• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:20
CET 12:20
KST 20:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down20ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier6Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League97
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book SC2 Power Rank: epic29 Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War Mathematicians needed to calc "Low Econ Epicness" SCHNAIL now supports Remastered Ziemie's Starcraft 1 Prequel Campaign
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Grand Finals 2v2v2v2 Tournament Stage 1: Community Poll
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Deus Ex 3!? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8890 users

[M] (2) Dominion Warship

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-06 05:44:44
October 19 2012 03:55 GMT
#1
[image loading]

Dominion Warship
by Fatam
version 0.6 [NA]


Overviews:

90 Degree:
[image loading]

56 Degree:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +
The map export image function doesn't like hatch doodads sometimes, so some of them may not show up correctly on these overviews.



Statistics:
+ Show Spoiler +
Playable area: 168x176 (this number seems too big for a 2p map, but it plays smaller than this)
Rush distance - nat-to-nat: 98 (Ohana is 92, for some perspective)
# of bases: 12 8m2g
# of destructible debris: 2
# of watchtowers: 3


Map Features:
+ Show Spoiler +
The map has 4 relatively easy bases that aren't too far away from each other, which is offset by the fact that the rush distance is not big and there are 3 major attack paths.

There is a 5th base (which could probably be taken as an aggressive 3rd or 4th) nearer the middle of the map. It is a fairly safe base until the opponent takes down the rocks defending it, which opens up a huge ramp.

The 6th base is very far away for both players (by land, anyway) on the right side but is extremely defensible, complete with a defensive highground, LOS blockers, a xel'naga tower, and a 1 FF ramp.

Though there is significant airspace to the right of the each main, the secondary xel'naga towers and mains (mineral line on the left side) are set up in such a way that drops coming from that direction are not overpowered.

The central highground with the Terran Dominion symbol is one of the most important places on the map, as it is the widest attack route and it looks down on the central xel'naga tower.

The secondary xel'naga towers are great for covering your rear end from drops.

The map has 1 tight choke (down the middle), but otherwise it is pretty open (esp. once the rocks are gone at the 5th)


Aesthetics:
+ Show Spoiler +

I wanted to do a spaceship / space installation theme without using decals all over the place, since they do not show up for players using Low Graphics Settings (which happens to be a really high % of the playerbase).

I also wanted the doodads to make sense (maps like Daybreak, etc. are really bad about this - they look cool but half the doodads make no sense at all). Fans are fairly evenly distributed the way actual ventilation might work, "gas storage units" are near the guns and thrusters of the ship, hatches are near important features of the ship which would allow workers to go inside, the ship's outer edges and important inner areas have smaller guns attached to defend attacks, etc.

[image loading]
Terran Dominion

[image loading]
Sons of Korhal

[image loading]
Alpha Squadron

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]
FFE

[image loading]
Wall-off isn't hindered by LOS blockers near main ramp

[image loading]
Possible Terran defense at the 6th base

[image loading]
Possible Protoss defense at the 6th base

[image loading]
Possible Zerg defense at the 6th base

Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Rukis
Profile Joined April 2009
United States252 Posts
October 19 2012 04:04 GMT
#2
Awesome looks amazing but the main doesn't look big enough D:! and some of the bases need to be larger like the thirds ramp for the forth should be bigger too. Bases are a bit boxy but that is just a picky thing about me looks so boxy... so mesmerizing.
Flash was the Genius, Nada was the true god.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 19 2012 04:10 GMT
#3
Haha, cool. That terran decal is sweet. I really dig your "realistic" aesthetics intent. When HotS comes out you will have a ton of new doodads that will be perfect for this. link to video

The 4th base should have a much wider opening if it's going to be that close. Or at least make the entrance facing to the left. The base on the right is soooo far away. But I kind of like it. Once the game gets to the stage where somebody takes it, all of a sudden the map explodes open and center control is not just nice but THE thing. At that point taking the forward 5th is way more viable if the gravity shifts away from the lanes on the left side. Don't think you need the towers on the right side, they just promote passivity. The rocks in the middle are kind of random. Doesn't seem like a chokepoint that you need to be small at any point. I love the tower in the middle, creates a big pull off the main route and the ramps on far side (to the right) provide perfect mobility to reward holding the center.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-19 04:50:58
October 19 2012 04:46 GMT
#4
Awesome looks amazing but the main doesn't look big enough D:


The mains were actually too big several days ago when I was still working things out w/ the map; I had to shrink them. As of now they are an itty bit bigger than Daybreak's mains (basically the same area), so I think they're fine in size.

The 4th base should have a much wider opening if it's going to be that close. Or at least make the entrance facing to the left.


That's probably true. ATM it's a 2 FF ramp. iirc the 4ths on common maps like Daybreak is more like a 3 FF opening and occasionally 4 like w/ CK. Good catch.

edit: I added some screenshots just for fun @ the end of the aesthetics section to show how one might defend the 6th base as each race.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Monochromatic
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States1000 Posts
October 19 2012 05:12 GMT
#5
[image loading]
You basically have 3 chokes for 5 bases. Change which way the ramp faces at the fourth won't fix this.

I'd suggest you scrap the fourth entirely and move the third over and give it another entrance, but you'd have to do something to add more entrances. If you have to keep it, I'd move it to the right side, near the sixth base. Would also give some purpose to those bottom watchtowers.
MC: "Guys I need your support! iam poor make me nerd baller" __________________________________________RIP Violet
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
October 19 2012 06:01 GMT
#6
I wouldn't mind making big changes like that since the map is still fairly early in the creation process. But is that really an "easy wall-off"? All the stuff you have marked is like 15-20+ buildings worth of wall lol, And there would be no way to defend that long of a wall.

And it's just as many chokes to defend 3 bases as well - which is something to consider.

I do agree that the nat could be slightly repositioned to increase the size of the nat -> 5th choke by a bit. That combined with a 4 FF ramp at the 4th instead of 2 FF like Path suggested would go a long way.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 19 2012 06:27 GMT
#7
On October 19 2012 15:01 Fatam wrote:
I wouldn't mind making big changes like that since the map is still fairly early in the creation process. But is that really an "easy wall-off"? All the stuff you have marked is like 15-20+ buildings worth of wall lol, And there would be no way to defend that long of a wall.

And it's just as many chokes to defend 3 bases as well - which is something to consider.

I do agree that the nat could be slightly repositioned to increase the size of the nat -> 5th choke by a bit. That combined with a 4 FF ramp at the 4th instead of 2 FF like Path suggested would go a long way.

The expansion progression for the first 4 bases would benefit from redesign/adjustment for sure but I think it could be okay just with tweaking. Adjusting the nat is a good thought. The ease of defending the 3rd and 4th base just by camping between them is the biggest problem right now imo. Increasing the ground distance between them (possibly with some completely different terrain/cliffs/paths etc) and maybe increasing the flight distance would make it better.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
ihasaKAROT
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4730 Posts
October 19 2012 06:47 GMT
#8
Merge the 3rd and 4th, right now its too choky and too easy to defend. Smooth that area and merg the expansions.
KCCO!
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-22 00:40:23
October 19 2012 10:57 GMT
#9
Thanks for the feedback all, No need for any more "4th is too close to the 3rd" comments as I'm reworking the 4th, the choke north/south of it and that area in general. Feel free to comment on other things though.

So far I've also gotten rid of the "island" / overlord spot outside the natural in order to open up that area even more.

Was able to get rid of the rocks in mid by changing the nat/main so that the rush distance on that path even w/out rocks is fine.

edit: it needs some texture / doodad work because there's a few slightly barren areas now, but here's a rough draft if you want to comment on the changes I've made so far -

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
moskonia
Profile Joined January 2011
Israel1448 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-19 13:42:47
October 19 2012 13:37 GMT
#10
Looks like a really cool map. but how about adding a backdoor to the 6th? right now it would only be taken as a hidden base imo, and that would fix that.

EDIT: Just looked over the aesthetics and they look really really good, but I think you are using way over too many LoS blockers, and most of them will change close to nothing / just get in the way of your buildings, I say get rid of those that might block your buildings.
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
October 19 2012 23:08 GMT
#11
A backdoor to the 6th is an interesting idea, as it would possibly help the defender more than the attacker depending on where it's placed. It's tricky to do with the current layout though - as putting a path that runs closer to the natural would probably make the nat's mineral line siegable from below. And the map is already -huge- in dimensions for a 2p map so I don't really want to stretch the map any more to the right in order to have room for a path there.

@ LOS blockers in the main - Players can still wall off at the main ramp which is the important thing (imo anyway). It's a roomy enough main base that the tiny strip of LOS blockers shouldn't hinder anything building-wise. "Are the LOS blockers in the best position to benefit the defender?" - is a good question though. Maybe they aren't.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
October 19 2012 23:11 GMT
#12
This is off-topic but has been on my mind for a while. I really wish there was a way in SC2 for one player's units to be able to pass through a choke, but the other player's units can't. Some games have things like this (see Heroes of Might and Magic with colored border guards/gates) and it absolutely EXPLODES the amount of things you can do in a map. If anyone can figure out how to do that I would tip my hat.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Just_a_Moth
Profile Joined March 2012
Canada1972 Posts
October 19 2012 23:26 GMT
#13
You should take cliff away from the 6th and put it on the 4th or 3rd. Since right now the 6th is so far away and out of the way, that the ledge makes it even less likely to be taken. Where as if it was the 4th or 3rd (4th is best methinks) it would make expanding a little for difficult. Also if the cliff was no longer present on the 6th people could also take a hidden base there and probably hold it with few units even when drops become available. Just my thoughts.

PS you just get rid of the cliff and not transfer it to another base instead.
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
October 19 2012 23:39 GMT
#14
On October 20 2012 08:26 coasts wrote:
You should take cliff away from the 6th and put it on the 4th or 3rd. Since right now the 6th is so far away and out of the way, that the ledge makes it even less likely to be taken. Where as if it was the 4th or 3rd (4th is best methinks) it would make expanding a little for difficult. Also if the cliff was no longer present on the 6th people could also take a hidden base there and probably hold it with few units even when drops become available. Just my thoughts.

PS you just get rid of the cliff and not transfer it to another base instead.


Here's another possible option - if I halve the highground so that the part that overlooks the minerals isn't there. That way a drop from the attacker can't mineral/geyser harass from the highground, it can only hit the town hall. You will probably already have a spine/cannon/marines/whatever up on that side of the highground anyway, so it's not like you'll be completely unready if he drops there.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 20 2012 08:34 GMT
#15
On October 20 2012 08:11 Fatam wrote:
This is off-topic but has been on my mind for a while. I really wish there was a way in SC2 for one player's units to be able to pass through a choke, but the other player's units can't. Some games have things like this (see Heroes of Might and Magic with colored border guards/gates) and it absolutely EXPLODES the amount of things you can do in a map. If anyone can figure out how to do that I would tip my hat.

You could do it with triggers for sure, maybe just with data. I have been wondering about this forever. I wanted to make a special cliff that all ground units can descend cliffwalk but can't go back up.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
October 20 2012 10:26 GMT
#16
On October 19 2012 19:57 Fatam wrote:
Thanks for the feedback all, No need for any more "4th is too close to the 3rd" comments as I'm reworking the 4th, the choke north/south of it and that area in general. Feel free to comment on other things though.

So far I've also gotten rid of the "island" / overlord spot outside the natural in order to open up that area even more.

Was able to get rid of the rocks in mid by changing the nat/main so that the rush distance on that path even w/out rocks is fine.

edit: it needs some texture / doodad work because there's a few slightly barren areas now, but here's a rough draft if you want to comment on the changes I've made so far - [image loading]


Haha, wanted to comment about that front of the natural obstacles in the middle, as I thought with the highground behind it would have been too chokey; but as I see, you already dealt with it.

I like the map. I think the bases could need a little bit more of the red texture (natural, 4thh, 5th, 6th), which I think looks really cool.
Bswhunter
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Australia954 Posts
October 20 2012 11:04 GMT
#17
I kinda like the clunky feel of the terrain. Also the overview reminds me of FTL
Stop browsing and do whatever it is you're supposed to do. TL will still be here when you get back
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-22 01:03:36
October 22 2012 00:49 GMT
#18
[image loading]

Just finished the big update. Original post has been updated (text/pics) to reflect the changes.

- all the chokes/areas along the left side are bigger.
- 4th was changed to face away from the defender, and has a much wider ramp.
- Main / Nat was changed a tiny bit to increase the rush distance slightly
- removed the middle rocks
- changed the 6th in a few ways to make it even more defensible
- the extra 2 XNTs are now inside the 6ths. While a bit of an odd choice, it provides a fairly important point of interest (because it protects you against drops) that is far away from the middle and it helps make the 6th more defensible once you take it, so I'm pretty happy with it.
- Improved the aesthetics (more red stuff in bases, added Sons of Korhal and Alpha Squadron logos, and some other stuff)
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 40m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 493
ByuN 246
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1743
Horang2 801
Bisu 772
firebathero 648
GuemChi 486
FanTaSy 453
BeSt 447
Killer 215
Soma 212
Soulkey 208
[ Show more ]
Zeus 189
EffOrt 172
Mind 171
Last 144
Leta 132
Pusan 80
Snow 70
sorry 69
910 39
Bishop 37
Barracks 31
ToSsGirL 31
Aegong 24
Classic 21
Sea.KH 18
Free 17
zelot 16
soO 15
Sacsri 9
Counter-Strike
x6flipin116
Other Games
B2W.Neo867
XaKoH 402
Happy373
Pyrionflax211
Livibee70
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL1549
Other Games
ComeBackTV 392
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 21
lovetv 7
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 36
• Adnapsc2 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 880
Upcoming Events
OSC
2h 40m
Yamato Cup
3h 40m
IPSL
5h 40m
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
11h 40m
WardiTV Weekly
1d
Ultimate Battle
1d
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
IPSL
6 days
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-30
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.