EPTThis will be my first TL mafia (but not my first mafia)
Magic: The Gathering Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
This will be my first TL mafia (but not my first mafia) | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
Acrofales, the fact that you and Mattchew were on opposing teams the last three games is exactly the definition of coincidence, which makes your accusation completely random. Also it seems that the only person you are not suspicious of is Nova, my other candidate for scum. Nova, why would you think it's a good idea to kill a veteran d1 unless you somehow knew he wasn't on your team? | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 10:18 VisceraEyes wrote: Attn: Zelblade, Acid and MouldyJeb It has come to my attention that you signed up for a game only to post one time and then disappear for half a day. In keeping with my meta, I'm in favor of lynching lurkers if no scummy candidate presents himself, so consider this my final warning. I will not hesitate to vote to have you lynched today, as all three of you have exhibited at least tertiary interest in this game since it has started and all three of you are now absent. I find this to be far scummier than Nova's posting (who my vote is on now). I'm here (just on a different time zone). The questions I wanted to ask have been asked and answered by other people. I want to read the thread one more time before voting. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 10:24 EchelonTee wrote: Of those three I would most support Acid dying, just chiming in . Why? Because of all the lurkers, I'm the only one who posted content? Did I finger one of your pals in my suspicions? | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
##Vote marvellosity | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 18:05 zelblade wrote: Acid so what do you think of nova now? Why is marvellosity buddying with nova a scummy thing to do? My opinion of Nova hasn't changed. Sure, being aggressive is good but it just seems like he's trying too hard to get a bandwagon started on anybody. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 19:01 marvellosity wrote: Apparently you can't read. Well done you. Oh, really ? If I may : 1. Voting without reasoning : On May 22 2012 06:03 marvellosity wrote: ##Vote: Mattchew I just can't bear it. On May 22 2012 06:03 marvellosity wrote: To be clear: this is absolutely a policy lynch. 2. Buddying with Nova : On May 22 2012 02:46 marvellosity wrote: I don't think I'd agree to a Nova lynch unless something very particular came up. Atm he's playing to his not-very-useful town meta rather than his post-extensively scum meta On May 22 2012 07:27 marvellosity wrote: Guys. Look at Nova's filter in LIV where he was also town (and where I won on your behalf, Katina dearest). Very similar. Not convinced by his lynch at all. 3. So I did actually look and this is just an outright lie. Nova's play was literally the opposite of what he is doing now : in that game he was against random votes, against bandwagoning, he played less aggressively and more analytically. I think you're scum. I think Nova_Terra is your scumbuddy and I'm fine lynching either one of you today, although I'd prefer you because there's a slightly higher chance you're not vanilla. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:08 marvellosity wrote: How is it different from LIV? Quite a few posts but generally not a lot of content, no? For now I'm going to answer 'who I'm suspicious of' as 'who I'd like to be dead'. So other than Matt, Nova, Acid, and to a lesser extent Jeb. Excellent reversal ! Since when do you want Nova dead ? Also, why do you want me dead ? Wait, I think I know. It starts with an O and ends in an MGUS. Keep digging. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:26 Zealos wrote: I'm pretty sure the 2nd part is the reasoning, its a policy lynch against an annoying posting style that isn't helping town. That's your reasoning. He didn't explain his. " I'll lynch you cause I don't like you !" that's not a reasoning. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 23:15 Tunkeg wrote: Questions @acid How do you think WBG, VE and Katina have played thus far? They are all in on a NT case, what do you read from this? Nothing much to say. They make a good case against NT, but I'm tempted to agree with VE when he says that it feels too easy. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
At the start of the day, a couple players made a case against NT, and you (like Acrofales before you, whom you are replacing) jumped in to defend him, twice. As soon as I called you on buddying with NT, you included him in a list of people you'd like to see dead, and justified that with something about him being a useless townie. Now, to quote your own words : On May 22 2012 02:46 marvellosity wrote: I don't think I'd agree to a Nova lynch unless something very particular came up. Atm he's playing to his not-very-useful town meta rather than his post-extensively scum meta What is the particular something that came up? What did NT do exactly that prompted you to change your opinion to this : On May 22 2012 21:30 marvellosity wrote: Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight. You're using the same argument in both cases, but resulting in different conclusions, and that swift reversal came mere minutes after being accused of buddying. Seems to me like you're trying to distance yourself from NT now that prospects are looking grim. If that's not the case and you truly had an epiphany, please quote the exact post from NT that made you change your mind. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 02:11 Mattchew wrote: "What is worse than a wolf in sheep's clothing?" —Wolfhunter's riddle In a strange twist of fate, one of the most annoying creatures in the multiverse was brought to the place where it could cause the most damage. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 03:10 HiroPro wrote: Acid: You say that you suspect marvel because he initially defended N_T, and then tried to distance himself. But that would would mean that you think they are both mafia. So then, why is it that you feel that the case on N_T is "too easy", but Marvel is a good candidate to lynch? It's just a feeling. I feel it's too easy to lynch NT today. However, my case against marvellosity rests on facts and if we do lynch him, and he is indeed scum, then I think we need to lynch NT. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 07:12 marvellosity wrote: Don't be silly dear, I'm not important enough to shoot Not town enough to shoot. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 07:16 EchelonTee wrote: yeah acid is scum lol Yeah it's totally scummy to use reason and logic to expose someone's lies. Also typical scum behavior to NOT jump on the bandwagon that kills a townie. Wait, what? You want to find scum, look hard at those who voted for Jeb without a solid reasoning, including those who might have voted for him and then switched at the last minute once the lynch was secured. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 07:32 EchelonTee wrote: Acid I think ur scummy because 1. lurking for much of the beginning of the day. average scum trait you don't go for anyone until things have started chugging a long. in a mini like this, scum are going to hide around a lot. they probably goign to have a few active members, but the way you've been lurking, not pushing things or being provocative (save for your one single minded focus) seems like u want to avoid the spotlight, like ur disinterested in extensive scumhunting. Wrong. I voiced my suspicions very early in the game day, and then it was actual night IRL where I live, so I went to sleep. 2. using faulty logic to push someone, crutched upon by a few points of decent logic. common scum trait ur initial reason for being susp. of marv was "voting w/o logic and buddying with nova" wasn't good at all and felt fake, just cuz u needed to vote. first point isn't true, second one isn't inherently scummy. ur later point of marv's change of opinion on NT is a decent point, but it looks like ur just trying to build and build and build a rolling case instead of actually try and re-examine ur case. it's prety common for scum to pick a candidate to tunnel for, preferrably one that isn't immediately going to be lycnhed, It makes you look constructive, but you don't take the blame for townie lynches if the lynch doesn't go through Wrong again. At this point I don't know if you genuilely suck at reading or if you're just trolling me. Marvellosity did vote without logic, as did Acrofales before him - remember they are the same role. Voting mattchew because he speaks in MTG flavor text is retarded, and the combination of that PLUS his buddying with Nova, who was giving off pretty scummy vibes, is why I voted for him. Again, if you had bothered to actually read my posts, you would have known that. 3. didn't mention jeb at all. scum don't want to talk about mislynches as much as possible when there's a townie mislynch, scum often are one of the random single voters on other people (citation: Ver's Mafia guide). Most townies want to consoliidate a strong lynch so will focus on a few candidates. Scum would rather avoid the town bandwagons. The only townies who stay off the main candidates are especially stubborn players (Toad, VE), and I don't get that vibe from you Seriously, this is either trolling or plain idiocy, what you're talking about only applies to games where town needs a majority vote in order to secure a lynch. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 08:01 EchelonTee wrote: why do people always say "if you actually read my posts blah blah blah"? we're all over the 5th grade right? it's easy as fuck to read things. it's really hilarious how your response is "no ur wrong read my posts" and OMFG can't you people REASON??????? look this is what you wrote you said "marv voting without reasoning". he HAD REASONING; you explained it right there in your posts! is it shitty reasoning, sure! but you fcking outright lied when you said "marv voted without reasoning" Yeah, you're really helping your case there. You want to nitpick words, fine. It was voting without reasoning, since his vote wasn't based on reason, but on an emotional reaction to something he found annoying. why is everyone so derp? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH And why behold you the speck that is in your brother's eye, but consider not the beam that is in your own eye? - some dude from the bible I think | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 20:17 froggynoddy wrote: Yeah but useless stuff in terms of scumhunting. I have been inactive due to work and sunny weather. Have been catching up on the thread this morning. I unfortunately did not get to put my vote off Katina as I only got back to the thread post lynch. If I had done I would have probably voted N_T. @VE: Perhaps I'm being thick but are your suspicions on WBG simply because you think he's been dodging you? That seems an exceedingly stupid thing to do as scum no? @Acid: Are you still confident on a marv lynch? Your case on him seems like the strongest so far (which still isnt much tbf). I would still like him to explain how he came about his reversal, but I'm not sure I'll be voting him again at the start of Day 2. First I want to read the thread again, specifically how the Jeb lynch happened, who pointed fingers and who followed, that sort of thing. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 23 2012 21:39 marvellosity wrote: EBWOP: if you seriously think I'd push something like that as mafia, you're out of your mind. Sure you would. Typical scum. Act all scummy and then act indignant when called out. "Oh come on if I was scum I would never be so obvious about it! Pschaw!" | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 24 2012 07:19 wherebugsgo wrote: You bore me. Acid who would you kill today? Zelblade. He's posted nothing of value and his vote on Jeb was just a follower vote. He also promised us content but has failed to deliver. Katina lurks too much. And finally, I think there's at least one scum between you and VE. Haven't made up my mind which one yet. | ||
| ||
