|
On September 20 2012 08:41 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:Show nested quote +On September 20 2012 08:19 drazak wrote: Obviously, I have many many many hours to devote to things related to mafia, the posts say 1-2 hours a day, I give more like 3-4,and obviously if I had time to read through filters and be less circumspect I would. I have a family life and other things going on, so I can't before deadline. Therefore I'm left with one option which is to say I will post about it D2 morning. I'm willing to look at Killing if other people have stopped on the whole idea of killing a lurker to prove a town. TBH killing a lurker to prove a town is one of the best things that can happen D1, as we have a town to work with D2. That's just my thought on the matter, I haven't really looked at killingtime, and I don't know what his IRL situation is at the moment, so going to bed might be because he has to be up in 4 hours already, staying up another 2-3 would be crazy. It's not "killing a lurker to prove a town", it's killing a town to prove a town. We would be at d3 without both masons and with either 1 or 2 extra townies dead (depending on how successful our d2 lynch is). Best case scenario is d3 with one scum lynched, 2 masons dead and 1 VT night killed. That's bad. The worst case scenario is fucking horrible.
Actually the best case scenario is that if sharrant is lying both he and cubu could be mafia which gives us 2 scum kills. But like you said the worst case scenario in which they are actually masons and there is no jk would leave us with 2 blue roles killed. The best case and worst case scenarios are so extreme making it a pretty big risk, which is why waiting on that issue is a pretty safe route.
|
I'm confused why drazak isn't pushing for a Killing lynch, he's kind of defending him. Only in his last post he reluctantly said he'd be willing to "look at Killing". If was drazak (and he is town) I would jump at the chance of lynching someone I had been FOSing earlier to avoid what I know to be a 100% mislynch. You can argue that this is what scum would do as well though. The only options that completely makes sense is both being scum, but that's a weak association read etc.
|
On September 20 2012 08:51 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 20 2012 08:41 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:On September 20 2012 08:19 drazak wrote: Obviously, I have many many many hours to devote to things related to mafia, the posts say 1-2 hours a day, I give more like 3-4,and obviously if I had time to read through filters and be less circumspect I would. I have a family life and other things going on, so I can't before deadline. Therefore I'm left with one option which is to say I will post about it D2 morning. I'm willing to look at Killing if other people have stopped on the whole idea of killing a lurker to prove a town. TBH killing a lurker to prove a town is one of the best things that can happen D1, as we have a town to work with D2. That's just my thought on the matter, I haven't really looked at killingtime, and I don't know what his IRL situation is at the moment, so going to bed might be because he has to be up in 4 hours already, staying up another 2-3 would be crazy. It's not "killing a lurker to prove a town", it's killing a town to prove a town. We would be at d3 without both masons and with either 1 or 2 extra townies dead (depending on how successful our d2 lynch is). Best case scenario is d3 with one scum lynched, 2 masons dead and 1 VT night killed. That's bad. The worst case scenario is fucking horrible. Actually the best case scenario is that if sharrant is lying both he and cubu could be mafia which gives us 2 scum kills. But like you said the worst case scenario in which they are actually masons and there is no jk would leave us with 2 blue roles killed. The best case and worst case scenarios are so extreme making it a pretty big risk, which is why waiting on that issue is a pretty safe route.
True, didn't think that through properly.
For me the most important part is that this is unlikely to be a scum plot by Sharrant.
And now it's too late to change. Oh, the suspense...
|
Hm. I think if Drazak flips scum, Killing might not be a bad person to go after. There was no strong assosciation between either of them at any point, but there was no finger pointing from Drazak at the end. Unfortunately that's very, very speculative because Killing hasn't been here so there's been no opportunity to either go after Drazak or avoid mentioning him.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Voting over, no more posty until Night post
|
God damn this thread blew up fast. I would've went with a no lynch over Drazak but it doesn't matter now.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Night 1![[image loading]](http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110826090014/uncyclopedia/images/b/b9/Watermelon.jpg) What an interesting piece of fruit
Hirosho Poro lay on her bed, exhausted. Entertaining two clients at once was tough work. She thought she should probably take a bath, but being a lazy and filthy individual decided to leave it until morning.
As Hirosho Poro started to drift off, she heard the door creak open. Light poured in from the hallway, and she put her hand over her eyes to shield them from the glare. All she could see though was a hulking silhouette.
"What do you want?" she grumbled. "I'm finished for the day, let me sleep."
"Oh, you're finished for the day alright," said the shadowy figure.
A banana boomeranged towards Hirosho Poro's forehead and she slumped back on the bed.
The next morning, Hirosho Poro was found still prone on her bed. But, shockingly, her head had been replaced by a giant watermelon. And, doubly unfortunately, the bedsheets were soaked in green blood.
drazak, as Hirosho Poro the Regular Whore, was lynched!
+ Show Spoiler [Final Vote Count] + Final vote count
kushm4sta (1) - Sharrant, RemedySC debears (2) - KillingTime, Sharrant, kushm4sta, rethos, rethos, KillingTime Sharrant (1) - Sonic Death Monkey, thrawn2112, debears, JacobStrangelove, JacobStrangelove, rethos, drazak, Stutters695 Stutters695 (0) - JacobStrangelove, Sharrant, Atreides Cubu (2) - kushm4sta, Stutters695, KillingTime, Atreides, drazak drazak (5) - Sharrant, Sonic Death Monkey, kushm4sta, thrawn2112, Stutters695 KillingTime (1) - debears
Cubu did not vote!
It is now Night 1. You have just under 24 hours to get your night actions into me *and* my cohosts. I will look into finding a replacement for Cubu.
|
|
On September 20 2012 09:01 Atreides- wrote: God damn this thread blew up fast. I would've went with a no lynch over Drazak but it doesn't matter now.
What is this? You don't post ANYTHINBG productive for 48 hours and then you conveniently drop by 1 minutes after deadline to chime in you think drazak is a mislynch. Is this hunting for cheap townie points before drazak is flipping green?
|
My thoughts on killing vs drazak. drazak I didn't even think drazak is scummy. I just voted for him now because of the last minute omg we need to vote for someone confusion. 1 he is not that scummy. a lot of scumhunting and nothing that strikes me as a huge scumslip 2 he's not even a lurker. I thought he was more of a lurker but I just went through his filter and I would not consider him a lurker.
killingtime i was in the process of reading his filter just now, but i just realized the deadline already passed. so fail.
|
Alright, well this turn out too great.
Gonna look into people who voted for Drazak, starting with who I think is mafia.
On September 20 2012 05:34 kushm4sta wrote: OK so as I see it here are our options atm: Sharrant, cubu, killing. Killing is not that much of a lurker. He's not lurker enough to even be considered a lurker IMO. Killing is scummy looking to me, but he looked that way last game too.
Okay, so you state the three you want to focus on. Killing would be a reasonable choice, you have pushed for him a little bit earlier. Instead you don't think for yourself and just hop on a bandwagon. I also think saying you're hopping on bandwagon isn't much defense.
|
EBWOP - This didn't turn out too great.
|
Wait, wait. Kush, are you saying Drazak was doing a lot of scum hunting, and that he wasn't a lurker?
Also, town get to talk during the night? This is interesting.
|
yeah i don't consider drazak to really be a lurker. and yeah the only reason i voted for him was total 100% bandwagon ill admit it lol
|
A lot of posters coming out of the wood work once the shit storm had settled and we've had a mislynch.
![[image loading]](http://images.wikia.com/superheroes/images/4/43/Captain_Hindsight.jpg)
##FOS Captain Hindsight
|
On September 20 2012 09:09 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:Show nested quote +On September 20 2012 09:01 Atreides- wrote: God damn this thread blew up fast. I would've went with a no lynch over Drazak but it doesn't matter now. What is this? You don't post ANYTHINBG productive for 48 hours and then you conveniently drop by 1 minutes after deadline to chime in you think drazak is a mislynch. Is this hunting for cheap townie points before drazak is flipping green?
I wasn't around after my last post, and I mixed up the voting deadline by an hour (thought it would be an hour from now, my bad). Your last sentence is a pretty moot point since it'd look equally bad for me if he flipped red.
The instant bandwagon against him is pretty interesting, and it's obvious now that the mafia had a strong hand in it.
|
/obs this game I guess, whatever
|
No, Atreides, that's not correct. The point is that if you're looking for cheap townie points, it's because you KNOW he will flip green. That's the difference. If you were red, there'd be no chance of you looking bad because he flipped red.
I'm not sure about you, I just wanted you to know why it's not a moot point.
@Kush Where is all Drazak's scumhunting then?
|
On September 20 2012 09:16 Atreides- wrote:Show nested quote +On September 20 2012 09:09 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:On September 20 2012 09:01 Atreides- wrote: God damn this thread blew up fast. I would've went with a no lynch over Drazak but it doesn't matter now. What is this? You don't post ANYTHINBG productive for 48 hours and then you conveniently drop by 1 minutes after deadline to chime in you think drazak is a mislynch. Is this hunting for cheap townie points before drazak is flipping green? I wasn't around after my last post, and I mixed up the voting deadline by an hour (thought it would be an hour from now, my bad). Your last sentence is a pretty moot point since it'd look equally bad for me if he flipped red. The instant bandwagon against him is pretty interesting, and it's obvious now that the mafia had a strong hand in it.
It was a rethorical question.
It's obvious mafia had a strong hand in it? Jesus fucking Christ, you haven't even followed the thread and now you drop in with random accusations.
|
Is this the point where I need to spend 10 posts explaining FOSing Captain Hindsight was a joke?
|
|
|
|