|
On April 15 2011 01:23 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 01:06 Barundar wrote:
@GM Doesn't mean you can't have an opinion on him, coag's meta is no where as solid as a player like Ace. You just ignored that I critized your analysis of AO and went on a rant about coag, I guess you are more touchy on the last issue?
@Jackal Yeah we don't have to believe his DT claim. His arguments are like any other arguments though, you either agree or disagree. LSB lied so much in last game that I stopped looking at the arguments against chaoser and just wanted him dead, which turned out to be a huge mistake as you know. Well what am I going to say about your criticism of my arguments? You brought up no real points other than its "bashing" not much I can reply to that, now is there? I could argue the point, but anyone who reads the analysis can come to their own conclusions, there's no need for me to get upset over it ^_^ I dont follow what you are implying about coag's meta, as far as I know every game I have played with coag he has played exactly the same. Either way, its irrelevant, we are either going to hang him today or have him shot tonight, that will clear up the situation wonderfully. In regards to protacs arguments, which seems to be what really concerns you; find that much of what protac says seems to make sense to me, his arguments are persuasive, I even agree with some if his points, and then I remember it coagulation I'm talking about, the guy who ten minutes into the day in Guts and Glory suicided into our medic, the guy who claimed medic to LSB in XXXVII based only on his gut. So yes, I do find the liars arguments persuasive, fw is a great poster and I find his analysis to be excellent, if he had tried this on almost any other player I would probably be waving a pitchfork and going for the lynch of his chosen target. Is that enough of an opinion for you? Anyway I'm done discussing coag, if you guys want to lynch him then do so, otherwise a vigi will shoot him tonight (assuming we have any around). I'm off to class, I'll be back later to scumhunt.
After refusing to address my actual points, the pressured pardoner finally concedes that the analysis is strong. Yet he doesn't want to vote Coagulation. This is a mafia who doesn't want to commit to bussing a teammate.
Anyway, due to the lack of votes for GMarshal, I'm going to switch back to Coagulation. When GMarshal pardons though, don't be surprised.
|
On April 15 2011 04:55 Protactinium wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 01:23 GMarshal wrote:On April 15 2011 01:06 Barundar wrote:
@GM Doesn't mean you can't have an opinion on him, coag's meta is no where as solid as a player like Ace. You just ignored that I critized your analysis of AO and went on a rant about coag, I guess you are more touchy on the last issue?
@Jackal Yeah we don't have to believe his DT claim. His arguments are like any other arguments though, you either agree or disagree. LSB lied so much in last game that I stopped looking at the arguments against chaoser and just wanted him dead, which turned out to be a huge mistake as you know. Well what am I going to say about your criticism of my arguments? You brought up no real points other than its "bashing" not much I can reply to that, now is there? I could argue the point, but anyone who reads the analysis can come to their own conclusions, there's no need for me to get upset over it ^_^ I dont follow what you are implying about coag's meta, as far as I know every game I have played with coag he has played exactly the same. Either way, its irrelevant, we are either going to hang him today or have him shot tonight, that will clear up the situation wonderfully. In regards to protacs arguments, which seems to be what really concerns you; find that much of what protac says seems to make sense to me, his arguments are persuasive, I even agree with some if his points, and then I remember it coagulation I'm talking about, the guy who ten minutes into the day in Guts and Glory suicided into our medic, the guy who claimed medic to LSB in XXXVII based only on his gut. So yes, I do find the liars arguments persuasive, fw is a great poster and I find his analysis to be excellent, if he had tried this on almost any other player I would probably be waving a pitchfork and going for the lynch of his chosen target. Is that enough of an opinion for you? Anyway I'm done discussing coag, if you guys want to lynch him then do so, otherwise a vigi will shoot him tonight (assuming we have any around). I'm off to class, I'll be back later to scumhunt. After refusing to address my actual points, the pressured pardoner finally concedes that the analysis is strong. Yet he doesn't want to vote Coagulation. This is a mafia who doesn't want to commit to bussing a teammate. Anyway, due to the lack of votes for GMarshal, I'm going to switch back to Coagulation. When GMarshal pardons though, don't be surprised.
If GMarshall pardons coag we have two successive lynches lined up. 1 if we have a vig with half a brain. Plus you'll be gone. Town win-win-win.
Pardon him GMarshall.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
So I finally had a chance to read through all coag's posts. As its been stated, scum hunting was nearly non-existent. Nearly everything was either related to why assassins are bad or why kav shouldn't be lynched. I would like to hear some analysis from him if he hopes to survive the day. Even if prot is a liar, I'm not convinced he is clean.
I want to bring up MetalFace again. Besides Red, the initial argument was largely ignored.
+ Show Spoiler +On April 14 2011 12:01 kitaman27 wrote:Another person I think we should look at: MetalFace
I played with this guy as scum and he was a horrible, horrible lurker. Here are some gems so far: On April 11 2011 11:15 MetalFace wrote:
Ideally we want a townie as mayor. Worst case scenario is mafia get mayor. I'd say a third party getting mayor falls in between these two. Unfortunately, we have no way of knowing who is who. On April 11 2011 11:15 MetalFace wrote:
Pretty much, the big power of the mayor is the first day lynch and the subsequent triple vote count. On April 11 2011 11:15 MetalFace wrote:
Also, remember that an assassin mayor is not ideal; a townie mayor is. From his previous game, I think this post speaks a lot to his approach as scum. On October 22 2010 23:08 MetalFace wrote:
This is my first time playing and I didn't want to screw myself over by saying something dumb
Here are some follow-up posts.
On April 14 2011 12:49 MetalFace wrote:
Anywho, I think Prot is full of crap. Someone else mentioned it but I think it's true that he is actually just an assassin who is upset he didn't get immunity from becoming mayor, so now he needs a new lie to keep himself alive. I think Lynch All Liars should be applied here and we should just out him now, but apparently other people think differently. There's a lot of pointless arguing right now. Just kill Prot.
On April 14 2011 13:11 MetalFace wrote:
Prot lied. He either lied about being an assassin or lied about being a DT. I think it's the best policy of the town to lynch anyone who lies. This benefits the town because only townies can tell the truth the entire game.
As for who I think we should lynch otherwise, I'd say Rean. aidnai did a pretty nice analysis a while back. I think our next target though should have more to do with the results of Prot's flip and what happens at night. If Prot flips DT, then Coag will have a big sign over his head. If not, then we take a better look at anyone who supports Prot's lying ways.
On April 11 2011 12:15 MetalFace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2011 11:34 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Posts like the ones MetalHead just made are pretty scummy imo, you have to look past the "wordswordswordswordswords" and think about what the direction of their post is. His post had no direction other than to appear contributive. That's not good. My direction was the implication that people who attacked Protactinium's campaign have scummy motives.
On April 14 2011 13:11 MetalFace wrote:
If Prot flips DT, then Coag will have a big sign over his head. If not, then we take a better look at anyone who supports Prot's lying ways.
He contradicts himself, based on what the popular opinion holds. First, when many people were on board with supporting Prot, he calls his attackers scummy. Now that Prot has been outed, he calls his supporters scummy. In addition, when asked to bring up some lynch candidates, he takes the easy way out by pushing LAL on prot and mentioning Rean, who has already been analyzed by several people. I'm putting my vote on him for the moment.
|
Meh, I'm confused. I wanna vote for Coag, but I guess we'll know better after tonight.
Yet, killing the pardoner? :/
|
On April 14 2011 21:52 DropBear wrote:Out of the three names on the respective bandwagons, Robellicose, Serejai and Kenpachi, there are two new players and one guy whos been around for a while. Kenpachi First his voting pattern. DAY 1 - MAYOR VOTE Show nested quote +On April 11 2011 09:41 Kenpachi wrote:Hey guuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuys. dont ignore me and tell me how im lurking and shit  .. So, how many Assassins are in the game? Maybe if Protact dies, 1 less assassin for the remaining to hunt. Its beneficial for townie in a game with less KP.. I think Kita makes a good point about Protact in the late game (not too sure if it was mentioned before but it just struck my mind) Im going to go with GM cause im a sheep ![[image loading]](http://www.undertheiceberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/Sheep.jpg) A lot of people sheeped on the GM vote as well so it doesn't stick out to me. It only becomes suss when you follow up with this: Show nested quote +On April 12 2011 13:16 Kenpachi wrote:
mmm looks like something isnt going right. my vote on the wrong guy? You had about an hour to change your vote. You were present in thread and active. Why didn't you? Why are you sheeping exactly? DAY 2 - LYNCH VOTE These are from the voting thread rather than the main thread itself. Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 06:07 Kenpachi wrote:
owait IM VOTING THE WRONG PERSON LOL
##Vote Coagulation What the hell is going on here? Next some other posts. KENPACHI'S MAYOR CAMPAIGN Show nested quote +On April 10 2011 13:19 Kenpachi wrote:I would like to run for Mayor again Lets make Kenpachi Mayor Initiativehttp://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=4910627+ Show Spoiler +Who are you and what can you do for town? I am Kenpachi and i cannot do anything for you. Why do believe you should be mayor? Well, thats easy to answer. I am Kenpachi. Do you understand what is going on at the moment? No but i will read the thread How experienced are you in a game of Mafia? i played about 7 games i think, winning about 2 of them doing nothing You scummy fuck. You've contributed very little. You've repeated what other people have said. You just described yourself as either scum or scared. Which are you? DAY 1 POSTS First, as GMarshal is pulling ahead, he claims that he is busy and cannot be involved. Show nested quote +On April 12 2011 08:23 Kenpachi wrote:
sorry guys im busy today. Im leaning towards being replaced cause this is going to be a heavy week.. He then goes on to make 18 one-line posts within the space of an hour around lynch time contributing nothing, coinciding with his inaction on the mayor vote. Show nested quote +On April 12 2011 14:10 Kenpachi wrote:
DrH. i will give you advice. If i say something, go against it plz? Why are you trying to get people to avoid looking at what you say? DAY 2 POSTS More pointless bandwagoning. Trying to look as though he's contributing and is not. Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 07:18 Kenpachi wrote:
Scum Team
Coagulation
Barundar
GMarshal
RedFF
Mister Wiggles
Robellicose
ilovejonn
~~~~~~
-runs away like a noob who accuses people and dont post reasons why they are scum because their reason for believe they are scum is actually bandwagoning other people's idea on the people they accused- When he is questioned about it by ilovejonn he replies with this: You are goofing off almost as much as Serejai. RECENT EARLY GAME BEHAVIOUR AS TOWN I've looked through a few of his more recent games in which he was almost always town. His strange one-liners have been present in all the games I looked at but there a few subtle differences. Last game, when he was town, he had his own opinion. I refer to the recently completed Insane Mafia 2, in which Kenpachi was a townsman. Following is some of his analysis on Day 1 of this game. Notice how this kind of stuff is absent from him in this game. + Show Spoiler +On March 26 2011 06:21 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2011 14:54 iGrok wrote:
Okay, I thought I was done posting but I decided to check before I went to sleep. Won't be able to in the morning.
Kavdragon, excellent points. I completely agree with you (except that I'm scummy - I look forward to reading your reasons). @Bumatlarge/Tackster, I think we should lynch annul. A) Lynch an item-gamer. B) Lynch an anti-town. Annul has been nothing but a distraction, and even if he is town (which I doubt), he's better off dead imo. lol. iGrok looks the most scummy to me imo. Hes acting like a 1st time player when he stated he was a veteran which ends up being SCUM Hes not reading carefully enough+ Show Spoiler +To further give solid opinions, a few people I want on that list include:
Annul: Reasons stated above.
Deconduo: General scummy feel (Obviously I need to explain this further, but I'll do that when i get the time.)
iGrok: More scummy play, including apposition to clearly town plans, putting down of plans without putting forward alternatives, and fanning arguments. (More on this to follow) In Chronological Order after alignments were sent out: On March 24 2011 13:25 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2011 13:06 annul wrote:
i already claimed green. i am saying you are not a blue, not that i am a blue.
you have been given ALIGNMENT pms, not role pms. Annul, thats stupid reasoning. Alignment pms always have details about the alignment's group powers (if applicable). Do you have any evidence to the contrary? Show nested quote +bumatlarge:
And annul, if I am not blue, then a real blue can come out and counter claim me. If there is a reason why he would not, then enlighten me. My alignment PM gave me more then my alignment. That is all I will say until I am mayor. A blue counter-claiming would be nice. a confirmed scum lynch d1 would be nice ^^ Lets be more obviousOn March 24 2011 13:11 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2011 12:53 bumatlarge wrote:
Well, I think I already slipped up and it is fairly obvious if you lookat my posts that I am part of the police force. I've mulled it over and the only thing we really have to lose is outing one member (me) to everyone. So let me go over why it's clear you should vote for me.
1) I am the most confirmed you can get. If there is no counter-claim, I will be assuredly more town then anyone else.
2) I have a circle of 3 other townies. I've ruled out that we have a member with a different win-condition, since mafia has decent numbers already, and 3rd party is BP. Additionally, the numbers add up with how many are in each faction.
3) We have access to more then a circle. I won't disclose anymore until it's clear I am going to win.
Personally, I have a lot of time to devote, and I have 4 times the man power of any other candidate. I believe that being elected as confirmed town mayor will not be the hard part, but rooting scum out and realizing their counters to me being mayor will demand effort.
So I advise green townies in the race drop out and vote me, because I doubt you have more to offer. If you are mafia or third party, please stay in the race or counter claim to make my job easy. Yeah, the slip was kind of apparent, unless scum is really bad :/. Your plan makes a lot of sense, especially if you have a circle. The only thing is that no one knows their powers yet... I hope you and your body guards don't get good ones :/ I don't think Jackal is confirmed anything right now. I'll vote for you unless a better campaign comes along. Lol. He doesnt want Bum with a good role so id assume its terrible play (like me ) or scumminess trying to post something of worthOn March 24 2011 14:13 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +Kavdragon:
Mayor: Bum, this is directed at you. Your campaign revolves around making sure that the mayor does not fall into the wrong hands. This is evidenced by the fact that you are selling your self as blue, and having a circle of confirmed persons. You are NOT selling your scum hunting abilities. You are taking a very passive approach by using the mayoral protection for a blue.
The problem is, we need active scum hunters. The game is won with analysis and scum hunting, NOT blues. As per the advice of the vet's in the previous game, Mafia will likely be shooting for the active leaders of the town, not blues. Thus the protection would be better given to them.
I'm not saying that I doubt your townie-ness, but I am saying that the mayor needs to be a leader, and a good analyst. If you can step up to the plate and deliver those things I'll throw my vote in behind you, but so far you've not shown great analysis. The fact that you didn't see this problem with your plan, and revealed yourself that way is evidence that you are not analyzing things very well. Because of this, I'm keeping my name in the pool. There also the fact that the mayor can choose the lynch, and can rely on active scumhunters' advice. The leader in this case only has to make the final decision, and I'd rather that be a confirmed town who will listen to scumhunters than an unknown or even probable town. Of course, this relies on no counterclaims in the next, oh, 12 hours or so i guess. Somethings offbeat or is it just me?On March 24 2011 14:24 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2011 14:22 Lanaia wrote:
This isn't night then? I'm a little confused. This is night. Day1 starts when the 24hr n0 starts iirc Feeding off of Lanaia's newbieness.On March 25 2011 02:24 iGrok wrote:
Okay, here's what I have so far:
Bum slipped hard early on, so he claimed blue. This opened up an opportunity for him to act as a mouth for the blues and lets us get a confirmed townie as mayor (assuming no counterclaim, if there is a counter claim I will re-assess the situation). And a confirmed townie as Mayor lets us get Lynch 1 under our control.
However, kavdragon makes a convincing argument, and I know that when I'm scum I usually try to snipe the best hunters first, so protecting them is a must. Hopefully, when roles are revealed, there will be some Medics/Doctors who can protect our best analysts. But they could also be used to protect bum.
Brownbear's analysis of bum's situation was good, but I think a little flawed. Its worth trading N blues for N scum, and so if Bum really is blue, the best thing that could happen is that scum counter claims. However, if there is a CC, the other blues shouldn't back up bum. 2 for 1 Blue to Scum isn't a good trade imo, and we'll have to lynch 1 blue at least. Scum doesn't have to keep claiming up to 4-4.
Currently, my vote is split between bum and kav, although I think if bum shows decent analysis d1 he'd steal my vote. A useless wall of text but theres a key info here. He states that hes a Veteran. Well hes doing shit lol cause this is all common sense. ..... On March 25 2011 02:27 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2011 02:26 ilovejonn wrote:
I just want one place I have to look at to go through with everything. Besides, people
type
like
this
in
irc,
then
I have to read
a very long
log. This is an excellent point. I'm going to go vote no on the poll now spam spamOn March 25 2011 04:02 iGrok wrote:
Suppose 2 people remain in the item game, 1 scum and 1 town, and both are killed at night - who gets the item? Why is he asking thisOn March 25 2011 05:39 iGrok wrote:
Tackster, note that I'm vote for Bum conditional to a good CC (obviously a half-assed cc I'll just laugh at). If so, I'll probably vote chaoser.
But a blue mouth with longevity would be really useful to have. So even if there is a CC, I propose we lynch the CCer first, and then bum if the CC flips blue. I mean its been long enough that any CC has to be doubtful, right? You shouldn't lynch someone off their role unless their role is GodFather straight up or Serial Killer or some obvious Scum/3rd Party RoleOn March 25 2011 06:39 iGrok wrote:Seems like thats exactly what hes doing, tackster Spam Spam SpamNext Post to look at 858 Ill bbl. iGrok, I call you SCUM Additionally, his mayor voting pattern is decisive. Show nested quote +On March 26 2011 07:19 Kenpachi wrote:Back~ Well the next few posts from iGrok are meh. not worth posting about really. Also doing this helped me understand whats going on in the game a whole lot better.  ##Vote Bum The combination of his being on both bandwagons, his bizarre posting and the subtle differences between this game and his Insane 2 town posting are why you should ##Vote KenpachiMy secondary candidates are Robellicose and Serejai
hi. anyone who analyzes me is new to this game clearly.
I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT MOST OF YOUR POINTS OF ME ARE INVALID
If you look at my posts carefully, youd notice that i was against voting Protact. Though i didnt say i didnt trust DrH, i didnt. GM was the best choice. Also, i post a mayoral run every game with mayor. Do i get votes? This is the first game where i got a vote. Please look at the current situation when you analyze my posts. Think for a second. Your questionings of my posts are easily answered if you just 1 or 2 pages around my post .... I dont think your scum. you are just trying to be useful because no one analyzes me
Imo, ilovejonn and Wiggles are the most scummy in the game and that list infact was not a joke but a list of my own suspects. Just, im too lazy to back up my reasonings. Besides, i wanted people to respond to it and i included that little paragraph for a reason. please read it carefully (with emphasis on the like). Ill do in 2 days or so (if im not too lazy then because thats when my break begins  ) but just telling you, my analyses are inaccurate as i was wrong on iGrok and wrong on everyone before that.
Conclusion: you are a newbie in TL Mafia. Welcome!
|
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight?
|
On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Would you lose a DT over a Vet?
Think about it, Protact is a waste of a lynch. Directs KP (black) to 1 person if Coag is town.
|
the fact that lsb doesn't have a stupid plan already involving everyone roleclaiming/dying to the mafia makes me think he is scum
|
On April 15 2011 06:54 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Would you lose a DT over a Vet? Think about it, Protact is a waste of a lynch. Directs KP (black) to 1 person if Coag is town.
He is not a DT
|
On April 15 2011 06:54 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Would you lose a DT over a Vet? Think about it, Protact is a waste of a lynch. Directs KP (black) to 1 person if Coag is town.
If we lynch coag and he flips red, it says nothing about protact's alignment, and we're likely to be in the same situation regarding him tomorrow. Lynching him is a bad idea too, as we're either lynching a DT (unlikely in my opinion) or an assassin (not so great for town still compared to lynching a mafia).
|
On April 15 2011 06:53 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight?
Cause Coag is a vet, and I'd rather lynch a Assassin over a vet.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On April 15 2011 06:58 LSB wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:53 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight? Cause Coag is a vet, and I'd rather lynch a Assassin over a vet.
Wouldn't you rather lynch scum (other than coag), than an assassin?
|
I'd rather lynch scum.
Why do you trust Coagulations roleclaim in the first place?
|
What is with all these people insinuating Protactinium might be a DT after he was outed...
|
On April 15 2011 06:59 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:58 LSB wrote:On April 15 2011 06:53 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight? Cause Coag is a vet, and I'd rather lynch a Assassin over a vet. Wouldn't you rather lynch scum (other than coag), than an assassin?
Who else is up for the lynch?
On April 15 2011 06:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I'd rather lynch scum.
Why do you trust Coagulations roleclaim in the first place?
I don't get why don't people accept Coag's claim at face value? If he was mafia he'd claim townie.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On April 15 2011 07:02 LSB wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:59 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:58 LSB wrote:On April 15 2011 06:53 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight? Cause Coag is a vet, and I'd rather lynch a Assassin over a vet. Wouldn't you rather lynch scum (other than coag), than an assassin? Who else is up for the lynch?
Are you not going to bother looking and settle for black?
|
On April 15 2011 07:02 LSB wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:59 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:58 LSB wrote:On April 15 2011 06:53 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight? Cause Coag is a vet, and I'd rather lynch a Assassin over a vet. Wouldn't you rather lynch scum (other than coag), than an assassin? Who else is up for the lynch? Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 06:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I'd rather lynch scum.
Why do you trust Coagulations roleclaim in the first place? I don't get why don't people accept Coag's claim at face value? If he was mafia he'd claim townie.
if i were mafia i'd claim veteran
|
On April 15 2011 07:02 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 07:02 LSB wrote:On April 15 2011 06:59 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:58 LSB wrote:On April 15 2011 06:53 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight? Cause Coag is a vet, and I'd rather lynch a Assassin over a vet. Wouldn't you rather lynch scum (other than coag), than an assassin? Who else is up for the lynch? Are you not going to bother looking and settle for black?
Prot is probably mafia, I've already explained why it is very likely.
In addition I don't believe that Metalface has enough on him to call him red.
|
On April 15 2011 07:07 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 07:02 LSB wrote:On April 15 2011 06:59 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:58 LSB wrote:On April 15 2011 06:53 kitaman27 wrote:On April 15 2011 06:52 LSB wrote:
Happy birthday Protactinium!
And on a somewhat related note, lets lynch him. I've already explained why he's been lying over and over. I have no idea why people are trying to lynch coag.
Why do you keep arguing for lyching Prot. Why waste a lynch when the assassins can take care of him tonight? Cause Coag is a vet, and I'd rather lynch a Assassin over a vet. Wouldn't you rather lynch scum (other than coag), than an assassin? Who else is up for the lynch? On April 15 2011 06:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I'd rather lynch scum.
Why do you trust Coagulations roleclaim in the first place? I don't get why don't people accept Coag's claim at face value? If he was mafia he'd claim townie. if i were mafia i'd claim veteran
Just saying, you kindof suck at fake claims.
By suck I mean you really really suck at fake claims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://clatl.com/images/blogimages/2011/03/21/1300730497-head_explode.jpg)
