EPTGSL Open Mini Mafia IV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
And I really don't like that thinks its scummy that vivax would question it: On February 13 2014 05:44 IAmRobik wrote: Additionally, your post questioning it is awkward. If someone calls me town I'd be happy as all hell. It's d1. Who gives a damn really on any sort of rationalizaiton. That's like the opposite of how a townie should think. If someone gives you a townread for no good reason, how do you not immediately get suspicious of that person? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 13 2014 06:07 IAmRobik wrote: 2) I don't think that's the opposite of how town should think. If people have reads that they want to keep to themselves for the time being that's fine. If people want to put out reads just to promote conversation that's fine too. If I'm called town I'm thrilled. I'm town. I know I'm town. If someone else that's town realizes I'm town, that's one less person that I need to convince and 1 less mislynch that town wastes. Unless that person is scum of course. Like you say "If someone else that's town realizes I'm town" well how would you know that person is town? You wouldn't of course. And when the reasoning is terrible (ie: like urs was) it should immediately raise ur eyebrows. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
I really didn't like how rayn jumped all over him for it since I think it looked like he was just trying to find something to jump on and I feel like rayn should know better. He's since backed off but it's possible it's just cause IamRob gave him no choice by the amount of posting he's doing. Really don't like Mattchew right now. Everyone of his posts seem carefully non-confrontational and he's giving out way too many town reads. By my count he's had townreads on vivax, iamrobik, quantum and rayn while the closest thing to a scumread is this: On February 13 2014 06:27 Mattchew wrote: I'm not sure if he actually thinks grack is scum or not since that's all he says about him.Is lynch grack and not look back | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 13 2014 22:26 VIVAX420 wrote: This is pretty much how I feel. Scum is looking for something "safe" to talk about. The fact that of all the things in the thread he could respond to, he chose setup talk, is scummy IMO.i thought more about mattchew's comment on sidespring. the post itself wasn't nervous, but I think it might show nervousness that he chose to talk about setup over everything else. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 00:28 roundabound wrote: DNP has made a single post that is obviously not a very good looking post. Didn't think I should spend too much time discussing obvious stuff. Hopefully he posts more.Why is DNP not on your comment agenda? I don't think scum would be nervous talking about setup. I think it's scummy that setup is the only thing he chose to discuss. On February 14 2014 00:28 roundabound wrote: Like I said I don't like the way Mattchew looks.What is your current read on Mattchew; considering you are effectively "safely" +1'n his read. So yeah I have 2 scumreads indpendant of each other that don't really mesh well as scumbuddies. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 00:48 Grackaroni wrote: What's wrong with the way Mattchew looks? Looks can be deceiving you know. On February 13 2014 12:57 JarJarDrinks wrote: Really don't like Mattchew right now. Everyone of his posts seem carefully non-confrontational and he's giving out way too many town reads. By my count he's had townreads on vivax, iamrobik, quantum and rayn while the closest thing to a scumread is this:I'm not sure if he actually thinks grack is scum or not since that's all he says about him. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 00:53 roundabound wrote: Yes. would lynchIs DNP a person of suspicion or not... On February 14 2014 00:28 roundabound wrote: scummy <> only indicative of a mafia mindset. You read DNP as scum because he made 1 shitty post and then peaced. I have seen plenty of town make 1 shitty post and go awol for a while. Can you tell me why this tell is only indicative of a mafia mindset?I have seen plenty of town only discuss setup early game; you have failed to elucidate me towards why this tell is only indicative of a mafia mindset. On February 14 2014 00:28 roundabound wrote: Uh neither. I think they are both scummy but I think it's unlikely that they are both scum together. Is something wrong w/ that?So what is the outcome? Are you keeping Sidesprang/Mattchew as a scum team; or are you rescinding a read? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 00:56 IAmRobik wrote: Well he's clearly not afraid to give his opinion about people so I'd think he'd have some scumreads but he doesn't seem to have any apparently. Scum doesnt want to help lynch innocents so it's possible he doesnt want to give a scumread on anyone untill some townwagons form so he can make sure he doesn't have to be on one of em because he called that person scummy earlier.JJD, Please explain what is inherently scummy about giving out town reads? I can totally see what you are saying with regards to chewy being non-confrontational. This is weird because I perceive him to be a more aggressive player. If I had my choice, I'd very much prefer him to play this game similarly to how he plays on video, but that doesn't seem likely to happen...at least not given how he's played the game so far. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 01:15 roundabound wrote: Specifically, #1 - As town you come out of BttB with the intent to do your own thing, call your own shots. Of note, you outline your positions in detail and are certainly not afraid to go against the grain. #2 In this game, your filter is undeniably more passive than BttB. It is also full of +1's such that twice now you have agreed with the scum reads of people *YOU* previously declared as scummy. (roundabound with DNP, and mattchew with sidesprang). Meh, I don't really see too much of a difference. I definately started that game out very aggressive but I don't think there's really been too much stuff to attack in this game as of yet. You could read some of my scum games I suppose since I don't think I've been passive in them. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 02:22 Mattchew wrote: This is like exactly what I said about you and sidespring.your both scummy and i wouldnt blink an eye at lynching either of you, but your interactions do not read as teammates | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 00:57 Grackaroni wrote: I think he looks ok from filtering him. I haven't really been able to keep up with the thread. He actually gave something resembling a read here though I don't know why he thought mattchew looked ok from his filter @ that point. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 09:45 roundabound wrote: I note very similar entrances: Is that very different from my entrance in the town game of mine that u posted earlier? On November 20 2013 22:50 JarJarDrinks wrote: Only a few pages in but first impression is mocsta is scum. Giving himself a post limit and then posting a bunch of 1-liners to start the game is pretty bad. Then he get's pissed @ Bereft for questioning him about it? <Followed by reasoning> | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 09:45 roundabound wrote: Because the people I'm suspicious of haven't been posting. There's only so much I can do w/ the posts so far. @ this point, I think we should vote off the scummiest looking lurker.But, I dont get how you can agree with so many reads, yet, not cast a vote; or progress any of these reads further. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 10:42 roundabound wrote: DNP would be fine w/ me. ShiaoPi also. Who would that be if we lunches right now? ~moc Still don't like sidespring who's kinda lurking but he's right that I attacked him a bunch in the last game and we were both town so I'm gonna back off a bit. I'd rather give people more of a chance to post though before we go ahead and lynch them. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 14 2014 12:03 VIVAX420 wrote: I think we should definitely consider it. Like he makes 1 post, people jump on him about it and he disappears? Maybe he's scurd.moc do you think it would be smart to lynch DNP with 1 post? Like, If he was scum and could get through the entire first day lynch free w/o posting anything else, why wouldn't he? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
##Vote Grackaroni Start giving reads/analysis/something | ||
| ||
