• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:52
CEST 01:52
KST 08:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection1Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview4[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)7
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th70Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League4Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double0Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th Changing from 12 to 8 is just asking for StarCraft TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Welcome to the External Content forum Mutation # 527 Hell Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 526 Rubber and Glue
Brood War
General
Every Matchup's Top 5 Winrates (all ASLs & KSLs) Pros React To: ASL S21 Finals VPN experiences Quality of life changes in BW that you will like ? BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [BSL22] WB Final & LB Semis - Saturday 21:00 CEST Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
McBoner: A hockey love story 2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Customization Drives Loyalty…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2691 users

[M] (2) Uncanny Valley - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
August 24 2012 17:30 GMT
#21
On August 25 2012 01:28 monitor wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

I've got a couple balance concerns/gameplay concerns that I'll list here, but I must preface by saying this is a very good looking map and looks well made.

So my first point is a minor one, and it is that the main looks very small. Lategame TvZ and TvP can sometimes get up to 15+ barracks or so. It's important to have somewhere to build them, and usually the main the is the most comfortable and logical spot. On this map, there is a little bit of space near the third and a tiny bit of room in the inbase natural, but not quite enough total. I think the main needs to be enlarged- you could almost double the size now and it would be fine. For my suggestion how to do this, I have to talk about my other concerns.

My second point of concern is the the fourth, fifth, and sixth (if needed) bases are nearly impossible for zerg to take in ZvP, and to a lesser extent in ZvT. This is because the distances between the players are very short- similar to Ohana. These days, Zerg can almost never take a fourth or fifth expansion against P/T on Ohana because the opponent's pushes come so quickly that there is no time to react or get into position. Ohana has some previous stats that help it be balanced on TLPD, but I believe it is going to become worse and worse for balance. Also the gameplay strongly discourages comebacks and encourages being highly aggressive.

The white lines show pushes coming from Protoss, but it could be Terran also. The distances are all very short and don't give Zerg much time to react, build spines, get in position, counter attack, etc. On top of that, the push paths are very very small and choked which will make any PvZ just that much stronger until Zerg has brood lords.

[image loading]

Daybreak has a similar lategame style, where the expansions are along the left and right sides of the map in a linear fashion. However there is a major difference between the maps- Daybreak is MUCH larger cross map, because the map is longer horizontally than vertically. I believe that Uncanny Valley is going to need to be stretched in order to make the gameplay work. Widening the map by simply enlarging the middle would work wonders imo. Even 12-16 hexes would help the problems, but you could probably go up to 24 hexes increase if you want. Essentially you could leave the main/nat where they are and move the rest of the map outwards, which will allow you to increase the main size.

Note: The push distances become even shorter as the game progresses (5th to natural is short and the middle bases are seconds from the opponent).

[edit]

My final concern with the map is that these areas are too easy to hide units below, because the double cliffs with overshadow units on the lowground if they are positioned correctly. The same problem occurs with the middle expos on Shakuras, except minerals block most of the spots that units can be hidden. A simple solution is to raise the lowground harassment areas to middleground.

[image loading]


Thanks for the feedback monitor, once again proving that you are the boss when it comes to understanding maps. If I'm honest with myself, I kind of knew that it wasn't wide enough but having already widened it once, and knowing what a pain it would be fixing all the aesthetics, I've been reluctant. The main size issue is also something I was aware of, having already made it as large as I could within the bounds I was working with. My plan for the next update is to move the nat gas nearest to the main to the other side so that there is a larger area there to expand the main. This will also mean that zergs get a much easier overlord scout on the nat gasses, hopefully this will be counteracted slightly by the fact that the main gasses are much harder to scout, any thoughts on this? The other change I was considering is moving the rocks from the ramp they are currently on to the ramp between the main/nat/3rd but I'm much more hesitant on that one and I don't want it to be too passive plus players seem to be able to hold the 3-wide ramp on entombed just fine.

The point about hiding units behind the double cliff is not something that I had thought of. Luckily it's an easy fix
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
August 24 2012 17:58 GMT
#22
On August 25 2012 02:30 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2012 01:28 monitor wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

I've got a couple balance concerns/gameplay concerns that I'll list here, but I must preface by saying this is a very good looking map and looks well made.

So my first point is a minor one, and it is that the main looks very small. Lategame TvZ and TvP can sometimes get up to 15+ barracks or so. It's important to have somewhere to build them, and usually the main the is the most comfortable and logical spot. On this map, there is a little bit of space near the third and a tiny bit of room in the inbase natural, but not quite enough total. I think the main needs to be enlarged- you could almost double the size now and it would be fine. For my suggestion how to do this, I have to talk about my other concerns.

My second point of concern is the the fourth, fifth, and sixth (if needed) bases are nearly impossible for zerg to take in ZvP, and to a lesser extent in ZvT. This is because the distances between the players are very short- similar to Ohana. These days, Zerg can almost never take a fourth or fifth expansion against P/T on Ohana because the opponent's pushes come so quickly that there is no time to react or get into position. Ohana has some previous stats that help it be balanced on TLPD, but I believe it is going to become worse and worse for balance. Also the gameplay strongly discourages comebacks and encourages being highly aggressive.

The white lines show pushes coming from Protoss, but it could be Terran also. The distances are all very short and don't give Zerg much time to react, build spines, get in position, counter attack, etc. On top of that, the push paths are very very small and choked which will make any PvZ just that much stronger until Zerg has brood lords.

[image loading]

Daybreak has a similar lategame style, where the expansions are along the left and right sides of the map in a linear fashion. However there is a major difference between the maps- Daybreak is MUCH larger cross map, because the map is longer horizontally than vertically. I believe that Uncanny Valley is going to need to be stretched in order to make the gameplay work. Widening the map by simply enlarging the middle would work wonders imo. Even 12-16 hexes would help the problems, but you could probably go up to 24 hexes increase if you want. Essentially you could leave the main/nat where they are and move the rest of the map outwards, which will allow you to increase the main size.

Note: The push distances become even shorter as the game progresses (5th to natural is short and the middle bases are seconds from the opponent).

[edit]

My final concern with the map is that these areas are too easy to hide units below, because the double cliffs with overshadow units on the lowground if they are positioned correctly. The same problem occurs with the middle expos on Shakuras, except minerals block most of the spots that units can be hidden. A simple solution is to raise the lowground harassment areas to middleground.

[image loading]


Thanks for the feedback monitor, once again proving that you are the boss when it comes to understanding maps. If I'm honest with myself, I kind of knew that it wasn't wide enough but having already widened it once, and knowing what a pain it would be fixing all the aesthetics, I've been reluctant. The main size issue is also something I was aware of, having already made it as large as I could within the bounds I was working with. My plan for the next update is to move the nat gas nearest to the main to the other side so that there is a larger area there to expand the main. This will also mean that zergs get a much easier overlord scout on the nat gasses, hopefully this will be counteracted slightly by the fact that the main gasses are much harder to scout, any thoughts on this? The other change I was considering is moving the rocks from the ramp they are currently on to the ramp between the main/nat/3rd but I'm much more hesitant on that one and I don't want it to be too passive plus players seem to be able to hold the 3-wide ramp on entombed just fine.

The point about hiding units behind the double cliff is not something that I had thought of. Luckily it's an easy fix


Heh, thanks. I know its a massive pain, and ultimately it is your map so any changes are your decision of course. I often won't change my maps because its too much of a nuisance once I've finished the aesthetics. The gas move sounds good but I doubt it will fix the small size completely. I always like encouraging scouting, and I don't mind if its easy. I kind of prefer easy to scout gasses in both the main and natural. Scouting the gases is especially important in ZvP and ZvT, but Zerg can usually sack an ovie to scout the main. I wouldn't be too concerned about it, its kind of a minor thing.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 10 2012 23:28 GMT
#23
Updated! Changed a bunch of things. Will do some aesthetics shots tomorrow. Somehow I've been mapping with my texture settings set to low this whole time, I was wondering why my maps looked so different in game to in the editor. Now that's fixed expect my screenshots to be much better.

It's published to the melee section on EU if anyone fancies playing on it.

[image loading]
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
September 11 2012 02:37 GMT
#24
Looks really good. Looks like you updated the aesthetics a bit from when I last saw it.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Semmo
Profile Joined June 2011
Korea (South)627 Posts
September 11 2012 06:02 GMT
#25
Yay, you got rid of the unnecesary LOS blockers ^_^
The map is on the small side, and not all the expos will be taken, but small map + back expo is interesting.
Mapmaker of Frost, Fruitland and Bridgehead
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 11 2012 11:47 GMT
#26
On September 11 2012 15:02 Semmo wrote:
Yay, you got rid of the unnecesary LOS blockers ^_^
The map is on the small side, and not all the expos will be taken, but small map + back expo is interesting.


Yeah you've touched on the concept there. I figured SC2 is mostly a 2 base game now, with the exception of PvP. So, if players are going to get up to 2 bases anyway, why not give them the second base for free? Well in the past this has lead to turtley, deathbally games, so this map is my attempt at countering that. The nat is harassable but difficult to attack head-on. This means you have some interesting decisions on when to break down your own rocks once you have your 3rd base. Breaking down the rocks makes for easier harass defence as you can park your army at the top of the ramp and move to the 3rd/nat/main easily but makes your nat more vulnerable. I imagine most players will break down the rocks once the 3rd is established but may choose to keep them if they feel certain timing attacks are coming. The map emphasises control of the middle which should also help break up turtley games, especially as it is a small map so seeing your opponent coming is very important. The middle is quite open though so you have to be wary of flanks and being caught out of position. The outer LoS blockers denote the radius of the XNT meaning you can't see in but they can't see out, which should encourage scouting. The centre bases also help control of the middle but at the sacrifice of a slightly lower economy (6m1hg) and less obvious expansions. The 4ths being double high ground and roughly the same distance from the opposition as the 3rd should make them easier to defend but taking them does change the area you have to defend considerably. With the 4th (and subsequent 5th) and the nat being open to harass I can see this being a good tactic whilst pushing the 3rd. As you rightly said, I doubt all of the bases will be taken in 1 game, the forward bases would be extremely difficult to hold whilst the opposition has their 4th/5th but I feel every bases has a use and is important in different situations/matchups.

My main worry with the map in it's current guise is the 3rd. I'm unsure exactly how this will play out and whether the choke or the main 3x ramp need tweaks. Would love to get some high level games on it as there is only so much I can learn from getting rolled by ArcticRaven's mech build every game
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
MistSC2
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden583 Posts
September 11 2012 19:05 GMT
#27
This map looks siiick!
Maru, TY, Clem <3
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 11 2012 20:22 GMT
#28
Some aesthetics shots

+ Show Spoiler +

Nat
[image loading]

3rd
[image loading]

Half Base
[image loading]

Centre
[image loading]

Rocks and Blockers
[image loading]

Back Passageway
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
September 13 2012 19:39 GMT
#29
Now Available on NA
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 13 2012 19:43 GMT
#30
Who wants to play?
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 13 2012 22:46 GMT
#31
Don't forget to send me your replays if you do
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 17 2012 22:36 GMT
#32
Hey I played a couple PvZ's, they were way fun. I will add some comments and some links to the replays later. For now:

One of the geysers is unbuildable, the left one at the 4 oclock base. Double check there's no doodad or something?

Also you can blink over the rocks into the natural, despite the LosB. Not sure if this is intended behavior. If you want to prevent blink-ins you'd need to put the LosB inside the rocks. Can't decide if I like the ability to blink in or not. It's cool so I guess it should stay, but it allows an extra aggressive option in PvP for blink all-ins to be so much stronger.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 18 2012 09:49 GMT
#33
On September 18 2012 07:36 EatThePath wrote:
Hey I played a couple PvZ's, they were way fun. I will add some comments and some links to the replays later. For now:

One of the geysers is unbuildable, the left one at the 4 oclock base. Double check there's no doodad or something?

Also you can blink over the rocks into the natural, despite the LosB. Not sure if this is intended behavior. If you want to prevent blink-ins you'd need to put the LosB inside the rocks. Can't decide if I like the ability to blink in or not. It's cool so I guess it should stay, but it allows an extra aggressive option in PvP for blink all-ins to be so much stronger.


Thanks for the heads up! Will look in to those.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
eTcetRa
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia822 Posts
September 18 2012 11:13 GMT
#34
Map looks stunning, good work!
Retired Mapmaker™
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 18 2012 11:44 GMT
#35
On September 18 2012 20:13 eTcetRa wrote:
Map looks stunning, good work!


Cheers man. I played on Orbit Brutus the other day, holy shit it is even better looking in-game! Seriously nice map.

In regards to the blinking over the rocks issue, what are people's thoughts on this? Baring in mind that if they had an observer they would be able to blink there anyway.

I think I will have to change it as it intuitively feels like you shouldn't be able to do this. I will do some testing in this area regardless.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
September 18 2012 17:15 GMT
#36
I agree intuitively it feels like you shouldn't be able to. And I'm surprised that this prevents warp in if it doesn't prevent blink, as both of those require vision of the area you're targeting, no?
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
September 18 2012 22:48 GMT
#37
On September 19 2012 02:15 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I agree intuitively it feels like you shouldn't be able to. And I'm surprised that this prevents warp in if it doesn't prevent blink, as both of those require vision of the area you're targeting, no?

I'd imagine if the area that you can see is small enough you would be able to blink in but not have enough room to warp. Stalkers can probably blink to even the smallest speck of space (just as you can or could drop units into small areas,) and then they are further into the losb.
all's fair in love and melodies
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
23:00
s11 supplemental draft
Freeedom7
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft478
ZombieGrub285
Codebar 5
StarCraft: Brood War
NaDa 18
Dota 2
monkeys_forever268
capcasts100
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King89
Other Games
summit1g10311
Doublelift1086
C9.Mang0392
uThermal364
JimRising 264
ViBE54
minikerr6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick664
BasetradeTV187
Counter-Strike
PGL164
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 99
• RyuSc2 39
• musti20045 33
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt300
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
9m
RSL Revival
7h 9m
Lambo vs SHIN
Solar vs Rogue
herO vs Clem
Maestros of the Game
11h 9m
SKillous vs Ryung
Solar vs Percival
Maru vs sOs
Lambo vs Arrogfire
IPSL
16h 9m
ZZZero vs WorsT
Julia vs eOnzErG
BSL
19h 9m
TerrOr vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs eOnzErG
Replay Cast
1d
RSL Revival
1d 7h
Maestros of the Game
1d 13h
SHIN vs Nicoract
Rogue vs Gerald
ByuN vs Shameless
Cure vs TriGGeR
OSC
1d 13h
IPSL
1d 16h
Dragon vs Artosis
dxtr13 vs Hawk
[ Show More ]
BSL
1d 19h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Maestros of the Game
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

2026 KK StarCraft Pro League
BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
KK 2v2 League Season 1
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
Escore Tournament S2: King of Kings
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026

Upcoming

YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
Heroes Pulsing #3
Heroes Pulsing #2
Bounty Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.