EPTWorld Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 11
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 02 2013 15:23 Clarity_nl wrote: That's fine and I think we have some information that came out of it rather than lurker lynch policy talk which is a dead horse. But do you plan on hanging on to your rng lynch today unless someone becomes obvious scum? Or do you feel that oats is no longer a random lynch now and you think he's most likely to flip scum at this time, and if that changes you'll change your vote? I'm not planning to vote oats because of RNG. I like my vote on him. I have suspicions on risen. Although HF's most recent posts are nice I'd like to hear more from him once he's awake again (and sloosh remains null). In general, I think given my current info Oats is the optimal lynch for hittings lots of scum, removing potential liabilities at lylo (both as lynchbait and as a poor decisionmaker), and improving thread atmosphere. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888508 fluff question http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888710 reads, weak, not interrogative, no votes, no reasons http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888809 weak read http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888965 weird questions. not getting his point across directly Not much to go on, but he didn't do much. I'm not ready to lynch him yet but I am quite unimpressed. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
But did you not find it odd that I gave him a townread earlier? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Anything you wanna talk about? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 02 2013 15:23 Clarity_nl wrote: That's fine and I think we have some information that came out of it rather than lurker lynch policy talk which is a dead horse. But do you plan on hanging on to your rng lynch today unless someone becomes obvious scum? Or do you feel that oats is no longer a random lynch now and you think he's most likely to flip scum at this time, and if that changes you'll change your vote? What info in particular do you think was gained? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
slOosh at least started asking questions when he initially joined into the discussion although has not really contributed since then at least he read up to date or so it seems. He's not too into meta but is alright saying that oats' play is just like his meta view of him though which was a little odd. Need to hear more on that side of things. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
Shit I don't even know what to write... Been so looong. Oats seem either weird, confused or scummy. Not sure which yet. On October 02 2013 13:16 Oatsmaster wrote: Stifling discussion is top scum play for calling someone scummy when they are being agressive and shit. Holyflare is the right lynch!. The first sentence still doesnt make sense to me after reading it 5 times (Hungover so might be my fault). it also baffles me that he seems so sure about who to lynch so early. There are other examples: On October 02 2013 14:01 Oatsmaster wrote: All those words. That dont mean anything. I meant saying that someone is stifling discussion is what scum always like to do. Everyone else thinks that you are scummy. Therefore I cant do anything more to convince people at this point of time. COME ON HOLYFLARE. STOP POSTING LONG POSTS. NOT GOOD. You and BH are probably not on the same scumteam but I have a way more sure read on you than on BH. BH, is Holyflare a noob or not? This whole posts is nonsense aswell. But through all this I somewhat still think he is town... hmm... HF's rambling about meta and being weak is rubbish. Him jumping the rng wagon, as pointed out by Risen, without any good reason is rubbish. After this, despite that BH think he have been posting better, he havent really done anything. He has sheeping BH and using BH arguments to push oats. ##Vote Holyflare | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 02 2013 18:34 marvellosity wrote: What info in particular do you think was gained? Just the usual really. I didn't mean anything in particular but it >felt< that the starting hours were more productive than usual due to BH's rng lynch suggestion. I can't really quantify it. What do you think of oats? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On October 02 2013 18:38 Dirkzor wrote: I believe BH's rng post was meant to be what it turned out to be. Discussion starter. It worked. Great. Now lets move on and find scum. Shit I don't even know what to write... Been so looong. Oats seem either weird, confused or scummy. Not sure which yet. The first sentence still doesnt make sense to me after reading it 5 times (Hungover so might be my fault). it also baffles me that he seems so sure about who to lynch so early. There are other examples: This whole posts is nonsense aswell. But through all this I somewhat still think he is town... hmm... HF's rambling about meta and being weak is rubbish. Him jumping the rng wagon, as pointed out by Risen, without any good reason is rubbish. After this, despite that BH think he have been posting better, he havent really done anything. He has sheeping BH and using BH arguments to push oats. ##Vote Holyflare Really? I have plenty of reasons for doing it and I've explained them about a million times now. There is an entirety of posts between my first post and then that are not "rubbish". Despite the fact that I've seemingly used someone's arguements do you not still think the points that have arisen are apt in this context? Surely, in a game with no cop you do your utmost to seem the most towny and discover who is also a townsperson. How do you do that? Asking that person questions, finding connections between that person and others for later, has oats done any of this? No. Has risen done any of that? No. Sheeping a vote and giving weak reasoning yourself is in my opinion poor play, coming to the conclusion that someone is still town after all of the points made and the fact that you think his posts are nonsense is also just more poor decision making. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 02 2013 18:37 Holyflare wrote: slOosh at least started asking questions when he initially joined into the discussion although has not really contributed since then at least he read up to date or so it seems. He's not too into meta but is alright saying that oats' play is just like his meta view of him though which was a little odd. Need to hear more on that side of things. I like this observation :> | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Not even read his post voting Holyflare, but I don't really think he should be voting HF right now as his entrance into the thread. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Your question is silly. "yes, I was terrified someone might vote him before me, that's absolutely why I voted him like that" | ||
| ||
