|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Australia8532 Posts
On March 21 2012 09:56 Chocolate wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2012 09:53 bkrow wrote:Before i reported his blog i actually clicked through his post history. This guy is either on something or just doesn't quite understand the process. His post history is hilarious =P I think he's a 14year old kid living in the US that does not natively speak English. I didn't understand the process when I first joined too, so I'm glad he wasn't permed.
I think the key notion is to learn from your mistakes - he had i think 3 blogs closed because they were absolutely atrocious and then received PMs about what the problem was. If you are doing something wrong, and someone reprimands you, don't keep doing the same thing expecting a different result.
I think even a 14 year old who isn't a native English speaker can understand that?
|
On March 21 2012 10:06 bkrow wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2012 09:56 Chocolate wrote:On March 21 2012 09:53 bkrow wrote:Before i reported his blog i actually clicked through his post history. This guy is either on something or just doesn't quite understand the process. His post history is hilarious =P I think he's a 14year old kid living in the US that does not natively speak English. I didn't understand the process when I first joined too, so I'm glad he wasn't permed. I think the key notion is to learn from your mistakes - he had i think 3 blogs closed because they were absolutely atrocious and then received PMs about what the problem was. If you are doing something wrong, and someone reprimands you, don't keep doing the same thing expecting a different result. I think even a 14 year old who isn't a native English speaker can understand that?
You're right. Didn't realize so many of his blogs have been closed haha.
|
On March 21 2012 09:53 bkrow wrote:Before i reported his blog i actually clicked through his post history. This guy is either on something or just doesn't quite understand the process. His post history is hilarious =P
Lol I reported one of his blogs too.
Besides being crazy, he seems like just kind of a jerk to me. To shit on someone who offers their free time to help you, then complain about it publicly.... just wtf....
|
United States22154 Posts
On March 21 2012 10:06 bkrow wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2012 09:56 Chocolate wrote:On March 21 2012 09:53 bkrow wrote:Before i reported his blog i actually clicked through his post history. This guy is either on something or just doesn't quite understand the process. His post history is hilarious =P I think he's a 14year old kid living in the US that does not natively speak English. I didn't understand the process when I first joined too, so I'm glad he wasn't permed. I think the key notion is to learn from your mistakes - he had i think 3 blogs closed because they were absolutely atrocious and then received PMs about what the problem was. If you are doing something wrong, and someone reprimands you, don't keep doing the same thing expecting a different result. I think even a 14 year old who isn't a native English speaker can understand that?
Its happened twice.
The first time he reopened his thread three times, and got 2 dayed,
Then he opened the first grammar blog, it got closed soon after, when I closed the second one he made, I warned him to stop making bad/repeat topics.
He then made a third blog, just as bad as the other two. If he can't learn, he can't stay, I mean "don't open any more bad topics" is not that hard to grasp.
|
Btw GM, nice advice to sasharabon34 :D :D
|
GMarshal = Gary Marshal?
![[image loading]](http://www.sfmedics.com/Adventures/Getting%20to%20work%20with%20Garry%20Marshall.jpg)
|
Ding Ding! Winner Winner, Chicken Dinner!
|
Baltimore, USA22258 Posts
On March 21 2012 02:46 EvilTeletubby wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2012 23:58 Aeres wrote:
It was most likely galleried. The Gallery is where the mods send threads that are too sensitive for the closed forum. In-depth personal attacks that reveal information about somebody, like the thread you mention, get galleried. So does stuff like child porn, virus attacks, etc.
Anything that can still send its malevolent message in the closed forum is galleried. Yeah that thread was definitely galleried. Which was a shame because here is one of the example pics the guy used, I had felt a need to reply to. 
For added fun...
![[image loading]](http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/8805/screenshot2012032101340.jpg)
|
Sorry ETT, our short attention span has already moved onto the next big drama. This is soooo yesterday's news.
Speaking of which, anyone want to take any bets as to how many Combat_Ex threads are about to get closed in the next few days?
|
On March 21 2012 14:53 TheToast wrote:
Sorry ETT, our short attention span has already moved onto the next big drama. This is soooo yesterday's news.
Speaking of which, anyone want to take any bets as to how many Combat_Ex threads are about to get closed in the next few days?
I tend to disagree, Im totally stopped, enthralled, frozen and otherwise stuck in a rut pondering WHICH bewbs
|
On March 21 2012 14:38 EvilTeletubby wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2012 02:46 EvilTeletubby wrote:On March 20 2012 23:58 Aeres wrote:
It was most likely galleried. The Gallery is where the mods send threads that are too sensitive for the closed forum. In-depth personal attacks that reveal information about somebody, like the thread you mention, get galleried. So does stuff like child porn, virus attacks, etc.
Anything that can still send its malevolent message in the closed forum is galleried. Yeah that thread was definitely galleried. Which was a shame because here is one of the example pics the guy used, I had felt a need to reply to. On March 20 2012 08:29 IZyze wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/cUMdI.png) For added fun... + Show Spoiler +
Can we get a quick recap of the thread and why it was banned? Because, I was one of the first to reply on that thread and then I went to bed. But when I checked the entire thread was gone... The OP was pretty clean, 2 pictures from that girl but nothing to delete the thread for.
Was it deleted because the OP or because the posts after it?
|
On March 20 2012 23:58 Aeres wrote:
It was most likely galleried. The Gallery is where the mods send threads that are too sensitive for the closed forum. In-depth personal attacks that reveal information about somebody, like the thread you mention, get galleried. So does stuff like child porn, virus attacks, etc.
Anything that can still send its malevolent message in the closed forum is galleried.
Are your sources credible?
I don't know how I feel about being on a forum where the mods have a secret child porn gallery.
|
Zurich15359 Posts
Haha what?
I can't recall a single instance of child porn being galleried. For the most part Gallery is full of threads with personal information that shouldn't be visible in Closed.
|
That notion is fairly ridiculous. Storing child porn in any shape or form on TL would be a huge legal liability, even if nobody accesses it. And that apart from the fact, that it would be disgusting.
|
I assumed it was meant that any illegal information was deleted but the thread was stored for legal purposes, which would kinda make sense?
|
Only 1 ban and 4 Combat Ex threads in Closed? I would have thought for sure we would be at like 7-8 threads and at least 4 banned people by now.
|
On March 21 2012 22:33 TheToast wrote:
Only 1 ban and 4 Combat Ex threads in Closed? I would have thought for sure we would be at like 7-8 threads and at least 4 banned people by now.
Well maybe I've been living under a rock, but I don't even know why there would be combat-ex threads.
|
On March 21 2012 03:04 TheToast wrote:
lol, ET mixed up in the fraud/cheating/hot chick scandal of the month. Next on Maury, we find out who's the REAL father of Beauty's baby!
The kids with raging hormones don't even discriminate between hot and not hot. Put a paper bag over the chick and there will still be girl drama.
|
On March 21 2012 22:49 kerpal wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2012 22:33 TheToast wrote:
Only 1 ban and 4 Combat Ex threads in Closed? I would have thought for sure we would be at like 7-8 threads and at least 4 banned people by now. Well maybe I've been living under a rock, but I don't even know why there would be combat-ex threads.
Check the closed threads section. It's actually kind of funny.
On March 21 2012 22:54 andrewlt wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2012 03:04 TheToast wrote:
lol, ET mixed up in the fraud/cheating/hot chick scandal of the month. Next on Maury, we find out who's the REAL father of Beauty's baby!
The kids with raging hormones don't even discriminate between hot and not hot. Put a paper bag over the chick and there will still be girl drama.
This is true.
+ Show Spoiler +There's a Kelly Milkies joke in here somewhere, but I am not that heartless. :S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
