EPTPersonality Mafia 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Don't want to miss out of the GreYMisT points deal of the century. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Hello everyone! I think you should vote austinmcc for Mayor. Or any other elected office. But mainly mayor. As mayor, I'll aim to keep a healthy thread environment. We have a lot of heavily-themed roles it seems, and a couple posting restrictions or flavor-lovers. Limericks and rats are nice, but there are a lot of other things that get lost when there is too much creativity and not enough scumhunting. So please be judicious with your silly posts. But the real benefit to electing me mayor is that I will lynch scum. For now, that means lynching slOosh or crossfire. I like those better than oats, although I agree that oats doesn't look very green here. But iirc I'm not particularly good at putting oats's actions together with his alignment. slOosh is a good townie, and generally active. scumslOosh is inactive. slOosh this game is... But the stronger lynch today is crossfire. I like the idea that some scum will attempt to hide within personalities, allowing them to play the game from a less-than-town angle and pass it off as part of the game. crossfire has done just that. He has talked his nonsense, and I enjoyed reading his posts. But the posts contain little/nothing. bugs's post had some logic in them. Others are roleplaying within the context of scumhunting. crossfire is just posting nonsense. At best he called hiro out for voting for "non-alignment reasons," but he hasn't called out any other bad votes and he didn't go anywhere with hiro. Call out his vote, blink away. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
what are those BHs in the Foolishness pic holding? wbg's posts may ramble, but they rambled while making townie points (at times). Read his post about how rats work. It's not the most insightful thing ever, but it gave me a strong townie vibe on him, because he was still playing mafia while filling the thread with nonsense (unlike crossfire). oats does look bad. I like the point on reads more than the point on not following his own advice, especially within a game where everyone is playing as someone else. For starts, you look at the iamperfection/mocsta pushes from oats, but you miss this: On March 11 2013 02:31 Oatsmaster wrote: Oats still pushing iamp, before you post, in response to iamp finding hiro scummy based on hiro's wanting claims. Specifically, iamp made a case, and oats immediately jumps all over iamp. I dislike that, because he's not actually seeking discussion on those questions, he starts off with the all caps LYNCH IAMP, which makes it feel like the questions don't matter. He just wants to lynch iamp, for...making a case and scumhunting.LYNCH IAMP. Why Hiro and not the other numerous people with 1/2/3 posts? Also Hiro never pushed that idea as it was never brought up again. There's also his posts on ver. Check these out: On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote: Ver's entrance is "unimpressive" and he has no posts after. Reads like Oats finds this scummyI do not use the word expound. Mocsta start playing the damn game. What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv. Who is your top scumread. On March 10 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote: But now acro finds Ver scummy for the same post, and Oats thinks it's a horrible reason for a vote.Thats a horrible reason to think someone is scum. Seriously do you think he is serious? Also arent you of the opinion that vets shouldnt be lynched day 1 unless scum claim in thread? On March 10 2013 23:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro responds, and Oats downplays Ver's post. Ver has a whopping one post. And yet Oats still manages to have 3 different thoughts about it. Weird interaction, and weirdly inconsistent.Or he was kidding, and roleplaying. Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Also, why haven't you voted me for mayor? Why hasn't ANYONE voted me for mayor? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:01 marvellosity wrote: hey austin, why did you pick on sloosh (someone who hasn't posted yet, jeez) & crossfire, but not stutters? Because stutters is stutters, and I have played with him. Crossfire had posted and it was ALL fluff (and pretty much still is). slOosh is, again, someone who has impressed me as a townie, and someone i KNOW is generally lurky/less active as scum. Remember me checking him in parallel worlds? Same thing here. An uninterested slOosh is a scumslOosh imo, and as of yet we have no indication that his disinterest is personality-related and not because he's scum. On March 11 2013 16:49 yamato77 wrote: At 6:59 TL time, you said you'd solve the Kurumi problem. 7:06 Kita announces Kurumi town. Half the game calls you out for making a poor choice with your power. At 8:14, you say pro GF snipe. If you knew Kurumi was going to die, why did you wait so long to say so? Why didn't you respond to complaints about your use of your power earlier? First of all, my role is all inclusive. I didn't choose to reveal his alignment and then shoot him, it happens as a consequence of the person being town. So as soon as I PM'd his name as the alignment check, his fate was sealed and there was nothing I could do about it. On March 11 2013 23:24 marvellosity wrote: Seeing as how you initially responded to snb with summary statements like oats was town, felt like townoats, or whatever, I don't like how you are requesting others to go do the work of digging up oats's posts from past games and comparing his posts to others in this game and pastoats. You chose not to do that. Which points are good? Which make Oats scum? How is Oats' play different this game to Hiro's game, or how is it similar to LIX where he was mafia? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Crossfire is still scummy. slOosh's 3 posts ain't much, still doesn't look like townslOosh. I would like to be elected mayor. If elected mayor, I promise to go back in time to right now, and establish a Blue Ribbon Panel on the issue of wbg. I found parts of his posting townie, but he has dipped out after the whole kurumi bit, and I have undervaluated the scumminess of someone dipping out after key moment and lying low through pressure. Would anyone like to be on my Blue Ribbon Panel? The minutes of this first meeting will most likely contain discussion of how scumbugs responds to pressure. I remember him being town and lynched D1 in paranoia, and he was somewhat angry at getting lynched, lashing out at town for being dumb. Here there is none of that. Does bugs always get angry and lash out at town when lynched? or only mislynched? (I think I only have one game with scum bugs). Pending the results of at least that topic of discussion, I would consider lynching bugs. An associate of mine has submitted a file concerning mocsta and corazon. I will review that file, but as of now do not want to make either of them my lynch. Remember: a mayoral vote for austinmcc is a mayoral vote for austinmcc. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 12 2013 00:41 marvellosity wrote: Frankly, my future office was unconcerned with stutters's posts. I did not realize there had been as many as there had. Will poke at past stutters games, but at first glance even the fluffy posts don't strike me as anything more than stutters gonna stutters.So you think what Stutters has posted so far ISN'T all fluff? Why would I dig up posts to prove someone is town, unless they're getting lynched imminently? Corazon is giving a mafia-read on someone and I'm asking him to back it up with evidence. Fairly simple. They are fluffy, yes. But I am used to seeing very little activity from stutters, whereas I'm used to seeing very little activity from scumslOosh, but not town. stutters plays how he plays, slOosh has two different modes. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
iamp, top target right now is Crossfire. He's got my vote. His return hasn't been anything but more of the same. He's had a couple people say they're suspicious of him, or that he's scummy, but he's not gaining votes (just like me and my mayoral campaign  ). That is a bad indicator to me.bugs is a possible target, but I want to actually talk that one out. I know that I overvalue townie posts sometimes and discard someone's reaction to pressure over time, or other stuff like that. But, at the very least, I am unfamiliar with scum bugs, and I want to know what his normal reaction to pressure as scum is. As town, he got very angry in Paranoia, and it's not happening here. So it's likely he's scum, but I'm still slightly hung up on this, and seeing as my mayoral campaign hinges on lynching scum, I don't want to accidentally mislynch. Therefore, would rather go with crossfire atm. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
The two look different. I remember stutters posting infrequently that game, but his posts contained questions, thoughts on the mayoral campaigns, ideas of what he was looking for in a mayor. So yes, I would say that the two games are different. He has a kenpachi-esque post here, indicating perhaps that he is kenpachi, but he has neither purely lurked or purely trolled, his other posts feel more fluffy than kenpachi-y, and much much more fluffy than in LIX. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 12 2013 00:58 marvellosity wrote: By the way, I don't disagree with you about slOosh. I really really want him to get his ass back in this thread. I don't really see how you could  On March 12 2013 00:53 marvellosity wrote: btw austin, how exactly would I go about voting you for mayor? ^^ Mayor: austinmcc a vote for austinmcc is a vote for austinmcc | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 12 2013 01:03 Oatsmaster wrote: I think you are missing some words/a word?Wait wtf, how has BUGS DONE ANYTHING IN THIS GAME. Like how are you seeing scum bugs? Every other weird poster has been somewhat useful. even slOosh has been more useful than Bugs. Town bugs is useful. This bugs in not, and it bugs me. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 12 2013 01:02 marvellosity wrote: This is true.you know very well we can disagree about absolutely everything  | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 12 2013 01:03 Oatsmaster wrote: Wait wtf, how has BUGS DONE ANYTHING IN THIS GAME. Like how are you seeing scum bugs? Every other weird poster has been somewhat useful. even slOosh has been more useful than Bugs. Town bugs is useful. This bugs in not, and it bugs me. You seem to be applying for a position on my Panel. However, I am not convinced that you are a loyal constituent. Whereas other constituents have analyzed specific posts, specific lines, here is what you have done: On March 11 2013 13:34 Oatsmaster wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: wherebugsgo WBG, can you start playing the game now that the 'rat' has died? Or are you intent on doing NOTHING? On March 11 2013 22:45 Oatsmaster wrote: VE VOTE FOR EVERYBODY!!!!!! I dont see why WBG doesnt have like 15 votes on him. How is he town"? On March 12 2013 01:03 Oatsmaster wrote: Wait wtf, how has BUGS DONE ANYTHING IN THIS GAME. Like how are you seeing scum bugs? Every other weird poster has been somewhat useful. even slOosh has been more useful than Bugs. Town bugs is useful. This bugs in not, and it bugs me. Quite the case, quite the analysis. You have made a couple D1 cases. You have accused a bunch of other people of not scumhunting, or doing this or that little thing. However, despite bouncing your vote around all over the place, you have it resting on a guy that you aren't saying much about. I think I like that you are attempting to sling mud at every possible person who could oppose me for mayor, but yet...there seems to be no method to your slinging. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
I will continue to find people scummy who just disregard cryptic posts as useless. There are, at the very least, some thoughts in wbg's posts. See marv 's post above. See my post in response to snb yesterday, bugs had a somewhat neat post on how scum would be looking for targets, and why kurumi fit that bill. wbg looks scummy. I don't know how scum wbg responds to pressure, and if this is how he does so, then he should hang. But you are flinging mud everywhere, either to try and be useful OR to try and be active/point to your suspicions later when we lynch scum. Your mud has no weight behind it though. It is very thin, mostly water. It's pretty clear from other posts that you can read wbg's posts and get something out of them, his filter isn't entirely devoid of content. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 12 2013 01:25 Oatsmaster wrote: You are scummy. To the extent that you are a concerned citizen, my office has already released a memorandum on my lynch choices.So do you think Im scummy or not? Im confused at this point. If not me, then who is your top scum read. Crossfire (wbg) slOosh/stutters you Stutters has moved up after looking at his past game. wbg has moved up as he continues to be silent/mostly silent, both in the face of people saying he's scum and the people saying he's scum for particular reasons. slOosh remains slOoshy. In the past, I have poorly judged whether or not you were an upstanding citizen. You do not appear to be upstanding this game, but I have been wrong before. I'm currently not inclined to lynch you today over those others. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 12 2013 01:48 Promethelax wrote: The thing that I saw was thisMr mcc you award me a plaque but I give it back I wants accolades only from friends your posting is feeling pretend why is it I find you a hack? Now I ask you to tell me what is it that you see that makes bugsgo a friend not a foe how can that be? On March 11 2013 01:44 wherebugsgo wrote: bugs is attacking kurumi. With this post, bugs doesn't just go after a post, or a specific thing kurumi did, bugs discusses how he thinks mafia would be acting during that point in the day, and *I think* attributes those actions to kurumi. The rat does not come in twos or threes or even fours at the break of dawn. The rat comes alone, at first. It sniffs the air, searching, sniveling, and scampering. The rat's home is the very ground that it defiles. The dirt is ruined by its stench, its excrement black with the harbingers of pestilence. In the morning search for food, the rat seeks the weak and the helpless-the young and crawling, the old and feeble. The true time of the rat is night. For it is only then when the rat may bring his brother and sister, mother and father, to feast. The rat seeks the company of the gnawing, groveling vermin that use the innocent earth for their maligned purposes. This particular rat hails from the east. For now, he is alone. That is something I find townie (except for future times when marv does it). The way he adds that post in, rather than just hammering at the easy "two people playing like chez" bait, and instead tried to explain why Kurumi's reads/actions fit with a mafia mindset, made me think he wasn't just faking a suspicion and acting he part, he was actively thinking that Kurumi was scum. In light of things since then...he has looked worse and worse. Continuing to want kurumi gone after the host posts that kurumi was town, no bueno. Disappearing, no bueno, when I've seen town WBG get pissed over being mislynched early. All we've really seen is WBG returning to say that he feared kurumi, who a mod stated was town, would not be town later, due to Kurumi's talking about that. On March 12 2013 02:02 yamato77 wrote: I don't know about others, but I'm not concerned about the delay between check and kill. I'm concerned about the delay between check and you mentioning that, you know, you'd just shot a townie. And you mentioning it in a slightly oblique/trolly manner.The delay for my role was built in. On March 12 2013 00:37 austinmcc wrote: So why not let people know "oops, shot a townie" and give your reasoning earlier?At 6:59 TL time, you said you'd solve the Kurumi problem. 7:06 Kita announces Kurumi town. Half the game calls you out for making a poor choice with your power. At 8:14, you say pro GF snipe. If you knew Kurumi was going to die, why did you wait so long to say so? Why didn't you respond to complaints about your use of your power earlier? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Crossfire continues to be scum, but he's not actively dicking up the thread at this point. Seems like he's decided to lurk and not be so noticeable. The hopefully-soon-to-be-mayor would like to form a concerned citizens' council/neighborhood watch organization. The goal of this organization should be to look into what BC is doing. Specifically, he has called out a number of players for not participating. And he is right to call them out. But...that is the vast majority of his filter. His scumhunting has been limited to "here's a list of lurky folks, one or more of them is probably scum." That's not really scumhunting. Says oats soft-claimed scum, nothing further about oats. Just continued sniping at absent players. I do not like this. I expect more from BC, especially where he posts On March 06 2013 11:08 BloodyC0bbler wrote: weekend works less well for me but thats because im busy all day friday and saturday. Starts sunday I am good. If you can find a lot of substantive activity from him on Sunday, let me know. If you can find a lot of substantive activity from him Monday, let me know. Otherwise, citizens, please keep watch over BC. Do not let his absence pass you by. He knows how to play this game, and he has been content to drop the occasional comment about ver/foolishness/slOosh, and then discuss who he wants to lynch from that list. Scummy. | ||
| ||
