful roots. Two of them, Alakaslam, and ritoky, had made themselves comfortable on a nearby bench while a few others continued to argue pointlessly over the exact wording of their previous conversations. The NSA was delighted. Alakaslam had made himself Calvin, the boy that had asked Santa to alter his Nice list to include him. Indeed, Santa had quite a file on Calvin. Ritoky seemed to be simply reading a Calvin and Hobbes book while Alakaslam discussed his relation to the others' arguments through being Calvin during a wonderful time of year such as this. Santa wondered, who had made the snowman that was walking around the town. Who was that snowman shielding? Surely, the Snowman was a sturdy figure and could surely withstand a blast, and was made with pure intentions, with the spirit of Christmas in mind. Therefore, its owner is surely one of those that belongs to stay on the "Nice" list. They might even be in this argument! Could Alakaslam claim such a veteran role, Santa wondered? On December 09 2014 09:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Lmao. Okay, Templar top town for the rst of the day. I don't even care he voted me.That was the best thing I have evver read.
As for being naughty on my date... well well well. We will just have to see;)
He'll be here in five minutes so I'll leave you with this:
Templar Town
Damdred Town
Slam semitownie
Those I need to look more at:
HF
Vivax
Kelsier
Iffy:
Froggy
Kita (I expected more than just hey)
Fecal
I don't really like how two people jumped to defend me. That always makes me skeptical. Don't get me wrong, thank you for that, because it's absolutely true and makes sense.
HF is making something out of nothing. Idk if it's reaction testing? Or backlash for me calling him out on his post.
tbh, I'm not counting how many posts I make. I type a lot, I ask a lot of questions. If I get near my cap, well then, atleast I know I made a difference in the beginning of the day, instead of arguing later.
Have fun everyone, and see you tomorrow! On the sleigh ride, Santa had read this post very carefully. Ninjabunnies, along with many other people, had created her own list of who she expected to receive Christmas presents, and who would receive coal. What position was she in to determine this? Why should she do this? Santa supposed that it was a vital component of the argument taking place and that she was taking steps to ensure she was as or less likely to be placed on the naughty list compared to anyone else. Santa was not convinced, however. Why did she think these people were on the naughty list? Why had she bothered to defend the froggy one when she was going to label him Naughty for the same reason? Santa, fortunately, had brought his printer with him (it was magical) on the sleigh, and continued to receive mounds of evidence of the events taking place as he had travelled. He was curious about Vivax, but only because of the validity of his opinions in regards to the argument taking place. Was this knowledge of the argument they were having really common knowledge, or did only some of the suspects know of the full set of facts? Were they hiding something, perhaps? Santa also updated his list on the way to America. Nice: KoshiHalf the SkyOatsmasterkitaman27Damdredrsoultinfroggynoddykushm4stasickluckerAlakaslamVivaxObiWanShinobiThe_TemplarXatalosLightningStrikeliancourtbatsnacksritokyFecalfeastHolyflareGlowingBearLoneMeowTrfelTubesockKelsierSC27ninjabunniesNaughty: 27ninjabunnies Italics: No evidence of being nice or naughty, on list because they were there before (the game of mafia) started Underlined: Santa/ [Not]SanTa must investigate further Bold: Remains on the list for some time. Strikethrough: Moved to the opposite list None: New on the list However, Santa was not ready to do detective work yet. He decided to deliver some of the toys early so that things could be straightened out between these suspects. Through this, Santa hoped that all of them could be on the Nice list, but that was unlikely to happen. Meanwhile, The_Templar had an exam the next morning and really should study. A huge list post just to say you have a single scumread. Fluff. Obviously trying to look contributive and effortful. Second scum was found. Yes, because I did exactly the same thing in literally every game I play. That clearly makes me a Naughty person. There is plenty of information in that fluff. Before complaining that I'm not providing alignment-indicative information, consider reading the thread more carefully. plenty of summary information, and not a whole lot of pushing your scum reads/leaning scum reads. this also seems like a bit too defensive of a response especially considering who is criticizing you So ritoky, what do you think about what vivax said about you? Why aren't you pushing your scum reads really? don't have any yet. no1 has done anything blatantly strange imo, and that's where my day 1 scum reads come from. on another note, i think slam is like totally town. after seeing him as scum for the first time last game, he is nothing like he was.
you even read bro?
idk ask kelsier
|
Canada11355 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:14 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:12 Fecalfeast wrote:On December 09 2014 10:07 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok uhm we can lynch Templar because he is scum
We can lynch bats because he is scum
We can lynch kita because where the fuck is he
We can lynch sicklucker because he is reading but not interacting kthxbai I'd lynch templar because his posts, while long, are full of more fluff than slam's. idk who kita is but it's still early so give him a break I'd lynch sicklucker because I wanted to plynch him last game and he was scum. do you not like slam? please splain to me brochacho
I think slam seems the exact same in every game. Any tips for reading him?
|
HF can we do that thing this game where I'll tell you if I think you're flying off the rails?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:15 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:09 KelsierSC wrote:On December 09 2014 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax had the same train of thought. Like even more elaborated. He wasn't mentioned at all. I'm pretty sure I elaborated I didnt care about him over nb either but im not mentioned. Although that might have been later (he has made no return which is annoying), i think damd said something too maybe.
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. i gave you and bats as town right my ff read isn't an easy read at all. so I'm not throwing out easy reads at all. Anyway I explained bats did the analysis on hts and it felt towny to me. Plus his manner feels like the other town games bats has played You gave me a town read based on meta that is incomplete and didn't really factor in any game info other than "pressuring" which when you couple with my actual meta would mean nothing at all. Yet, when I say otherwise you somehow know it's still "town" Holyflare pressure rather than mafia. Your bats read as I explained to anyone looking critically does not make any sense at all but he's still a d1 town list. I can see you making an analysis point on him but what about the stuff I just explained? Why was he still a town read after I pointed out he was picking and choosing who scum were based on absolutely nothing (he even just admitted it)!
well no i dont have perfect information on you. But if your play feels like it did when you are town, and you do towny actions then I'm happy,d1 to add you to my town circle. That us what i did with you and bats.
yes bats didn't analyze vixen, but he did anslyse hts and i agreed with it, it reminded me of town bats.
i generally. Make a large town circle d1, my ff read was using specific information about his play d1
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:10 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax had the same train of thought. Like even more elaborated. He wasn't mentioned at all. I'm pretty sure I elaborated I didnt care about him over nb either but im not mentioned. Although that might have been later (he has made no return which is annoying), i think damd said something too maybe.
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. Agreeing with you and nb simultaneously about what froggy said is a contradiction, especially considering that what nb said about froggy was a contradiction in itself. I think HTS is scummy for that.
She doesn't agree with nb. Nb says thay people that talk about policy are scummy usually and then says that HE isn't scummy but instead an easy scum read to jump on (implying mislynch) and tries to stop that pressure which is 2 contradictory statements. She's contradictory.
Hts just explains his posts meaning and says it's null but scum reads bunnies for what I said. Don't see how they are the same at all.
|
On December 09 2014 10:20 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:17 rsoultin wrote:On December 09 2014 10:15 ritoky wrote:On December 09 2014 10:14 KelsierSC wrote:
Who has slam as semi/tentative/half chub town.
nb, dam... Who else i have slam as full fledged town Why? And what does Kelsier think of slam? Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 09:52 ritoky wrote:On December 09 2014 09:49 Damdred wrote:On December 09 2014 09:48 ritoky wrote:On December 09 2014 09:40 The_Templar wrote:On December 09 2014 09:37 GlowingBear wrote:On December 09 2014 09:34 The_Templar wrote:Santa, upon arriving in America, noted the return of several people to their youthful roots. Two of them, Alakaslam, and ritoky, had made themselves comfortable on a nearby bench while a few others continued to argue pointlessly over the exact wording of their previous conversations. The NSA was delighted. Alakaslam had made himself Calvin, the boy that had asked Santa to alter his Nice list to include him. Indeed, Santa had quite a file on Calvin. Ritoky seemed to be simply reading a Calvin and Hobbes book while Alakaslam discussed his relation to the others' arguments through being Calvin during a wonderful time of year such as this. Santa wondered, who had made the snowman that was walking around the town. Who was that snowman shielding? Surely, the Snowman was a sturdy figure and could surely withstand a blast, and was made with pure intentions, with the spirit of Christmas in mind. Therefore, its owner is surely one of those that belongs to stay on the "Nice" list. They might even be in this argument! Could Alakaslam claim such a veteran role, Santa wondered? On December 09 2014 09:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Lmao. Okay, Templar top town for the rst of the day. I don't even care he voted me.That was the best thing I have evver read.
As for being naughty on my date... well well well. We will just have to see;)
He'll be here in five minutes so I'll leave you with this:
Templar Town
Damdred Town
Slam semitownie
Those I need to look more at:
HF
Vivax
Kelsier
Iffy:
Froggy
Kita (I expected more than just hey)
Fecal
I don't really like how two people jumped to defend me. That always makes me skeptical. Don't get me wrong, thank you for that, because it's absolutely true and makes sense.
HF is making something out of nothing. Idk if it's reaction testing? Or backlash for me calling him out on his post.
tbh, I'm not counting how many posts I make. I type a lot, I ask a lot of questions. If I get near my cap, well then, atleast I know I made a difference in the beginning of the day, instead of arguing later.
Have fun everyone, and see you tomorrow! On the sleigh ride, Santa had read this post very carefully. Ninjabunnies, along with many other people, had created her own list of who she expected to receive Christmas presents, and who would receive coal. What position was she in to determine this? Why should she do this? Santa supposed that it was a vital component of the argument taking place and that she was taking steps to ensure she was as or less likely to be placed on the naughty list compared to anyone else. Santa was not convinced, however. Why did she think these people were on the naughty list? Why had she bothered to defend the froggy one when she was going to label him Naughty for the same reason? Santa, fortunately, had brought his printer with him (it was magical) on the sleigh, and continued to receive mounds of evidence of the events taking place as he had travelled. He was curious about Vivax, but only because of the validity of his opinions in regards to the argument taking place. Was this knowledge of the argument they were having really common knowledge, or did only some of the suspects know of the full set of facts? Were they hiding something, perhaps? Santa also updated his list on the way to America. Nice: KoshiHalf the SkyOatsmasterkitaman27Damdredrsoultinfroggynoddykushm4stasickluckerAlakaslamVivaxObiWanShinobiThe_TemplarXatalosLightningStrikeliancourtbatsnacksritokyFecalfeastHolyflareGlowingBearLoneMeowTrfelTubesockKelsierSC27ninjabunniesNaughty: 27ninjabunnies Italics: No evidence of being nice or naughty, on list because they were there before (the game of mafia) started Underlined: Santa/ [Not]SanTa must investigate further Bold: Remains on the list for some time. Strikethrough: Moved to the opposite list None: New on the list However, Santa was not ready to do detective work yet. He decided to deliver some of the toys early so that things could be straightened out between these suspects. Through this, Santa hoped that all of them could be on the Nice list, but that was unlikely to happen. Meanwhile, The_Templar had an exam the next morning and really should study. A huge list post just to say you have a single scumread. Fluff. Obviously trying to look contributive and effortful. Second scum was found. Yes, because I did exactly the same thing in literally every game I play. That clearly makes me a Naughty person. There is plenty of information in that fluff. Before complaining that I'm not providing alignment-indicative information, consider reading the thread more carefully. plenty of summary information, and not a whole lot of pushing your scum reads/leaning scum reads. this also seems like a bit too defensive of a response especially considering who is criticizing you So ritoky, what do you think about what vivax said about you? Why aren't you pushing your scum reads really? don't have any yet. no1 has done anything blatantly strange imo, and that's where my day 1 scum reads come from. on another note, i think slam is like totally town. after seeing him as scum for the first time last game, he is nothing like he was. you even read bro? idk ask kelsier
Nope, not at all. Just ask stupid questions. Better than stupid answers. Scum one game, and a game he pulled out of. Tsk tsk. For shame. Templar, where is that list?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:20 batsnacks wrote:
HF can we do that thing this game where I'll tell you if I think you're flying off the rails?
When does this even happen?? Unless you mean stopping me from policying randomers over my own reads then yea please.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
I dont see how anyone can have slam as anything but nul d1 his play is so weird in general.
like he isn't a lynch but you can't take what he says seriously.
|
|
|
On December 09 2014 10:20 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2014 10:15 Holyflare wrote:On December 09 2014 10:09 KelsierSC wrote:On December 09 2014 10:05 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax had the same train of thought. Like even more elaborated. He wasn't mentioned at all. I'm pretty sure I elaborated I didnt care about him over nb either but im not mentioned. Although that might have been later (he has made no return which is annoying), i think damd said something too maybe.
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. i gave you and bats as town right my ff read isn't an easy read at all. so I'm not throwing out easy reads at all. Anyway I explained bats did the analysis on hts and it felt towny to me. Plus his manner feels like the other town games bats has played You gave me a town read based on meta that is incomplete and didn't really factor in any game info other than "pressuring" which when you couple with my actual meta would mean nothing at all. Yet, when I say otherwise you somehow know it's still "town" Holyflare pressure rather than mafia. Your bats read as I explained to anyone looking critically does not make any sense at all but he's still a d1 town list. I can see you making an analysis point on him but what about the stuff I just explained? Why was he still a town read after I pointed out he was picking and choosing who scum were based on absolutely nothing (he even just admitted it)! well no i dont have perfect information on you. But if your play feels like it did when you are town, and you do towny actions then I'm happy,d1 to add you to my town circle. That us what i did with you and bats. yes bats didn't analyze vixen, but he did anslyse hts and i agreed with it, it reminded me of town bats. i generally. Make a large town circle d1, my ff read was using specific information about his play d1
Better answer. B+. Glass half full, but not everyone can be a realist. And it's xmas!
|
My naught list - FF hes very mean
My nice list! - Kelsier, dandred , gb
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
