EPTMagic: The Gathering Mini Mafia - Page 14
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 22 2012 18:02 Acid~ wrote: It looks like marvellosity's picked up right where Acrofales left off: buddying with Nova and voting without reasoning. ##Vote marvellosity Apparently you can't read. Well done you. | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
On May 22 2012 18:18 Nova_Terra wrote: Furthermore what about my logic is bad aside from the tunkeg thing, which, may i add, was very unclear as the time as the way he had made it seem was where he had really good scumhunting but everyone liked to lynch him because of the type of scumhunting. Eh it was pretty clear to me at least, but w/e. Quite a few things regarding the bad logic part, but some of those could be personal opinion. I also said the sentence about guilty until proven innocent because you attack wbg based on this: On May 22 2012 04:49 Nova_Terra wrote: I follow guilty until proven innocent WBG only posted general advice which shouldnt count for crap, defense of said general advice, and half omgus It *looks* like you are attacking WBG because he hasnt done much to prove that he is town as you say, but considering that quite a few people (including myself) havent exactly done much at that time, it looks like you are willing to lynch a large portion of town in the first part of D1 for not sufficently proving their innocence. Perhpas I misinterpreted. | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
Hey marv who are you suspicious of at this point besides mattchew? Can you also clearly state why you think nova is town based off meta alone? Because I cant see it being similar. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 18:05 zelblade wrote: Acid so what do you think of nova now? Why is marvellosity buddying with nova a scummy thing to do? My opinion of Nova hasn't changed. Sure, being aggressive is good but it just seems like he's trying too hard to get a bandwagon started on anybody. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
How is it different from LIV? Quite a few posts but generally not a lot of content, no? For now I'm going to answer 'who I'm suspicious of' as 'who I'd like to be dead'. So other than Matt, Nova, Acid, and to a lesser extent Jeb. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
On May 22 2012 18:21 Nova_Terra wrote: Right now im finding Mattchews play kind of cute, frustrating but cute. if he doesnt actually make some good, non-MTG card flavor analysis in the near future then I would be open to lynching him. | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:08 marvellosity wrote: How is it different from LIV? Quite a few posts but generally not a lot of content, no? For now I'm going to answer 'who I'm suspicious of' as 'who I'd like to be dead'. So other than Matt, Nova, Acid, and to a lesser extent Jeb. So you think nova is town yet you want to kill him? | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 19:01 marvellosity wrote: Apparently you can't read. Well done you. Oh, really ? If I may : 1. Voting without reasoning : On May 22 2012 06:03 marvellosity wrote: ##Vote: Mattchew I just can't bear it. On May 22 2012 06:03 marvellosity wrote: To be clear: this is absolutely a policy lynch. 2. Buddying with Nova : On May 22 2012 02:46 marvellosity wrote: I don't think I'd agree to a Nova lynch unless something very particular came up. Atm he's playing to his not-very-useful town meta rather than his post-extensively scum meta On May 22 2012 07:27 marvellosity wrote: Guys. Look at Nova's filter in LIV where he was also town (and where I won on your behalf, Katina dearest). Very similar. Not convinced by his lynch at all. 3. So I did actually look and this is just an outright lie. Nova's play was literally the opposite of what he is doing now : in that game he was against random votes, against bandwagoning, he played less aggressively and more analytically. I think you're scum. I think Nova_Terra is your scumbuddy and I'm fine lynching either one of you today, although I'd prefer you because there's a slightly higher chance you're not vanilla. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:22 Acid~ wrote: Oh, really ? If I may : 1. Voting without reasoning : I'm pretty sure the 2nd part is the reasoning, its a policy lynch against an annoying posting style that isn't helping town. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:08 marvellosity wrote: How is it different from LIV? Quite a few posts but generally not a lot of content, no? For now I'm going to answer 'who I'm suspicious of' as 'who I'd like to be dead'. So other than Matt, Nova, Acid, and to a lesser extent Jeb. Excellent reversal ! Since when do you want Nova dead ? Also, why do you want me dead ? Wait, I think I know. It starts with an O and ends in an MGUS. Keep digging. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:22 zelblade wrote: So you think nova is town yet you want to kill him? I wouldn't mind him dead. I just came from playing scum in LIV where 3/5 of my team were mod-killed and we still scored a convincing victory with the entire fucking town voting with me to kill another townie at LYLO, making a total of 6 consecutive townie mislynches and 0 scum lynches. Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:26 Zealos wrote: I'm pretty sure the 2nd part is the reasoning, its a policy lynch against an annoying posting style that isn't helping town. That's your reasoning. He didn't explain his. " I'll lynch you cause I don't like you !" that's not a reasoning. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:32 Acid~ wrote: That's your reasoning. He didn't explain his. " I'll lynch you cause I don't like you !" that's not a reasoning. On May 22 2012 10:44 marvellosity wrote: no u My point is that townies should in general strive to be as lucid and clear as possible. Don't give a flying two hoots what you think, if Mattchew just talks in plain text, it will achieve this better than speaking in MTG speak or whatever. Frankly I'm bored with the sheer quantity of townies who seem to not want to do this. Hence the vote. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:22 Acid~ wrote: 3. So I did actually look and this is just an outright lie. Nova's play was literally the opposite of what he is doing now : in that game he was against random votes, against bandwagoning, he played less aggressively and more analytically. lol? Taken from LIV: On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi First time he mentioned Kenpachi was this. More analytical and against bandwagoning? mmkay. We're gonna disagree here. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 22 2012 14:23 Nova_Terra wrote: You should give credit where it is due; I'm playing my town meta spot on, i've contributed, pressured, and encouraged activity by example, which is more than half the players in the game have done althoughh im surprised marv didnt join the Nova Scumwagon as well On May 22 2012 05:15 Mattchew wrote: The hardest lessons to grasp are the ones you've already learned. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187&user=255225 | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:30 marvellosity wrote: I wouldn't mind him dead. I just came from playing scum in LIV where 3/5 of my team were mod-killed and we still scored a convincing victory with the entire fucking town voting with me to kill another townie at LYLO, making a total of 6 consecutive townie mislynches and 0 scum lynches. Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight. "Kill the weak so they can't drag the strong down to their level. This is true compassion." —Benzir, archdruid of Temple Might | ||
|
Mouldy Jeb
United Kingdom37 Posts
| ||
|
Mouldy Jeb
United Kingdom37 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 22 2012 22:22 Mouldy Jeb wrote: early game i suspected nova because of rash decision making from his part and myself assuming the worst, matchew voting for me which wasn't given a viable explanation so i would be inclined to vote for matchew due to his random train of thought against others ## vote:mattchew It reeks of terror and chaos. | ||
| ||
