GSL Mini Mafia III - Page 6
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
So you actually believe I am scum? On October 20 2012 10:03 drazak wrote: Haha, I was gonna do the same thing for his way of asking me, but I wasn't sure if I wanted to be the first vote. ##Vote DarthPunk After some pressure for jumping all too early on my bandwagon presented your vote as more of a stimulus to discussion than a genuine vote. Hapa mentioned that this is what he believed but you did not correct him. On October 20 2012 10:25 drazak wrote: Just giving my thought process on it, while it may not be WIFOM, it's how I thought of it after the fact (and why I was hesitating on voting in the first place). I don't think Mafia have any need to bandwagon votes in an instant lynch game, could be wrong, but it seems somewhat ineffective as nobody will hammer it if there isn't sufficient reason, and if mafia does hammer it it's going to make them look pretty scummy. Voting also causes conversation, which mafia is likely to be somewhat adverse to for having less chance to scumslip. Just my thoughts on how it works with this scenario, obviously mafia have to make some votes. On October 20 2012 10:05 drazak wrote: Well, I kind of thought it was stupid, but yeah, it starts conversation and forces him to reply. Seemed like he was replying pretty well on his own though so I was gonna leave it, but the connection seems to have gone dead. Then after some more traction had been gained you seem to be leaning once again toward me being scum. On October 20 2012 12:24 drazak wrote: Sounds like you're trying to look like you're scum hunting while not actually hunting. You have been incredibly wishy-washy on me despite your vote. You jumped all to eagerly on an early bandwagon. Expressed fear of being singled out and Nervousness. These are not townie traits drazak. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:05 austinmcc wrote: Darth, do you believe that drazak is scum? I am not certain. I think his reaction to the pressure on me is Wishy-washy. Depending on the state of the thread. Pressure on Me. DarthPunk is scum. Pressure on him. I was stimulating discussion. Pressure on me again. Oh look you are scummy. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:11 austinmcc wrote: In light of that post, I'm specifically interested in whether you thought he was scum at the time you asked him his role. Not in whether you've found him scummy since then. What do you think Austin? It was my second post of the game. I thought he had a 2/9 chance of being scum. Honestly. | ||
drazak
United States479 Posts
![]() | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Regarding DP If I'm getting his logic correctly, he used "role" instead of "allignment" when questioning Draz because scum will somehow be under more pressure if they fakeclaim later, correct? Well it doesn't make sense, but it's not scummy. The fact that he's sitting here and earnestly explaining incomprehensible logic away makes me think he's town tbh. Regarding Draz I coached Drazak in two newbie games, so I feel I should say something about his meta/playstyle. Drazak got mislynched in both his games (pretty early) for lurkiness/wishy-washyness as town. Nothing he's done is alignment indicative so far. I will say he's shown much more interest in this game than his previous games FWIW. Nothing to make a read on him yet. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:13 DarthPunk wrote: What do you think Austin? It was my second post of the game. I thought he had a 2/9 chance of being scum. Honestly. You say you asked because it would make him less likely to fakeclaim later in game. But you asked only him. Why would you ask only drazak, in order to make him uncomfortable with fakeclaiming later, if you didn't think he was scum and had no more reason to suspect he'd be fakeclaiming then anyone else? That's why I'm asking. The question sounds dumb, and I expect your answer to be "No, he had the same 2/9 chance as anyone." It just makes your explanation...still weird. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:15 Hapahauli wrote: I go off to play some TF2 and the thread blows up - sweet! Regarding DP If I'm getting his logic correctly, he used "role" instead of "allignment" when questioning Draz because scum will somehow be under more pressure if they fakeclaim later, correct? Well it doesn't make sense, but it's not scummy. The fact that he's sitting here and earnestly explaining incomprehensible logic away makes me think he's town tbh. Regarding Draz I coached Drazak in two newbie games, so I feel I should say something about his meta/playstyle. Drazak got mislynched in both his games (pretty early) for lurkiness/wishy-washyness as town. Nothing he's done is alignment indicative so far. I will say he's shown much more interest in this game than his previous games FWIW. Nothing to make a read on him yet. Like even if they are 1% less likely to fake claim why the hell not? There is absolutely no difference either way but I thought that this way May have some small advatage of the other so I chose that way. I honestly don;t see what is so difficult to understand about this. It is not as if that scenario needs to occur or if it is even likely. I thought it may be the better play out of two otherwise equal options. So I chose it. I am baffled that no one understands that. geez. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:16 austinmcc wrote: You say you asked because it would make him less likely to fakeclaim later in game. But you asked only him. Why would you ask only drazak, in order to make him uncomfortable with fakeclaiming later, if you didn't think he was scum and had no more reason to suspect he'd be fakeclaiming then anyone else? That's why I'm asking. The question sounds dumb, and I expect your answer to be "No, he had the same 2/9 chance as anyone." It just makes your explanation...still weird. If there was even the slightest chance that draz was scum and would be less comfortable fake claiming it was a better play than the alternative IMO. I am done with this. You don't agree. so be it. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:19 DarthPunk wrote: Like even if they are 1% less likely to fake claim why the hell not? There is absolutely no difference either way but I thought that this way May have some small advatage of the other so I chose that way. I honestly don;t see what is so difficult to understand about this. It is not as if that scenario needs to occur or if it is even likely. I thought it may be the better play out of two otherwise equal options. So I chose it. I am baffled that no one understands that. geez. The point that people are trying to make is that it makes no difference. Scum aren't going to be deterred (or even remember) something like this. Anywho, I think it's best to agree to disagree here. It gave me a town read on you anyway so cool. Nao off to bed - peace out folks. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:30 Hapahauli wrote: The point that people are trying to make is that it makes no difference. Scum aren't going to be deterred (or even remember) something like this. Anywho, I think it's best to agree to disagree here. It gave me a town read on you anyway so cool. Nao off to bed - peace out folks. If it makes no difference why does anyone care enough to waste all this time on it?!?!?! | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On October 20 2012 13:16 austinmcc wrote: You say you asked because it would make him less likely to fakeclaim later in game. But you asked only him. Why would you ask only drazak, in order to make him uncomfortable with fakeclaiming later, if you didn't think he was scum and had no more reason to suspect he'd be fakeclaiming then anyone else? That's why I'm asking. The question sounds dumb, and I expect your answer to be "No, he had the same 2/9 chance as anyone." It just makes your explanation...still weird. So what you are saying is that me asking the only person in the thread at that point makes less sense than calling for a mass claim 30 mins into day one. 0_o | ||
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH OMGOMGOMG MVP GOGOGOGO WIN IT FOR THE PROGAMERS. Life = Cheesier for sure. Everyone that is town should be rooting for mvp right now! | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Anywho, On October 20 2012 13:15 Hapahauli wrote: I go off to play some TF2 and the thread blows up - sweet! Regarding DP If I'm getting his logic correctly, he used "role" instead of "allignment" when questioning Draz because scum will somehow be under more pressure if they fakeclaim later, correct? Well it doesn't make sense, but it's not scummy. The fact that he's sitting here and earnestly explaining incomprehensible logic away makes me think he's town tbh. Regarding Draz I coached Drazak in two newbie games, so I feel I should say something about his meta/playstyle. Drazak got mislynched in both his games (pretty early) for lurkiness/wishy-washyness as town. Nothing he's done is alignment indicative so far. I will say he's shown much more interest in this game than his previous games FWIW. Nothing to make a read on him yet. Yea, it doesn't make much sense. I don't think it's scummy, but I sure don't think it's townie either. A scum in his position would certainly have to justify himself as well, I don't see why you are taking this to be a town read this early on. This meta read, however, makes me less suspicious of drazak for that vote alone. Right now I'm more interested in Keirathi. Made this one easy-to-make post, and didn't really stick around, made no other comments. This seems to me like too easy of a post for someone like Keir to make, and doesn't seem genuine. On October 20 2012 12:19 Keirathi wrote: I completely agree with vader here. I mean, DP, what if Draz is a blue. What do you expect him to say? Of course he's not going to claim a blue role (I hope), a few hours into day 1. So, he claims Progamer. Then he gets close to lynch, and says "Okay, I'm actually Nestea. Don't lynch me!". What are you going to do, lynch him because he lied and said he was progamer 3 hours into the game? I call bullshit. You know that everyone is going to claim progamer just the same as everyone is going to claim green. There were many acceptable replies iamp's accusation. Yours was not one of them. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Yea, it doesn't make much sense. I don't think it's scummy, but I sure don't think it's townie either. A scum in his position would certainly have to justify himself as well, I don't see why you are taking this to be a town read this early on. It's one of those really over-thought-out plans that aligns very well with townie thought process. Not definitive by any means, but I do consider it a town tell. This meta read, however, makes me less suspicious of drazak for that vote alone. Whatever the meta read, he's posted more in this game already than his last town game (mislynched D1). He seems very eager to post, and that makes me think he's town. His defenses have been instant (and IMO honest), and mulling over his history, I'd be pretty surprised if that came from scum-Drazak. Right now I'm more interested in Keirathi. Made this one easy-to-make post, and didn't really stick around, made no other comments. This seems to me like too easy of a post for someone like Keir to make, and doesn't seem genuine. Yah I'm a bit surprised at how little Kei has contributed so far. Early D1 caveats of course, but I always had the impression that his town play was very active on the early days. | ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On October 21 2012 00:46 Hapahauli wrote: Yah I'm a bit surprised at how little Kei has contributed so far. Early D1 caveats of course, but I always had the impression that his town play was very active on the early days. It was friday night. I went out. I wasn't expecting the game to start yesterday, and I wasn't going to change my plans anyways. Also, that's such a blanket statement (and not even necessarily a true one...I've not been super active early in like half of my games), that has absolutely nothing to do with my alignment. I was "very active" in the early game as scum too. So what was the point of even saying that? On October 20 2012 23:58 Z-BosoN wrote: Right now I'm more interested in Keirathi. Made this one easy-to-make post, and didn't really stick around, made no other comments. This seems to me like too easy of a post for someone like Keir to make, and doesn't seem genuine. What the fuck does that even mean? "Someone like Keir"? And also, explain how that post isn't genuine, please. Darth's post, pre-explanation, made absolutely zero sense, and I disagreed with him asking it. Post-explanation, it was still dumb and never going to accomplish what he said his "goal" was, but at least I understand his reasoning now. Anyways, its gameday. I'll be around off and on today, but not sitting at the computer all day. | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 21 2012 00:46 Hapahauli wrote: @ Z-Bo It's one of those really over-thought-out plans that aligns very well with townie thought process. Not definitive by any means, but I do consider it a town tell. Whatever the meta read, he's posted more in this game already than his last town game (mislynched D1). He seems very eager to post, and that makes me think he's town. His defenses have been instant (and IMO honest), and mulling over his history, I'd be pretty surprised if that came from scum-Drazak. Yah I'm a bit surprised at how little Kei has contributed so far. Early D1 caveats of course, but I always had the impression that his town play was very active on the early days. Wait a minute, when trying to assess DP's townieness, you first said: The fact that he's sitting here and earnestly explaining incomprehensible logic away makes me think he's town tbh. This is much different than: It's one of those really over-thought-out plans that aligns very well with townie thought process. Not definitive by any means, but I do consider it a town tell. In the first instance, you are atributing your town read to DP's "sitting here and earnestly explaining his logic". In the second, it's not his defense at all, but it's actually his own "plan". I will agree with you on the second one, but when I disagreed on the first one, why did you pull out another reason instead of commenting on the first? Why did you find DP's defensiveness to be a town tell? Keir is not necessarily active in day one, but what he does not do is make a post like that and disappear. In liquid city, when he found something he thought to be interesting, he stayed around for a while to further investigate it. In this game, however, there were a series of posts immediately after his own in which he did not comment on and did not say anything about. I find this to be quite unsettling. | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 21 2012 01:18 Keirathi wrote: It was friday night. I went out. I wasn't expecting the game to start yesterday, and I wasn't going to change my plans anyways. Also, that's such a blanket statement (and not even necessarily a true one...I've not been super active early in like half of my games), that has absolutely nothing to do with my alignment. I was "very active" in the early game as scum too. So what was the point of even saying that? What the fuck does that even mean? "Someone like Keir"? And also, explain how that post isn't genuine, please. Darth's post, pre-explanation, made absolutely zero sense, and I disagreed with him asking it. Post-explanation, it was still dumb and never going to accomplish what he said his "goal" was, but at least I understand his reasoning now. Anyways, its gameday. I'll be around off and on today, but not sitting at the computer all day. Why the overreaction? I found your post to be an useless agreement that didn't add anything, and your lack of follow-up even more suspicious. The underlined is why I didn't find it to be genuine, given that there were a string of posts after your own which dealt with it. I fully agree that it was dumb, but you left no opinion of it. That's just saying something and drawing no conclusions from it, and even worse, not looking like you want to draw any conclusions. I can be wrong here, but your post to me didn't feel genuine and I think that makes you suspicious. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
What about those statements don't make sense with each other? I don't get it. But again, it's not really DP's "defensiveness" - it's his willingness to explain a plan that quite frankly is wayyyy over-thought-out in an earnest manner. | ||
| ||