| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
KingCorwin
United States134 Posts
Cardinal Uploaded to [NA] [WOL] Made by KingCorwin ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/EGAs10I.jpg) Stats: Spawns: 4 Playable Bounds: 164x164 1v1 Force Cross spawn, 2v2 positions are cross map 16 base, 2 gold base VODs: + Show Spoiler + Live cast Best of 5 by Mcdominate; HighFlyer [T] v. Kohdez [P] http://www.twitch.tv/mcdominate/b/371392897 Please leave comments and feedback below! | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
| ||
|
KingCorwin
United States134 Posts
| ||
|
Unsane
Canada170 Posts
- In 2v2 this map looks very similar to a map whose name i cant remember, but it had an equal ground backdoor entrance covered by rocks. I abused blink stalkers waaaay too much that map. That whole map was a terrible idea. | ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
| ||
|
Sumadin
Denmark588 Posts
Once you have taken a third, you can start to expand upwards on the partner main, while still holding the lowground, meaning you don't sacrifice any safety by rabid expansion. There is too many expansions covered by too little space. I could see it working as a 2v2 map and i do dig the way the Backdoor into the natural is made, but this map won't work for 1v1. | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
On February 15 2013 04:47 Sumadin wrote:Once you have taken a third, you can start to expand upwards on the partner main, while still holding the lowground, meaning you don't sacrifice any safety by rabid expansion. There is too many expansions covered by too little space. This is why I don't believe in axial maps in general, they always feature this pattern where both players expand in parallel away from each other. It just doesn't work. You should expand in a twirl around the centre. | ||
|
DilemaH
Canada402 Posts
| ||
|
Arghmyliver
United States1079 Posts
Maybe if you switched the ramp with rocks to make the backdoor the natural and altered the current natural to be a potential third? I dunno. Looks great though will definitely try it ^_^! | ||
|
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
| ||
|
gronnelg
Norway354 Posts
| ||
|
KingCorwin
United States134 Posts
| ||
|
KingCorwin
United States134 Posts
| ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2142 Posts
On February 15 2013 04:47 Sumadin wrote: I am sorry but that expansion pattern won't work. Even if Close position is banned(as it should be) we still see the problem that also occured on Shakuras version 1.0 and Metropolis. Once you have taken a third, you can start to expand upwards on the partner main, while still holding the lowground, meaning you don't sacrifice any safety by rabid expansion. There is too many expansions covered by too little space. I could see it working as a 2v2 map and i do dig the way the Backdoor into the natural is made, but this map won't work for 1v1. Agreed - actually this map has the potential to be even worse than Metropolis. Although the distances are shorter so the potential for split map situations is reduced, in the event that it happens you'll get the most uber-turtly fastest map possible style game with a secure 8 bases for each player. In my opinion though, the exact same reasons would make this map perfect as a 2v2 macro map where each player actually has the potential to secure 4 bases, a feat which is near impossible on probably every existing 2v2 ladder map. | ||
|
monitor
United States2409 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Would be a cool 2v2 map if you made only one main have an entrance, and then connect the corner bases on that respective side. | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
IPSL
Dragon vs Ret
Patches Events
RSL Revival
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/bDHEuTu.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/KiJgQ54.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/r0wWjB8.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/9U15kcR.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ljtXlbe.png)
