On September 15 2013 13:29 Pandain wrote: Here's what I did night one: It's Kush 4, OP 6, Blub 4.
I agree to help try and get Zealos lynched instead of OP, since you guys didn't want to lynch kush.
Grack changes from OP to Zealos. Kush 4, OP 5, Blub 4, Zealos 2 Blub changes from OP to Zealos Kush 4, OP 4, Blub 4, Zealos 3 I change from Kush to Zealos Kush 3, OP 4, Blub 4, Zealos 4 It is 6:59. I realize that no one else is online or going to change. OP was going to be lynched since he hit 4 first. Given the strange votes I had seen on OP I had believed he was town, so I would rather lynch Blub than OP.
So I change from Zealos to blub to ensure Blub is lynched instead as I thought it was the better choice.
On September 14 2013 06:58 Pandain wrote: ##Unvote: Old PArtner ##Vote: Zealos
Ok. This above vote gives me a wtf kind of moment (you apparently thought you were voting OP and not kush, which would make you think OP had one less vote than he actually did at that time, which in turn would let you think OP was safe)
Oh yeah no I was probably copying the format of the people above me. Or just consistantly thinking about OP.
Alright. Seems geniune. Rest of your game is on par with being pretty town. Back to strong townread on you
On September 15 2013 14:49 kushm4sta wrote: well thurs - sun are my busiest days so I will have more time soon!
I don't see how you totally fail to mention this in pregame when the game starts on a thurs. Thats the first day and night, and half of the second day.
Honestly I believe kush. would he really NEED to have an explanation to be a bad contributor today when he can just say "we must lynch OP" and be done with it? there's no reason for him to say this unless it's the truth.
I went through your posts to see if you had a point, BH, and went through like seven of your games. I realized that when town you are very reasoned and attempting to convince people through calm, if passionate measures. Aka you don't really use caps, and don't attempt to use humor to downplay the other side.
I then realized you play like you are playing now when you are anti town.
Then I also realized that even if you aren't scum, you're still a third party and who really cares in the end. This is a free lynch that we get a 70% chance of hitting scum, you would do the same in our situation and we aren't changing it. Especially since mafia only killed *another* survivor.
So for our sake either do more analysis if you want or stop spamming the thread.
Yeah I'm aware what I've done so far won't convince anyone, and everyone who currently matters has already voted me. I need to do something more drastic/better, and that will require work and reading the thread. That being said, Pandain, you really don't understand how I play. You can tell me that when I'm town I'm "calm, if passionate" and I don't use caps but that's not really an accurate portrayal of how I play. Anyone who reads that post will realize that also it's not possible that you've digested 7 of my games. You don't even know me.
quick observation when reading through vayne's filter: vayne you remind me of my uncle who still lives with my grandmother and hates black people because he never gets laid
@panda Earlier in the post quoted below you call me CERTAIN SCUM. Unreadable, antitown, fine those words probably describe me. But how could you say I am certain scum?? The fake claim reason is super weak. Why would scum reveal they know about fake claims? Also ask anyone, I have a history of trying to abuse game mechanics which is why my mind naturally went there.
Then there's this defense of Umasi. I think he is a HIGHLY LIKELY to be scum. Your defense is really bad imo. He is attempting to generate discussion?? lol.. what do you expect scum to do? be like me and do absolutely nothing?
Also about his attack on blubb here..it's terrible. He is essentially nitpicking an awkwardly worded phrase, giving vague reasons why it makes blubb scum.
I think it's a breach in mentality, you are scum
A breach in mentality wtf is that...
On September 15 2013 12:04 Pandain wrote: Umasi is town Doesn't post much, but is attempting to promote discussion, albeit late because he was a replacement. Also Goodkarma struck town to me as he correctly identified the pointless koshi/grack/va/snb situation.
This post to me seems like he's attempting to generate discussion:
Picking koshi may seem random, I picked him because his posts rubbed me the wrong way and I didn't want to meddle with the SnB bandwagon then.Is this scummy? Well it could be scummy if SnB were scum. Koshi's push against SnB then was even less justified then my read on Koshi.
few things with this line, blub. kind of a wacky thing to phrase, but why didn't you want to mess with the wagon? like, why is that a thought that even entered your head? 'Should I interfere with this or not' and in the underlined, you say 'if SnB were scum' why are you speaking in a different tense than the present? I think it's a breach in mentality, you are scum, SAB is town, and since you know this, phrased it the way you did accidentally. ##VOTE BLUB
your opening post struck me really wrong, the fact that you fos(or whatever you did, lightly pressure) grack makes me think grack is kinda townie since you're pretty scummy.
gotta go to sleep now, not nearly done catching up with the thread, will check in in the morning and try to catch up as much as possible before school.
I'll leave it to pandain to talk about you being scum or not, I'm in agreement with him, you probably are. However, why WOULD I switch off blub? My vote was already on him, it would have been easy to just afk and stay on him, right? 'breach in mentality' as in I thought he was writing about things from a scum perspective.
well A: you targeted goodkarma, who I know is town, and that made me immediately think 'uuuuuh' about you, general inactivity is probably playing a part, you slipped the fake claim, and you've had a 'dgaf' attitude, but it really doesn't feel like you ACTUALLY have that attitude. Although maybe you totally do! basically, for the same reasons as pandain.