EPTNewbie Mini Mafia - Page 26
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
| ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14210 Posts
Hell Its about time. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
Drem903
United States100 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
![[image loading]](http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070808222628/uncyclopedia/images/9/98/Teletubbies-sun.png) Day 3 You have 48 hours to determine the next lynch. | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On November 05 2011 11:00 kitaman27 wrote: Day 3 You have 48 hours to determine the next lynch. LOL  | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
Also...nobody died? Either an interesting mafia ploy, good work by a medic, or mafia inactivity. Whichever it is I'll take it. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14210 Posts
God damm I've wanted to vote him so hard from before this game got into the teen pages. Every post that I've seen him post just oozes scum. Next skrammen dies. They've both scum or we're all dead we don't have a choice at this point before people get paranoid that I'm scum. | ||
|
Drem903
United States100 Posts
On November 05 2011 11:42 sermokala wrote: ##vote Toadesstern God damm I've wanted to vote him so hard from before this game got into the teen pages. Every post that I've seen him post just oozes scum. Next skrammen dies. They've both scum or we're all dead we don't have a choice at this point before people get paranoid that I'm scum. Coul we get more information other than "oozes scum"? What makes these people more suspicious to you? | ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On November 05 2011 11:42 sermokala wrote: ##vote Toadesstern God damm I've wanted to vote him so hard from before this game got into the teen pages. Every post that I've seen him post just oozes scum. Next skrammen dies. They've both scum or we're all dead we don't have a choice at this point before people get paranoid that I'm scum. You think they are both scum when Toad was the third vote on Skrammen day 1? When it couldn't be known whether that would get him killed or not? Somehow I sincerely doubt scum would have been willing to risk bussing one of their own that early on... If you think Skrammen is scum or if you think Toad is scum, I could understand some, but both I cannot comprehend. You'll have to explain yourself a lot better than that. Also, you'll have to do a lot of posting/explaining in general if you actually want to help us out. Hackle didn't exactly leave us with much to work with. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14210 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
The same goes for Skrammen and xsksc. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14210 Posts
Exhibit 1. On October 31 2011 17:31 Toadesstern wrote: He just turned out to attack me and since I know I'm not mafia that does sound a bit strange to me reasons a threat to onesself and then references that "he knows hes not mafia". his first moves in this very thread are counter to another instead of just srugging off and trying to elaborate on someone else. Smart scum moves proving his guilt. Exhibit 2 On November 01 2011 01:54 hacklebeast wrote: ## vote toadesstern I think his moves have been shady since the beginning. First tries to get the important figures to revel themselves (not explicitly, but if a lurker suddenly started posting significantly after it would give mafia a good clue), then follows it up with a lot of talk about the necessity to kill lurkers. To top it off he fingers chocolate only to rescind his vote after no one else follows suit. Switches up his game then (this is page 13) going from randomly choseing someone rescinds this and then trys to get a lynch to happen without justifying it. simple slight of hand to remove any question to himself about anything while achieving his end goal as a scum. Exhibit 4 On November 03 2011 20:21 Toadesstern wrote: wtf is this hyshes. I am almost certain harb's green. I'm not going to stop voteing for you because of those 3 posts and to tell the truth all 3 aren't exactly looking town. I've got my vote on hyshes as well ## Vote Hyshes Also how do you know we got a dt? We don't have to have one. Yeah couple of people look blue but they could be medics as well or one medic one dt or whatever. And btw that could be a reason why mafia did not go for obvious lynches as well. Maybe they feared there actually is a medic who would get a hero safe on someone like ciry on day1. A townie is just not going to say "yeah go ahead and lynch me" just because of one vote, no matter how strong the case. He would try to defend and tell the guy where his mistake is to make sure he's not getting lynched because after all, a 100% townie lynch is worse than a 90% townie lynch. After all you know for certain if you are town or not. I did the same although I phrased it a little bit different. I told you to lynch either skrammen or me as I thought it's the only majoritys we're going to get today and since I know I'm not mafia I went for skrammen because I thought he's something about 50% town which is still better than a lynch on me. Accepts bait But guess what happened to one of the guys who voted for him? Risk is dead and he was a townie. easy clean mafia tactics by toad here. Exhibit 5. On November 03 2011 20:25 Toadesstern wrote: Also if you REALLY know 3 scums + dt (however that's possible) there would be no problem to tell us. Yeah our dt would die but who cares if we got a 100% proof list of those 3 scums (which is never going to happen). So that last post just makes no sense. Maybe you got a decent idea, I think I got a decent idea of who might be blue and who might be mafia too but I'm not going to be as bold to say I'm 100% sure. Additionally a DT really hasn't that much extra information. I'd say (that is if we got one!) he either checked skrammen or me on night1. So he either knows if I'm red/green or if skrammen is red/green but that's still 9 people left (11 - 1 he checked - himself) he's completly unaware of. this is the most oozing post for me. If someone came out and said that they know who the scums and dt is they would be imediatly cast into doubt with little evidence and the real scums would pounce on that. then he goes on about his "idea" of whos scum and only gets away withoutsaying anything about it by saying that hes not "bold". /vote Toadesstern and thats all I'm going to do for my first couple posts. made a bunch of mistakes but I'm sure I'll get into this just fine. | ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
You still did nothing to address this: You think they are both scum when Toad was the third vote on Skrammen day 1? When it couldn't be known whether that would get him killed or not? Analysis is important, but make it good. I have some questions regarding yours: his first moves in this very thread are counter to another instead of just srugging off and trying to elaborate on someone else. What does this sentence even mean?You have nothing listed as exhibit number 3, did you mean to post more? If so, why did you remove it? In exhibit 4, if the voting for Hyshes is an implication of being scum, can you please explain why everyone else voting for him isn't scum as well? Also, does that imply you believe me to be scum for starting the case against Hyshes? Also, from Toad 5 hours before your exhibit 5, in regards to him 'not saying' his reads: Right now I'd still like to push for hackle the most. Drem and skrammen both are strange but I'm not sure about both right now. Drems mistake the other day is just so simple it got to be a real mistake rather than a scumslip. Also given he doesen't know how many mafias are in this game I'd sag he's not mafia. I still got a feeling skrammen might be green, I'm off to univerity now and will look this through later on. Also, at the time of your exhibit he is voting for Hyshes, so clearly he thought Hyshes is scum as well. Don't abuse a lack of context with quoting, it is a scummy thing to do. I accept exhibit two and the point about him being a benefactor from Risk's death. Exhibit one I don't understand so I cannot comment on. Also, this won't fly: First off It can't be me no mafia would go inactive Expect me to drill you on everything until I have a good read on you. Feel free to help out by posting lots of your reads and explanations for them. A good starting point would be answering my original question regarding Skrammen/Toad. Additionally, I would like your reads on Chocolate and xsksc, along with an explanation of course. | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 05 2011 13:00 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Chocolate and xsksc, I would be interested in hearing your reads on each other, as well as an explanation of the read of course. The same goes for Skrammen and xsksc. Certainly, I'll start with Chocolate He hasn't posted a lot, so I don't have much of a read on him. He seems like a semi-active lurker, not saying a lot but still getting his vote/opinnion in, he's stayed out of the spotlight quite well. He could well be a mafia just trying to get by quietly, although at the moment I don't have too much on him. Skrammen This guy intrigues me, his defense was pretty weak day 1, and I think he only missed being lynched because mafia must have spread their votes. This guys green if toad is mafia, but the same can be said for toad. BOTH of these guys benefited from risks death, skrammen a bit more indirectly than toad. Risk was pretty much the only guy defending skrammen day 1, so when he flips green it makes skrammen look good. He was also the guy leading the toad campaign. I have re-read the thread, and I STILL can't decide which one of these guys is scum and which isn't. Current FOS list would be something like this 1) Toad or Skrammen 2) Drem 3) Someone who's fitting in well and hasn't been thought about too much, chocolate or hackle/hackles replacement perhaps. I think I'll start the day with a pressure vote ##vote Drem903 On November 02 2011 07:20 Drem903 wrote: I guess i don't honestly have a good reason as to why i did not vote for SKrammen in the end. You blocked the skrammen lynch day 1, without even having a good explanation? @Drem What are your current reads? Do you still hold by your day 1 decision to help block the lynch? How do you feel about Skrammen and Toad now? | ||
| ||
