EPTCan't actually believe there's been that many on this board already.
TL Mafia XXX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
Can't actually believe there's been that many on this board already. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 30 2010 09:47 flamewheel wrote: Ah forgot to say that. Also not allowing Watcher to watch self. Also yes unlimited buses. Also freak you guys with [s and ]s in your names. I give you permission to get a mod to change my name for me, as I've requested for a few years  | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
CuDi or ManOnTheMoon If you seriously got this name change I... I would find some cool way to repay you whenever you needed it! | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
You're good at this guessing stuff  Been using it for b.net for the past couple of years, haven't been in LighT since 07 so my username is a bit archaic  | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 06 2010 09:07 LSB wrote: After Reading (part of) XXVIII, it seemed like on the first day people just sat in a circle waiting for someone to say something stupid. waits for a while People in XXVIII remarked we have three choices on the first day: 1) 2) Kill someone inactive/dumb (Benefits: Inactive people don't help us. Problem: It's seems more likely that an inactive person is town) 3) Kill someone who seems like Scum. (Problem: never works) Lol so we're going to randomly kill someone using mob mentality and activity as a fire starter. Good idea for town unity. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 06 2010 17:40 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Dude, just shut up and let us kill you already before I figure out who the sixth and final member of your team is. Y'all have been so obvious about this when you should have just kept your cool and waited for people to change their joke votes. Instead, you freaked out with well over 24 hours left in the day and only a few votes on your precious comedian. If anyone legit claims to him you should be permanently banned from TL mafia. I'm not really joking although I am too kind hearted to follow through on this. Feel free to spam his inbox with joke claims, though, it could distract him from coordinating what they do next. In fact, I encourage this. ##vote Bill Murray Lol best post of the last 5 pages. Sorry BM I think a mass roleclaim is a terrible idea. I never like the idea in any setup for mafia since it really can mess up the flow of the game. Not to mention people (especially townies) have this odd obsession with lying. Let's review your last game that you hosted.... people were lying left and right about their roles. It definitely hurt the town as we had to focus on the liars and much of the attention was drawn off of suspicious players, like BC who was actually mafia. I'm a bigger advocate of town circles and mob mentality. It's not that I think this system works better in all instances, but it keeps the mafia on their toes for much of the game. If we all roleclaim honestly then they have a perfect list of all of the roles in the game. I'm not going to vote for you, yet. However I will reconsider if the day turns out a little differently. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 06 2010 22:29 LSB wrote: And I am against Roleclaim. Their's no way we can keep track of who would lie. And I would assume that Blue Roles would lie to. Cause a role claim is a great way to give a 'who to hit' list to the mafia. So I would assume the final count of the role-claim would be 30 townies, not very helpful Actually the opposite is true. If the town agrees to a roleclaim it's the duty of both green and blue roles to truthfully roleclaim. We did this in the Harry Potter mafia; however we were only allowed to give names, which caused trouble for "iffy" characters who needed to be checked every day despite having about 3 DT's alive, one being the godfather. In reality, the blues are likely to tell the truth, but there's a lot of greens to account for. And some of the people currently playing have either witnessed this or have done it themselves. And I don't like doing that when Chezinu and the brown army is playing. That's just asking for trouble. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
I think if it came down to who was more likely to help later it would be Bill.Murray. I don't know how love1another plays, or if he's ever played in another mafia game. His behavior alone warrants a day 1 lynch. Especially since we haven't had anyone doing some bs roleclaim on day 1 so there's really no other options at this point. I'll save my vote in case BM is getting too far ahead. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 09 2010 04:23 BrownBear wrote: I think it's an excellent plan, but the problem is that it's out in the open. Are we really 100% sure that it's foolproof? If there is a hole in it, we have to assume mafia are smart enough to find it (assuming anything else is bad play), and thus we can't do it. I really really want it to succeed, but I'm trying to be realistic/play devil's advocate a bit here. The hole is that everyone else is a target lol | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
We always make the wrong decision by shunning people who make "bad plans" (aka lynching them). We should be looking for more suspicious players, and right now Chezinu, Foolishness and YM both come to mind. It's obvious that something fishy is going on. I don't know if Chezinu is trying to bait certain players or if he's just playing target practice as a townie, it just doesn't add up. Youngminii is doing what I have done a few times myself, and I can understand his frustration, but it puts you on the spotlight very easily. There's a difference between a rational argument and an irrational bread crumbing war. The latter almost never works and you will never get "mafia" to jump on you. Typically it turns out to be the town. This is good because you "know" that they are probably pro-town, but you're painting a LARGE target on your back. I'm a bit disturbed over this hit Foolishness took last night. We don't actually know if he took a hit, and though the numbers make sense, it could be a setup. We could be allowing a trap to manifest itself. Logically we should either lynch or check that player, but with the framer running around this isn't a bread and butter night action (wham bam thank you ma'am kinda deal). I'm still voting for myself for now, but my vote is probably going to Chezinu if he doesn't step it up. I still want to see more contributions from Chez, Foolishness, and YM. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 10 2010 14:51 ~OpZ~ wrote: 1. Chezinu 2. Bill Murray 3. Pandain 4. DarthThienAn 5. Divinek 6. youngminii 7. VayeshMoru 8. rastaban 9. Pyrrhuloxia 10. XeliN 11. love1another (Townie, Day 1 Lynch) 12. Amber[LighT] - WtF amber is playing too? 13. Chaoser (Nosy Neighbor, Night 1) 14. Artanis[Xp] - Yo....Post.. 15. BrownBear 16. zeks - Zeks is mafia. 17. KF91 - ....You're playing? 18. bumatlarge - I see you posting.... 19. Foolishness - I believe he's veteran. 20. iNfuNdiBuLuM 21. Iaaan (Townie, Day 1 Modkill) 22. LSB (Townie, Night 1) 23. ~OpZ~ - STFU 24. Misder - Post 25. tree.hugger 26. Jayme - ....When is his last post? 27. Roffles - Wtf Roffles...Post again god damn.... 28. Hesmyrr - ...I told you... 29. SouthRawrea - Post something intelligent... 30. larjarse - Post more Sup brah nice to see you too  | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 10 2010 22:51 Divinek wrote: did you just say young always plays like this? good god have you read anything of the argument against him, the whole point is he's playing differently from normal. What's your point? YM has stated this, even though he's playing similarly to how he usually plays. He didn't branch too far off from his play, at least in the last game afaik. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 11 2010 03:32 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Hide your kids, hide your wife and hide your husbands, cuz I rapin' everybody out here. I knew we should have dealt with this on Day 1. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On August 11 2010 11:24 tree.hugger wrote: ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I get back, and some garbage wagon on Pandain is what comes up? I thought I was reading a different game. This sets a new record for shoddy town play. If Pandain were ninja, stands to reason he'd act like mafia, in spreading some deception around. But would mafia claim ninja? That's the dumbest strategy I've ever heard. Because mafia would obviously put a huge target on their backs by claiming a third party elimination role. Who's logic was that? We had a vote between two solidly opposed camps. We had ample evidence to lynch youngminii. The mafia had likely all stacked on BM, because that was the only way to save him. At any rate, we have an excellent opportunity to get a kickass role list of innocent or mafia names. INSTEAD XeliN waltzes in and provides enough "evidence" to start a third party bandwagon that provides the world's most convenient outlet for the mafia. This literally ranks as one of the worst town-plays of all time. And to answer your question in pm's, XeliN, there's no way in hell I'm telling you anything. Your town circle seems to have a hole the size of the titanic, and with the slick move you just pulled off there, I think I'd rather go along with the people I currently trust, and not add a whole host of people who can't keep their mouths shut, and who would rather help the mafia then kill them. Worst town move I think I've ever seen. Good grief. whoops someone didn't read the end of day post. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
Haiku? | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
Too bad you's gon' be lynched tomorrow | ||
| ||
