EPTEdit: This is not my video, I just wanted to share it. Credit goes to KroogCraft.
30 Thors vs 90 Mutas as of Patch 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
bendez
Canada283 Posts
Edit: This is not my video, I just wanted to share it. Credit goes to KroogCraft. | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
Thanks for sharing. | ||
|
Khalleb
Canada1909 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
In a real game you won't see a terran spamming thors (unless they want to lose) and one or two thors will be eaten up by mutas which don't clump as much in this game and if you only have a group or two it wouldn't be hard to keep them spread out. Try broodlords next :D. | ||
|
Tdelamay
Canada548 Posts
| ||
|
Chen
United States6344 Posts
| ||
|
Trezeguet
United States2656 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
i wonder how well they do if theycame at all sides | ||
|
Nal_rAwr
United States2611 Posts
| ||
|
fAker
Denmark44 Posts
 they are to big and weird lookin  | ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
| ||
|
dextahr
United States47 Posts
| ||
|
Tamerlane
Canada426 Posts
| ||
|
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
| ||
|
Corvi
Germany1406 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On March 31 2010 08:51 fAker wrote: too bad thors still sucks they are to big and weird lookin Thors rape Hydras (1 shot them if they have 1+ attack), rape mutas, do good vs roaches (but need some marauder support), do good vs Ultras.... What more do you want? I use Thors almost every TvZ I play. | ||
|
Tom Phoenix
1114 Posts
Oh wow, that was so one-sided. I did not think a 0.5 splash raidus would make that much of a difference. This is going to have a big effect on Mech in TvZ. Now, if only Archons were this effective against Mutas.... =( | ||
|
DoomBacon
United States165 Posts
On March 31 2010 08:52 dextahr wrote: Interesting. I'd be more curious to see a more realistic situation, like 1 thor vs 9 mutalisks and then 1 thor vs 9 mutalisks + micro to see how effective thors would be for holding off mutalisks early game. The huge range on the thors kind of skews the results a bit I think. I'm fairly sure that in small numbers of both a thor is still at least cost efficient but I would have to test that. Also keep in mind that thors have a very long build time and muta are mmmuuuuuuch faster than thors and can just run around them and pick off stragglers or run into the SCV line and be back to the base in time to defend. | ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
On March 31 2010 08:51 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: how about a more realistic scenario, like 3 thors vs 12 mutas? ya, this video doesnt tell us anything about a real game, but it was interesting to see. | ||
|
Sc1pio
United States823 Posts
| ||
| ||
