EPTYou'll see I'm on the banlist sitting out Normal Mini, but that game has ended and Flamewheel just hasn't updated the list.
Palmar <3
Resistance 2 - Tunnel Rats - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
You'll see I'm on the banlist sitting out Normal Mini, but that game has ended and Flamewheel just hasn't updated the list. Palmar <3 | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Welcome Back chaos13! | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
We´re still taking signups for replacements. | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
Resistance 2 - Tunnel Rats - Mission 1 - ![[image loading]](http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg62/scaled.php?server=62&filename=3959054512310f0d028e.jpg&res=medium) It was cramped, cold, and damp in the cellar. The core of the Second Resistance Front was gathered inside the old, moldy bunker. There were many new faces, after the entire First Resistance Front were brutally crushed to death by a buffalo stampede the year before. Despite the danger, they were all bound together by their anger at the unjust occupation of their beloved city. Navillus, the charismatic leader of the Second Resistance Front, stood up from his seat at the front of the table. "This has gone on long enough! They think they have us beaten, but we will stand up from under their boot, and they will know that it is not cockroaches they tread on, but men! We will put a stop to the Invaders, and their inhumane treatment of the people, because people, unlike cockroaches, bite back!" His throat parched, Navillus took a sip from his cup of exquisite, british tea, recently smuggled into the city during a daring operation by the Resistance Front. "The day after tomorrow, the first anniversary of the defeat of the First Resistance Front is held at the main square. We will strike a crippling blow to their celebration! Tomorrow night, a team of three brave Soldiers of the Resistance will, under the cover of the night, blow up Emanuels Fireworks Shop! It is a dangerous mission, I don´t expect all of you to return alive, but know this; though you die, the Second Resistance Front lives on!" Navillus if the first leader. Submit your team in this thread. Vote on teams in PMs to both hosts. The vote is decided when everyone has voted. The current deadline for the day is 23 february, 09:00 GMT (+00:00), but this is likely to be extended. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
Until such time as I see a team I like you're all getting nayvotes. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
Since we don't have a team up yet it's hard to discuss whether its a good or a bad team (also because we have had no discussion). So why the nay vote? O_o Considering that everyone will be town in their own eyes the best team you can possible get right now is one where you yourself are on since you know your own alignment. I would likely support any team with me on it as it guarentees 1/3 town right there. Any team that fails the mission the person who suggested the team should automaticly be under suspicion, even if the team is without that person (or perhaps especially so). | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On February 19 2012 18:56 Dirkzor wrote: Yay... We're going to blow up that anniversary! Since we don't have a team up yet it's hard to discuss whether its a good or a bad team (also because we have had no discussion). So why the nay vote? O_o Considering that everyone will be town in their own eyes the best team you can possible get right now is one where you yourself are on since you know your own alignment. I would likely support any team with me on it as it guarentees 1/3 town right there. Any team that fails the mission the person who suggested the team should automaticly be under suspicion, even if the team is without that person (or perhaps especially so). The idea that someone would suggest a team that doesn't include themselves is utterly preposterous. If you're town-aligned, there is no reason you would possibly suggest a team that doesn't contain yourself, as your alignment is the only alignment you can confirm. It would be an unimaginably bad move to suggest a team without yourself. Given what you said earlier in your post I'm surprised you didn't figure this out yourself. I would not be averse to change my vote to a "yay" depending on the team I see. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On February 19 2012 19:18 Blazinghand wrote: The idea that someone would suggest a team that doesn't include themselves is utterly preposterous. If you're town-aligned, there is no reason you would possibly suggest a team that doesn't contain yourself, as your alignment is the only alignment you can confirm. It would be an unimaginably bad move to suggest a team without yourself. Given what you said earlier in your post I'm surprised you didn't figure this out yourself. I would not be averse to change my vote to a "yay" depending on the team I see. That being said, unless I see a team I like, I'm just gonna "nay" everyone until it's my turn to suggest a team, since that's the only way I can know 100% that the guy setting up the team isn't scum. When you make your team, make a good case for it. I hope to see Navillus in the thread pushing his ideas, getting reads and stuff before committing to a team. A baseless team suggestion will have well earned my Nay vote. Furthermore, the deadline is a little flexible since we will be going through several rounds of team suggesting / rejecting / argumentation today (probably). | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
But that does not invalidate my point. If you suggest a team, and that mission fail, everyone on the team should be under suspicion - agree? But you (the teamleader) even more since you might be privy to more information then the rest of us if you are scum. If it so happened that you suggested a team without youself on it and it still failed you would be even more suspicious. Your point about Nay voting every team until you can make your own team are bad. I agree it would be smart to be teamleader so you are sure that no scum are the leader but we will never get a mission going if everyone thinks like that. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Also, very easy to hide for scum this game, but meh. It actually feels a lot harder as scum than you might think. I know I never felt secure even with how well the last game went for scummy people. So we can still scumhunt, and we can still be useful. Really, this game should be easier than normal mafia, all I have to do is find 2 townies for the first day and BAM I got this. Look out scum, I got this game and you can't kill me. | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
Your point about Nay voting every team until you can make your own team are bad. I agree it would be smart to be teamleader so you are sure that no scum are the leader but we will never get a mission going if everyone thinks like that. This. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
I'm just a regular townie, nothing to worry about here. As such, I should be on night1 team. I think Dirkzor should too based on what he's written in this thread so far. Dunno who I'd pick third but ... Unfortunately I'm last picker so I probably wont have a chance to propose a team today. That was all for now. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
Hi guys I'm just a regular townie, nothing to worry about here. As such, I should be on night1 team. [QUOTE] What purpose do you have for posting that?! And with colors?! Claiming to be town is what anyone would do at this point in the game. Adding on colors and "Nothing to worry about here" just rubs me the wrong way... Even if you call me town... | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On February 19 2012 20:01 Dirkzor wrote: But that does not invalidate my point. If you suggest a team, and that mission fail, everyone on the team should be under suspicion - agree? But you (the teamleader) even more since you might be privy to more information then the rest of us if you are scum. If it so happened that you suggested a team without youself on it and it still failed you would be even more suspicious. If you suggest a team without yourself you clearly don't understand how this game works. I will definitely nayvote any team that doesn't include the guy suggesting it lol. The fact that you consider the situation where the leader isn't on the team means you need to think about the setup more. The leader knows his own alignment-- why would he ever under any circumstances not include himself on his own team??? On February 19 2012 20:01 Dirkzor wrote: Your point about Nay voting every team until you can make your own team are bad. I agree it would be smart to be teamleader so you are sure that no scum are the leader but we will never get a mission going if everyone thinks like that. On February 19 2012 23:24 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: No out-of-thread communication, I like the sound of that. This. You guys didn't read my post. Unless a team is good I will nayvote it. I haven't seen a good team suggested yet so I will nayvote until I see one. I'd prefer to be the leader myself but if a well-reasoned, good team is suggested I can make do with not being the leader. | ||
| ||
