|
warning - this thread might contain spoilers. my post doesn't contain any but other posters' posts might.
i just saw the 10:10 (est) show of harry potter and the prisoner of azkaban
i thought it would be better, although i didnt think it was a bad movie. i didn't feel that there was enough of a "critical point"/"turning point" in the movie. the plot all sort of seemed to keep nearing the climax, without the climax actually occuring.
and then when what i considered to be the climax (the whole little thing when sirius black, harry, lupin, and the mouse/traitor guy meet inside the tree or whatever) seemed so weak 
its sorta like when you build up to something so much and then when it happens its like "eh..."
i didn't read the books (i plan to soon) but i dont know.. i just thought it would be a bit better. i feel it was too built upto that point and then the payoff wasnt that great.
oh well least i got in for free. your guys thoughts?
|
[Insert random Harry Potter Flame here]
[Followed by Mydnyte yawning because he doesn't like Harry Potter]
|
|
|
|
|
rofl see? Everyone calls me Ken. WTF!?
|
On June 04 2004 21:43 Mydnyte wrote: [Insert random Harry Potter Flame here] [Followed by Mydnyte yawning because he doesn't like Harry Potter]
|
When I rule the world I'm ordering all Harry Potter fans over 8 to march into the sea...
|
|
|
On June 04 2004 21:51 Servolisk wrote:
When I rule the world I'm ordering all Harry Potter fans over 8 to march into the sea...
gold
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, I just saw the third movie and for anyone wanting something that maintained some loyalty to the books, I wouldn't see it, in fact avoid it if you have any loyalty to the books. So horribly off from the books. For once I'm disappointed, majorly disappointed. They gutted the book, leaving the characters with no charisma or charm. They made snape look half evil of what he acted like in PoA. Harry was a wimp compared to the stoic attitude he displayed in the book. The hermione/ron thing was just so ARGHH, I'm H/H person, and I remember JK talking about how she had to tell the directors to add or remove parts because of later on. Well hermione and harry never really got their moments, so that means it looks like RON and Hermione are ending up together which just A:LKJFD:SLKFJLKSJF. LUPIN was a joke, he was so scrappy and not anything like I thought he would be. It's really quite a disappointment, and considering that GoF is going to be ONE movie?? Are they insane, it will be like Harry goes to hogwarts and then suddenly appears in Riddles graveyard. I have to express my dissent with one word/sound/whatever "Arghh"
For non HP people, they are trying to put a book that is 800 pages into 1 2 hour movie, gogo WB --;
|
I heard JK Rowling was a billionaire, and Harry Potter replaced lotr as the best selling book of all time
|
I guess I can't look at myself in the mirror then
|
....@gryffindor
I"m [used] to be a pretty big harry potter fan (until I got older becuase the books came out so sluggishly), and the actress (Emma Watson) who players Hermonine is really pretty. Yeah. I'm probably going to ask the weirdo girl i'm interested in to see taht or Chronicles of Riddick.
|
On June 04 2004 21:58 Veg wrote:
im quite certain return of the king made more money than all thirty five harry potter books // movies combined
rar
http://www.boxofficereport.com/atbon/100m.shtml
if rotk is on #6 and harry potter (just the first one) is #13, i dont think thats true :/
|
|
|
Are you kidding me? The books have made more money selling than those movies combined. ( speculation )
|
Hell, I use to be like that. 2 years ago, I called my little brother a faggot for liking the movies. Then I saw one, and I was interested. I read the books and I loved them. IF you read them and then told me they were SHIT, your comments would have more bearing.
|
actually most people i know really think it sucks, but i will ignore that and watch all 3 of the harry potter movies
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
