EPTHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
-Ba`alzamon-
Sweden602 Posts
| ||
|
KiLLme1st
United States1824 Posts
On a sidenote you could definetly tell a difference from this movie as apposed to the others due to the new director. This movie was by far the best of the 3 thus far. | ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5457 Posts
| ||
Waxangel
United States33548 Posts
On June 05 2004 07:28 STIMEY d okgm fish wrote: oh yeah there was this gay guy and he was really goofy he was from new hampshire and gay and guess what he asked me if i read harry potter, i think thats a gay pickup line, so i was like NO IM NOT GAY JESUS CHRIST..... oh good lord you are god :D | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
On June 05 2004 07:24 KiLLme1st- wrote: I saw the movie at midnight, with a bunch of friends. I enjoyed myself, I don't go see these movies for great acting or an awesome story I see them for eye candy. The special effects are good and make the movie interesting. I must say I live right next to OSU, and our biggest theatre which is 24 screens sold out 20 of them for the midnight showing, and it was mostly college students my age. I go see movies for entertainment not based on whether I am gonna be "cool" or not if I see them. Anyone who says you are not "cool" for seeing a movie should set themselves on fire and die. On a sidenote you could definetly tell a difference from this movie as apposed to the others due to the new director. This movie was by far the best of the 3 thus far. i agree, Emma Watson (Hermione) is all the eye candy i need. | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
rofl | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5457 Posts
On June 05 2004 07:44 BigBalls wrote: i agree, Emma Watson (Hermione) is all the eye candy i need. i think she's only 14 years old guys t.t | ||
|
pfff
Belgium1352 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
but I know many that read the books and dislike the movies. | ||
|
pyogenes
Brazil1401 Posts
| ||
|
pyogenes
Brazil1401 Posts
On June 05 2004 08:34 [pG]Liquid`Nazgul wrote: but this is not different from the norm with MANY books that are made into moviesdon't think I know anyone that read the books and dislikes them but I know many that read the books and dislike the movies. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
|
pfff
Belgium1352 Posts
On June 05 2004 09:06 Slaughter)BiO wrote: lotr > harry potter in books and movies. Thats all I have to say. so there actually exist books that are better then harry potter? damn, my worlds fallin apart. | ||
|
ItchReliever
2489 Posts
| ||
|
pfff
Belgium1352 Posts
| ||
|
pyogenes
Brazil1401 Posts
| ||
|
ItchReliever
2489 Posts
| ||
|
EAGER-beaver
Canada2799 Posts
| ||
|
ItchReliever
2489 Posts
On June 05 2004 10:00 EAGER-beaver wrote: So much harry potter bashing. Books 1 & 2 are for kids. 3 and onwards are for an older crowd and are incredible literary pieces. lmao. They're all clearly aimed at kids. LOOK AT THE DICTION. They're incredibly entertaining books, and the 4th one ranks high on my best book of all time list. Keep in mind this is not coming from a teeny bopper who's still struggling with puberty and the opinions of others, but a 20 year old who's been an avid reader his entire life, having grown up on Stephen King, Bernard Cornwell, and just about every classic you can think of, I've read. Despite that, this "kid crap" as most of you think, ranks among the best in literature. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if most of you would rather whatch the latest in reality tv from fox than read a book, so my opinions are lost entirely upon you. From a guy who has supposedly been an avid reader all his life, I find it very weird that you regard Harry Potter so highly. You are a unique case for sure if you have in fact "grown up on just about every classic that [I can] think of" and still think this. In my opinion though, Harry Potter lacks the many components that would qualify it as a good book. | ||
| ||
