• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:46
CEST 21:46
KST 04:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool51Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
China Uses Video Games to Sh…
TrAiDoS
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2413 users

[M] (2) Uncanny Valley - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
August 24 2012 17:30 GMT
#21
On August 25 2012 01:28 monitor wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

I've got a couple balance concerns/gameplay concerns that I'll list here, but I must preface by saying this is a very good looking map and looks well made.

So my first point is a minor one, and it is that the main looks very small. Lategame TvZ and TvP can sometimes get up to 15+ barracks or so. It's important to have somewhere to build them, and usually the main the is the most comfortable and logical spot. On this map, there is a little bit of space near the third and a tiny bit of room in the inbase natural, but not quite enough total. I think the main needs to be enlarged- you could almost double the size now and it would be fine. For my suggestion how to do this, I have to talk about my other concerns.

My second point of concern is the the fourth, fifth, and sixth (if needed) bases are nearly impossible for zerg to take in ZvP, and to a lesser extent in ZvT. This is because the distances between the players are very short- similar to Ohana. These days, Zerg can almost never take a fourth or fifth expansion against P/T on Ohana because the opponent's pushes come so quickly that there is no time to react or get into position. Ohana has some previous stats that help it be balanced on TLPD, but I believe it is going to become worse and worse for balance. Also the gameplay strongly discourages comebacks and encourages being highly aggressive.

The white lines show pushes coming from Protoss, but it could be Terran also. The distances are all very short and don't give Zerg much time to react, build spines, get in position, counter attack, etc. On top of that, the push paths are very very small and choked which will make any PvZ just that much stronger until Zerg has brood lords.

[image loading]

Daybreak has a similar lategame style, where the expansions are along the left and right sides of the map in a linear fashion. However there is a major difference between the maps- Daybreak is MUCH larger cross map, because the map is longer horizontally than vertically. I believe that Uncanny Valley is going to need to be stretched in order to make the gameplay work. Widening the map by simply enlarging the middle would work wonders imo. Even 12-16 hexes would help the problems, but you could probably go up to 24 hexes increase if you want. Essentially you could leave the main/nat where they are and move the rest of the map outwards, which will allow you to increase the main size.

Note: The push distances become even shorter as the game progresses (5th to natural is short and the middle bases are seconds from the opponent).

[edit]

My final concern with the map is that these areas are too easy to hide units below, because the double cliffs with overshadow units on the lowground if they are positioned correctly. The same problem occurs with the middle expos on Shakuras, except minerals block most of the spots that units can be hidden. A simple solution is to raise the lowground harassment areas to middleground.

[image loading]


Thanks for the feedback monitor, once again proving that you are the boss when it comes to understanding maps. If I'm honest with myself, I kind of knew that it wasn't wide enough but having already widened it once, and knowing what a pain it would be fixing all the aesthetics, I've been reluctant. The main size issue is also something I was aware of, having already made it as large as I could within the bounds I was working with. My plan for the next update is to move the nat gas nearest to the main to the other side so that there is a larger area there to expand the main. This will also mean that zergs get a much easier overlord scout on the nat gasses, hopefully this will be counteracted slightly by the fact that the main gasses are much harder to scout, any thoughts on this? The other change I was considering is moving the rocks from the ramp they are currently on to the ramp between the main/nat/3rd but I'm much more hesitant on that one and I don't want it to be too passive plus players seem to be able to hold the 3-wide ramp on entombed just fine.

The point about hiding units behind the double cliff is not something that I had thought of. Luckily it's an easy fix
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
August 24 2012 17:58 GMT
#22
On August 25 2012 02:30 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2012 01:28 monitor wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

I've got a couple balance concerns/gameplay concerns that I'll list here, but I must preface by saying this is a very good looking map and looks well made.

So my first point is a minor one, and it is that the main looks very small. Lategame TvZ and TvP can sometimes get up to 15+ barracks or so. It's important to have somewhere to build them, and usually the main the is the most comfortable and logical spot. On this map, there is a little bit of space near the third and a tiny bit of room in the inbase natural, but not quite enough total. I think the main needs to be enlarged- you could almost double the size now and it would be fine. For my suggestion how to do this, I have to talk about my other concerns.

My second point of concern is the the fourth, fifth, and sixth (if needed) bases are nearly impossible for zerg to take in ZvP, and to a lesser extent in ZvT. This is because the distances between the players are very short- similar to Ohana. These days, Zerg can almost never take a fourth or fifth expansion against P/T on Ohana because the opponent's pushes come so quickly that there is no time to react or get into position. Ohana has some previous stats that help it be balanced on TLPD, but I believe it is going to become worse and worse for balance. Also the gameplay strongly discourages comebacks and encourages being highly aggressive.

The white lines show pushes coming from Protoss, but it could be Terran also. The distances are all very short and don't give Zerg much time to react, build spines, get in position, counter attack, etc. On top of that, the push paths are very very small and choked which will make any PvZ just that much stronger until Zerg has brood lords.

[image loading]

Daybreak has a similar lategame style, where the expansions are along the left and right sides of the map in a linear fashion. However there is a major difference between the maps- Daybreak is MUCH larger cross map, because the map is longer horizontally than vertically. I believe that Uncanny Valley is going to need to be stretched in order to make the gameplay work. Widening the map by simply enlarging the middle would work wonders imo. Even 12-16 hexes would help the problems, but you could probably go up to 24 hexes increase if you want. Essentially you could leave the main/nat where they are and move the rest of the map outwards, which will allow you to increase the main size.

Note: The push distances become even shorter as the game progresses (5th to natural is short and the middle bases are seconds from the opponent).

[edit]

My final concern with the map is that these areas are too easy to hide units below, because the double cliffs with overshadow units on the lowground if they are positioned correctly. The same problem occurs with the middle expos on Shakuras, except minerals block most of the spots that units can be hidden. A simple solution is to raise the lowground harassment areas to middleground.

[image loading]


Thanks for the feedback monitor, once again proving that you are the boss when it comes to understanding maps. If I'm honest with myself, I kind of knew that it wasn't wide enough but having already widened it once, and knowing what a pain it would be fixing all the aesthetics, I've been reluctant. The main size issue is also something I was aware of, having already made it as large as I could within the bounds I was working with. My plan for the next update is to move the nat gas nearest to the main to the other side so that there is a larger area there to expand the main. This will also mean that zergs get a much easier overlord scout on the nat gasses, hopefully this will be counteracted slightly by the fact that the main gasses are much harder to scout, any thoughts on this? The other change I was considering is moving the rocks from the ramp they are currently on to the ramp between the main/nat/3rd but I'm much more hesitant on that one and I don't want it to be too passive plus players seem to be able to hold the 3-wide ramp on entombed just fine.

The point about hiding units behind the double cliff is not something that I had thought of. Luckily it's an easy fix


Heh, thanks. I know its a massive pain, and ultimately it is your map so any changes are your decision of course. I often won't change my maps because its too much of a nuisance once I've finished the aesthetics. The gas move sounds good but I doubt it will fix the small size completely. I always like encouraging scouting, and I don't mind if its easy. I kind of prefer easy to scout gasses in both the main and natural. Scouting the gases is especially important in ZvP and ZvT, but Zerg can usually sack an ovie to scout the main. I wouldn't be too concerned about it, its kind of a minor thing.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 10 2012 23:28 GMT
#23
Updated! Changed a bunch of things. Will do some aesthetics shots tomorrow. Somehow I've been mapping with my texture settings set to low this whole time, I was wondering why my maps looked so different in game to in the editor. Now that's fixed expect my screenshots to be much better.

It's published to the melee section on EU if anyone fancies playing on it.

[image loading]
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
September 11 2012 02:37 GMT
#24
Looks really good. Looks like you updated the aesthetics a bit from when I last saw it.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Semmo
Profile Joined June 2011
Korea (South)627 Posts
September 11 2012 06:02 GMT
#25
Yay, you got rid of the unnecesary LOS blockers ^_^
The map is on the small side, and not all the expos will be taken, but small map + back expo is interesting.
Mapmaker of Frost, Fruitland and Bridgehead
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 11 2012 11:47 GMT
#26
On September 11 2012 15:02 Semmo wrote:
Yay, you got rid of the unnecesary LOS blockers ^_^
The map is on the small side, and not all the expos will be taken, but small map + back expo is interesting.


Yeah you've touched on the concept there. I figured SC2 is mostly a 2 base game now, with the exception of PvP. So, if players are going to get up to 2 bases anyway, why not give them the second base for free? Well in the past this has lead to turtley, deathbally games, so this map is my attempt at countering that. The nat is harassable but difficult to attack head-on. This means you have some interesting decisions on when to break down your own rocks once you have your 3rd base. Breaking down the rocks makes for easier harass defence as you can park your army at the top of the ramp and move to the 3rd/nat/main easily but makes your nat more vulnerable. I imagine most players will break down the rocks once the 3rd is established but may choose to keep them if they feel certain timing attacks are coming. The map emphasises control of the middle which should also help break up turtley games, especially as it is a small map so seeing your opponent coming is very important. The middle is quite open though so you have to be wary of flanks and being caught out of position. The outer LoS blockers denote the radius of the XNT meaning you can't see in but they can't see out, which should encourage scouting. The centre bases also help control of the middle but at the sacrifice of a slightly lower economy (6m1hg) and less obvious expansions. The 4ths being double high ground and roughly the same distance from the opposition as the 3rd should make them easier to defend but taking them does change the area you have to defend considerably. With the 4th (and subsequent 5th) and the nat being open to harass I can see this being a good tactic whilst pushing the 3rd. As you rightly said, I doubt all of the bases will be taken in 1 game, the forward bases would be extremely difficult to hold whilst the opposition has their 4th/5th but I feel every bases has a use and is important in different situations/matchups.

My main worry with the map in it's current guise is the 3rd. I'm unsure exactly how this will play out and whether the choke or the main 3x ramp need tweaks. Would love to get some high level games on it as there is only so much I can learn from getting rolled by ArcticRaven's mech build every game
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
MistSC2
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden583 Posts
September 11 2012 19:05 GMT
#27
This map looks siiick!
Maru, TY, Clem <3
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 11 2012 20:22 GMT
#28
Some aesthetics shots

+ Show Spoiler +

Nat
[image loading]

3rd
[image loading]

Half Base
[image loading]

Centre
[image loading]

Rocks and Blockers
[image loading]

Back Passageway
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
September 13 2012 19:39 GMT
#29
Now Available on NA
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 13 2012 19:43 GMT
#30
Who wants to play?
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 13 2012 22:46 GMT
#31
Don't forget to send me your replays if you do
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 17 2012 22:36 GMT
#32
Hey I played a couple PvZ's, they were way fun. I will add some comments and some links to the replays later. For now:

One of the geysers is unbuildable, the left one at the 4 oclock base. Double check there's no doodad or something?

Also you can blink over the rocks into the natural, despite the LosB. Not sure if this is intended behavior. If you want to prevent blink-ins you'd need to put the LosB inside the rocks. Can't decide if I like the ability to blink in or not. It's cool so I guess it should stay, but it allows an extra aggressive option in PvP for blink all-ins to be so much stronger.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 18 2012 09:49 GMT
#33
On September 18 2012 07:36 EatThePath wrote:
Hey I played a couple PvZ's, they were way fun. I will add some comments and some links to the replays later. For now:

One of the geysers is unbuildable, the left one at the 4 oclock base. Double check there's no doodad or something?

Also you can blink over the rocks into the natural, despite the LosB. Not sure if this is intended behavior. If you want to prevent blink-ins you'd need to put the LosB inside the rocks. Can't decide if I like the ability to blink in or not. It's cool so I guess it should stay, but it allows an extra aggressive option in PvP for blink all-ins to be so much stronger.


Thanks for the heads up! Will look in to those.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
eTcetRa
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia822 Posts
September 18 2012 11:13 GMT
#34
Map looks stunning, good work!
Retired Mapmaker™
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 18 2012 11:44 GMT
#35
On September 18 2012 20:13 eTcetRa wrote:
Map looks stunning, good work!


Cheers man. I played on Orbit Brutus the other day, holy shit it is even better looking in-game! Seriously nice map.

In regards to the blinking over the rocks issue, what are people's thoughts on this? Baring in mind that if they had an observer they would be able to blink there anyway.

I think I will have to change it as it intuitively feels like you shouldn't be able to do this. I will do some testing in this area regardless.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
September 18 2012 17:15 GMT
#36
I agree intuitively it feels like you shouldn't be able to. And I'm surprised that this prevents warp in if it doesn't prevent blink, as both of those require vision of the area you're targeting, no?
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
September 18 2012 22:48 GMT
#37
On September 19 2012 02:15 RFDaemoniac wrote:
I agree intuitively it feels like you shouldn't be able to. And I'm surprised that this prevents warp in if it doesn't prevent blink, as both of those require vision of the area you're targeting, no?

I'd imagine if the area that you can see is small enough you would be able to blink in but not have enough room to warp. Stalkers can probably blink to even the smallest speck of space (just as you can or could drop units into small areas,) and then they are further into the losb.
all's fair in love and melodies
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL
19:00
S22 - Open Qualifier #6
ZZZero.O72
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 523
elazer 359
IndyStarCraft 221
Hui .118
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16594
Mini 553
Larva 319
firebathero 229
Dewaltoss 132
ZZZero.O 72
IntoTheRainbow 15
HiyA 11
Dota 2
canceldota99
capcasts2
Counter-Strike
olofmeister24175
byalli2087
tarik_tv1387
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu387
Khaldor247
MindelVK12
Other Games
summit1g7770
Grubby3281
FrodaN2081
fl0m1003
B2W.Neo755
mouzStarbuck263
ArmadaUGS81
Trikslyr34
Railgan15
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1270
StarCraft 2
angryscii 25
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 7
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3441
Other Games
• Shiphtur173
• tFFMrPink 17
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
14h 14m
Wardi Open
14h 14m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 14h
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
BSL
5 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
BSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.