|
Lulz. Since I am going to go to bed shortly and I have to vote and I really don't think Amazingzidwxzyrhgbdss whatever is scum. And iGrok would rage quit if I voted for him. I'm voting for Aril because the little prick just voted for me twice and spelled my name wrong each time. With nary a word in here.
|
@Vain. I'm not particularly concerned about your defense of Lafali. My question regards your vote for rookie on day1.
You first post here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=227500¤tpage=28#554 concluding that Jackal's analysis of rookie was not sufficient. I'm cutting this out of your post here:
On June 07 2011 07:39 Vain wrote: It was true that he was asking for information but proposing that we should have a strategy doesn't really ring a scum bell for me.
Then later, you switch your vote to rookie roughly an hour later saying:
On June 07 2011 08:28 Vain wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2011 08:23 Impervious wrote:Alright, I'm back, and I've read the last ~10 pages to try to get myself up to date. I've probably missed something, but I think I have a good idea on what's going on so far. On June 07 2011 04:16 Jackal58 wrote: Impervious???? Bah. Obviouscum. I'll be keeping an eye on you. Scum. Btw - GREEN AND YELLOW!!!!! Ok, now, from what I've seen, I think Jackal's plan is best. I've seen a bunch of "newbie" posts, but that one seriously hinted at finding blues, as well as finding flaws in previously used investigative strategies. While it may be a "newbie" type post, it also answers a question I ask myself whenever I'm looking at someone - Are they acting in the best interest of the town? My gut feeling is "no", even though he has so few posts. And, rather than pick on lurkers for the sake of picking on lurkers (since they'll likely be modkilled at some point), I think our best move at the moment is to lynch rookie44. Ok, i guess you're right. His posts didn't really contribute and now with the knowledge of that there is a thread for mafia alone freeloader isn't really a viable option too. So with that my vote will also be on Rookie for the sake of voting. 4 hours remaining but i'm going to bed so my vote is final. Goodnight
Only roughly an hour passed between these two posts. During this period, rookie had not posted and no one had brought up any new reasons as to why to vote for rookie.Yet you vote for rookie on the basis that: "His posts didn't really contribute and now with the knowledge of that there is a thread for mafia alone freeloader isn't really a viable option too. " That in no way is a justification to vote to lynch someone. Simply because they didn't contribute should not justify a vote and considering that there were other candidates with significant evidence against them (which you seem to ignore), it seems highly suspicious that you jump right to rookie's vote when you earlier argued that he "didn't ring your scum bell".
|
I'd also like to note that tdAdonis' only post in this thread was his /in. Really man? I'm far from the most active user but if you're going to sign up for a mafia game at least post in the thread.
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On June 10 2011 10:01 Senj wrote: Dug back through the thread for a second time with a sheet noting interesting things about iGrok and Amazingxkcd. I'll spare you all a giant wall of text as the arguments against them have already been laid out and beaten to death. However, I did find several interesting things that will hopefully bring up a little discussion.
iGrok analyses Kurumi, calling him out as scum (I stand corrected on my previous defense of iGrok's analysis.) Yet says he isn't a good lynch vote. Uh... right. That's a pretty big disconnect between the words and the actions.
I also find it strange that iGrok puts himself on his no-lynch list early on. Isn't that sort of a given? preservation of self and play to win.
Amazingxkcd also puts an analysis of himself under his Huge Posts O' Analysis. Is that supposed to be some resounding defense of yourself?
If you want, i can go completely through his post of me as my defense if you like.
|
Amazing, who's post of you? Go for it bud.
How much time is left for Day 2?
|
On June 10 2011 10:09 Senj wrote: I'd also like to note that tdAdonis' only post in this thread was his /in. Really man? I'm far from the most active user but if you're going to sign up for a mafia game at least post in the thread. And the host will deal with that issue. It happens in every game. A point I tried to make earlier that Amazingkidxyz turned into a scum tell. Those that don't post and don't vote are inactives and the host will modkill them. We don't have to deal with them. Those that post once or twice per cycle are lurkers. Those are the ones that need to be looked at.
|
On June 10 2011 10:03 Jackal58 wrote:Lulz. Since I am going to go to bed shortly and I have to vote and I really don't think Amazingzidwxzyrhgbdss whatever is scum. And iGrok would rage quit if I voted for him. I'm voting for Aril because the little prick just voted for me twice and spelled my name wrong each time. ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif) With nary a word in here. Wow guys.. this is one of the scummiest posts I've ever seen. Wishy-washy, apologetic, and leading no where. Ends off with a random useless vote.
I'd say this post is far more incriminating than anything Amazing or iGrok have posted so far. Combined with analysis from Amazing (whom I believe is likely DT), I'm switching my vote to Jackal.
iGrok just seems disgruntled now, he's still on the list for potential GFs, but I still think it's nowhere near solid.
|
|
On June 10 2011 10:14 teamsolid wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2011 10:03 Jackal58 wrote:Lulz. Since I am going to go to bed shortly and I have to vote and I really don't think Amazingzidwxzyrhgbdss whatever is scum. And iGrok would rage quit if I voted for him. I'm voting for Aril because the little prick just voted for me twice and spelled my name wrong each time. ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif) With nary a word in here. Wow guys.. this is one of the scummiest posts I've ever seen. Wishy-washy, apologetic, and leading no where. Ends off with a random useless vote. I'd say this post is far more incriminating than anything Amazing or iGrok have posted so far. Combined with analysis from Amazing (whom I believe is likely DT), I'm switching my vote to Jackal. iGrok just seems disgruntled now, he's still on the list for potential GFs, but I still think it's nowhere near solid. I agree. But it seems to implicate both players (iGrok and Amazingxkcd) since he could easily vote for either regardless of his alignment. Considering that most people support lynching either candidate, he could have thrown his vote to either side without attracting suspicion at all.
|
I voted for Aril to make a point. You guys are smarter than a toothbrush. Figure it out.
|
On June 10 2011 10:20 Jackal58 wrote: I voted for Aril to make a point. You guys are smarter than a toothbrush. Figure it out. His posts consist of: a defense of freeloader.
|
EBWDP His posts consist of a defense of freeloader. A "sorry I can't vote now" (votes for Kurumi). A really weird description of his scripting tool. And a vote for you. Very scummy.
|
Plus the bastard spelled my name wrong. :st; But mostly what you said Trance.
|
Ebwop
|
On June 10 2011 10:14 Senj wrote: Amazing, who's post of you? Go for it bud.
How much time is left for Day 2? About an hour
|
On June 10 2011 10:14 Senj wrote: How much time is left for Day 2? roughly 1 hour remains in the day. Vote count coming up shortly.
edit: ninja'd
|
|
Xkcd is the obvious choice here. He RARELY gives analysis (besides his big anlysis post, but that is just a means of accusing jackal, more on this later) and most of his posts are blind accusations or heavily defending himself
On June 07 2011 06:34 amazingxkcd wrote:You seem to be in a position to defend rookie44 when he has made quite a lot of scummy posts, particularly trying to take advantage of noobs to slip up their roles with Show nested quote +What i believe is the crucial difference is that we have large amounts of time for discussion. This also gives us the time to create a solid plan for using whatever roles we have effectively (it would seem that way). Also, notices how already from the start of the game, he is asking for roles and wanted to lynch Treadmill without any sound proof besides making a suggestion about the freeloader wagon being loaded with mafias Show nested quote +Would it be a legitimate stratagy if we lynched treadmill with the thought that he and some other mafia got overzealous with voting for freeloader? Here, he is making assumptions about what the mafia should do, which is trying to divert attention away from him. Show nested quote +It seems like if someone got a role in the mafia then they would be more anxious to start the game, and would be much more active in the very beginning. This is a mafia game for less experienced players so maybe that means there will be some metagame mistakes? for these reasons and the ones given by jackal58 as well as kurumi, i am voting for Rookie44 on the basis of clear scummy post and trying to divert attention away from himself with circular logic ##Vote: Rookie44also alderan, I am very suspicious of you for trying to defend this guy. Elaborate as to why you think he is not a scum.
This is xkcd's post about his vote for rookie. Note that he did vote for him within 2 minuites of senj and 5 minuites of kurumi. This is obviously not coincedence as the last accusation of him was a half hour earlier by jackal. Also very importantly note that This was posted after all 3 of them voted! Now this has to require some communication. I'm not actually sure about kurumi, because he voted first quoting jackal's argument. But the other 2 hopping on almost immediately shows that they were trying to start a bandwagon. My speculation is that jackal may be mafia, and was waiting until someone (kurumi) voted for rookie at which point his mafia buddies would strike. Both are VERY likely mafia, but I think xkcd is much more likely as he voted last.
Also, this style is very different from all previous posting of his. This is his first attempt at analysis, which makes me wonder if someone else wrote it for him.
This is xkcd's 1st real post 1.
It is quite clear that it can be seen who are the main talkers for both side. The only question is now how to distinguish between the two sides and how to act upon it
Note that he NEVER told us who he was talking about, and the fact that he mentioned people from “both sides” makes me think he KNOWS both sides. Whoever the “main talkers” are for all we know, they could all be mafia or all be town! Now look at the rest of his post “ The only question is now how to distinguish between the two sides and how to act upon it”. This is obviously just some generic “i'm not mafia” phrase tacked on to the end. He's mafia, and he's not good at it.
Another interesting one
On June 07 2011 10:30 amazingxkcd wrote: Ebwop; this is directed at impervious
Also, drazerk is looking like a scum now that i start to evaluate him more in depth. I will do more work to see if i should switch my vote to him if impervious gives a proper response.
He never did analysis of drazerk. His only real anylsis is again of rookie which furthers my suspicion that someone may have wrote it for him.
On June 09 2011 02:01 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 01:48 aprudds wrote: I wake in the morning and I come back to giant walls of text. Oh boy, fun.
First off Drazerk, I still want to hear a response.
Next, can you guys please, make your analysis more readable? This is more directed towards Kurumi, Sprungjeezy and to a lesser extent Treadmill.
Kurumi: It takes every ounce of mental strength to even read through your posts without skipping them over. Please structure your thoughts and lay them out in a constructive manner instead of trying to barf whatever you were thinking on the page and hoping people will read it. Your posts have no coherent flow and with 5 of them in a row it just makes me want to ignore you for the rest of the game. I told you this before at the beginning but if your going to continue to defecate on the page I'm just going to ignore everything you write.
I'm not trying to be a dick but your posts make my eyes and brain hurt. It's worse than trying to read Shakespeare.
Treadmill: Giant quote walls hurt. They hurt alot. I am VERY THANKFUL though that you managed to at least have the courtesy of structuring it. Jackal was right on when he said to break it up so people can try and digest the information better.
Sprungjeezy: No your formatting isn't attractive at all. It's downright confusing. If you want people to actually read what you write without getting lost next time make it coherent. I literally cannot see what point your trying to make other than "he's suspicious vote for him". I apologize if you think that I'm stupid but can you make it clear what new information your bringing to the table? Because I just don't see it.
Lastly it's very disturbing that everyone seemed to have already forgotten the first lynch. We lynched the doctor and instead of looking at the votes to find scum, people are playing WIFOM.
People on my FOS: Kurumi-The voting fiasco Senj-The voting fiasco amazingxkcd-The voting fiasco and reasons outlined by treadmill Jimbooo-I have already outlined my reasoning Drazerk-I have already outlined my reasoning
xkcd, Jimboo and Drazerk care to justify yourselves?
This is for you, aprudds, you only referenced treadmill's posts but what is your thoughts? You want me to defend myself against you when you got nothing to say about me. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tymQB.png) replying with an xkcd comic... cute, however this just shows that he is only trying to avoid having to defend himself.
On June 09 2011 02:08 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:04 aprudds wrote:On June 09 2011 01:58 amazingxkcd wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote: Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol. Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. That is the statement i am trying to push for. I voted for rookie with similar evidence as jackal, while not knowing about his posts, then later people started to push for me. Notice the people who voted for rookie on jackal's posts then switched over to vote for me when one of the scums said i was suspicious. The problem is that jackal started the bandwagon with not so strong reasons. it looked like he was trying to get some more information out of rookie and see the reaction rather than the full out lynch. For you, an observer, to completely blindly agree with Jackal's reasoning (which isn't that strong in the first place) and then vote in a seemingly organized manner with 2 others is where the suspicions come in. Your less than stellar post history doesn't help you at all either. If Jackal's reasoning wasn't strong enough and if he just wanted information, then why did he vote for rookie right away after his analysis of rookie as detailed below? Show nested quote +On June 07 2011 06:01 Jackal58 wrote:On June 07 2011 05:47 TranceStorm wrote:On June 07 2011 05:38 Jackal58 wrote:You guys want to vote for scum? Vote this guy - rookie44: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=9611408Has played before so he has an idea how it works. Very subtle in his fishing for blues. Only scum fish for blues. Wants to know what methods and tactics are used to catch scum. Wants us to share them with everybody. Claims it will help derail scum tactics. When it will obviously do the opposite. Has all but disappeared since this post. I'm sure he'll show up momentarily to tell me how full of shit I am. That's where my vote is going. I would recommend you all do the same. Would you mind doing a post-by-post analysis of rookie44's posts? (There are only 3) Right now I can't really see how subtly he is fishing for blues. After all, we don't know how experienced he really is, so I would like a little more clarification as to your accusation. We'll start with the post I linked: On June 06 2011 04:22 rookie44 wrote: Hey guys,
This is all getting a bit out of hand, we seem to already be getting in each others faces over perceived (and real) sleights. I have only played mafia on battle.net, and this is going to be quite a different game to that. Only real difference is timing. Tactics are the same
What i believe is the crucial difference is that we have large amounts of time for discussion. This also gives us the time to create a solid plan for using whatever roles we have effectively (it would seem that way). This is role fishing. He's wanting people to post their roles and tell him how they intend to use them. At the very least he's hoping a noob would post something along the lines of I'm a DT. Who should I check
Maybe some of the more experienced players could expand on what investigative stratagies they have used; their pitfalls, and how we may evade those pitfalls. This is saying "I am scum. How are you guys going to catch me? It's called a scum slip
Perhaps an added benifit will be that it will be very tricky for a mafia to come up with a generalized stratagy that is grounded in reason, so maybe there will be some suspiciously quiet people. (I assume it will be difficult for a generalized stratagy becasue i can only see the mafia being able to take advantage of a specific stratagy by getting their peolpe in the right places). This is just bullshit trying to provide a townie reason for asking.
My analysis in red. This guy is scum.
A lot of other posts suggest that rookie and jackal may be in cahoots. This one suggests that jackal may be town and they took the opportunity to vote for rookie.
The reason I bring this up is that this means that they wanted him to die, which they had no reason for. I am just bringing this up because the only possible reason to start a bandwagon at that point was to save freeloader. This makes me suspicious of freeloader.
On June 09 2011 02:11 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2011 02:08 Kurumi wrote:On June 09 2011 02:07 Jackal58 wrote:On June 09 2011 01:54 Kurumi wrote: Why is everyone forgetting about Jackal and listing everyone who voted on rookie besides him,this is confuses me a lot,lol. Also ask questions. I try to improve as much as I can. Can't deduce something out of my posts? Ask,I'll straighten them up and make them "readable". I dislike being ignored when I am not mafia,really. I loved it in PYPI,but here it is unnecessary. If we lynched a person every time they are wrong we'd have to lynch you 35 or 40 times today. Not saying that You're scum,just that's an interesting observation that they blame everyone besides You. I agree with this, and started to discuss this, but the main townies besides you aren't helping me with this. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lVa9l.png) another xkcd comic in place of content... I would say this is annoying, but it serves the purpose of showing what hes doing. He claimed to try to start a discussion, but now that he's given a chance to start it, he instead says “UGH I tried to tell you about this, but not now, you're too late!” The only reason that he would decide not to is that he changed his mind, or someone told him not to. This is another connection between him and jackal, and I think that this means that they are both mafia, or trying to use jackal as a scapegoat.
His next big post is his analysis of everyone. I'll ignore most of it, but I think the most interesting part is his accusation of jackal. First thing to note is that his is the only one not spoilered. This is obviously to get attention on his accusation of him. Next he says jackal is GF, this would make us want to lynch him more! 3rd is, when he wrote this, he was getting a LOT of votes. All of these lead to either jackal being mafia, and he voted him because if he does get lynched, people would leave jackal alone. Or 2 Jackal is his scapegoat, and he's trying to get jackal lynched instead of him.
On June 09 2011 13:45 amazingxkcd wrote: 1 last thing before i treuly go to sleep. This will create a shitstorm. I want all of you to watch people's reaction to my accusations to jackal. If they try to defend him without a doubt, they are trying to protect him. They are mafia scum. Do not forget.
This one is just dumb of him. He is claiming all people that don't agree with him are mafia. He is only mentioning jackal again. There is definitely something between him and jackal at this point, but this post is entirely him trying to turn town against each other.
On June 10 2011 02:57 amazingxkcd wrote: I am still in school, waiting for the finals to finish in 20 mins. A lot of people have been advocating for iGrok's lynch so i will take that into account. Looking at his current status, he's making memes for map threads and trying to avoid the issues against him. I will further into that when i get home from school.
this one is just him trying to divert attention. He sees he has a shot at surviving today, so he jumps all over that. Every single post from that point is him attacking Grok to survive.
I think it's obvious that amazingxkcd is scum.
|
Time's running out and my prime suspect looks like he's about to get himself mod-killed. I'd rather not waste my vote on Jimbooo.
My vote is going towards amazingxkcd. His day 1 activity, especially the first post and then several after attacking others for making fluff first posts are my basis here.
|
Something came up, I don't know if I e at my computer. Votes don't count after deadline.
|
|
|
|