On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote:
The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards.
The reason is "No, you suck"
The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards.
The reason is "No, you suck"
Oooh shit! I'm stupid.
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
hifriend
China7935 Posts
May 09 2011 12:43 GMT
#6821
On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. | ||
57 Corvette
Canada5941 Posts
May 09 2011 12:44 GMT
#6822
On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. | ||
oBlade
United States5271 Posts
May 09 2011 14:30 GMT
#6823
On May 08 2011 22:28 oBlade wrote: Show nested quote + On May 06 2011 15:14 H wrote: On May 06 2011 14:52 oBlade wrote: I am hung up over the SFW pics thread. The only notes are no NSFW pictures and a pic in every post. But people also moderate it based on taste, which is contrary to its own purpose (good pics get caught in a moderation net of offensiveness). Also, since there's no note to avoid such images, it's underhanded to chastise people for posting what they logically concluded was appropriate content for the thread. edit: 6666th reply Can you give an example? Unless you're arguing that racist/overly sexist pictures should be in the thread, I haven't seen what you mean. I think they should be in the thread. It's about random pics that make you laugh, so when someone posts a pic they thought was funny but then gets a warning, it's like the rat getting shocked by electricity when it tries to eat the cheese. Also, it's not unheard of that some black people would laugh at some of the offending pics. Or rather, there's a difference between a joke and actually perpetuating racism or some other prejudice. But even if policy doesn't agree, just put a warning about "racist/sexist pics forbidden" in the thread itself. That way instead of warning every person who posts one and having confused posters, far fewer will be posted and you can just ban them for not reading the warning. (I'm pretty sure "racist/sexist pics forbidden" would be a big enough umbrella for what we're talking about. Some similar pics moderation might disagree with, but iirc that Belgian who clogged the thread with a couple of "Americans, they are that stupid" pics wasn't scolded.) Not to harp on this, but I saw another ostensibly racist picture warned in the SFW pics thread. It made me remember another point: what's the purpose in warning people for some pics that they post in the thread, but not removing the offending pics? It's not effective, and (partly because) it's moderation that doesn't seem to be based on a transparent policy. If there were just a "no racist/sexist pics" warning, the pics would largely not be posted (yet as I say if offending pics were never really edited out, they are scattered in the first 450 pages anyway), and you could just ban anyone who posted one. Codifying what can't be posted in the thread also stops the set of censored materials from growing without anyone noticing. If there is some argument that this is covered by the "use common sense" notice, that's quite nebulous. Common sense is more than enough for someone to post a pic he thinks is funny in the thread, and then get surprised when TL.net Bot wants to get buddy buddy with his inbox. Insofar as race is mentioned in the 10 commandments, it has to do with discouraging malice. People rarely use the pics thread for malice. | ||
Danjoh
Sweden405 Posts
May 09 2011 14:54 GMT
#6824
On May 09 2011 23:30 oBlade wrote: Show nested quote + On May 08 2011 22:28 oBlade wrote: On May 06 2011 15:14 H wrote: On May 06 2011 14:52 oBlade wrote: I am hung up over the SFW pics thread. The only notes are no NSFW pictures and a pic in every post. But people also moderate it based on taste, which is contrary to its own purpose (good pics get caught in a moderation net of offensiveness). Also, since there's no note to avoid such images, it's underhanded to chastise people for posting what they logically concluded was appropriate content for the thread. edit: 6666th reply Can you give an example? Unless you're arguing that racist/overly sexist pictures should be in the thread, I haven't seen what you mean. I think they should be in the thread. It's about random pics that make you laugh, so when someone posts a pic they thought was funny but then gets a warning, it's like the rat getting shocked by electricity when it tries to eat the cheese. Also, it's not unheard of that some black people would laugh at some of the offending pics. Or rather, there's a difference between a joke and actually perpetuating racism or some other prejudice. But even if policy doesn't agree, just put a warning about "racist/sexist pics forbidden" in the thread itself. That way instead of warning every person who posts one and having confused posters, far fewer will be posted and you can just ban them for not reading the warning. (I'm pretty sure "racist/sexist pics forbidden" would be a big enough umbrella for what we're talking about. Some similar pics moderation might disagree with, but iirc that Belgian who clogged the thread with a couple of "Americans, they are that stupid" pics wasn't scolded.) Not to harp on this, but I saw another ostensibly racist picture warned in the SFW pics thread. It made me remember another point: what's the purpose in warning people for some pics that they post in the thread, but not removing the offending pics? It's not effective, and (partly because) it's moderation that doesn't seem to be based on a transparent policy. If there were just a "no racist/sexist pics" warning, the pics would largely not be posted (yet as I say if offending pics were never really edited out, they are scattered in the first 450 pages anyway), and you could just ban anyone who posted one. Codifying what can't be posted in the thread also stops the set of censored materials from growing without anyone noticing. If there is some argument that this is covered by the "use common sense" notice, that's quite nebulous. Common sense is more than enough for someone to post a pic he thinks is funny in the thread, and then get surprised when TL.net Bot wants to get buddy buddy with his inbox. Insofar as race is mentioned in the 10 commandments, it has to do with discouraging malice. People rarely use the pics thread for malice. I'm guessing they leave the borderline cases as a warning to others also. There are a few posts that the pictures have been edited out and the user was banned. | ||
johanngrunt
Hong Kong1555 Posts
May 09 2011 14:59 GMT
#6825
On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. I feel it's going to take me a long LOOOOng time T.T | ||
![]()
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
May 09 2011 15:00 GMT
#6826
On May 09 2011 23:54 Danjoh wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2011 23:30 oBlade wrote: On May 08 2011 22:28 oBlade wrote: On May 06 2011 15:14 H wrote: On May 06 2011 14:52 oBlade wrote: I am hung up over the SFW pics thread. The only notes are no NSFW pictures and a pic in every post. But people also moderate it based on taste, which is contrary to its own purpose (good pics get caught in a moderation net of offensiveness). Also, since there's no note to avoid such images, it's underhanded to chastise people for posting what they logically concluded was appropriate content for the thread. edit: 6666th reply Can you give an example? Unless you're arguing that racist/overly sexist pictures should be in the thread, I haven't seen what you mean. I think they should be in the thread. It's about random pics that make you laugh, so when someone posts a pic they thought was funny but then gets a warning, it's like the rat getting shocked by electricity when it tries to eat the cheese. Also, it's not unheard of that some black people would laugh at some of the offending pics. Or rather, there's a difference between a joke and actually perpetuating racism or some other prejudice. But even if policy doesn't agree, just put a warning about "racist/sexist pics forbidden" in the thread itself. That way instead of warning every person who posts one and having confused posters, far fewer will be posted and you can just ban them for not reading the warning. (I'm pretty sure "racist/sexist pics forbidden" would be a big enough umbrella for what we're talking about. Some similar pics moderation might disagree with, but iirc that Belgian who clogged the thread with a couple of "Americans, they are that stupid" pics wasn't scolded.) Not to harp on this, but I saw another ostensibly racist picture warned in the SFW pics thread. It made me remember another point: what's the purpose in warning people for some pics that they post in the thread, but not removing the offending pics? It's not effective, and (partly because) it's moderation that doesn't seem to be based on a transparent policy. If there were just a "no racist/sexist pics" warning, the pics would largely not be posted (yet as I say if offending pics were never really edited out, they are scattered in the first 450 pages anyway), and you could just ban anyone who posted one. Codifying what can't be posted in the thread also stops the set of censored materials from growing without anyone noticing. If there is some argument that this is covered by the "use common sense" notice, that's quite nebulous. Common sense is more than enough for someone to post a pic he thinks is funny in the thread, and then get surprised when TL.net Bot wants to get buddy buddy with his inbox. Insofar as race is mentioned in the 10 commandments, it has to do with discouraging malice. People rarely use the pics thread for malice. I'm guessing they leave the borderline cases as a warning to others also. There are a few posts that the pictures have been edited out and the user was banned. yup, exactly. it's the same reason that really really stupid posts or flames aren't edited when warned or banned -- so that other posters can see what isn't acceptable. images containing nudity or graphic violence (or generally anything nsfw) will be edited out, though | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
May 09 2011 16:09 GMT
#6827
On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekrul is lurker | ||
hifriend
China7935 Posts
May 09 2011 16:12 GMT
#6828
On May 10 2011 01:09 chaoser wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekurl is lurker someone told me that like 8 years ago as I was watching rekrul get beat up by JessE in a showmatch in stockholm ^^ | ||
garbanzo
United States4046 Posts
May 09 2011 16:14 GMT
#6829
On May 10 2011 01:09 chaoser wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekurl is lurker Actually it's lruker. ![]() Day[9] mentioned this a few times in his dailies. Usually he uses rekrul and grobyc as examples. There's also raelcun. I can't remember anyone else at the moment. | ||
![]()
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
May 09 2011 16:23 GMT
#6830
On May 10 2011 01:14 garbanzo wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2011 01:09 chaoser wrote: On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekurl is lurker Actually it's lruker. ![]() Day[9] mentioned this a few times in his dailies. Usually he uses rekrul and grobyc as examples. There's also raelcun. I can't remember anyone else at the moment. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Rekrul Rekrul Lurker Its not rekurl, its Rekrul. | ||
garbanzo
United States4046 Posts
May 09 2011 16:54 GMT
#6831
On May 10 2011 01:23 Kipsate wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2011 01:14 garbanzo wrote: On May 10 2011 01:09 chaoser wrote: On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekurl is lurker Actually it's lruker. ![]() Day[9] mentioned this a few times in his dailies. Usually he uses rekrul and grobyc as examples. There's also raelcun. I can't remember anyone else at the moment. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Rekrul Rekrul Lurker Its not rekurl, its Rekrul. There was a typo on the original post. I was pointing it out and attempting to make a joke. It has since been edited, so now what I said makes no sense. | ||
Ge0Rob
England61 Posts
May 09 2011 19:54 GMT
#6832
![]() | ||
![]()
zatic
Zurich15312 Posts
May 09 2011 19:59 GMT
#6833
On May 10 2011 04:54 Ge0Rob wrote: Im probably going to be banned for this but you guys are awesome ![]() That's getting boring. No ban for you. Ha! | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
May 09 2011 20:54 GMT
#6834
On May 10 2011 04:59 zatic wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2011 04:54 Ge0Rob wrote: Im probably going to be banned for this but you guys are awesome ![]() That's getting boring. No ban for you. Ha! Damn - had a bet on how long it would take him to get banned lol | ||
carloselcoco
United States2302 Posts
May 09 2011 21:05 GMT
#6835
On May 10 2011 04:59 zatic wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2011 04:54 Ge0Rob wrote: Im probably going to be banned for this but you guys are awesome ![]() That's getting boring. No ban for you. Ha! LOL! That is such a paradox! WP! xD | ||
H
New Zealand6138 Posts
May 10 2011 06:08 GMT
#6836
On May 10 2011 01:14 garbanzo wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2011 01:09 chaoser wrote: On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekurl is lurker Actually it's lruker. ![]() Day[9] mentioned this a few times in his dailies. Usually he uses rekrul and grobyc as examples. There's also raelcun. I can't remember anyone else at the moment. there's also nitram, but idk how often he posts now! also there is literally nothing interesting about my id | ||
![]()
Harem
United States11390 Posts
May 10 2011 06:15 GMT
#6837
On May 10 2011 15:08 H wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2011 01:14 garbanzo wrote: On May 10 2011 01:09 chaoser wrote: On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekurl is lurker Actually it's lruker. ![]() Day[9] mentioned this a few times in his dailies. Usually he uses rekrul and grobyc as examples. There's also raelcun. I can't remember anyone else at the moment. there's also nitram, but idk how often he posts now! also there is literally nothing interesting about my id How does it feel to be only 1/5 of me? | ||
iamke55
United States2806 Posts
May 10 2011 06:20 GMT
#6838
On May 10 2011 01:14 garbanzo wrote: Show nested quote + On May 10 2011 01:09 chaoser wrote: On May 09 2011 21:44 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:43 hifriend wrote: On May 09 2011 21:42 57 Corvette wrote: On May 09 2011 21:41 hifriend wrote: skcusornij was just banned by Puosu. That account was created on 2011-05-09 21:16:53 and had 4 posts. Reason: kcusuoy,on Here's an interesting one lol. PBU maybe? The guy's name is "Jinrosucks" backwards. The reason is "No, you suck" Oooh shit! I'm stupid. Don't worry, it takes time before you can read words backwards. rekurl is lurker Actually it's lruker. ![]() Day[9] mentioned this a few times in his dailies. Usually he uses rekrul and grobyc as examples. There's also raelcun. I can't remember anyone else at the moment. omgwtfbbq, cannot unsee! I knew about rekrul but not the other two. Now I'm never gonna see a weird name a not read it backwards. | ||
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
May 10 2011 06:22 GMT
#6839
TuElite was just temp banned for 1 week by H. That account was created on 2010-03-04 16:29:16 and had 307 posts. Reason: Sometimes when you're coming at an issue from a completely and utterly uneducated perspective it's best not to open your mouth at all in the first place. I don't know how old you are, but suicide is not something which invokes a reaction of "so the fuck what?" when it happens. Everyone around the person is affected and left with residual feelings. The fact you ask "why even categorize suicide as a bad thing" leaves me wondering whether you've ever dealt with death. When a friend of yours kills themselves, you don't just distance yourself and shrug. To imply that is actually insulting towards people with any semblance of empathy. Take a week off and think about what you posted Yet again I am astounded by the stupidity and ignorance of some members of TL only for a mod to show up and prove my faith in this site. H you are a champ. I couldn't have said it better. I hope the bastard stays away ![]() | ||
Torenhire
United States11681 Posts
May 10 2011 06:23 GMT
#6840
Pretty fancy. You get to join the Rekrul / Raelcun / Grobyc / Nitram club now! And how does it feel being 5x the size of H, Harem? Fatty. Also total mindfuck by zatic. DOES NOT COMPUTE | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Rain ![]() Sea ![]() Horang2 ![]() Mini ![]() Shuttle ![]() hero ![]() Rush ![]() Mong ![]() PianO ![]() [ Show more ] Terrorterran ![]() sSak ![]() HiyA ![]() Rock ![]() Aegong ![]() Killer ![]() soO ![]() zelot ![]() sorry ![]() IntoTheRainbow ![]() SilentControl ![]() Movie ![]() League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games hiko1418 Beastyqt952 Fuzer ![]() ScreaM506 crisheroes387 Lowko356 OGKoka ![]() FrodaN307 Liquid`VortiX170 ArmadaUGS150 QueenE113 Trikslyr56 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • LUISG ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • Migwel ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube Dota 2 League of Legends |
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
PiG Sty Festival
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
PiG Sty Festival
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|