[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 72
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 21 2014 22:05 Holyflare wrote: You used a post from a player that has had 0 contribution to the game as a platform for you to further your paradigm of VE. Not only is that strange but you do not question HOW he could have those reads (something you absolutely should because how else do you learn about another player's mindset?) The only thing you question is his read on wave. You should absolutely not be happy when someone calls you or someone else town for no reasoning and should be questioning it as you have been questioning mostly everything for the entirety of the game. As for the rest of the thread: I don't understand why this conversation was ended around here. We absolutely should be pushing everyone and not letting them ignore posts and accusations directed at them. It's a team game where we have to demonstrate our townieness to each other. Why should we let a player not participate in the game just because he gets better later when in fact we have the potential to learn more about his alignment today? This sentiment was echoed by hapa BUT THEN TOTALLY CONTRADICTED AS WELL. I don't understand the mindset behind this. You suggest we find his alignment by way of pressure but then give into the sentiment of other players of which you do not know the alignment of and say that we should not pressure him because he won't respond instead of taking the initiative of your confirmed alignment to yourself and pressuring sandroba yourself. This isn't something a townie mindset does at all. I'm interested to hear your reasoning before I put my vote down on you though because there's no reason being hasty. That being said the thing that stuck out to me the most was VE's posts and vote on Prome. I actually agree with much of what he has said and I do not get the motive behind happa's line of questioning. Hapa mentioned: Why do you assume that it is retroactive justification instead of new evidence coming to light after a troll vote? What he was saying made sense and prome's opening post seemed like it was pre-written before he even read any of the game. I'll get into this later when I have the time and get back but for now I'll leave you to talk about what i've said above. Whoa chainsaw alert. Did anyone pick up on that? Very subtly says 'well we should have continued the discussion about sandroba BUT LOOK AT WHAT SCUM HAPA DOES!' On January 21 2014 23:07 Holyflare wrote: Why Foolishness over sandroba? They have both posted nothing. Your goal is clearly to lynch a lurker today so why are you going to ignore the rest of what has happened on day 1 when your intentions are already set in stone? Same thing here. Asks about sandroba but doesn't talk about pushing him, just uses it as a way to attack gonzaw. On January 22 2014 06:13 Holyflare wrote: I do not want to participate in a discussion based on a person with 4 posts, it is futile. Foolishness has posted nothing and gonzaw is spending his entire time focusing on that person. I want to know what Gonzaw is like in other games, does he tunnel like that, does he declare he is not reading the thread till he gets home only to still spend his time on futile research? These are all questions I would like to know the answers to based on people's previous games with him. Just because he has put effort in and has posted does not make him towny. I asked that question specifically to kita because I think me and him are on the same wavelength (he asked gonzaw how long it took him to do the foolishness meta post - what I assumed to be seeing how he was allocating time) and I would like him to elaborate on his thoughts. I have no attitude towards foolishness other than my dislike for his unexplained reads. It's not scummy, it's not towny, I want to know his reasonings before I take my read further. Could he be scum? Yes. Could he be town? Yes. I do not know and cannot know until he posts, so of course my attitude to him would be a net null read. Again, much of Holy's posting looks like chainsaw-type stuff. Makes sense here if Foolishness is scum, but unflipped association, no, bad Wave. At the very least Holy went hardcore on the two towniest people in thread. On its own that's alignment non-indicative (Holy could be just wrong or scum) but it's still something to consider. I don't believe that ages-old defense that 'Why would a scum Holy attack the people who looked the best?' applies. On January 23 2014 03:08 Holyflare wrote: I don't get why people are picking up on me attacking hapa who "looked towny", he had contradictions in a thought process that I picked up on and questioned. Either way, I apologise for my lack of playing this game. I fully expected to be able to contribute time but my circumstances changed on the day the game started and so each and every single one of my posts has been posted from my phone, I was just picking up on points that I thought were contradictary and the such, no "aggression" is intended it's just how I post (Hogwarts I got called out for being aggressive as scum so there is no way I would ever try and look like that in a game again as scum). Either way, my initial read was on gonzaw being scummy because of his time allocation, that subsequently changed based on his responses and although I mention the repeated bastardisation and misconstruing of my posts that increasingly (as he kept doing it and still is) looks more and more like a tunneled towny and so I used my time to defend myself from him so as to divulge my thought processes and vindicate myself to the person that I think is towny (from the people that I have focused on). I thought hapa was looking scummy because of his contradictions but his response to me made me back off of that. I can't delve into quotes and things like I normally would but please please look at when gonzaw posted that "case" (that I said was heavily misconstrued) on me. The responses that meekly followed that said "yeh, that's true" and "hmmm yeh I can see that" should be heavily scrutinised as they were, like was just said, not backed up by votes. Like I said at the start, you shouldn't let people who get better later "sandroba AND foolishness (although he has posted now)" sit back, they should be entirely pressured. Sandroba even went so far as to get a good ++ (I think?) from foolishness??? despite his less than 1 page filter with nothing contributary in. Either way, I've asked to be subbed out so have fun. This post of his actually kinda looks good, especially considering I do believe he was somewhat correct in that critique of Hapa, though it clearly did not make Hapa scum. I refuse to apply any thought to his vote or talking about subbing out in thread. That opens up a huge can of worms that probably ends up with geript talking about it somehow. Next post will be Toad. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On January 25 2014 02:32 VisceraEyes wrote: Not all who are off limits are lost. Or....something like that.Like, I would contribute, but I've been told that my suspects are off limits so I'm kinda at a loss as to what I even CAN do to prove my innocence. Maybe a story? I can offer the following more entertaining things to contribute on: (1) A magical world in which Gonzaw is mod-confirmed Gonzaw. Once he is known red, what in his filter makes you smack his head and go "I should have seen this..." (2) Talking heavily about either marv or kita. Preferably kita today, but if you DO get lynched, thoughts on marv would be helpful. (3) WoS has posted a boatload since your last bout of activity. If nothing else, he's a big topic for today and you can determine what you think of his recent stuff. (3) is not particular entertaining. (2) may not be either. Oh well. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 25 2014 02:42 VisceraEyes wrote: And I'm not even going to be around to be all "NAH GUYS YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WE'RE BROTHERS!" VE. VE don't do this to me. There is a reason I was hesitant to invoke the name. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 25 2014 02:43 austinmcc wrote: (1) A magical world in which Gonzaw is mod-confirmed Gonzaw. Once he is known red, what in his filter makes you smack his head and go "I should have seen this..." On January 24 2014 07:13 gonzaw wrote: Goddamit I forgot to sen....hmm, I think scum may try something weird tonight. Who knows! Did I just solve your little game austin? Do I get a prize? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 24 2014 06:26 Toadesstern wrote: like I said, I'm reading. Time spent posting is time spent not reading right now... But we can talk a little if you want, I spent the last hours and I'm getting a headache so I need something else to do for now or I'm going crazy. I read everything from the point I replaced in. From the people that seem to be worth looking into I really don't see foolishness being mafia. As far as I've come, I liked his posts and agreed with most of it, I liked his thought process when he pointed it out and when he didn't I found myself knowing what he's getting at because I had the same idea when reading something. VE is weird but I'd lean town on him so far. Town-VE is a man who likes to go on an adventure and posts like he doesn't give a crap. He posts weird, he posts stuff that makes people go "wat?" and all that kind of stuff. Mafia VE restrains himself more because he knows he has to and I'm not seeing that. Not sure about Kita yet, he's all over the place. WoS certainly the one I'd want lynched the most atm. Some stuff I didn't like about him. So pretty much start from the bottom and work my way up. Other than that I do have some beef with Hapa but he seems not to be an option right now due to votings so I'll trust you guys on that one until I'm done reading. Anything you want to talk about in specific? I'm not going to ramble or hypnotoad this game if you're looking forward (?) to that. Kind of got myself lynched as town (like actively, not passivly...) in the last game I played on d1 because I couldn't stand talking to rayn anymore and he kept tunneling everyone no matter what... so main goal right now is to make sure that doesn't happen again. Toad seems to actually put effort into keeping with Holy's reads. That strikes me as REALLY weird. Like...he defends Foolishness similarly to Holy, has 'beef' with Hapa similar to Holy....why would a townie who replaced in ever need to try and stay consistent with the person he replaced's reads? (Terrible grammar but whatevs). Already mentioned the useless suspicion on me that is never truly followed up on. On January 24 2014 08:22 Toadesstern wrote: well I'm missing out on some 10 or so pages inbetween but yeah I guess. I don't really see a conundrum on Foolishness to be honest. I'd rather lynch into one of you five guys than Foolish atm. I really do not think he'd behave the way he did before deadline if he knew Sandro was mafia so either he played withough knowing his alignment or he's just town. SO this post is just stupid. And was pointed out already---overcompensation maybe to make him defending a scumbuddy look REALLY unlikely but that kinda seems like I'm injecting my own bias in there. He goes on to clarify though and rethink it after marv calls him out again on it: On January 25 2014 01:14 Toadesstern wrote: I'd actually like to take that back. No idea what I was thinking yesterday... Had the whole voteswitch happening over a longer time period in my head and after rereading some of the posts Foolish did I just don't think they're that alignment indicative as it seemed on first look. Like when he mentioned that if he's mafia he has no plan to win because he's limiting the lynch candidates. Same thing can be said about Kita and myself and VE certainly doesn't look like he's having any kind of longterm plan whatsoever either. The exception here's WoS as he still holds firmly on this prom lynch he wants to get, only ever so slightly hinting at maybe being willing to lynch Foolishness a little more but not actually doing so. checking out his filter atm, you'll get something from me in a while. I actually kind of like the WAY in which he reconsiders this in terms of talking about that 'longterm scumplan' thing. The way Foolishness talked about that reminded me of scum Ace in a way I don't think I can describe. But once again, I'm the primary target here so it doesn't ultimately matter what he thinks of Foolish, right? As long as I get lynched today. For crappy reasons. On January 25 2014 01:32 Toadesstern wrote: what's the truth. VE being mafia and you being wrong? Why didn't you say so from the beginning instead of doing those 2 wall of texts telling everyone how town he is for things that are in your opinion most likely not alignment indicative. And THIS post was infuriating but I already addressed it. Obvious attempt to discredit me and twist my words. Like...at least gonzaw has some legitimate points to bring that I can think of, but all Toad has done is take the 'easy way out' to my lynch, bringing up thinks like 'was afk for lynch,' and 'stuff looks forced,' while not-so-subtly slinging shit. I could definitely see a Foolishness/Toad scumteam especially considering how hesitant and tentative Toad discusses him, but as for the other way around I seem to remember Foolishness actively calling Holy scum so I'm not really sure. I'd still lynch Foolishness above all right now but I'd probably put Holy/Toad above Prome in lynchworthiness. Simple due to this I may be forced to completely drop the conspiracy theory for now. Scum order for me would be Foolishness Toad Prome and by PoE kita Decently sure marv is town. Gonna do kita/marv later I think. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
He was NOT on sandroba, but WAS around. His largest post in the thread is his combinatrics post. Flashes onto minions to steal farm. Could maybe lynch. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On January 25 2014 02:59 VisceraEyes wrote: Kita has a few big posts that have very little in the way of conclusions. Any that do have conclusions have the word "null" attached to them...."leaning townie null" or "scummy null" etc. Doesn't make him scum, but doesn't make him contributory either. He was NOT on sandroba, but WAS around. His largest post in the thread is his combinatrics post. Flashes onto minions to steal farm. Could maybe lynch. Ugh I laughed but please don't troll VE. Why am I town when the whole thread disagrees? What about Toad? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On December 24 2013 13:57 gonzaw wrote: Hello guys. Nice to finally start the game! :D I think marv is being very suspicious, here: Everybody knows Hapa was just trolling, like all trolling town do on early D1. You know, have some banter, some chats, random vote, etc, the usual stuff. It happens every game, we all know townies who do that to try and pass the time and have some fun early D1, or maybe to even get the ball rolling and get people to post and react. Marv should know this. Like...it's part of the TL Mafia "meta": derpy townies on D1. Yet marv instantly jumps on Hapahauli the first instance he can, just because of that? And he seems so sure about it? Really? I don't buy it This is just hilarious. Trust me, this is not "Classic scum Foolishness". If Foo' was scum, I'd know by now. Or at least, I wouldn't have such a strong townread on him. He's been posting very actively, being part of discussions, and in general trying to enforce some order in this D1. Scum Foo doesn't do that. Scum Foo lurks a little bit, posts some (kind of bad) suspicions on people and that's it. Even more, marv doesn't even attempt to defend himself against Foo's accusations (which I agree with, see previous quote), he just OMGUSes him and tries to deflect attention. Yeah...this is no town marv. I think the bonfire does not want green blood today marvy-marv. Would you like to get closer to it a little bit? Why? Oh, nothing, I think I saw a coin in there....yes....go closer....yes more more. ##Vote: marvellosity Oh, btw, yeah any Self-Aware Miller should obviously claim. Don't waste pages and pages discussing that shit, everybody knows that by now. Also, yeah blabla "lurkers are bad", "we should policy lynch lurkers and inactives" bla bla, we all heard it before so let's cut the crap and lynch marv. Austin austin! Look at the post I found for your game! I knew it could be done! + Show Spoiler + Just ignore the post that comes after this one. | ||
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
On January 25 2014 02:59 VisceraEyes wrote: His largest post in the thread is his combinatrics post. This part is untrue. Why do you keep bringing up a side thought and acting as if it is my only contribution? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=56#1106 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=36#720 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=30#593 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=27#539 On January 25 2014 02:59 VisceraEyes wrote: Flashes onto minions to steal farm. #Worth | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
Like I said, from my innitial read I didn't like WoS and most of it comes down to how he presented himself in the thread early on. Not surprising considering that my innitial read only consisted of the first 20 or so pages. Anyways, let's start with his very first post of the game: On January 21 2014 10:39 WaveofShadow wrote: Welp, gonna go with my usual opener. I think the only difference here is for the first time I'm actually relieved to roll town. I'd be pretty terrified to go up against this town as scum. One of these days I will have another scumgame; it seems that day is not today. Holy! Where you at? I've never played a non-voice game with you before. Let's do something. and given his more recent posts, like the two about VE this really is a common theme here: It doesn't look genuine at all. So first of all you'll realize the first phrase, being Welp, gonna go with my usual opener. and you'll probably think that it doesn't sound motivated at all, but whatever, could be anything, right? So you continue reading and he explains how he's happy that he rolled town because he'd be terrified to go up against town in this game. Now the green thing on itself is nothing at all, like I said could be anything, but take into account that he actually points out that he's happy to have rolled town and I don't believe a word he says. That post doesn't sound delighted, happy or whatever else. It does sound like he's completly unmotivated On we go: On January 21 2014 10:51 WaveofShadow wrote: well yeah, could be anything, right? Next post:lol I'm really hoping you're not scum kita. Nah no reason to vote sandroba yet. Not only is there basically nothing to vote him for, I've seen what he's capable of as the game progresses (from PYP) and if he is town and plays this game anything like that, he'll start slow and then start bringing the pain to scum. On January 21 2014 11:21 WaveofShadow wrote: As far as I can tell, he doesn't respond to pressure on himself this early so it wouldn't matter. I only offered that as an aside anyway, my main reason for not wanting to vote him is because I literally don't see one. Hapa, do you see yourself getting shot N1 in this game? you guys seem to like the word coincidence, what about this one? Not reason YET to vote Sandro and next post he says there's no reason at all. Why would he want to say "yet" if he doesn't think he's scummy to begin with. Yes I'm accusing him to have known that Sandro is red and he slipped here slightly. A lot of people have mentioned that what he has posted feels faked. I'm not going to quote the big VE-post for the threads sake so instead I'm going with a combi-solution and picked something that I just don't like and I think was faked as well: On January 22 2014 10:32 WaveofShadow wrote: It's totes gonna be me I CAN FEEL IT Your current scumread is still Prome I believe? Prome is also a player who often comes out with a massive case against someone and pushes it pretty hard. Why do you not reserve the same judgment for him? Not much to say here, I just put it as an "example" post to adress this in general. Yes The VE post is a lot better of an example and you should certainly read that and what was replied about that. another examplary quote: On January 21 2014 15:42 WaveofShadow wrote: Only preliminary reads I really have are those who have been actively participating in the thread. I have VE as my strongest townread atm, which I believe I have mentioned before (or at least hinted towards). Hapa I have you as slight town because your entrance and play thus far is consistent with how I remember you from that one game where I smurfed as Gravityman, though I remain wary here because I am not the best meta-user around. Your lines of questioning appear pretty towny as well so even without meta you keep the cursory townread. I have Prome as null atm for a combination of things that VE is also on him about (though the difference may be I don;'t find him scummy necessarily)---his entrance seems way too weird, attention-grabby and most of all forced to be something scum would attempt, but then again I'm not a big fan of the content nor his seemingly baseless townread of me. Is there anything else anyone wants before I'm off to bed? I won't be around for much of tomorrow but I will return in the evening. On January 23 2014 04:41 WaveofShadow wrote: And for the record I probably am probably scummier on inactive Foolishness than inactive sandroba. Could be bias because I have precedent in PYP for sandroba in terms of an early game lurk then blasting onto the scene, but as was mentioend before (I forget by who atm?) sandroba was actively engaging the thread when he was around, whereas Foolishness basically hasn't talked to anyone, he just threw stuff and fucked off multiple times. he has a crapton of these kind of posts in his filter were he describes something he considers weird but backs up and undermines himself saying he's not sure about it at all. Townies try to convince people. Townies usually think they're right in the first place and yes townies get cold feet sometimes but if that happens they try to not bring it in the thread to avoid paranoia and because they're trying to CONVINCE other people. Doesn't look like a townie to me. He wasn't around at deadline either, no posting. There's a certain mafia agenda to be found there.
Seems l pretty convenient to not be around at deadline if you're mafia. The same (the very last part) can be said about VE and it's my main point about him because he's even worse in that regard as he was around for CERTAIN, he posted just before the switch happened and just didn't bother to post or do anything. The above however and the fact that hapa died is more than enough to prioritize WoS over VE today. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Whatever I can accept that to some degree but it still pisses me off that I essentially have to lie to the thread on my D1 if I don't have a strong read to show people I'm town. That isn't right. And as for the point about me not being here for lynch? Marv, if you would be so kind, what happened the last time people tried to get me lynched for not being around? Have I ever ONCE lied about not being around when i could be? This in particular REALLY fucking gets my goat because it's like it's the best you can do and it's blatantly false, and I have no way to effectively prove it. Are you purposefully trying to antagonize me with your case? | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Want to know why I said yet? Because if sandroba showed up and started to do something that looked scummy, then I'd have reason to vote him! Hurr durr But please by all means put a mafia spin on it without even considering the fact that it is equally likely to come from town. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 22 2014 09:22 Foolishness wrote: At this moment I feel that Promethelax or HolyFlare should be lynched today. Gonzaw's catch on Holyflare's contradiction is really damning and I'm almost ready to pull the trigger just on that. HolyFlare's defense did feel a bit contrived and forced? He did bring up some good points but at the same time I don't feel like he said all that much. That may just be confirmation bias at this point though. Holy is like 100% scum for him initially. On January 23 2014 05:09 Foolishness wrote: Also I would still vote HolyFlare, but I'm a nice a guy and he asked to be subbed out and I read too much into that sometimes. However Foo doesn't talk or do anything regarding Holy for like 24 more hours, where he backs out ONLY based on the sub thing, and nothing else (i.e forgets the previous case) + Show Spoiler + On January 23 2014 05:31 Foolishness wrote: Sounds like you're making good arguments why he should be lynched. Look at it this way. Let's say I posted and said, "Kitaman is the best lynch right now!" what would you respond? You'd say, "wtf he's been pushing the town in the right direction and asking good questions." Now I say, "Promethelax is the best lynch right now!" (or Holyflare) what is your response? You say, "Eh, I feel like he's doing okay..." I don't see any arguments that show that Promethelax is pushing the town in the right direction or pushing a pro-town agenda. He's responded sure, but where's the conviction and the push to get something done? On January 23 2014 05:44 Foolishness wrote: Are you going to vote for HolyFlare then? On January 23 2014 05:57 Foolishness wrote: I already said that I'm prefectly okay with HolyFlare getting lynched. And by perfectly okay, I really mean okay. As in, if guys are that convinced that Promethelax needs another chance then please let me know now so I can move my vote. But now he wants him lynched as well? Second to Prome in a wishy washy manner of course. On January 23 2014 05:42 Foolishness wrote: I said I was confirming my read on him. You're asking me a question and quoting the post I answered it in? See where my vote is now? Promethelax or HolyFlare, both are good lynches. HolyFlare's recent posts are very meh, but he could genuinely be frustrated and he did ask to be replaced out. Had he not asked to be subbed out this would be an easy decision, but I feel his real life frustration could be coming out in his posting behavior. I could also just be reading too much into this. In the italics, he calls him "good lynch", yet in the bolded he backs out again in a wishy-washy manner? How can you say "I could also just be reading too much into this" if you just called him "good lynch" and are saying "He's a very good lynch I wouldn't mind him dead" and the like all the time? On January 23 2014 07:11 Foolishness wrote: sandroba is not a good lynch when Promethelax and HolyFlare are still alive. This is his last thoughts on the matter at the end of the day basically. Prome and Holy NEED to die. Yet his vote is on Prome, never even considers changing it to Holy (only saying "Yeah! If it comes down to it I will surely vote Holy of course!" when pressured and the like), and even backed out of Holy before so is he still wanting to lynch him or not? Anyways, before sandro died, he wanted Prome and Holy dead. What about after sandro died? Here is his 3rd page of his filter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137&user=Foolishness¤tpage=2 Check from this post basically: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=44#872 Now CTRL+F Holy and Toad. Here are the results: Holy: On January 23 2014 09:04 Foolishness wrote: I don't think that's actually possible. Look at the order of events. Starting at this point where there are 6 votes on me and 3 on Promethelax (keep in mind this is 12 minutes before the deadline): http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=41#820 The six votes on me are (in order of when they occurred): VisceraEyes, gonzaw, WaveofShadow, Promethelax, marvellosity, Hapahauli. Now there is definitely some analysis to be done on how these votes accumulated on me but I will save that for later. At this point gonzaw started the switch on sandroba. Austin immediately joined in. Now only gonzaw was voting on me so I'm still winning by a landslide. It's possible that they did this thinking there is no way a bandwagon on sandroba would start, but I highly doubt they would have that attitude. That is, entertain the thought for a second that gonzaw/Austin are actually mafia. They could just hammer the vote on me to ensure a town lynch (incredibly easy for gonzaw to do, Austin could just toss his vote on Promethelax or somewhere else). But that didn't happen. Then marvellosity switches his vote as well. At this point I have 4 votes and Promethelax and sandroba both have 3. Hapa and Promethelax also follow shortly after. It's definitely clear that the switch to sandroba was started and enforced by towns. This was not mafia bussing each other. The big question to answer here is: what reason would mafia have for switching off of me onto sandroba? If I'm town, there's definitely no reason to. I'm hovering around 50% of votes (HolyFlare's vote isn't going to count), it'd be so easy to just ensure that I got voted. The only scenario where the mafia would have reason to switch is if I'm also mafia (which isn't true). But that scenario, however absurd, would be reasonable, thinking that I'm more valuable to the mafia than sandroba is at this point. Thus I am in the belief that the votes on sandroba were mostly, if not 100%, town. Including my top suspect Promethelax. This seems to make a lot more sense given how that went down. What does this all mean? Mafia could have ensured I was lynched if they were on the vote switch, so why bother vote switching in the first place? No, mafia did not vote switch. What's more likely is that the mafia were voting for me but not on the switch (VE, WoS) or the mafia were all voting for Promethelax (me, sandroba, kitaman). Note that kitaman was going against sandroba during day 1. Remember that assuming Promethelax is town, mafia were in a great position at the end of the day. Town Foolishness has 6 votes and the runner up at 3 votes is also town. This is great for them cause they get to decide who's getting lynched. If I'm mafia why is there not more votes on Promethelax and where is my team to defend me? Sure I got kitaman pushing for Promethelax but I was in a desperate situation there. Things wouldn't have unfolded the way they did if that was the case. So instead this means that mafia were likely already voting for me. But they wouldn't want to go with the vote switch since that was on a mafia. VE is the only person that fits this bill since he was strangely absent during lynch time (and he posted 15 minutes after the lynch). WoS would be gone but I did feel his vote on me was questionable (will look into that later don't worry). Mafia were voting for me and were sitting comfortably, and when a vote switch happened they weren't around for it. On January 24 2014 04:55 Foolishness wrote: If I'm mafia with sandroba that should clear Promethelax. The other mafia would likely to be kitaman or HolyFlare or just a random straggler who was already voting for me. Promethelax has made a lot of sense in his most recent posting (not the drunk ones, though I actually can't tell for some of them lol). Also sandroba went after him. On January 24 2014 05:07 Foolishness wrote: Then you should be advocating that WoS and one of the other mystery people (kitaman, HolyFlare) are mafia. From what we know of day 1 if the four of you die then the town wins. Toad: On January 24 2014 05:48 Foolishness wrote: If I'm mafia what is my game plan to win this game? That'd probably mean the other member was on the sandroba train and I'm hoping that he can cruise the next 4 lynches to victory. If my mafia buddy is in the pool of Toad, Kita, VE, WoS then we're pretty much screwed since they are already under suspicion and I can only survive so long and divert so many lynches before I get punished for it. If one of you, austin, marvellosity, Promethelax, Hapa is mafia I'm pretty sure they will reveal themselves over time. Not tomorrow, maybe not even day three, but they will show it eventually. Off of long term behavior. That's it. Those are the ONLY mentions of his 2nd scumread. Sorry, LEAD scumread (after backing out of Prome), all of N1 and D2. How so? Well, remember this post? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=46#914 In this post Foolishness proves Promethelax is town. Therefore, Foo stops chasing Promethelax. Makes sense. That post, and posterior posts of his though, make little mention of the non-sandro voters though. So, check this again: On January 23 2014 07:11 Foolishness wrote: sandroba is not a good lynch when Promethelax and HolyFlare are still alive. Foo's 2 SUPER HEAVY scumreads are Prome and Holy. Sandro dies, he "exonerates" Prome... ...so what about Holy? Nothing. He even says stuff like Then you should be advocating that WoS and one of the other mystery people (kitaman, HolyFlare) are mafia Foo, shouldn't YOU be advocating Holy is mafia....since you know...HE SHOULD BE YOUR LEAD MAFIA CANDIDATE NOW? No mentions of Toad either, just in passing. Woudln't a Foolishness+sandro+Holy scumteam make sense? Think about it: Holy has IRL issues and can't be active. Holy was AFK for most of the day (just was posting early D1 nothing else). Most likely, in scumland, he was AFK as well. sandro was AFK too. So, the ONLY active scum is Foolishness. That does seem to make sense right? Foo is alone to fight town. Therefore, all the votes piling on him without "resistance" isn't really a problem, since only town is active in the thread (sandro and Holy are afk, thus can't do shit) and only town is voting in the thread. When sandro does come back though, he tries to save Foo somewhat by going against Prome who had 2 votes at the time. Holy voted me (and not Prome for instance). Here is his vote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=41#807 The votecount at that time was 5-Foolishness and 4-Prome. You could say scum Holy would vote Prome to save Foo right? But then again, that'd basically make him out himself. Holy didn't do anything, had no scum reads. Why the hell would he randomly vote Prome? It would make no sense and out him as scum. This he takes the safe route out and wastes his vote. Foo had the most votes at that time, and even if Holy voted Prome it'd be 5v5, with Foo still getting lynched (because he had 5 votes first). It could also make more sense of his actions "confirming" the townies and acting pro-town. He says so himself, the only suspects left would be Wave, VE, kita and Toad. But, he, and we as well, are focusing on VE, Wave and kita. Those could be 3 misslynches, before we get to Holy. Scum wins with 3 mislynches, so it's a viable strategy for scum Foo to act "pro-town", make sense, confirm those townies, etc. That way he makes us all believe he is town (so we don't lynch him), and he uses his influence to avoid getting Toad lynched. Hell, maybe after this he backs out of his "these guys are confirmed town" read and goes after marv or Prome again (when town starts to panic and get paranoid) ..........did I just convince myself of this? Fuck if I know Fuck this game, I'm going to watch cats on youtube. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:26 WaveofShadow wrote: So once again, you think I'm scum because I'm not confident in my reads. Whatever I can accept that to some degree but it still pisses me off that I essentially have to lie to the thread on my D1 if I don't have a strong read to show people I'm town. That isn't right. And as for the point about me not being here for lynch? Marv, if you would be so kind, what happened the last time people tried to get me lynched for not being around? Have I ever ONCE lied about not being around when i could be? This in particular REALLY fucking gets my goat because it's like it's the best you can do and it's blatantly false, and I have no way to effectively prove it. Are you purposefully trying to antagonize me with your case? I am very well aware of the fact that there's no point for you to prove it and neither can I prove it. I'm pointing it out because I still see mafia agenda in it and like I said VE did the same, not sure about Kita, haven't read him just yet but could be he did it as well. I'm saying I see reasoning for mafia to be doing that and while not being sure how it went down everything else makes the thing tipp in your direction, instead of VE. And no I'm not trying to make you mad, you should know that after last game I'm certainly not going to try to make anyone mad. Should I ignore it though? | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 25 2014 03:16 Toadesstern wrote: how do you guys read so fast... I'm still trying to get through WoS filter and it's just so much "i think this ... but well... maybe not" and can't get through because of that... Like I said, from my innitial read I didn't like WoS and most of it comes down to how he presented himself in the thread early on. Not surprising considering that my innitial read only consisted of the first 20 or so pages. Anyways, let's start with his very first post of the game: and given his more recent posts, like the two about VE this really is a common theme here: It doesn't look genuine at all. So first of all you'll realize the first phrase, being Welp, gonna go with my usual opener. and you'll probably think that it doesn't sound motivated at all, but whatever, could be anything, right? So you continue reading and he explains how he's happy that he rolled town because he'd be terrified to go up against town in this game. Now the green thing on itself is nothing at all, like I said could be anything, but take into account that he actually points out that he's happy to have rolled town and I don't believe a word he says. That post doesn't sound delighted, happy or whatever else. It does sound like he's completly unmotivated lol Wave's play this game has been anything but unmotivated. Anyways, could lynch Toad today I guess. But VE isn't doing shit. | ||
| ||