• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:32
CEST 06:32
KST 13:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, sOs, Reynor, Solar15[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Unyielding3Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025)17[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Rejuvenation8
Community News
Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A Results (2025)1$1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th]4Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #66Weekly Cups (April 28-May 4): ByuN & Astrea break through1Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game29
StarCraft 2
General
How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A Results (2025) Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, sOs, Reynor, Solar
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group B GSL 2025 details announced - 2 seasons pre-EWC 2025 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers) [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group A $1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th]
Strategy
[G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise Mutation # 469 Frostbite
Brood War
General
[G] GenAI subtitles for Korean BW content BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest ToSsGirL stream thread Battlenet Game Lobby Simulator
Tourneys
[ASL19] Ro8 Day 4 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL19] Ro8 Day 2
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Grand Theft Auto VI Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Elon Musk's lies, propaganda, etc. Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey Surprisingly good films/Hidden Gems
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Logitech mx518 cleaning.
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
What High-Performing Teams (…
TrAiDoS
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
Test Entry for subject
xumakis
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10467 users

Newbie Mini Mafia LII

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 08 2014 22:54 GMT
#36
/in

Team Liquid's Mafia board looks legit. I'd like to get my feet wet.

I've got plenty of experience playing Mafia, but I've never played the forum version of it. Let's see how this shakes out. Also, is there anyone coaching the scum side? >.>
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 09 2014 02:04 GMT
#40
On February 09 2014 10:38 Promethelax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2014 07:54 Cavalinho wrote:
/in

Team Liquid's Mafia board looks legit. I'd like to get my feet wet.

I've got plenty of experience playing Mafia, but I've never played the forum version of it. Let's see how this shakes out. Also, is there anyone coaching the scum side? >.>


There will be someone, coaches are not yet finalized but we have always had someone step forward to coach in the past and someone will do so in this game.


Wonderful. I'm not used to forum games so I really hope this pans out.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 10 2014 04:46 GMT
#45
Is the forum always this dead? It doesn't seem like anyone else wants to sign up.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 10 2014 06:38 GMT
#47
On February 10 2014 15:24 Beneather wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 10 2014 13:46 Cavalinho wrote:
Is the forum always this dead? It doesn't seem like anyone else wants to sign up.

Yeah it's taking a while for this game to start, is this normal? Or is it just cause it's a newbie game.


I might just shove my head into the fire and play a regular game instead. >.>
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 03:22 GMT
#70
Let the games begin. I've been dying for the game to start.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 04:01 GMT
#72
On February 16 2014 12:57 IAmRobik wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 16 2014 12:22 Cavalinho wrote:
Let the games begin. I've been dying for the game to start.

dying ehh? Let the dying begin
##vote cavalinho


Lets take this outside, I don't even care. Hold my earrings.

##vote IAmRobik
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 04:15 GMT
#76
On February 16 2014 13:09 IAmRobik wrote:
okok, you're town. I rescind.

##unvote cavalinho


That was...A rather poor reaction to what was obviously a joke vote.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 06:16 GMT
#83
On February 16 2014 13:49 IAmRobik wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 16 2014 13:15 Cavalinho wrote:
On February 16 2014 13:09 IAmRobik wrote:
okok, you're town. I rescind.

##unvote cavalinho


That was...A rather poor reaction to what was obviously a joke vote.

huh? I cleared you as town for your response.


Oh, so I'm clear now. Cool.

Hey guys, I'm clear.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 20:15 GMT
#94
Man, I wanted to suggest murdering Amiko. You beat me to it. I think IAmRobik is a person of interest for his odd sense of spinelessness earlier, but we can cross that bridge when we come to it.

##unvote IAmRobik
##VOTE Amiko
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 20:38 GMT
#98
On February 17 2014 05:34 Amiko wrote:
I think this early the only information we have is on ourselves - votes change too much to mean anything unless you give some kind of reasons for your actions. So I am glad to explain why I may vote for people (being idle) or the only town read I had at the time (Lord Tolkein asking about innocent child).

I don't like OneKing's reasoning for voting me, though - (1) you want to discourage long posts, which I think hurts town (2) you classify saying you are town as scumsided rather than neutral (3) you claim (probably joking) that you are clear, and (4) providing the time you shouldn't expect posts from me (morning MST) merely provides a time, I'm sure there are times you sleep/commute as well and I would like to know them so you don't have an excuse for silence down the line.
That said, I think OnceKing is acting slightly townsided because he has at least started some discussion by giving a reason for his vote, even if it is misguided.

Moving forward, I see Cavalinho's post as scummy -
Cavalinho, what were your reasons for wanting to lynch me? The same reasons as OnceKing, or is there anything else to add? If you wanted to suggest voting me, why not suggest it in your earlier post?


Because, quite frankly, I wasn't sure if I should have pursued your post due to this actually being a newbie game. I wasn't sure if real players would actually think like that in a gametype that emphasize newness.

But since I'm not the only one that thinks it, then I'm going to roll with the fact that this is probably the right path to go down.

Oh, and for the record, this argument doesn't come out of nowhere. It's brought up in Ver's Mafia XXX guide at the top of the forum; Misder made the same kind of post you did at the start of the day and wound up being red. If players better than us are suggesting looking for the exact traits you showed in your very first post, we're probably on the right track.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 20:59 GMT
#100
On February 17 2014 05:48 Amiko wrote:
I appreciate you explaining your reasoning somewhat - do you have a townread on OnceKing right now, or do you think you would have followed any other post that had brought up my post?

I think OnceKing's points are
1) Post is long
2) Criticism re: not playing before
3) Criticism re: claiming town
4) Criticism re: playtime
5) Inactives / not voting

I think I touched on a few of these in my last post, but let me ask this -
Regarding playing before, don't you think that is relevant to the game? Your last post even mentions that it is relevant this is a newbie game.

I still think it is scummy that you wanted to suggest voting me but decided not to until someone else did, first. This early in the game I think we should post our suspicions as they arise.


I townread OnceKing, because he's posting his thoughts without fear. Hell, he even brought up what I wanted to bring up, so I see no point to view him as scum at this point if we think the exact same way. I see no point in scumreading anyone that shares the same viewpoint as I do about something so suspect and out of place so early. Any other post probably would have brought me around to vote you, had I not finally come out and made my suspicions clear before anyway.

Also, you say it's scummy to suggest voting you but I should post my suspicion as it arises. How is it that I'm scummy for saying that I think you're scum? Should I just never vote on my suspicions? Should I just ignore my suspicions if someone else shares the same sentiment as I do?

Your argument has holes in it and really only seems to be poking at the fact that I'm supposedly bandwagoning.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 22:56 GMT
#112
On February 17 2014 06:56 Lord Tolkien wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2014 06:23 Amiko wrote:
Oh, two other points:

(1) Game experience is already showing that it is something we can use to evaluate-

On February 17 2014 05:25 IAmRobik wrote:
OnceKing,

That's one hell of an argument for a newbie game. what's your experience?


(2) In reflection, I guess it would appear less scummy for my first post to be like everyone else and randomly vote without providing any information on myself. So, three questions:
If I were mafia, why would I try to stand out?
Did my post contribute more or less helpful than any of the other first day posts?

I think my first post contributed to town, certainly more than the other meaningless d1 posts:
1- It identified my reasoning for how I would vote if I had no scumreads
2- It told you when to expect inactivity and when I would have no excuse for inactivity


Also I disagree with Tolkein's comment re lynching idle players. The longer the game goes, the more information we have from active players. Between our copchecks and filters, the players who are talking will be easier to attack for our inconsistencies and our analysis. Silent players don't provide town with any information, and more importantly they won't scumhunt during the day.

For your day 1 post: though it was long, it was fairly low-content like most of the other Day 1 posts, with the only outstanding quality of being long. Verbosity is not a redeeming quality in and of itself. I appreciate the extra info on yourself, but that wasn't necessary. We learned that:
1) you've read mafia threads before and this is your first mafia game on TL (aka like most of us, unnecessary I feel but that may just be me)
2) you claimed town (uninteresting)
3) when to expect your posts (somewhat useful, but unnecessary).

Outside of that, you volunteered a town read on me for asking about the innocent child, and then advocated lynching idle players.

I'm fine lynching idle players, it's a question of WHEN we lynch them. Day 1, it's a terrible idea due to limited information. You listed OneKing as an idle player and he actively contributed once he had a read, for instance. As the game progresses, then it becomes a very valid choice. As is, I would strongly recommend avoiding a Day 1 lurker lynch. The longer the game goes the better lynching lurkers becomes, but atm, no.

So in general, there are reasons why it seems scummy. Not willing to condemn you based on that solely since it was one post, you did put up a decent defense and raised good points about Cavalinho.


Except he hasn't provided any actual reason as to why I'm scum aside from voting him after agreeing with OnceKing. At best, his entire line of rationale can be classified as OMGUS; even then, it isn't a good one, as he is trying to push what he perceives as the weakest line of reasoning against the people pushing him right now.

He says voting is scummy, but outing reads is not. But then I call him on it and he says that voting isn't scummy and the fact that I think he's mafia after someone else posted all of the things I was already thinking of is scummy. But he already said that outing reads isn't scummy.

His logic is unsound and it makes no sense whatsoever. What's actually kind of funny was that I was rethinking my stance after what you posted earlier, but he keeps trying to push back on me which, in turn, makes me go after him.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 16 2014 23:33 GMT
#115
On February 17 2014 08:14 Lord Tolkien wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2014 07:56 Cavalinho wrote:
On February 17 2014 06:56 Lord Tolkien wrote:
On February 17 2014 06:23 Amiko wrote:
Oh, two other points:

(1) Game experience is already showing that it is something we can use to evaluate-

On February 17 2014 05:25 IAmRobik wrote:
OnceKing,

That's one hell of an argument for a newbie game. what's your experience?


(2) In reflection, I guess it would appear less scummy for my first post to be like everyone else and randomly vote without providing any information on myself. So, three questions:
If I were mafia, why would I try to stand out?
Did my post contribute more or less helpful than any of the other first day posts?

I think my first post contributed to town, certainly more than the other meaningless d1 posts:
1- It identified my reasoning for how I would vote if I had no scumreads
2- It told you when to expect inactivity and when I would have no excuse for inactivity


Also I disagree with Tolkein's comment re lynching idle players. The longer the game goes, the more information we have from active players. Between our copchecks and filters, the players who are talking will be easier to attack for our inconsistencies and our analysis. Silent players don't provide town with any information, and more importantly they won't scumhunt during the day.

For your day 1 post: though it was long, it was fairly low-content like most of the other Day 1 posts, with the only outstanding quality of being long. Verbosity is not a redeeming quality in and of itself. I appreciate the extra info on yourself, but that wasn't necessary. We learned that:
1) you've read mafia threads before and this is your first mafia game on TL (aka like most of us, unnecessary I feel but that may just be me)
2) you claimed town (uninteresting)
3) when to expect your posts (somewhat useful, but unnecessary).

Outside of that, you volunteered a town read on me for asking about the innocent child, and then advocated lynching idle players.

I'm fine lynching idle players, it's a question of WHEN we lynch them. Day 1, it's a terrible idea due to limited information. You listed OneKing as an idle player and he actively contributed once he had a read, for instance. As the game progresses, then it becomes a very valid choice. As is, I would strongly recommend avoiding a Day 1 lurker lynch. The longer the game goes the better lynching lurkers becomes, but atm, no.

So in general, there are reasons why it seems scummy. Not willing to condemn you based on that solely since it was one post, you did put up a decent defense and raised good points about Cavalinho.


Except he hasn't provided any actual reason as to why I'm scum aside from voting him after agreeing with OnceKing. At best, his entire line of rationale can be classified as OMGUS; even then, it isn't a good one, as he is trying to push what he perceives as the weakest line of reasoning against the people pushing him right now.

He says voting is scummy, but outing reads is not. But then I call him on it and he says that voting isn't scummy and the fact that I think he's mafia after someone else posted all of the things I was already thinking of is scummy. But he already said that outing reads isn't scummy.

His logic is unsound and it makes no sense whatsoever. What's actually kind of funny was that I was rethinking my stance after what you posted earlier, but he keeps trying to push back on me which, in turn, makes me go after him.

His rationale was that you stated that you had originally pegged his post as scummy, but didn't post until after OnceKing made the initial case. Which, honestly, in the current Day 1 climate of no info is as decently sound as we'll get.

Since we have to lynch someone (I don't think we can go for no lynchings), I'm fine lynching Amiko and, assuming we have a Cop, checking either you (most favorable) or OnceKing (I read him as townish, but just to make sure). How we move forward Day 2 depends on how Amiko reads and if we get a red read (which isn't reliable since Godfather, and we probably have a 33%-50% chance of that being the fake read we get, and we might not have a Cop), but unless something new comes up, that's my (newbie) analysis of what we should do.

I may be painting a target on my back to get mafia-killed, but whatever.


Checking the more outspoken players such as you, me, Amiko, and OnceKing is a poor strategy. We can gather reads on each other by watching as we push our agendas throughout the game.

Lurking players are a different matter entirely. Depending on what Amiko flips, we can get a relatively solid gauge on whats going on.

Now, for the sake of argument, I'm going to walk through both scenarios.

A) Amiko flips green or, heaven forbid, blue.
1: The mafia will most likely be hiding amongst the inactives since they had almost no pressure put on them throughout the first day.
2: Mafia started the lynch and cast suspicion on themselves. This is a possible scenario, but it's still unlikely that a cop check will solve the issue since the most likely candidate for pushing someone that is supposedly town would be the Godfather.

B) Amiko flips red.
1: Mafia either defended him or bussed. Either way, mafia wouldn't be so outspoken on the first day trying to attract attention to themselves.
2: The people running the lynch should be almost confirmed town since mafia obviously wouldn't run one of their own guys into the ground so early.

Either way, cop checks should be carried out on the uncertains lurking in the background rather than the most outspoken players. Hell, even if we don't lynch Amiko today, I wouldn't want a cop check to be carried out on him for the sake that we can rely on him talking more than the other 4 players or so not saying much of anything.

I'm also putting a lot of emphasis on votelists because, even if we mislynch early, we can take a look at who's voting who and who is pushing what. If everyone on the chopping block for today's lynch is blue/green, we can look to the inactives as possible targets since no pressure was put on them throughout the day.

There's still more than 24 hours left for today's votes. Don't forget that. We have all the time in the world. I'm not even 100% on the Amiko lynch yet, so I might take my vote down just so we can get more reads.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 17 2014 05:06 GMT
#146
On February 17 2014 13:12 OnceKing wrote:
re: Amiko

I actually agree with you regarding your points on Cavalinho and Lord Tolkien. More specifically I feel that they've both jumped onto the wagon I'm pushing onto you without contributing anything themselves: Cavalinho just said I beat him to it and Lord Tolkien, well...

Going through his filter here's what Lord Tolkien's got:
- random soft defense of you from before our roles came out
- says he's unconvinced that Amiko is scum, then votes for him saying his vote doesn't matter (???)*
- quoted a Cavalinho hypothetical scenario breakdown and just said he agreed with it without adding anything
- takes no sides -- I'm either "town or Godfather", Cavalinho is "slight scum" or "moderate town", Beneather being slightly scum for voting him (???)
- speculates on setup (meh)
- focuses an awful lot on Godfather/NKs

*Yes, your vote always matters. If you're town then this is your weapon.
The only thing is that he's been posting a lot which I appreciate but I just don't see anything original coming out of him, and here's a disconcerting post...

Show nested quote +
On February 17 2014 08:14 Lord Tolkien wrote:
Since we have to lynch someone (I don't think we can go for no lynchings), I'm fine lynching Amiko and, assuming we have a Cop, checking either you (most favorable) or OnceKing (I read him as townish, but just to make sure). How we move forward Day 2 depends on how Amiko reads and if we get a red read (which isn't reliable since Godfather, and we probably have a 33%-50% chance of that being the fake read we get, and we might not have a Cop), but unless something new comes up, that's my (newbie) analysis of what we should do.


Yeah, we're all newbies here. Why bring it up? I reiterate, who CARES how much experience we do or don't have? Presumably we've all read guides or bits and pieces of other games or something else -- why should you want to detract from your own analysis unless you're trying to hide?


I've been contributing. Just because I agree with your earlier post doesn't make me mafia. What, am I not allowed to follow plans through? Can I not agree with another person's analysis? I'm wasting time and effort defending myself because he keeps pushing on me for following a plan.

Basically all of my posts boil down to either trying to kill Amiko or save myself, because he keeps calling me out for agreeing with you. I think it's ridiculous that I'm getting looked at as possible mafia because I agree with someone else's analysis. (For the record, I agree with all of what you said about it. Just in case this comes up again.)

I'm actually getting very frustrated with the way this is going, because I can't sit down and get reads from anyone since I'm defending my views every other post I make. Even when I point at both Lord Tolkein and IAmRobik, I have people doubting the fact that I'm town since I'm focused on getting one lynch done today and looking at these other people in the mean time.

(And also, Tolkein's disinterest in who gets lynched today is very concerning. I know I suggested him slightly before, but if we aren't going to go after Amiko, then I suggest either IAmRobik or Lord Tolkein.)

Also, I stated earlier that we should be using our cop checks on the uncertains. Amiko's activity should tell us enough about his agenda if we leave him alone long enough, and we obviously can't get rid of all 2-3 mafia in one day.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 17 2014 05:25 GMT
#148
On February 17 2014 14:13 OnceKing wrote:
Whoa, defensive! I'm just saying that you just agreed with me without really adding anything new. I'm honestly looking pretty hard at Lord Tolkien right now -- and I'd like to see a more split situation on votes anyhow because this will drive more discussion.
Therefore, ##VOTE Lord Tolkien


I'm getting very frustrated with Amiko.

I'm going to stay on this vote until tomorrow and see what's going on later.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 17 2014 07:57 GMT
#168
My big issue with the lynches being discussed is that I don't think Amiko and Lord Tolkein can be a team. I seriously doubt Tolkein would bus him so easily and without further discussion, as pointed out by Beneather. If one is town, the other is mafia. I don't think there would be a reason for them to just randomly vote each other with so much at stake in such an active, unspammy d1.

My primary scumreads, as of right this moment, are Amiko, Lord Tolkein, and IAmRobik. Amiko has put together some analysis, but winds up coming to completely different conclusions from what I'm thinking. IAmRobik has pointlessly defended Amiko earlier and completely dropped off the radar after giving a spineless answer early on.

(For the record, I think IAmRobik is scum because of the way he was pointlessly defending Amiko earlier, by using the exact same reasoning that makes Amiko suspicious.)

And OnceKing is my strong townread as of right now. I see absolutely no reason for anyone to vote him for any reason, so Lord Tolkein voting him makes my stomach churn.

I've also noticed that I'm starting to get really aggravated from Amiko's attacks on me; I know that I'm town, and I'm already losing my patience with someone trying to find hidden meaning in my accusations. Instead of just trying to tunnel him, I propose we all start following a more rigid guideline for this first lynch in order to stop all the OMGUS'ing going on.

I think we all need to come to some sort of conclusion from the information we've gotten and the reactions we've received so far before making any other moves. We have a bunch of solid analysis going around and a clear, short, concise thread to work with. We should isolate our possible lynches to a smaller number of people and see what happens. Maybe the extra pressure will lead to some new insights.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 17 2014 07:59 GMT
#169
Off topic, but I just realized I've been spelling Lord Tolkien's name wrong this whole thread...Lol.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 17 2014 09:03 GMT
#172
Actually, that's a very good idea you have. I say we do that to stop the rampant OMGUS'ing going on right now. I'm just going to copy paste it into a quote for easier access later on.

From LT:

Your suggestion is sound, however. I'll lay it down. To open a case, one person proposes a person to be lynched and examined. When one case is open, you can't raise another person up for lynching. If people agree, that person gets voted for lynching, if not, the case can be closed and another person can be proposed after X number of votes to be overturned (say majority-1).
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 17 2014 20:41 GMT
#205
Although I'm still not sold on Robik being entirely townie, I'd really like to bring up the details of my lynch. The only reason people are considering me as of right now are because I jumped on the chance to vote Amiko. I'd like everyone to sit down and give me a serious answer as to why this is scummy.
Spectaticle
Cavalinho
Profile Joined February 2014
United States946 Posts
February 17 2014 21:38 GMT
#209
Except nobody found it scummy except for two people. Almost every single other player in the game has a townread on me. Stop talking as if everyone shares the same views that you do, because they obviously don't.

To explain my reasoning on Cavalinho a little better, this is the kind of direct post I was looking for earlier. As I am looking at everyone in this thread, I want people to tell me what they agree or do not agree with.

I don't see the post as important. But I wanted to at least try to clarify to Cavalinho why I think most of us found his followup vote so scummy in case he is town.


You aren't even saying anything in this post. You say it's direct and that it matters, and then you're saying it doesn't matter.

Explain your scumread. Do it now. Stop beating around the bush and looking for things you can twist.
Spectaticle
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
GSL 2025 Group B
Liquipedia
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
Nicoract vs ArTLIVE!
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
LiuLi Cup #38 / Kanoya Showmatches
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft621
CosmosSc2 31
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 264
PianO 189
scan(afreeca) 84
Sharp 50
JulyZerg 2
Dota 2
monkeys_forever525
NeuroSwarm108
League of Legends
JimRising 642
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1124
Coldzera 344
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0431
Mew2King161
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor167
Other Games
summit1g11090
RuFF_SC2105
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1008
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv118
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 87
• Light_VIP 60
• practicex 50
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 25
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo777
• Stunt307
Other Games
• WagamamaTV123
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
5h 28m
Online Event
23h 28m
ShoWTimE vs MaxPax
SHIN vs herO
Clem vs Cure
SHIN vs Clem
ShoWTimE vs SHIN
SOOP
1d 4h
DongRaeGu vs sOs
CranKy Ducklings
1d 5h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 6h
SC Evo League
1d 7h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 9h
Chat StarLeague
1d 11h
PassionCraft
1d 12h
Circuito Brasileiro de…
1d 13h
[ Show More ]
Online Event
1d 23h
Matvey vs herO
SHIN vs Cure
Clem vs MaxPax
ShoWTimE vs herO
ShoWTimE vs Clem
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Chat StarLeague
2 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
BeSt vs Light
Wardi Open
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Soulkey
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL Code S
5 days
ByuN vs Rogue
herO vs Cure
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
6 days
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

FGSL Season 1
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
StarCastTV Star League 4
JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
2025 GSL S1
Heroes 10 EU
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSLPRO Spring 2025
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.