EPTTSL3 Qualifiers and Point Rankings - Page 5
| Forum Index > PokerStrategy.com TSL3 Forum |
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
| ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10307 Posts
| ||
|
Count9
China10928 Posts
| ||
|
Finrod1
Germany3997 Posts
| ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
 Ciara 1142.  Fenix, GoOdy 1004. Stephano 655-8.  TLO, Junny, PredY, ThorZaIN 51 | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
| ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
| ||
|
GreatFall
United States1061 Posts
| ||
|
FlashIsHigh
United States474 Posts
 | ||
|
cHicKeLoR
Germany559 Posts
| ||
|
Get.Midikem
Sweden312 Posts
1 vs 16, 2 vs 15 and so on. To make one more round. | ||
|
blae000
Norway1640 Posts
Also, can't seem to find Dimaga anywhere..?! | ||
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
ThePhan2m
Norway2751 Posts
| ||
|
rift
1819 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On January 28 2011 13:03 rift wrote: I am very worried about the point system implemented, only because of the relatively wide difference between points for each placement. Players who make it one round further in a single tournament have a far greater chance of qualifying, whereas players who show consistency in multiple tournaments, which I believe to be more difficult, still have little chance to catch up. It's obviously too late to change anything, but I really hope that players with multiple high finishes will be able to qualify along with those who made it near the top once. I don't quite follow this, since the points system is designed to reward consistency over one off performances. For instance, placing 2nd once will net you less points than two semifinal finishes. | ||
|
rift
1819 Posts
On January 28 2011 13:13 Plexa wrote: I don't quite follow this, since the points system is designed to reward consistency over one off performances. For instance, placing 2nd once will net you less points than two semifinal finishes. At the end the top 8 breakdown will be a minimum of 100 points in each spot: 1. 114+ (Ciara currently) 2. 100+ (ESC.GoOdy currently) 3. 100+ (FnaticMSI.Fenix currently) 4. 100+ 5. 100+ 6. 100+ 7. 100+ 8. 100+ ..due to the 2nd place finishes. The current or future ro4 (+51), ro8 (+26), and ro16 (+14) finishers will have to overcome this 100+ point barrier in the next 5 opens; in addition, a 2nd place finisher could take another round, as Ciara did. It's doable, just difficult, especially in a tournament of this size. If I am making a mistake here I apologize. We'll see how it goes, top players will probably rack up the points easily--it's just tight with 5 more opens. | ||
|
huameng
United States1133 Posts
On the other note, someone who gets 9-16th 7 out of 8 events loses out to a one time runner-up. This isn't exactly what I'd call rewarding consistency, but do we as fans want someone in the TSL who can't get past the ro16 of an open event? I don't mind the point system. | ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On January 28 2011 14:09 rift wrote: You are right, things are getting tight. Which is why every TLOpen matters! The system is working exactly as we intended it; multiple high finishes are what will determine who makes it through with the lower rounds providing somewhat of a tie-breaker effect.At the end the top 8 breakdown will be a minimum of 100 points in each spot: 1. 114+ (Ciara currently) 2. 100+ (ESC.GoOdy currently) 3. 100+ (FnaticMSI.Fenix currently) 4. 100+ 5. 100+ 6. 100+ 7. 100+ 8. 100+ ..due to the 2nd place finishes. The current or future ro4 (+51), ro8 (+26), and ro16 (+14) finishers will have to overcome this 100+ point barrier in the next 5 opens; in addition, a 2nd place finisher could take another round, as Ciara did. It's doable, just difficult, especially in a tournament of this size. If I am making a mistake here I apologize. We'll see how it goes, top players will probably rack up the points easily--it's just tight with 5 more opens. | ||
| ||
