EPTAssuming that is soon enougjh to avoid me gettiong mod killed
/in
Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
Assuming that is soon enougjh to avoid me gettiong mod killed /in | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [LOL delayed] + Normally my first post has spoiler LOL in it. Sorry this one doesn't I will try to make time tomorrow for it, except it is not very LOL and instead merely pretty, it does however have to do with "apeture" and is hence topical. meh it will amuse me. First note i have driven 1400km in the last two days so I am little fuzzy. If I make no (even less than normal) sense (sorry) I will try for a return to normal service tomorrow. Anyway the game the thread so far seems odd, maybe its the unusual for me size? @WOS. I see you doing stuff. What I don't see is you trying to find stuff out? I have seen the points 'other people' made about you and they made sense when I read them. (I will see if they still do after a good nights sleep) ##vote WaveOfShadow I am also intrigued by why earlier posts by 'other people' did not wind up in a vote or how their misgivings were soothed. + Show Spoiler [LOL preview] + | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 30 2013 10:40 Blazinghand wrote: {emphadd}I think I probably know cora better than you do. honestly the reason I'm antagonizing him is because 1) it's super hilarious to do so, and 2) his response to my antagonism will be telling of his alignment (even after he reads this). Since I didn't make a read on him based on his initial anger, I figured escalating was the best way to determine just how deep the butthurtitude goes. Cora's response to this will be alignment-indicative. He's not good enough to prevent it from being alignment-indicative, even after reading this paragraph. So BH, having seen the response, what was Cora's alignment? Given Dandels post... + Show Spoiler + On August 30 2013 14:19 Dandel Ion wrote: Yes, hello. Replacing Corazon I see. Last time i did that he couldn't handle the ball requirement of playing scum and fucked off because he rolled scum Now I see the butthurt is overflowing. While I have not read the role PM yet (DEAL WITH IT), I will probably have the same role as him (it's likely, but one can never be sure) Thus I feel it is my responsibility to FUCK YOU YOU ARE ALL SONS OF A BITCHES WHY DID YOU STEAL MY CANDY RAWEAWESESKEJLKSJEFLKWEJF *sob* everyone is so mean to me! /curtains Whoooooooo What do you make of Dandels suggestion his alignment might not be the same as Coras was? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 00:03 raynpelikoneet wrote: Have you played/read other Aperture games? Because that's exactly what Black Mesa is. And kitaman very well knows that. Rayn: Have you played/read other Aperture games? Axle: Nope (not recently enough to remember anything) Rayn: Because that's exactly what Black Mesa is. Axle having just buzzed it while that is kind of what it @Rayn Why do you claim to know what it 'is' instead of 'was'? Why dont you wonder how grey might have changed it for this game? Rayn: And kitaman very well knows that. @Rayn I am not clear how what kitaman very well knows happened in previous games has an effect on your interpretation of what he said? I think kitaman did not post it did not post what he said about faction because he thought it was a brand a new thought to everyone, but because at least one person on the scum team will have said that in their QT (hence all the scum already know), and there might be (and are) town players like me who have not read aperture (recently enough) to remember anyth9ing about it. I also never played either portal for more than 5 mins, and its been a very long time since I last knew who Black Mesa was. it is thus a net win to tell any townies who dont know(me) the most important stuff from the last games. So from my point of view anyone pointing out obvious important thematic stuff from aperture games, portal or ... is fine with me. if that offends some players put it in spoiler tagged to the end of useful post. ta. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 08:49 VayneAuthority wrote: It's a good idea to lynch geript because we can test if his claim is real or not. If it is real, then we look at the people that soft pushed his lynch once he claimed, because that is where the scum lies. A lynch that tells us absolutely nothing and is surely not scum is scum driven. @vayne. HUH? Surely the underlined bit is you.... driving a Geript Lynch. hence according to you the bold bit you must be scum? If it is as you say "where the scum lies"... is it "A lynch that tells us absolutely nothing?" | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 09:03 strongandbig wrote: why can't he be one-shot lynchproof scum they have existed before probably more frequently than multishot lynchproof town Are these these only the altetrnatives you are aware of that he might be? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 10:30 VisceraEyes wrote: OH gawd when BH starts talking about absolute reasons why he's town he's scum. GG ladies. I tend to base my estimates of some ones alignment on my thoughts not theirs. However overly simplistic or overly rigid interpretations that come out how the poster wants them are a flag. Does your rule only limit to BH? Oh gawd when players start making scum calls based on single pieces of evidence that are not the link to scum QT, then I then I start to think they are scum, then I remember and sigh. THEN I REMEMBER ITS VE AND VE IS ALWAYS SO SERIOUS IT HERTZ. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
only because you asked + Show Spoiler [so nicely] + On August 31 2013 10:33 Blazinghand (ebwopped to) wrote: Seriously though show me how it makes sense for P(Blazinghand is town|Blazinghand knew cora would rq) < 1 and I will be amazed On August 31 2013 10:33 Blazinghand wrote: er, < 1? or ~Blazinghand is town? pretend I wrote that in a way that makes sense and is mathy and impressive The trouble with mathy and impressive is it is harder to create false dichotomies. If (in a game almost but not quite exactly like this one) you were scum and Cora was scum.... if the QT you two were arguing about stuff. and it spilled over into the thread.... and thus even if Cora was made to rage quit then the replacement was going to be good enough... (to be a win) Now in that reality mathematically (but not morally) there is no downside? As scum its win win + Show Spoiler [As per RandomBums post] + On August 31 2013 10:38 randombum wrote: I don't know if you deserve credit for getting cora replaced by dandel (whom I'm not sure is as good of a player as you seem to think since dandel failed to make us gods amongst mafia players in our last game together). Like you said you didn't expect that as the outcome. So what could have happened was he gets super angry, but not quit, and the two of you argue in thread dis-railing everything which one could easily see as a scum thing to do. I personally want to believe you weren't trying to get him to quit, because winning by being so unfun to play with that others quit is no good. In that reality either the two scum rage at one another giving distance + shit up the thread. One of them quits and gets replaced by the widely renowned scum player Dandle.... See Sig line | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 10:54 VayneAuthority wrote: I don't know what you are saying most of the time but I am not being subtle about it all, I am saying geript is a good lynch. Scum wouldn't want to take a stance on it, but make sure it happens. They can't go back and edit their posts now so I have no problem saying it. WoS brings up a good point about him playing so blatantly cocky, that there is a possibility he WANTS to be lynched for whatever reason Vayne: I don't know what you are saying most of the time but If I am asking you questions at the time that does not matter. Indeed if you think about it... if I had explained really clearly what I didn't like (found alignment ambiguous) about your previous post then you replying would have been easy as scum or town (hence not alignment indicative). With the way I asked the question your reply are your thoughts not merely mine reflected back at me. Vayne: I don't know what you are saying most of the time but Tip: If that gives you difficulty working out my alignment try asking me the questions... try finding out if I have good reasons behind what I do. Be warned: asking me questions often tells me more about your alignment than me asking you and you answering mine.  Vayne: I don't know what you are saying most of the time but Thats ok it works like that both ways. I asked you the question because I had failed to understand what you were thinking. (On August 31 2013 08:49) I could put the meaning you have replied with to your original words but only if I assumed you were town. If I guessed you were scum I could have put a scum motive to them. I still can but now its harder wine to drink. A normal interpretation of any question I asked is to explain in more words something related to whatever I asked or referred to. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
##unvote WOS (flips coin) ##vote MrZentor | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 18:35 Clarity_nl wrote: Sounds like the definition of a vig shot? Do you think you can get 16 votes for what basically amounts to a policy lynch? Why come into the thread like this? @Cakepie. Q to Cakepie. Given two people (Alak + 1 other) how would you decide which is best to lynch and which is best to vig shoot. Why for you is alak the one to lynch? If he is a buffoon... how good would you think his scum game is...? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 19:13 Clarity_nl wrote: step 1.5 fuck off after your opening post and don't return BTW now that i read the other responses altogether... this is quite welcome you have just had, and you have actually played fewer games than Alak. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=mafia&t=c&f=-1&u=cakepie&gb=date&d= So please do respond to at least some stuff. Dont think of it as "Whats with all the hostile?" try to consider it as a mad desire to get you off the vig tonight list. Yours was the filter than was on the other side of the coin flip I did to decide who to vote between you and Mr Zentor. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19640640 TLDR: post More words soon... please. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On August 31 2013 19:21 cakepie wrote: I'd shoot if I could, but I can't, so I use my vote to add emphasis to what I think. -- The latter for now, even if I may not get what I want. He is an impediment to my game as I rely on communication and reasoning, and people being comprehensible. I am not completely sold on the lynch du jour, so while I examine and weigh other possibilities, I intended for my vote to make a statement, even if it is not necessarily a viable lynch at this point. -- IDGAF what you think about the timing, I play this game as my RL schedule allows, and I don't believe I'm breaking any rules. ninja'd ta people not posting is even more of an impediment to mine. (and i think you had run out of people not posting to prod.) but the rest I can see | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
Gee i hope the vig's dont decide they prefer other targets tonight. ##unvote MrZentor On September 01 2013 05:14 geript wrote: Well BH... this is a GreyMist game. You can believe me that you get lynched today and be effective for the next 3.75 hours or you can continue to be scum. Your choice Well Geript, ... I've been waiting for whatever the supposedly "towny play your were going to make to play out" so far I just see IDGAF scum twisting in the wind. You now appear to be making some new claim? Not just unlynchable... ##vote Geript | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On September 01 2013 05:38 Blazinghand wrote: we still need one more vote! yes we do. Attention The following may or may not be useful. (I can but try) Assuming at least one wagon can reach majority.... (and we have some time left) Then even though i hate shenanigans.... @BlazingHand @Clarity @VisceraEyes I need two conditions met. If any of you three WILL not be here near lynch could you please tell me as I would want to choose an alternate. If any one of you three is not of the opinion that say... greater 50:50 I am town I might (probably) also need to choose an alternate. (please remember that I mean the real statistical 50:50 and that at the game start is was closer to 75:25 i was town due to standardish ratios town v scum) Alternatively again... someone else may have some last minute shenanigans and then that could make this whole post moot. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On September 01 2013 05:41 geript wrote: First off people, if I were scum you need to answer a few basic questions: 1. Why would I explain shit about my role? 2. Why would I continue to troll people to get a reaction? 3. Can you honestly think that I'd be this brazen from the start just to force me to use my ability instead of vote rigging D2 or D3 as scum? You people are being intentionally dense. I intentionally played to my scum meta because I wanted to see who would choose to focus where. So what did you learn? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On September 01 2013 05:38 Blazinghand wrote: we still need one more vote! yes we do. but one of the vote is Geript so we really need 2. Attention The following may or may not be useful. (I can but try) Assuming at least one wagon can reach majority.... (and we have some time left) Then even though i hate shenanigans.... @BlazingHand @Clarity @VisceraEyes I need two conditions met. If any of you three WILL not be here near lynch could you please tell me as I would want to choose an alternate. If any one of you three is not of the opinion that say... greater 50:50 I am town I might (probably) also need to choose an alternate. (please remember that I mean the real statistical 50:50 and that at the game start is was closer to 75:25 i was town due to standardish ratios town v scum) I would also need a few relatively non descript random town individuals but there ought be some of those... Alternatively again... someone else may have some last minute shenanigans and then that could make this whole post moot. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On September 01 2013 06:04 kitaman27 wrote: Also, geript can't vote for himself. Keep that in mind with the majority. Ideally we have more on him than 16 to avoid vote stealers and scuh. yeah vote stealers... that makes it scarier. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
Given the OP says You may not vote for yourself. Isn't an attempt to do so invalid? On September 01 2013 06:04 kitaman27 wrote: Also, geript can't vote for himself. Keep that in mind with the majority. Ideally we have more on him than 16 to avoid vote stealers and scuh. So geripts vote is informal and not to be counted? On September 01 2013 05:44 Crossfire99 wrote: Day 1 Lynch geript (15): VisceraEyes, Oatsmaster (0): Koshi (0): Dandel Ion (0): kitaman27 (0): WaveOfShadow (1): ShiaoPi (1): WaveofShadow Blazinghand (1): HiroPro, Felkyr (3): cephiro (0): Mr. Cheesecake (0): VisceraEyes (1): strongandbig MrZentor (0): Alakaslam (1): cakepie yamato77 (1): The lynch will happen in at Sunday, Sep 01 12:00am GMT (GMT+00:00). With 31 alive it takes 16 to lynch. Let me know if I missed something or made a mistake. Remember that only votes in the voting thread count and voting is required. Voting Thread | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On September 01 2013 06:08 kitaman27 wrote: Or perhaps the one time lynch proof to zero time lynch proof? Not quite sure how items are passed. you could read the OP: Item mechanics. | ||
| ||
