• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 14:23
CET 20:23
KST 04:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle
Tourneys
[BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1462 users

[M] (2) Uncanny Valley

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-11 20:18:51
August 18 2012 01:14 GMT
#1
[image loading]

Uncanny Valley
by OxyGenesis
128x126 | Published on EU


[image loading]

+ Show Spoiler [Overview] +

[image loading]


Been experimenting with this main/nat layout and this is the result. Trying out a few new ideas/techniques here, partially inspired by Ohana. Critique welcome.

For those that may be interested http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley
+ Show Spoiler [Aesthetics] +
Nat
[image loading]

3rd
[image loading]

Half Base
[image loading]

Centre
[image loading]

Rocks and Blockers
[image loading]

Back Passageway
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]



+ Show Spoiler [Change Log] +
- Made whole map wider
- Enlarged the main
- Reworked centre
- Lots of smaller terrain tweaks
- Overhauled the aesthetics
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
coZy
Profile Joined March 2012
United States65 Posts
August 18 2012 01:56 GMT
#2
Looks like a really interesting map to play on. Can't really comment on balance though. I like the natural and 3rd along with the 2 ramps into the main. Really cool idea.
Visage814
Profile Joined April 2012
United States109 Posts
August 18 2012 03:14 GMT
#3
Definitely an interesting idea, I think it would probably work in most situations... especially since you can just wall off the ramp not going to the natural after fast expanding if you feel like you need to.

I personally think the LOS blockers in the middle might be a little over the top, fights would get pretty weird. Although that could be good
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
August 18 2012 03:16 GMT
#4
Aesthetics are definitely cool. The color scheme and lighting has a "night elf" feel to it.

Middle is pretty interesting. I feel like LOS blockers are super underused in maps right now. Or at least, they aren't used in interesting ways when they are used.

I think a problem with the mid is that someone just can't engage there at all if the other person has the watchtower because the disadvantage from not having LOS of their army (while the other player is unaffected by the LOS blockers) will be huge.
Basically I think the middle would be 20x more interesting if there wasn't a watchtower there, because then -both- players would have to use the LOS blockers to their advantage.

The main/nat/third is obviously quite unique, it's hard to say without testing but I actually think it works. FFE'ing is slightly more difficult to do than in some maps but not impossible at all.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
goste
Profile Joined April 2011
Australia46 Posts
August 18 2012 04:16 GMT
#5
I think the rocks blocking the natural are interesting. But they look like they will be too easily defend-able from the high ground - unless you have Banshee/Muta/Voids, in which case walls don't matter much. Although, as you take your third, you will probably want the rocks to be broken so you can move quickly between the third and nat to defend.

The map certainly looks pretty!!

You should upload it to NA!
Top 10 reasons to procrastinate: #1 -
Coppermantis
Profile Joined June 2012
United States845 Posts
August 18 2012 04:33 GMT
#6
Very good looking map, it'll be interesting to see what will happen with that natural layout.
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
August 18 2012 06:17 GMT
#7
Well done. I do kind of agree with what Fatam said about the watchtower in the middle. I wish there was a better place to put them on the edges of the map. Then it'd turn into take the outside edges of the map, which are longer and provide watchtowers, or go through the center which is dangerous and covered with lots of LoSB.

I'm wondering how it'd work if you made high ground in the middle like this:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


Definitely one of the better more unique 2p maps that has been posted recently. Keep up the great work!
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
Apoo
Profile Joined January 2011
413 Posts
August 18 2012 07:24 GMT
#8
Aesthetics. I always wanted to create a map looking like that, but i never achieved it. Great job! Im curious what it would look like if you add a little bit more blue textures instead of only green in the centre, maybe it would be even more great.

Natural layout is unique, but fine - from my point of view. First 3 bases are pretty easy to defend too, but thats kind of standard nowadays. I really like the transition from 3base to 4base, it reminds me of Cloud Kingdom. The middle is kind of unique, have to see how it plays out. Could be a brilliant feature - with the LOS-blockers the Xel Naga Tower gets even more important.

I hope it gets picked up by some tourneys or something. Would love to see it get played.
An2quamaraN
Profile Joined March 2011
Poland379 Posts
August 18 2012 11:50 GMT
#9
This map...looks like Teldrassil from WoW. Very beautiful.
Acritter
Profile Joined August 2010
Syria7637 Posts
August 18 2012 12:06 GMT
#10
Is that a full-gas inbase natural? I'm not sure how much I like that. It wasn't the only reason Jungle Basin was a bad map, but it certainly didn't help. If the Jungle Basin rocks were never knocked down fast enough to stop fast expansions, then these rocks certainly never will. Middle of the map is hard to spread creep through, but I'm guessing you knew this already. Engagements there will probably favor Terran due to Medivacs. Siege Tank wars in that area should be wicked fun, though. Nothing else to comment on. The inbase nat is clearly the biggest thing about this map. However, I think that having that available would shake things up enough that it would end up being beneficial. Not every game needs to be on Daybreak, after all...
dont let your memes be dreams - konydora, motivational speaker | not actually living in syria
Shkudde
Profile Joined February 2011
Netherlands709 Posts
August 18 2012 12:11 GMT
#11
Looks great, the use of LoS-blockers in the middle is very interresting to say the least. Natural lay-out with the destructibles is cool too.

But I have to say you really can't use the space-shark, that is ESV-property
$O$ | herO[jOin] | Zest hwaiting!
ArcticRaven
Profile Joined August 2011
France1406 Posts
August 18 2012 13:03 GMT
#12
It is possible to put LoS blockers under Destructible rocks. It would be more elegant
[Govie] Wierd shit, on a 6 game AP winning streak with KOTL in the trench. I searched gandalf quotes and spammed them all game long, trenchwarfare247, whateva it takes!
kiklion
Profile Joined April 2011
99 Posts
August 18 2012 15:22 GMT
#13
PvZ

I feel this map allows protoss to more safely open gateway expand. You can protect the main ramp that way and hopefully react fast enough to zerg breaking down rocks with lings/roaches.

Zerg on the other hand, would probably take the third as their natural followed by the natural (not that there is much time difference there usually. This allows them to hide if they went 2 base or three base, meanwhile zerg can scout the natural easily with an overlord. Furthermore, the initial 4 lings can easily cover all ground paths. If the toss does an ~8 minute timing, you only have one area to defend. Muta's are also an option with the air around the natural/third.

ZvZ, can you wall off the big ramp to the natural with evos and a spine crawler or two? If so, such that you only have one real entrance I can see this making more zvz's going to a later game. The issue with opening roach is the ling player goes a fast third and tries to deny yours / ling runbys if you move roaches to defend it. But that would be solved here with a walloff be-tween the big ramp and the small ramp.

SeinGalton
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
South Africa387 Posts
August 19 2012 01:18 GMT
#14
Very pretty map - I'm actually busy on something that looks startlingly similar - it's very uncanny . I like the experimentation, but it seems with the treacherous lowground middle might make this a rather splitty map? Perhaps not - it's a rather small map with a base layout that encourages long term play, I think we could see great if somewhat crazy games on this. Nice work.
They're coming to get you, Barbara.
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
August 20 2012 12:56 GMT
#15
Thank you for all the comments. I have made a couple of tiny tweaks and finally sorted out the publishing issues so it is up on in the arcade section of EU! Search for Uncanny.

If you play on it I would love the replays. Specific the 3rd/4th for zerg need testing, and feedback on how people feel about the overall size and rush distances would be really useful.

An Idea I have been playing with in my head is having the XNT decay something like 5/6 minutes in to the game. Xel'Naga Fortress was a map that had this feature and I think it might work well here.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
Meltage
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany613 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-20 13:04:45
August 20 2012 13:03 GMT
#16
I love the setting.

I think the middle half-base is too vulnerable. Waht if a bigger part of the closest LOSB line was solid wall or gap instead?

If this map is still valid in HotS, you could have collapsable rocks clsoe tot he tower, so that players may choose to make it unavailable (at least I hope this might work - perhaps two collapsable rocks are needed for it?)
http://mentalbalans.se/aggedesign
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
August 20 2012 15:18 GMT
#17
On August 20 2012 22:03 Meltage wrote:
I love the setting.

I think the middle half-base is too vulnerable. Waht if a bigger part of the closest LOSB line was solid wall or gap instead?

If this map is still valid in HotS, you could have collapsable rocks clsoe tot he tower, so that players may choose to make it unavailable (at least I hope this might work - perhaps two collapsable rocks are needed for it?)


Cheers Meltage. I have some ideas for improving the half base area. The XNT is certainly a conundrum, will need testing to see if it provides too much of a positional advantage currently.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
Zerg.Zilla
Profile Joined February 2012
Hungary5029 Posts
August 20 2012 17:28 GMT
#18
Wow awsome looking map...gona try it out tonight.
(•_•) ( •_•)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■) ~Keep calm and inject Larva~
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
August 20 2012 21:41 GMT
#19
I'm liking this map a lot. Beautiful implementation of the new natural. I like all of the LOS blockers on the side that you have them on, so the defender can still get out to see.

I was trying LOS blockers on the other side to prevent the placement of a pylon near enough, which seemed cruder than your solution.

The aesthetics are also gorgeous and I like the middle LOS blockers, though I agree that the half base is so vulnerable as to not really be worth it.

There is also a hint of circle syndrome but still very nice.

^_^
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-24 16:34:05
August 24 2012 16:28 GMT
#20
I've got a couple balance concerns/gameplay concerns that I'll list here, but I must preface by saying this is a very good looking map and looks well made.

So my first point is a minor one, and it is that the main looks very small. Lategame TvZ and TvP can sometimes get up to 15+ barracks or so. It's important to have somewhere to build them, and usually the main the is the most comfortable and logical spot. On this map, there is a little bit of space near the third and a tiny bit of room in the inbase natural, but not quite enough total. I think the main needs to be enlarged- you could almost double the size now and it would be fine. For my suggestion how to do this, I have to talk about my other concerns.

My second point of concern is the the fourth, fifth, and sixth (if needed) bases are nearly impossible for zerg to take in ZvP, and to a lesser extent in ZvT. This is because the distances between the players are very short- similar to Ohana. These days, Zerg can almost never take a fourth or fifth expansion against P/T on Ohana because the opponent's pushes come so quickly that there is no time to react or get into position. Ohana has some previous stats that help it be balanced on TLPD, but I believe it is going to become worse and worse for balance. Also the gameplay strongly discourages comebacks and encourages being highly aggressive.

The white lines show pushes coming from Protoss, but it could be Terran also. The distances are all very short and don't give Zerg much time to react, build spines, get in position, counter attack, etc. On top of that, the push paths are very very small and choked which will make any PvZ just that much stronger until Zerg has brood lords.

[image loading]

Daybreak has a similar lategame style, where the expansions are along the left and right sides of the map in a linear fashion. However there is a major difference between the maps- Daybreak is MUCH larger cross map, because the map is longer horizontally than vertically. I believe that Uncanny Valley is going to need to be stretched in order to make the gameplay work. Widening the map by simply enlarging the middle would work wonders imo. Even 12-16 hexes would help the problems, but you could probably go up to 24 hexes increase if you want. Essentially you could leave the main/nat where they are and move the rest of the map outwards, which will allow you to increase the main size.

Note: The push distances become even shorter as the game progresses (5th to natural is short and the middle bases are seconds from the opponent).

[edit]

My final concern with the map is that these areas are too easy to hide units below, because the double cliffs with overshadow units on the lowground if they are positioned correctly. The same problem occurs with the middle expos on Shakuras, except minerals block most of the spots that units can be hidden. A simple solution is to raise the lowground harassment areas to middleground.

[image loading]
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Ladder Legends
17:00
WWG Masters Showdown
SteadfastSC230
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SKillous 450
White-Ra 317
SteadfastSC 230
ProTech129
BRAT_OK 97
DivinesiaTV 25
MindelVK 24
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2004
Shuttle 482
Dewaltoss 133
Mini 109
Hyun 95
ggaemo 56
yabsab 44
910 24
soO 19
Killer 14
[ Show more ]
HiyA 12
NaDa 5
Dota 2
Gorgc7580
Counter-Strike
fl0m1093
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby1197
Khaldor725
Liquid`Hasu453
Other Games
FrodaN3054
Beastyqt758
B2W.Neo676
mouzStarbuck237
ToD217
ArmadaUGS190
QueenE81
Mew2King62
Chillindude10
Organizations
Other Games
PGL1240
gamesdonequick796
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 41
• HeavenSC 17
• Adnapsc2 11
• Reevou 10
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV628
• HappyZerGling75
Other Games
• imaqtpie1227
• Shiphtur205
Upcoming Events
BSL 21
37m
StRyKeR vs TBD
Bonyth vs TBD
Replay Cast
13h 37m
Wardi Open
16h 37m
Monday Night Weeklies
21h 37m
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 1
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.