|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On April 05 2012 11:01 NicolBolas wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 10:18 dAPhREAk wrote: sinistrorsey2 was just temp banned for 2 days by Falling.
That account was created on 2011-08-01 12:28:35 and had 40 posts.
Reason: You've been warned about this before. "6. THOU SHALL RESPECT FORUM VETERANS" I'm not sure how you thought your post conformed to this commandment.
when does one become a forum veteran? He was mocking iNcontrol, so it's not like it's a borderline case... didnt care much about sinistroesieus. was just curious about what defines a veteran, and seeing the responses in here basically nothing. except ETT saying pre-2007.
|
On April 05 2012 11:04 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 11:01 NicolBolas wrote:On April 05 2012 10:18 dAPhREAk wrote: sinistrorsey2 was just temp banned for 2 days by Falling.
That account was created on 2011-08-01 12:28:35 and had 40 posts.
Reason: You've been warned about this before. "6. THOU SHALL RESPECT FORUM VETERANS" I'm not sure how you thought your post conformed to this commandment.
when does one become a forum veteran? He was mocking iNcontrol, so it's not like it's a borderline case... didnt care much about sinistroesieus. was just curious about what defines a veteran, and seeing the responses in here basically nothing. except ETT saying pre-2007.
It's kind of like the Oracle tells Neo in the first Matrix. Noone can tell you you're the one. You either are or you aren't. You just know it, balls to bones.
Or something like that. There's no pre-defined checklist or criteria. It just happens. And even then, there's kind of levels of it.
|
On April 05 2012 10:21 Torenhire wrote: If you have to ask, you aren't one :p
Respect me yo! I have a rule of thumb to treat STX fans as vets.
Also any of the defunct teams.
|
On April 05 2012 10:48 JingleHell wrote: You can also test it by getting banned. If the ABL thread gets derailed for days afterwards with bad puns revolving around your name, and mods and admins get in on it, odds are good you've got at least some credit with the staff.
See I would've gone with "if your third temp ban is still just a 2 day", but w/e
|
On April 05 2012 11:05 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 11:04 dAPhREAk wrote:On April 05 2012 11:01 NicolBolas wrote:On April 05 2012 10:18 dAPhREAk wrote: sinistrorsey2 was just temp banned for 2 days by Falling.
That account was created on 2011-08-01 12:28:35 and had 40 posts.
Reason: You've been warned about this before. "6. THOU SHALL RESPECT FORUM VETERANS" I'm not sure how you thought your post conformed to this commandment.
when does one become a forum veteran? He was mocking iNcontrol, so it's not like it's a borderline case... didnt care much about sinistroesieus. was just curious about what defines a veteran, and seeing the responses in here basically nothing. except ETT saying pre-2007. It's kind of like the Oracle tells Neo in the first Matrix. Noone can tell you you're the one. You either are or you aren't. You just know it, balls to bones. Or something like that. There's no pre-defined checklist or criteria. It just happens. And even then, there's kind of levels of it. well then. the rule that people should respect their veterans is kind of stupid then, right? because apparently you cant tell who they are...
|
On April 05 2012 11:10 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 11:05 JingleHell wrote:On April 05 2012 11:04 dAPhREAk wrote:On April 05 2012 11:01 NicolBolas wrote:On April 05 2012 10:18 dAPhREAk wrote: sinistrorsey2 was just temp banned for 2 days by Falling.
That account was created on 2011-08-01 12:28:35 and had 40 posts.
Reason: You've been warned about this before. "6. THOU SHALL RESPECT FORUM VETERANS" I'm not sure how you thought your post conformed to this commandment.
when does one become a forum veteran? He was mocking iNcontrol, so it's not like it's a borderline case... didnt care much about sinistroesieus. was just curious about what defines a veteran, and seeing the responses in here basically nothing. except ETT saying pre-2007. It's kind of like the Oracle tells Neo in the first Matrix. Noone can tell you you're the one. You either are or you aren't. You just know it, balls to bones. Or something like that. There's no pre-defined checklist or criteria. It just happens. And even then, there's kind of levels of it. well then. the rule that people should respect their veterans is kind of stupid then, right? because apparently you cant tell who they are...
Ooooh, touche. However, I would think that people can assume who and aren't veterans pretty easily. Worst case scenario, they will 'respect' someone who isn't a true veteran. I think that is acceptable... lol
|
Canada11278 Posts
Oh it's useful. If you have a 2011 30 post punk going after a 2004 vet unprovoked it's pretty clear cut. That's the main thing. Veterans say stupid stuff and you kinda expect people to react to it. When it's unprovoked and you have a history of it... it gets tiresome.
|
On April 05 2012 11:12 lwwkicker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 11:10 dAPhREAk wrote:On April 05 2012 11:05 JingleHell wrote:On April 05 2012 11:04 dAPhREAk wrote:On April 05 2012 11:01 NicolBolas wrote:On April 05 2012 10:18 dAPhREAk wrote: sinistrorsey2 was just temp banned for 2 days by Falling.
That account was created on 2011-08-01 12:28:35 and had 40 posts.
Reason: You've been warned about this before. "6. THOU SHALL RESPECT FORUM VETERANS" I'm not sure how you thought your post conformed to this commandment.
when does one become a forum veteran? He was mocking iNcontrol, so it's not like it's a borderline case... didnt care much about sinistroesieus. was just curious about what defines a veteran, and seeing the responses in here basically nothing. except ETT saying pre-2007. It's kind of like the Oracle tells Neo in the first Matrix. Noone can tell you you're the one. You either are or you aren't. You just know it, balls to bones. Or something like that. There's no pre-defined checklist or criteria. It just happens. And even then, there's kind of levels of it. well then. the rule that people should respect their veterans is kind of stupid then, right? because apparently you cant tell who they are... Ooooh, touche. However, I would think that people can assume who and aren't veterans pretty easily. Worst case scenario, they will 'respect' someone who isn't a true veteran. I think that is acceptable... lol
If you can't get at least SOME idea of whether they're a vet or not, you're WAY too new to be going for ANYBODY's throat.
Oh, and another consideration: a lot of it can be fairly sub-board specific.
|
On April 05 2012 11:16 Falling wrote: Oh it's useful. If you have a 2011 30 post punk going after a 2004 vet unprovoked it's pretty clear cut. That's the main thing. Veterans say stupid stuff and you kinda expect people to react to it. When it's unprovoked and you have a history of it... it gets tiresome.
in all fairness, you could have banned him for any number of reasons. ;-) i have no problem with the veteran rule. it just seems kind of silly when the people in this thread dont even know what a veteran is, and most of them are likely veterans.
On April 05 2012 09:48 sinistrorsey2 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 03:11 iNcontroL wrote: Please vote for me! Would love the opportunity for retribution. If not me any of the other players are more than deserving. PLZ VOTE FOR ME IM BAD, BUT EXTREMELY POPULAR LETS MAKE THAT SHINE!!! User was temp banned for this post.
|
On April 05 2012 11:54 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 11:16 Falling wrote: Oh it's useful. If you have a 2011 30 post punk going after a 2004 vet unprovoked it's pretty clear cut. That's the main thing. Veterans say stupid stuff and you kinda expect people to react to it. When it's unprovoked and you have a history of it... it gets tiresome. in all fairness, you could have banned him for any number of reasons. ;-) i have no problem with the veteran rule. it just seems kind of silly when the people in this thread dont even know what a veteran is, and most of them are likely veterans. Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 09:48 sinistrorsey2 wrote:On April 05 2012 03:11 iNcontroL wrote: Please vote for me! Would love the opportunity for retribution. If not me any of the other players are more than deserving. PLZ VOTE FOR ME IM BAD, BUT EXTREMELY POPULAR LETS MAKE THAT SHINE!!! User was temp banned for this post.
Knowing it and being able to define it in words are entirely different, especially when it's so... variable. I'm semi-vet-ish in Tech Support, although I'll probably never have full veteran status unless I get my smart ass in check. Put me in Strat, I can't expect shit. TLHF, same.
It's vague because if you try to put a crystal clear definition on it, people will try to rules-lawyer the specific definition. It's based on several factors of merit, rather than arbitrary post counts or time stamps. It's good that way.
It's a partial meritocracy with a dash of seniority and just a touch of notoriety.
|
I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet.
|
|
On April 05 2012 11:06 Mobius_1 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 10:21 Torenhire wrote: If you have to ask, you aren't one :p
Respect me yo! I have a rule of thumb to treat STX fans as vets. Also any of the defunct teams.
Well, STX is as good as defunct By you defnition, you should lick my boots as soon as I switch back to the OZ icon. When did Torenhire become a STX fan anyway?
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49497 Posts
On April 05 2012 12:22 ShadeR wrote: I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet.
I've been called a vet and not vet by different staff members before, so there really isn't a clear way of saying who is a vet.
|
On April 05 2012 18:49 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 12:22 ShadeR wrote: I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet. I've been called a vet (KT fans) and not vet (the rest) by different staff members before, so there really isn't a clear way of saying who is a vet. fixed it for you say thx now
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49497 Posts
On April 05 2012 19:03 blubbdavid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 18:49 BLinD-RawR wrote:On April 05 2012 12:22 ShadeR wrote: I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet. I've been called a vet (KT fans) and not vet (the rest) by different staff members before, so there really isn't a clear way of saying who is a vet. fixed it for you say thx now
no because that is false.
|
On April 05 2012 19:07 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 19:03 blubbdavid wrote:On April 05 2012 18:49 BLinD-RawR wrote:On April 05 2012 12:22 ShadeR wrote: I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet. I've been called a vet (KT fans) and not vet (the rest) by different staff members before, so there really isn't a clear way of saying who is a vet. fixed it for you say thx now no because that is false. zzzz I am more vet than you
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49497 Posts
On April 05 2012 19:11 blubbdavid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 19:07 BLinD-RawR wrote:On April 05 2012 19:03 blubbdavid wrote:On April 05 2012 18:49 BLinD-RawR wrote:On April 05 2012 12:22 ShadeR wrote: I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet. I've been called a vet (KT fans) and not vet (the rest) by different staff members before, so there really isn't a clear way of saying who is a vet. fixed it for you say thx now no because that is false. zzzz I am more vet than you
not in posting though.:p
|
On April 05 2012 19:15 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 19:11 blubbdavid wrote:On April 05 2012 19:07 BLinD-RawR wrote:On April 05 2012 19:03 blubbdavid wrote:On April 05 2012 18:49 BLinD-RawR wrote:On April 05 2012 12:22 ShadeR wrote: I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet. I've been called a vet (KT fans) and not vet (the rest) by different staff members before, so there really isn't a clear way of saying who is a vet. fixed it for you say thx now no because that is false. zzzz I am more vet than you not in posting though.:p Not bad Mr Rawr, you discovered my trap and elegantly avoided it. This round goes to you sir.
|
On April 05 2012 18:49 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 12:22 ShadeR wrote: I like ETT's definition. Join date before the announcement of SC2 and your a vet. I've been called a vet and not vet by different staff members before, so there really isn't a clear way of saying who is a vet. Yeah i've been called a vet on occasion as well. I am not a veteran!
|
|
|
|