• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:02
CET 11:02
KST 19:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Dark completes military service, returns to SC28[BSL23] RO16 Group Stage19Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?2Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175
StarCraft 2
General
Greetings.. No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Dark completes military service, returns to SC2 Serral's getting trashed by New Catsle's Mind Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Dark returns! GSL CK #7 4v4 Team Battle (Nov 19) soO & FanTaSy return! SC2 Kevin Scrim 4v4 (Nov 16) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps Starcraft 2 Advance [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion List of top players active on ShieldBattery Recommended BW Settings for Mouse and Video Starcraft:Brood War Discord Servers [BSL23] RO16 Group Stage
Tourneys
Bisu's Team vs Shuttle's Team 2026-11-14 2v2v2v2 Tournament Stage 1: Community Poll [BSL23] Ro16 Group C - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Pluto's TvP 5Marine 2Medic Push Infested Terran strategies in 2026 Nuke strategy worked in K-League 2026-11-09
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Free Space RTS Game, optimised f. Phone/Tablet etc List of Game Threads The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Can Game Data Analytics Help Players Improvements
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12075 users

[M] (2) Uncanny Valley - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
August 24 2012 17:30 GMT
#21
On August 25 2012 01:28 monitor wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

I've got a couple balance concerns/gameplay concerns that I'll list here, but I must preface by saying this is a very good looking map and looks well made.

So my first point is a minor one, and it is that the main looks very small. Lategame TvZ and TvP can sometimes get up to 15+ barracks or so. It's important to have somewhere to build them, and usually the main the is the most comfortable and logical spot. On this map, there is a little bit of space near the third and a tiny bit of room in the inbase natural, but not quite enough total. I think the main needs to be enlarged- you could almost double the size now and it would be fine. For my suggestion how to do this, I have to talk about my other concerns.

My second point of concern is the the fourth, fifth, and sixth (if needed) bases are nearly impossible for zerg to take in ZvP, and to a lesser extent in ZvT. This is because the distances between the players are very short- similar to Ohana. These days, Zerg can almost never take a fourth or fifth expansion against P/T on Ohana because the opponent's pushes come so quickly that there is no time to react or get into position. Ohana has some previous stats that help it be balanced on TLPD, but I believe it is going to become worse and worse for balance. Also the gameplay strongly discourages comebacks and encourages being highly aggressive.

The white lines show pushes coming from Protoss, but it could be Terran also. The distances are all very short and don't give Zerg much time to react, build spines, get in position, counter attack, etc. On top of that, the push paths are very very small and choked which will make any PvZ just that much stronger until Zerg has brood lords.

[image loading]

Daybreak has a similar lategame style, where the expansions are along the left and right sides of the map in a linear fashion. However there is a major difference between the maps- Daybreak is MUCH larger cross map, because the map is longer horizontally than vertically. I believe that Uncanny Valley is going to need to be stretched in order to make the gameplay work. Widening the map by simply enlarging the middle would work wonders imo. Even 12-16 hexes would help the problems, but you could probably go up to 24 hexes increase if you want. Essentially you could leave the main/nat where they are and move the rest of the map outwards, which will allow you to increase the main size.

Note: The push distances become even shorter as the game progresses (5th to natural is short and the middle bases are seconds from the opponent).

[edit]

My final concern with the map is that these areas are too easy to hide units below, because the double cliffs with overshadow units on the lowground if they are positioned correctly. The same problem occurs with the middle expos on Shakuras, except minerals block most of the spots that units can be hidden. A simple solution is to raise the lowground harassment areas to middleground.

[image loading]


Thanks for the feedback monitor, once again proving that you are the boss when it comes to understanding maps. If I'm honest with myself, I kind of knew that it wasn't wide enough but having already widened it once, and knowing what a pain it would be fixing all the aesthetics, I've been reluctant. The main size issue is also something I was aware of, having already made it as large as I could within the bounds I was working with. My plan for the next update is to move the nat gas nearest to the main to the other side so that there is a larger area there to expand the main. This will also mean that zergs get a much easier overlord scout on the nat gasses, hopefully this will be counteracted slightly by the fact that the main gasses are much harder to scout, any thoughts on this? The other change I was considering is moving the rocks from the ramp they are currently on to the ramp between the main/nat/3rd but I'm much more hesitant on that one and I don't want it to be too passive plus players seem to be able to hold the 3-wide ramp on entombed just fine.

The point about hiding units behind the double cliff is not something that I had thought of. Luckily it's an easy fix
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
August 24 2012 17:58 GMT
#22
On August 25 2012 02:30 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2012 01:28 monitor wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

I've got a couple balance concerns/gameplay concerns that I'll list here, but I must preface by saying this is a very good looking map and looks well made.

So my first point is a minor one, and it is that the main looks very small. Lategame TvZ and TvP can sometimes get up to 15+ barracks or so. It's important to have somewhere to build them, and usually the main the is the most comfortable and logical spot. On this map, there is a little bit of space near the third and a tiny bit of room in the inbase natural, but not quite enough total. I think the main needs to be enlarged- you could almost double the size now and it would be fine. For my suggestion how to do this, I have to talk about my other concerns.

My second point of concern is the the fourth, fifth, and sixth (if needed) bases are nearly impossible for zerg to take in ZvP, and to a lesser extent in ZvT. This is because the distances between the players are very short- similar to Ohana. These days, Zerg can almost never take a fourth or fifth expansion against P/T on Ohana because the opponent's pushes come so quickly that there is no time to react or get into position. Ohana has some previous stats that help it be balanced on TLPD, but I believe it is going to become worse and worse for balance. Also the gameplay strongly discourages comebacks and encourages being highly aggressive.

The white lines show pushes coming from Protoss, but it could be Terran also. The distances are all very short and don't give Zerg much time to react, build spines, get in position, counter attack, etc. On top of that, the push paths are very very small and choked which will make any PvZ just that much stronger until Zerg has brood lords.

[image loading]

Daybreak has a similar lategame style, where the expansions are along the left and right sides of the map in a linear fashion. However there is a major difference between the maps- Daybreak is MUCH larger cross map, because the map is longer horizontally than vertically. I believe that Uncanny Valley is going to need to be stretched in order to make the gameplay work. Widening the map by simply enlarging the middle would work wonders imo. Even 12-16 hexes would help the problems, but you could probably go up to 24 hexes increase if you want. Essentially you could leave the main/nat where they are and move the rest of the map outwards, which will allow you to increase the main size.

Note: The push distances become even shorter as the game progresses (5th to natural is short and the middle bases are seconds from the opponent).

[edit]

My final concern with the map is that these areas are too easy to hide units below, because the double cliffs with overshadow units on the lowground if they are positioned correctly. The same problem occurs with the middle expos on Shakuras, except minerals block most of the spots that units can be hidden. A simple solution is to raise the lowground harassment areas to middleground.

[image loading]


Thanks for the feedback monitor, once again proving that you are the boss when it comes to understanding maps. If I'm honest with myself, I kind of knew that it wasn't wide enough but having already widened it once, and knowing what a pain it would be fixing all the aesthetics, I've been reluctant. The main size issue is also something I was aware of, having already made it as large as I could within the bounds I was working with. My plan for the next update is to move the nat gas nearest to the main to the other side so that there is a larger area there to expand the main. This will also mean that zergs get a much easier overlord scout on the nat gasses, hopefully this will be counteracted slightly by the fact that the main gasses are much harder to scout, any thoughts on this? The other change I was considering is moving the rocks from the ramp they are currently on to the ramp between the main/nat/3rd but I'm much more hesitant on that one and I don't want it to be too passive plus players seem to be able to hold the 3-wide ramp on entombed just fine.

The point about hiding units behind the double cliff is not something that I had thought of. Luckily it's an easy fix


Heh, thanks. I know its a massive pain, and ultimately it is your map so any changes are your decision of course. I often won't change my maps because its too much of a nuisance once I've finished the aesthetics. The gas move sounds good but I doubt it will fix the small size completely. I always like encouraging scouting, and I don't mind if its easy. I kind of prefer easy to scout gasses in both the main and natural. Scouting the gases is especially important in ZvP and ZvT, but Zerg can usually sack an ovie to scout the main. I wouldn't be too concerned about it, its kind of a minor thing.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 10 2012 23:28 GMT
#23
Updated! Changed a bunch of things. Will do some aesthetics shots tomorrow. Somehow I've been mapping with my texture settings set to low this whole time, I was wondering why my maps looked so different in game to in the editor. Now that's fixed expect my screenshots to be much better.

It's published to the melee section on EU if anyone fancies playing on it.

[image loading]
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
September 11 2012 02:37 GMT
#24
Looks really good. Looks like you updated the aesthetics a bit from when I last saw it.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Semmo
Profile Joined June 2011
Korea (South)627 Posts
September 11 2012 06:02 GMT
#25
Yay, you got rid of the unnecesary LOS blockers ^_^
The map is on the small side, and not all the expos will be taken, but small map + back expo is interesting.
Mapmaker of Frost, Fruitland and Bridgehead
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 11 2012 11:47 GMT
#26
On September 11 2012 15:02 Semmo wrote:
Yay, you got rid of the unnecesary LOS blockers ^_^
The map is on the small side, and not all the expos will be taken, but small map + back expo is interesting.


Yeah you've touched on the concept there. I figured SC2 is mostly a 2 base game now, with the exception of PvP. So, if players are going to get up to 2 bases anyway, why not give them the second base for free? Well in the past this has lead to turtley, deathbally games, so this map is my attempt at countering that. The nat is harassable but difficult to attack head-on. This means you have some interesting decisions on when to break down your own rocks once you have your 3rd base. Breaking down the rocks makes for easier harass defence as you can park your army at the top of the ramp and move to the 3rd/nat/main easily but makes your nat more vulnerable. I imagine most players will break down the rocks once the 3rd is established but may choose to keep them if they feel certain timing attacks are coming. The map emphasises control of the middle which should also help break up turtley games, especially as it is a small map so seeing your opponent coming is very important. The middle is quite open though so you have to be wary of flanks and being caught out of position. The outer LoS blockers denote the radius of the XNT meaning you can't see in but they can't see out, which should encourage scouting. The centre bases also help control of the middle but at the sacrifice of a slightly lower economy (6m1hg) and less obvious expansions. The 4ths being double high ground and roughly the same distance from the opposition as the 3rd should make them easier to defend but taking them does change the area you have to defend considerably. With the 4th (and subsequent 5th) and the nat being open to harass I can see this being a good tactic whilst pushing the 3rd. As you rightly said, I doubt all of the bases will be taken in 1 game, the forward bases would be extremely difficult to hold whilst the opposition has their 4th/5th but I feel every bases has a use and is important in different situations/matchups.

My main worry with the map in it's current guise is the 3rd. I'm unsure exactly how this will play out and whether the choke or the main 3x ramp need tweaks. Would love to get some high level games on it as there is only so much I can learn from getting rolled by ArcticRaven's mech build every game
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
MistSC2
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden583 Posts
September 11 2012 19:05 GMT
#27
This map looks siiick!
Maru, TY, Clem <3
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 11 2012 20:22 GMT
#28
Some aesthetics shots

+ Show Spoiler +

Nat
[image loading]

3rd
[image loading]

Half Base
[image loading]

Centre
[image loading]

Rocks and Blockers
[image loading]

Back Passageway
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
September 13 2012 19:39 GMT
#29
Now Available on NA
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 13 2012 19:43 GMT
#30
Who wants to play?
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 13 2012 22:46 GMT
#31
Don't forget to send me your replays if you do
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 17 2012 22:36 GMT
#32
Hey I played a couple PvZ's, they were way fun. I will add some comments and some links to the replays later. For now:

One of the geysers is unbuildable, the left one at the 4 oclock base. Double check there's no doodad or something?

Also you can blink over the rocks into the natural, despite the LosB. Not sure if this is intended behavior. If you want to prevent blink-ins you'd need to put the LosB inside the rocks. Can't decide if I like the ability to blink in or not. It's cool so I guess it should stay, but it allows an extra aggressive option in PvP for blink all-ins to be so much stronger.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 18 2012 09:49 GMT
#33
On September 18 2012 07:36 EatThePath wrote:
Hey I played a couple PvZ's, they were way fun. I will add some comments and some links to the replays later. For now:

One of the geysers is unbuildable, the left one at the 4 oclock base. Double check there's no doodad or something?

Also you can blink over the rocks into the natural, despite the LosB. Not sure if this is intended behavior. If you want to prevent blink-ins you'd need to put the LosB inside the rocks. Can't decide if I like the ability to blink in or not. It's cool so I guess it should stay, but it allows an extra aggressive option in PvP for blink all-ins to be so much stronger.


Thanks for the heads up! Will look in to those.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
eTcetRa
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia822 Posts
September 18 2012 11:13 GMT
#34
Map looks stunning, good work!
Retired Mapmaker™
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 18 2012 11:44 GMT
#35
On September 18 2012 20:13 eTcetRa wrote:
Map looks stunning, good work!


Cheers man. I played on Orbit Brutus the other day, holy shit it is even better looking in-game! Seriously nice map.

In regards to the blinking over the rocks issue, what are people's thoughts on this? Baring in mind that if they had an observer they would be able to blink there anyway.

I think I will have to change it as it intuitively feels like you shouldn't be able to do this. I will do some testing in this area regardless.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
September 18 2012 17:15 GMT
#36
I agree intuitively it feels like you shouldn't be able to. And I'm surprised that this prevents warp in if it doesn't prevent blink, as both of those require vision of the area you're targeting, no?
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
September 18 2012 22:48 GMT
#37
On September 19 2012 02:15 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I agree intuitively it feels like you shouldn't be able to. And I'm surprised that this prevents warp in if it doesn't prevent blink, as both of those require vision of the area you're targeting, no?

I'd imagine if the area that you can see is small enough you would be able to blink in but not have enough room to warp. Stalkers can probably blink to even the smallest speck of space (just as you can or could drop units into small areas,) and then they are further into the losb.
all's fair in love and melodies
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
19:00
Sea Duckling Open #151
CranKy Ducklings0
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech144
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 21964
Shuttle 7664
Rain 2066
BeSt 883
Hyuk 597
Jaedong 588
FanTaSy 301
Larva 235
Killer 218
Pusan 180
[ Show more ]
actioN 175
Zeus 123
Mind 95
Mong 59
Bale 56
Hm[arnc] 35
Creator 35
NaDa 20
Sharp 20
ZerO 19
ZergMaN 18
Sacsri 17
sSak 15
sOs 11
yabsab 10
Shine 6
ajuk12(nOOB) 5
Movie 4
League of Legends
JimRising 443
Counter-Strike
fl0m3387
kennyS462
SPUNJ262
Other Games
summit1g12143
Lowko227
Sick181
NeuroSwarm88
ViBE52
ZerO(Twitch)1
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 12
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
1h 58m
ByuN vs SHIN
MaxPax vs Solar
Clem vs TBD
herO vs TBD
Lambo vs TBD
Rogue vs TBD
IPSL
6h 58m
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
BSL
9h 58m
TerrOr vs OyAji
UltrA vs Gosudark
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 58m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 1h
IPSL
1d 6h
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
BSL
1d 9h
Artosis vs Dewalt
Ret vs Tech
SOOP
1d 23h
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
GSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-12
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
Individual League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 591
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
StarCraft2 Weekly Open Tournament 2026 Grand Finals
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
IEM Kraków 2027
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.