• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:27
CET 19:27
KST 03:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down20ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier6Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League92
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Evil Geniuses - shutting down REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development
Tourneys
ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 KungFu Cup Announcement
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
SCHNAIL now supports Remastered Rollback Netcode in Brood War BW General Discussion [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos SC4ALL II Brood War Complete Invited Player Lineup
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [Women's StarCraft] MonstarZ vs BA 2026-10-30 Star Con San Diego 2026 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread R I P Patrick Stewart Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9069 users

Psi Storm Balance

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 Next All
FREEloss_ca
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada603 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 22:26:45
March 21 2010 09:01 GMT
#1
This ability is relatively similar to its Sc1 counter part in terms of damage, but in terms of animation, it casts almost instantaneously; making it un-dodgable.

The damage is also dealt more instantaneously, as opposed to over a period of a few seconds.

The spell is just as strong as it was in Sc1 in regards to damage, only now it's far easier to use; in regards to timing, aiming, and casting multiple storms at once.

In Sc1, its difficulty to use, in a way, balanced out its terrible, terrible damage.

I feel the damage needs to be spread over a longer period of time, giving players the opportunity to micro away, and avoid at least some of the damage.


Having entire armies decimated in a matter of seconds takes away from the game play itself; why bother with micro, and what units to focus fire when you can spam psi storm all day? It's also discouraging, that unless you have a decent advantage in army size and can absorb a few storms, you're going to get steamrolled.

Edit:

This post is by no means a call for a NERF to storm. It just needs to be modified in how it works, to better balance it.

After sifting through the crap in this thread and finding some decent posts I personally feel:

-It should do slightly more damage, but over a longer period of time

I don't think its AoE size should increase by any means, because the spell is so easy to multi-cast (compared to how hard it was to use in Sc1); in Sc2 you can throw down multiple, perfectly aimed Storms in a matter of moments, relatively easily.

Anyone who says Storm is harder to use in in Sc2 than it was in Sc1 needs to stop trolling.
"Starcraft...It just echos brilliance and manliness." - Tasteless
Odds
Profile Joined May 2008
Canada1188 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 09:04:42
March 21 2010 09:04 GMT
#2
Agreed. At the moment, particularly against Zerg, it just seems like there's no way to micro out of it effectively.
Odds.633, AM. Plat level currently. Would love more practice partners, add me, let's play!
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 09:08:28
March 21 2010 09:04 GMT
#3
psi storm does less damage than the original. it also has a smaller area of affect. there is plenty of time to micro away. your last point makes little sense as it's nearly the same, if not more so, the case in sc1

oh and it has less cast range.
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
MLG_Wiggin
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States767 Posts
March 21 2010 09:04 GMT
#4
You spelled EMP wrong.
@DBWiggin, SC2 ref
Luch
Profile Joined October 2008
Norway13 Posts
March 21 2010 09:13 GMT
#5
Yeah, lets nerf the protoss some moar!!
It isnt pollution that is hurting the environment, its the impurities in our air and water that are doing it.
RedTerror
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
New Zealand742 Posts
March 21 2010 09:18 GMT
#6
"more instantaneously"
Perseverance
Profile Joined February 2010
Japan2800 Posts
March 21 2010 09:18 GMT
#7
PSI Storm is fine...you have to predict it's cast. what I do is when I see the templar running forward during a battle I micro my mutas back and then watch it's wasted cast. It doesn't always work, but sometimes it does.

If anything make the templar more distinguishable because I sometimes mistake them for zealots. (This is with everything at max settings which is where the game thought I should be at)
<3 Moonbattles
Socke
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany451 Posts
March 21 2010 09:19 GMT
#8
i think storms much weaker (roaches lol!), not easier to use at all and early emp can deny it pretty well.

sc1 storm was just so much better -_-;
pzea469
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1520 Posts
March 21 2010 09:22 GMT
#9
i agree that storm should do damage over a period of time to allow microing away. It should also be buffed though, or else I'll just keep going collossi.
Kill the Deathball
ELESSAR
Profile Joined July 2009
Bulgaria173 Posts
March 21 2010 09:28 GMT
#10
protoss should loose storm and collossi they are too strong. nurf zealots some more while you are at it
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 09:33:38
March 21 2010 09:32 GMT
#11
Storm should have more duration and damage overtime. Units under the storm for a long time will receive full damage that can kill them while units that have been moved away would still live.

On March 21 2010 18:18 Perseverance wrote:
PSI Storm is fine...you have to predict it's cast. what I do is when I see the templar running forward during a battle I micro my mutas back and then watch it's wasted cast. It doesn't always work, but sometimes it does.

This seems to be almost impossible if there's LAN latency.
EximoSua2
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States216 Posts
March 21 2010 09:32 GMT
#12
Agreed. Even when I EMP, just one templar being able to sneak off a storm completely wins him the battle.
Puosu
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
7104 Posts
March 21 2010 09:33 GMT
#13
The problem is that small units clump far too much in SC2 so even though the AOE is smaller it often hits more units than it did in BW. The opposing player needs to learn to split his units better and fight the clumping that happens by having multiple hotkeys and just doing more efficient concaves.

It is not overpowered by any means and making it weaker would just result in protoss always going colossi instead.
Feefee
Profile Joined November 2009
Canada556 Posts
March 21 2010 09:36 GMT
#14
On March 21 2010 18:18 Perseverance wrote:
PSI Storm is fine...you have to predict it's cast. what I do is when I see the templar running forward during a battle I micro my mutas back and then watch it's wasted cast. It doesn't always work, but sometimes it does.

If anything make the templar more distinguishable because I sometimes mistake them for zealots. (This is with everything at max settings which is where the game thought I should be at)


That certainly works when you have fast air units that can escape safely, and when there's only one or so templar. I'm not convinced psi storm needs a nerf but I certainly felt some serious "you gotta be kidding me" in a TvP the other day where my opponent just streamed in his high templaer after the fight started. Very well played by him, so I can't complain, but I EMP'ed my heart out and simply didn't have enough to get all the units and high templar. And if you just miss 2 high templar with a terran bio army you're absolute dead meat.
I probably just needed more than 3 ghosts (although luckily my opponent didn't feedback), but that game convinced me soundly that storm is anything but weak.
ProoM
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Lithuania1741 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 09:42:45
March 21 2010 09:38 GMT
#15
sc1 storm damage was 114(If I remember right) and sc2 storm damage is 80 :}.

Edit: sc1 storm does 8x14 = 112, my bad ;P.
IMBA - International Mountain Bicycling Association.
ProoM
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Lithuania1741 Posts
March 21 2010 09:40 GMT
#16
On March 21 2010 18:32 lolaloc wrote:
Storm should have more duration and damage overtime. Units under the storm for a long time will receive full damage that can kill them while units that have been moved away would still live.

Show nested quote +
On March 21 2010 18:18 Perseverance wrote:
PSI Storm is fine...you have to predict it's cast. what I do is when I see the templar running forward during a battle I micro my mutas back and then watch it's wasted cast. It doesn't always work, but sometimes it does.

This seems to be almost impossible if there's LAN latency.

lol? If there's LAN Latency, it gets way easier to do this :}.
IMBA - International Mountain Bicycling Association.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 09:47:31
March 21 2010 09:41 GMT
#17
http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/storm_viable.sc2replay

Game where I played templar tech over robo tech. It was wayyyy more difficult and honestly, I felt that storm did more damage to my zealots than Atrioc's hydras thanks to charge. Before it used to be that I could control with Zealot speed, but charge remove that control and now zealots run straight into the storms and get raped. Colossi don't have this problem as splash doesn't hurt my own zealots. Also, it's REALLY difficult to cast it since units (on the whole) move a lot faster and with the latency on bnet you miss so often Storm is just an inferior option at every turn

I probably would have lost that game if I hadn't gotten two dts with a combine kill total of 40 shows you how far ahead I had to be to even be in contention using templar.

If you increase the time storm takes it's just going to hurt your zealots more D:
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
March 21 2010 09:43 GMT
#18
I could have sworn most people were complaining about psi storm delay a week ago.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Pervect
Profile Joined June 2007
1280 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 10:00:14
March 21 2010 09:59 GMT
#19
Nerfing psi storm would essentially mean Protoss has to open Robotics more than they already do, which is practically all the time. I prefer playing templar tech as Protoss but generally find Robotics to be more powerful. When playing against Protoss I generally have a more difficult time against Robo builds as well. In my opinion storm should be left as is, and Colossus should be nerfed a bit. Additionally changes should be made to Z to help P in PvZ and T to help T in TvP (even with EMP, I've had plenty of success feedbacking ghosts and my PvT win-rate seems really high while my PvZ is mostly abysmal).
FREEloss_ca
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada603 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-21 10:01:44
March 21 2010 10:00 GMT
#20
I'm in no way calling for a damage nerf. They can even buff the damage for all I care, I just feel it needs to have a longer duration of effect, at least giving some opportunity/purpose to dodge.

Right now It's more of an AoE nuke spell, that's spammable; it feels like a big "I.W.I.N" button...
"Starcraft...It just echos brilliance and manliness." - Tasteless
1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Big Brain Bouts
02:00
#132
RotterdaM764
IndyStarCraft 246
Liquipedia
Epic.LAN
22:00
Epic.LAN 49 Group Stage
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 764
IndyStarCraft 246
Maru 81
SHIN 68
BRAT_OK 53
Codebar 40
Rex 27
ByuN (SOOP) 21
Solar (SOOP) 21
Rogue 17
MindelVK 9
StarCraft: Brood War
BeSt 410
actioN 349
White-Ra 118
Dewaltoss 107
910 64
sSak 58
Trap 51
Hyun 42
Yoon 30
soO 24
[ Show more ]
ProTech20
Dota 2
Gorgc18147
qojqva1266
League of Legends
Trikslyr61
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu193
Other Games
gofns4661
Liquid`RaSZi1557
Grubby1395
singsing1345
Beastyqt714
KnowMe234
XaKoH 91
QueenE49
Organizations
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 514
Other Games
ComeBackTV 396
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 6
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP58
• 3DClanTV 33
• StrangeGG 31
• LUISG 22
• Adnapsc2 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix13
• ChaeLyn 6
• Pr0nogo 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2176
League of Legends
• Jankos1931
• Nemesis1712
Other Games
• Shiphtur559
• imaqtpie529
Upcoming Events
OSC
3h 33m
Replay Cast
4h 33m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
15h 33m
WardiTV Invitational
17h 33m
Epic.LAN
18h 33m
IPSL
21h 33m
eOnzErG vs McRibbed
LancerX vs StRyKeR
AI Arena Tournament
23h 33m
OSC
1d 19h
Yamato Cup
1d 20h
IPSL
1d 22h
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
[ Show More ]
Map Test Tournament
2 days
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
Ultimate Battle
2 days
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
3 days
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-28
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.