EPTOn December 22 2019 00:44 Ej_ wrote:
All goes back to TL not having an ignore button
All goes back to TL not having an ignore button
I'm pretty sure a lot of people would still prefer to report instead of ignoring.
The Automated Ban List - Page 3073
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Sent.
Poland9330 Posts
I'm pretty sure a lot of people would still prefer to report instead of ignoring. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On December 22 2019 01:14 Sent. wrote: I'm pretty sure a lot of people would still prefer to report instead of ignoring. Their loss. | ||
|
Jealous
10359 Posts
On December 22 2019 01:14 Sent. wrote: I'm pretty sure a lot of people would still prefer to report instead of ignoring. I'm pretty sure TL would still prefer that users report instead of ignoring. | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland27269 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51182 Posts
then again its not like its not requested, some guy recently made a request that TL+ user gets to hide other people's posts and also prioritize people with low post counts over high. | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland27269 Posts
On December 22 2019 16:57 BLinD-RawR wrote: its why its not even on the table let alone implemented. then again its not like its not requested, some guy recently made a request that TL+ user gets to hide other people's posts and also prioritize people with low post counts over high. That thread was beautiful. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
|
sneakyfox
8217 Posts
But if there were to be ignore in some form perhaps it could just be that those ignored posts are dimmed in some way, e.g. making the text color a light gray? That way the post is still there but it's easy to ignore for the reader. | ||
|
Jealous
10359 Posts
On December 24 2019 17:14 Ej_ wrote: So ignore won't be implemented under the pretense of moderation knowing better what kind of content I should read? Fair enough. Lmao not sure where you got that from but the reason that BR agreed to above is that it would make content unreadable in general. | ||
|
Luolis
Finland7190 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10359 Posts
On December 24 2019 23:57 Luolis wrote: Imo the problem with this ban is that there are a lot of rude and even malicious posters who argue in bad faith and bring in needless conflicts who get to post just fine, while fluidrone, albeit a very weird forum member but who didn't really go for fights with other people (as far as i remember) gets banned like this. I understand the mods but it feels very inconsistent. A lot of the news/LR threads are just flamewars more or less because of a couple of certain posters. Are you reporting those posters? | ||
|
sneakyfox
8217 Posts
On December 24 2019 23:57 Luolis wrote: Imo the problem with this ban is that there are a lot of rude and even malicious posters who argue in bad faith and bring in needless conflicts who get to post just fine, while fluidrone, albeit a very weird forum member but who didn't really go for fights with other people (as far as i remember) gets banned like this. I understand the mods but it feels very inconsistent. A lot of the news/LR threads are just flamewars more or less because of a couple of certain posters. Couldn't agree more. I have reported that stuff quite a few times but it is not acted upon. | ||
|
Luolis
Finland7190 Posts
Yes if its not already reported. | ||
|
Jealous
10359 Posts
Then they will eventually get warned/banned too. Why assume that there is nothing going on behind the scenes? Just because you don't have access to their mod logs? | ||
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On December 24 2019 17:14 Ej_ wrote: So ignore won't be implemented under the pretense of moderation knowing better what kind of content I should read? Fair enough. that's literally what moderation is  | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On December 24 2019 22:45 Jealous wrote: Lmao not sure where you got that from but the reason that BR agreed to above is that it would make content unreadable in general. Apparently nreadable for individuals who have decided to ignore certain users, willingfuly compromising their experience. So, there's an assumption here that an user ignoing someone would work against them. As in, the moderation assumes it knows better what I'm supposed to read than I do. I always thought the purpose of moderation was keeping the forums in tact, by removing posters that unarguably cause more harm than good, working in the best interests of all users. Not telling the users who they have to talk to. Numerous boards feature an ability to ignore picked users, I don't know why TL.net would figure this doesn't suit the website,. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19237 Posts
| ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
I do not think he meant any harm. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On December 25 2019 08:54 tofucake wrote: I'm speaking for me, not on behalf of the mod team here: If you can't make yourself not read a post by someone you don't want to read a post from, then clearly there must be some merit to NOT outright ignoring everything they write. Also, discussion is stupid when people ignore others. We like to promote civil discussion, not dissuade it. If someone is breaking the rules then we deal with that. But we don't have a rule about people needing to agree with each other. Well, sometimes I really don't want to scroll through 3 pages of certain people complaining about their Starcraft race being weak or talking about Serral in a GSL thread. Not much to do with self-restrain, it's just bothersome. | ||
|
Jealous
10359 Posts
On December 25 2019 07:48 Ej_ wrote: Apparently nreadable for individuals who have decided to ignore certain users, willingfuly compromising their experience. So, there's an assumption here that an user ignoing someone would work against them. As in, the moderation assumes it knows better what I'm supposed to read than I do. Ehm, no, unreadable for everyone. There would be repeat posts, people talking/posting past one another, probably passive-aggressive bullshit once a poster realizes they were ignored, and on top of all of that - if everyone simply ignores a shit user instead of reporting them, then that makes the job of moderators harder and the amount of shit posts that slip through the cracks greater. | ||
| ||
