Yeah, that's true. Alot of adults did start reading that book.

But the first book isn't as in depth as 2-4 are. Or so I think.
And yes, I've read all 4 about 3 years ago.

ItchReliever

2489 Posts

June 13 2004 16:38 GMT

#163

On June 14 2004 01:33 BroOd wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'd bet you haven't. Save your junior-critic bullshit for your community college english 101. You haven't made a single valid point in this entire thread, and you get abrasive when people don't side with you. What the fuck did you expect? Calling me an asshole because you're a hypocrite.

Lol, I'm still in high school, not in community college. I got 1300 something in PSATs when I took it during my freshman year. I'm aiming for at least a 1500 when I take it next year, so no I wont be attending a community college. thx.

tiffany

3664 Posts

June 13 2004 16:39 GMT

#164

there is a fifth as well =P

ItchReliever

2489 Posts

June 13 2004 16:39 GMT

#165

On June 14 2004 01:34 Mydnyte wrote:
Harry Potter is directed towards kids.
Are kids sophisticated?

I hope you realize that you're agreeing with me.

Mydnyte

3306 Posts

June 13 2004 16:39 GMT

#166

Never read the 5th.

tiffany

3664 Posts

June 13 2004 16:40 GMT

#167

200 points is kind of hard, albeit not impossible. good luck on that and good thing the psat requires no debate skills

BroOd

Austin10831 Posts

June 13 2004 16:41 GMT

#168

On June 14 2004 01:38 ItchReliever wrote:

Show nested quote +

Would you like me to pat you on the back and tell you how smart you are or something? You picked the most immaterial part of my post to respond to, which I guess I'll have to chalk up to poor reading comprehension. But then again... I guess that's been abundantly clear for some time now.

Commander{+}

United States2878 Posts

June 13 2004 16:41 GMT

#169

Guys he said it himself. He is argueing for the sake of argueing. He's not worth your time.

tiffany

3664 Posts

June 13 2004 16:42 GMT

#170

mydnyte, i'd say the fifth is one of the best books, either the third or the fifth. rowling keeps making each successive book longer though, i think order of the phoenix is 800+ pages

ItchReliever

2489 Posts

June 13 2004 16:42 GMT

#171

On June 14 2004 01:41 BroOd wrote:

Show nested quote +

Everything else that you said is bs. I haven't made a single valid point you say? Wtf, I disagree. DUH

And you're the one who assumed that I attended a community college, which is an insult in my opinion.

BroOd

Austin10831 Posts

June 13 2004 16:46 GMT

#172

Empirical evidence would suggest you're on your way there, if not already. Maybe you should leave the literary discussions to people who actually read, and continue "practicing arguing" in meaningless threads.

Commander{+}

United States2878 Posts

June 13 2004 16:48 GMT

#173

Oh and itch, here is a warning, not a flame:

If you continue to 'argue for the sake of argueing' and an admin gets involed, you probably WILL get banned. Its happened before. Learn how to admit your wrong, and know when to stop.

ItchReliever

2489 Posts

June 13 2004 16:48 GMT

#174

I don't practice arguing, I just said that the only way to get better is by practice when Mydyte told me I suck at it.

And I do read (more than Brood) so I think I have the "right" to post here, thx.

BroOd

Austin10831 Posts

June 13 2004 16:50 GMT

#175

On June 14 2004 01:48 ItchReliever wrote:
I don't practice arguing, I just that the only way to get better is by practice.

And I do read (more than Brood) so I think I have the "right" to post here, thx.

You already said you weren't an avid reader. Were you lying then or now?