|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Blazinghand
United States25551 Posts
On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue  I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts?
My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned.
|
On November 30 2011 02:53 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts? My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned.
The guy edited it out of his post before moderation occurred, but was still banned for it. Mods never alter the content of a post when issuing a warning or ban (barring NSFW material, advertising, and other potentially harmful or disruptive stuff). There has also been precedent for moderators handing out warnings or bans for offensive language that was removed by the poster prior to mod investigation. Given both of those facts, the likely result was just the guy being banned for using the word "faggot".
Moral of the story: Just don't say stuff like that in the first place. Editing it out will not save you from the Hammer.
|
On November 30 2011 03:20 Aeres wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 02:53 Blazinghand wrote:On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts? My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned. The guy edited it out of his post before moderation occurred, but was still banned for it. Mods never alter the content of a post when issuing a warning or ban (barring NSFW material, advertising, and other potentially harmful or disruptive stuff). There has also been precedent for moderators handing out warnings or bans for offensive language that was removed by the poster prior to mod investigation. Given both of those facts, the likely result was just the guy being banned for using the word "faggot". Moral of the story: Just don't say stuff like that in the first place. Editing it out will not save you from the Hammer.
Yeah, always keep in mind that Mods can see what you edit out, so no use trying to be clever and edit out your inappropriate material.
|
On November 30 2011 03:52 marttorn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 03:20 Aeres wrote:On November 30 2011 02:53 Blazinghand wrote:On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts? My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned. The guy edited it out of his post before moderation occurred, but was still banned for it. Mods never alter the content of a post when issuing a warning or ban (barring NSFW material, advertising, and other potentially harmful or disruptive stuff). There has also been precedent for moderators handing out warnings or bans for offensive language that was removed by the poster prior to mod investigation. Given both of those facts, the likely result was just the guy being banned for using the word "faggot". Moral of the story: Just don't say stuff like that in the first place. Editing it out will not save you from the Hammer. Yeah, always keep in mind that Mods can see what you edit out, so no use trying to be clever and edit out your inappropriate material.
Mods can see what we edit out?! o.O
|
On November 30 2011 04:32 VirgilSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 03:52 marttorn wrote:On November 30 2011 03:20 Aeres wrote:On November 30 2011 02:53 Blazinghand wrote:On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts? My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned. The guy edited it out of his post before moderation occurred, but was still banned for it. Mods never alter the content of a post when issuing a warning or ban (barring NSFW material, advertising, and other potentially harmful or disruptive stuff). There has also been precedent for moderators handing out warnings or bans for offensive language that was removed by the poster prior to mod investigation. Given both of those facts, the likely result was just the guy being banned for using the word "faggot". Moral of the story: Just don't say stuff like that in the first place. Editing it out will not save you from the Hammer. Yeah, always keep in mind that Mods can see what you edit out, so no use trying to be clever and edit out your inappropriate material. Mods can see what we edit out?! o.O
Ofc.
It most be pretty funny to read my posts as a mod.I'm the king of edits.
Meaning I can't type for shit.Or just remember always something after I press post and add it in later.
Like right now.
|
Blazinghand
United States25551 Posts
On November 30 2011 04:35 TheKefka wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 04:32 VirgilSC2 wrote:On November 30 2011 03:52 marttorn wrote:On November 30 2011 03:20 Aeres wrote:On November 30 2011 02:53 Blazinghand wrote:On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts? My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned. The guy edited it out of his post before moderation occurred, but was still banned for it. Mods never alter the content of a post when issuing a warning or ban (barring NSFW material, advertising, and other potentially harmful or disruptive stuff). There has also been precedent for moderators handing out warnings or bans for offensive language that was removed by the poster prior to mod investigation. Given both of those facts, the likely result was just the guy being banned for using the word "faggot". Moral of the story: Just don't say stuff like that in the first place. Editing it out will not save you from the Hammer. Yeah, always keep in mind that Mods can see what you edit out, so no use trying to be clever and edit out your inappropriate material. Mods can see what we edit out?! o.O Ofc. It most be pretty funny to read my posts as a mod.I'm the king of edits. Meaning I can't type for shit.Or just remember always something after I press post and add it in later. Like right now.
If you think about it, all the data for your post WAS stored on TL.net, then you added some more stuff by editing. There's no reason a changelog or diff wouldn't be saved.
|
spajn was just temp banned for 2 weeks by Chill.
That account was created on 2011-08-22 03:25:39 and had 21 posts.
Reason: Don't open a thread to blast your subjective opinion in a condescending manner. Yes, it's easy to say what you would do if you had talent, but having the drive of Idra or Huk to play 10 hours a day is a talent in iteself. Also, please don't mention Combat-Ex again on teamliquid.
fucking atrocious, should be perm.
|
On November 30 2011 06:14 Condor Hero wrote:
spajn was just temp banned for 2 weeks by Chill.
That account was created on 2011-08-22 03:25:39 and had 21 posts.
Reason: Don't open a thread to blast your subjective opinion in a condescending manner. Yes, it's easy to say what you would do if you had talent, but having the drive of Idra or Huk to play 10 hours a day is a talent in iteself. Also, please don't mention Combat-Ex again on teamliquid.
fucking atrocious, should be perm.
Guys, NonY hasn't won MLG, Dreamhack, or GSL! HE SUCKS!! Kick that scrub Diamond player out of Liquid, he's so bad roflroflrofl~
+ Show Spoiler +Goddamn, I hate that kind of attitude toward pros.
|
I need Lewis Black to dictate the post I would write about that guy.
|
I must say this post brought a smile to my face. SonuvBob is so optimistic:
On November 30 2011 07:10 Lysenko wrote:For some reason, the TL logo is missing from the forum banner. I'm running Firefox 4.0 on Linux. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/aNdIM.jpg) It shows up just fine on my iPhone, so I'm wondering if maybe some browser-specific something or other broke recently? Edit: I do not have control over the browser version installed on this machine, so if there's something broken with that, I'm sure I can live with it. Just wanted to let you guys know.
On November 30 2011 07:57 SonuvBob wrote:
This means you have been marked for death by R1CH.
You can try clearing your cache hitting ctrl-F5 to reload the image, but don't kid yourself. You'll be dead in a week.
Good to note: Missing TL logo = DEATH
Original Forum Here
|
On November 30 2011 15:13 Peanut Butter wrote:I must say this post brought a smile to my face. SonuvBob is so optimistic: Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 07:10 Lysenko wrote:For some reason, the TL logo is missing from the forum banner. I'm running Firefox 4.0 on Linux. It shows up just fine on my iPhone, so I'm wondering if maybe some browser-specific something or other broke recently? Edit: I do not have control over the browser version installed on this machine, so if there's something broken with that, I'm sure I can live with it. Just wanted to let you guys know. Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 07:57 SonuvBob wrote:
This means you have been marked for death by R1CH.
You can try clearing your cache hitting ctrl-F5 to reload the image, but don't kid yourself. You'll be dead in a week. Good to note: Missing TL logo = DEATH Original Forum Here
what does this mean?
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tvnqa.jpg)
+ Show Spoiler +also when did this become a joking around thread, i remember being chastised for such actions in this thread all about this is for transparency of moderation in team liquid, allowing a place of feedback.
|
Blazinghand
United States25551 Posts
On November 30 2011 16:35 semantics wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 15:13 Peanut Butter wrote:I must say this post brought a smile to my face. SonuvBob is so optimistic: On November 30 2011 07:10 Lysenko wrote:For some reason, the TL logo is missing from the forum banner. I'm running Firefox 4.0 on Linux. It shows up just fine on my iPhone, so I'm wondering if maybe some browser-specific something or other broke recently? Edit: I do not have control over the browser version installed on this machine, so if there's something broken with that, I'm sure I can live with it. Just wanted to let you guys know. On November 30 2011 07:57 SonuvBob wrote:
This means you have been marked for death by R1CH.
You can try clearing your cache hitting ctrl-F5 to reload the image, but don't kid yourself. You'll be dead in a week. Good to note: Missing TL logo = DEATH Original Forum Here what does this mean? + Show Spoiler +also when did this become a joking around thread, i remember being chastised for such actions in this thread all about this is for transparency of moderation in team liquid, allowing a place of feedback.
Is there... is there a way I could get that as my banner?
|
On November 30 2011 16:35 semantics wrote:
also when did this become a joking around thread, i remember being chastised for such actions in this thread all about this is for transparency of moderation in team liquid, allowing a place of feedback.
I think people are being directed to the website feedback forum if they have a problem with the moderation. This has more become a spectator place for viewing ban notes by the mods it would seem.
|
On November 30 2011 03:52 marttorn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 03:20 Aeres wrote:On November 30 2011 02:53 Blazinghand wrote:On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts? My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned. The guy edited it out of his post before moderation occurred, but was still banned for it. Mods never alter the content of a post when issuing a warning or ban (barring NSFW material, advertising, and other potentially harmful or disruptive stuff). There has also been precedent for moderators handing out warnings or bans for offensive language that was removed by the poster prior to mod investigation. Given both of those facts, the likely result was just the guy being banned for using the word "faggot". Moral of the story: Just don't say stuff like that in the first place. Editing it out will not save you from the Hammer. Yeah, always keep in mind that Mods can see what you edit out, so no use trying to be clever and edit out your inappropriate material.
Also I believe a copy of the post is sent to a mod if someone reports it, so if it was reported before the edit the offending part would still be in the report.
|
On November 30 2011 18:24 nam nam wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 16:35 semantics wrote:
also when did this become a joking around thread, i remember being chastised for such actions in this thread all about this is for transparency of moderation in team liquid, allowing a place of feedback. I think people are being directed to the website feedback forum if they have a problem with the moderation. This has more become a spectator place for viewing ban notes by the mods it would seem.
This thread feels almost like a small sub-community of its own. Only boot-licking conformists like myself, torte and probe post here!
|
mrtomjones was just temp banned for 1 week by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2011-04-19 18:28:29 and had 637 posts.
Reason:
On November 30 2011 06:43 mrtomjones wrote:
Show nested quote +
Do you HONESTLY think that not one single person who didn't play BW in current sc2 practices the same amount? Do you also think that not one of those people who practices a ton and has a great mindset also has the mechanics that they could have succeeded in BW? Will top BW players have an advantage over some? Obviously due to mechanics and their already regimented training. Does that guarantee that every top player will be a top player of BW? I'll let your delusional self decide that. But its already decided amongst people who love BW and dont enjoy sc2 so yah... perhaps you should go back to watching BW while its still around.
Don't be a dick.
 I think tl.net before sc2 was a much more better place T_T.
|
On November 30 2011 19:05 Sawamura wrote:Show nested quote +mrtomjones was just temp banned for 1 week by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2011-04-19 18:28:29 and had 637 posts.
Reason:
On November 30 2011 06:43 mrtomjones wrote:
Show nested quote +
Do you HONESTLY think that not one single person who didn't play BW in current sc2 practices the same amount? Do you also think that not one of those people who practices a ton and has a great mindset also has the mechanics that they could have succeeded in BW? Will top BW players have an advantage over some? Obviously due to mechanics and their already regimented training. Does that guarantee that every top player will be a top player of BW? I'll let your delusional self decide that. But its already decided amongst people who love BW and dont enjoy sc2 so yah... perhaps you should go back to watching BW while its still around.
Don't be a dick.
I think tl.net before sc2 was a much more better place T_T.
And smaller.
|
On November 30 2011 19:05 Sawamura wrote:Show nested quote +mrtomjones was just temp banned for 1 week by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2011-04-19 18:28:29 and had 637 posts.
Reason:
On November 30 2011 06:43 mrtomjones wrote:
Show nested quote +
Do you HONESTLY think that not one single person who didn't play BW in current sc2 practices the same amount? Do you also think that not one of those people who practices a ton and has a great mindset also has the mechanics that they could have succeeded in BW? Will top BW players have an advantage over some? Obviously due to mechanics and their already regimented training. Does that guarantee that every top player will be a top player of BW? I'll let your delusional self decide that. But its already decided amongst people who love BW and dont enjoy sc2 so yah... perhaps you should go back to watching BW while its still around.
Don't be a dick.
I think tl.net before sc2 was a much more better place T_T.
Eh relative to size there was still probably the same amount of idiots
|
Still, if you have a community of 10 people it's easy to ignore 1 stupid person. On the other hand it's quite hard to ignore 100 idiots out of a community of a 1000 despite having the same "idiot percentage". 
|
On November 30 2011 04:32 VirgilSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2011 03:52 marttorn wrote:On November 30 2011 03:20 Aeres wrote:On November 30 2011 02:53 Blazinghand wrote:On November 30 2011 02:16 mbr2321 wrote:On November 29 2011 20:02 Subversive wrote:Ah two great bans from Manifesto. One for calling someone a faggot - really glad he got temped. And the other guy was so rude and aggressive. Everytime I hesitate about reporting because I'm unsure if a mod will agree, and someone gets banned, it's always Manifesto7 to the rescue I just saw this post, but the whole "faggot" thing was edited out I think. Did the bannee edit the post out, or can mods change posts? My initial thought would be that a mod changed it-- the banned poster, being banned, can't edit his posts, though it's possible he did so before being banned. The guy edited it out of his post before moderation occurred, but was still banned for it. Mods never alter the content of a post when issuing a warning or ban (barring NSFW material, advertising, and other potentially harmful or disruptive stuff). There has also been precedent for moderators handing out warnings or bans for offensive language that was removed by the poster prior to mod investigation. Given both of those facts, the likely result was just the guy being banned for using the word "faggot". Moral of the story: Just don't say stuff like that in the first place. Editing it out will not save you from the Hammer. Yeah, always keep in mind that Mods can see what you edit out, so no use trying to be clever and edit out your inappropriate material. Mods can see what we edit out?! o.O
It was said somewhere in this thread, i believe, that they can only see your last edit. So if you press edit twice they can't see the first text you posted anymore. Can't remember who said it so unsure how accurate it is.
But the offending message is most likely sent along the report. So no amount of edits in that case would help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
