|
All those words. That dont mean anything.
it's the top scum play to stifle discussion. With his sure stance on me being scum and despite me resonding why I posted what I did is it not he who is in fact stifling the discussion?
I meant saying that someone is stifling discussion is what scum always like to do.
The fact that you say everyone else agrees with you in this thread is just testament to the fact that you have put no effort or thought into your stance and are just going with the flow to follow up for an 'easy' lynch.
Everyone else thinks that you are scummy. Therefore I cant do anything more to convince people at this point of time.
COME ON HOLYFLARE. STOP POSTING LONG POSTS. NOT GOOD.
You and BH are probably not on the same scumteam but I have a way more sure read on you than on BH.
BH, is Holyflare a noob or not?
|
On October 02 2013 13:56 Blazinghand wrote:
Really i currently for example have no reason whatsoever to believe, say, Sloosh is town, since he hasn't really posted, but that doesn't mean I'll vote him. in my opinion there needs to be a certain critical mass of evidence before i'm willing to cast a vote, even a pressure vote.
Thats your opinion, everyone is entitled to one.
Actually BH, lets say someone obviously fakeclaims like cop. Would you instantly vote for him?
|
ok im really gonna go now.
Play nicely guys.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Stop posting long posts??? It's called analysis of a player. The fact that even after I've posted that you aren't asking me anything, aren't trying to discover whether I am in fact town or not and aren't trying to decipher other peoples motives is just rubbing me the wrong way. It's easy to jump on a player because he played the noob card but there are 2 scum in this game not just one. If i were to be lynched and did indeed flip town then wouldn't you regret not pressuring other people on why they think i'm a sure fire scum?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
And as soon as I respond to something you leave? Really?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
The fact you can't just click my profile (you can even see my post count??) and see that I've only been in newbie games is just more testament to your alignment. Shouldn't you be discerning these answers before you know that "He's surely scum".?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Going to go to bed (6am) in roughly 10 minutes so if anyone wants to discuss anything further/immediately I'll be available for that.
|
Holyflare you mentioned earlier something about digging into people's playstyles. What do you mean by that / do you have some results or something?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I like meta, so I'll read around some other games but not right this second.
|
Cool, take your time with that, I'm not too into meta so no need to follow up on that with me.
I think Holyflare is pretty town.
Liking Risen the least.
Anyone hear to talk beside HF? (you can go to sleep we can talk tomorrow  )
|
Blazinghand
United States25549 Posts
i am here but a bit tied up
and yeah we're not lynching HF today, his new interactions are good
|
It's ok, I am getting supes tired too / gonna clock out any minute now.
Nothing too alarming from Oats for me. Seems like ol' Oats from back whenever I last played with him.
Agree / no?
|
Blazinghand
United States25549 Posts
I will strike him down with great vengeance!
|
I don't get it. I don't think I'm giving Oats special Oats slack when I say that nothing he has done is particularly bad.
Is your primary concern the "putting of words in your mouth"? Is Oats using faulty logic in a way that leans scum? I don't get it.
|
Blazinghand
United States25549 Posts
Yeah basically I'm mad at him so we should lynch him. Then he won't make me mad in future games cause I can basically lynch players on a whim due to my great influence. This is actually an okay reason imo because it will make him play good and not like oats.
Also RNG.
|
Blazinghand is a cool guy (meaning no lynchy lynchy todaysies despite no real read on him (sowwy))
Holyflare town, sloosh town (despite opening post making me tilt my head)
Risen is bleh, have to wait for him to have a scumread and have him explain it to see what colour his blood is.
Oats..... his OMGUS on BH looks pretty bad. But then again oats tends to look pretty bad early as town.
Did he, as scum, crack under the pressure of a single vote by BH? I dunno, sounds doubtful.
I liked his pressure on holyflare, because an opening post proclaiming newb should always be pressured. But sloosh came out looking town and oats hasn't retracted his vote yet, so let's see what he thinks when he's back.
I'm not convinced, anyway.
On October 02 2013 13:28 Oatsmaster wrote:
This feels so much like Mocsta in Newbie 47 or whatever.
Oats could you explain this?
|
Blazinghand
United States25549 Posts
Seriously though if the reason I've given for lynching him are normal oats behavior then that's like a policy lynch reason right there. We should do it, it would be awesome.
|
On October 02 2013 15:10 Blazinghand wrote:
Seriously though if the reason I've given for lynching him are normal oats behavior then that's like a policy lynch reason right there. We should do it, it would be awesome.
I know you like your game theory, and technically we have a 2/7 chance (since doc will claim), but the information we get off of people agreeing to a random lynch isn't that telling I don't think. Rather just spark discussion as usual and see what happens.
Despite,(according to database numbers) a random lynch being slightly more effective, if it hits town it probably gets less information than if there are a couple of lynch candidates and they are discussed and votes are moved around.
|
Blazinghand
United States25549 Posts
On October 02 2013 15:14 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2013 15:10 Blazinghand wrote:
Seriously though if the reason I've given for lynching him are normal oats behavior then that's like a policy lynch reason right there. We should do it, it would be awesome. I know you like your game theory, and technically we have a 2/7 chance (since doc will claim), but the information we get off of people agreeing to a random lynch isn't that telling I don't think. Rather just spark discussion as usual and see what happens. Despite,(according to database numbers) a random lynch being slightly more effective, if it hits town it probably gets less information than if there are a couple of lynch candidates and they are discussed and votes are moved around.
That's a reasonable thing to say. That being said, the RNG led (and in general it seems, leads) to a good discussion. I don't think things would have played out as they did unless I RNGed this game, and I'm glad I did.
|
On October 02 2013 15:20 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2013 15:14 Clarity_nl wrote:On October 02 2013 15:10 Blazinghand wrote:
Seriously though if the reason I've given for lynching him are normal oats behavior then that's like a policy lynch reason right there. We should do it, it would be awesome. I know you like your game theory, and technically we have a 2/7 chance (since doc will claim), but the information we get off of people agreeing to a random lynch isn't that telling I don't think. Rather just spark discussion as usual and see what happens. Despite,(according to database numbers) a random lynch being slightly more effective, if it hits town it probably gets less information than if there are a couple of lynch candidates and they are discussed and votes are moved around. That's a reasonable thing to say. That being said, the RNG led (and in general it seems, leads) to a good discussion. I don't think things would have played out as they did unless I RNGed this game, and I'm glad I did.
That's fine and I think we have some information that came out of it rather than lurker lynch policy talk which is a dead horse.
But do you plan on hanging on to your rng lynch today unless someone becomes obvious scum? Or do you feel that oats is no longer a random lynch now and you think he's most likely to flip scum at this time, and if that changes you'll change your vote?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
