The Automated Ban List - Page 2880

On March 05 2017 10:43 Cascade wrote:

I find it sooo hard to actually find a joke funny when it's introduced as "this is my joke and it's hilarious".

On March 05 2017 10:43 Cascade wrote:

I find it sooo hard to actually find a joke funny when it's introduced as "this is my joke and it's hilarious".

On March 04 2017 21:40 Plansix wrote:

I alway enjoy the debates on how many of us are facist and poison the discourse. Or if black protesters are vermin. Real enlightened stuff.

User was temp banned for this post.

On March 06 2017 01:50 TL.net Bot wrote:
ItsFunToLose was just temp banned for 2 days by tofucake.

That account was created on 2010-12-15 15:41:00 and had 460 posts.

Reason: You were just told there are better ways to post about imbalance, and then you erect a giant tower of balance whining and shut down any response with a dumb TLDR. If you aren't willing to discuss things, don't post on a discussion forum, go start a wordpress blog.

On March 06 2017 01:08 ItsFunToLose wrote:


This just in, its now Orwellian if you never adapt and do the same shit over and over again expecting different results. wait, that's the definition of insane, my bad.

not all compositions are viable in all matchups. you might not build every unit in every matchup. this is not indicative of poor balance.

The shitty thing here for me to admit is that the whiny terrans are actually right. sc2 is riddled with so much gimmicky bullshit that it's absolutely impossible to salvage a respectable, balanced RTS out of it. absolutely impossible. The terrans are right. swarm hosts are a gimmick that should never exist in an RTS. period. mothership cores, force fields, swarm hosts, vipers, reapers, literally the first 10 sc2-unique units I think of are gimmicky trash units.

mech will be viable the second they throw the entire three expansion failure of a sequel in the trash and start from scratch with a true successor to the greatest game of all time.

mech will be viable when blizzard realizes that just giving units raw cost efficient stats rather than bullshit gimmicks will result in a deeper, more competitively balanced game.

is there anyone who has been paying attention that can honestly argue that blizzard had any fucking clue what they were doing with sc2?

TLDR: you can't balance mech until you delete sc2 or: I can't stay on topic when discussing anything blizzard because I have unresolved anger problems



User was temp banned for this post.

On March 08 2017 22:31 SKN1995 wrote:
Apologies for my ignorance but where do you see the stated reason for which people were warned and or banned?

On March 08 2017 23:32 opisska wrote:
Warnings are the epitome of boring. If somebody looks for them, it just means they weren't warned enough to know that. As a public service, let me provide you all a taste of how your warning inbox may look like. In no way or form I am admitting that those were actually given to myself!

- This part is unnecessary. There's no need to insult the person you're quoting. You can get your message across without being aggressive.

- Please put some effort into your posts. One word replies and other low content posts are not appreciated here.

- While you have a point and BW elitism is annoying, you shouldn't express it in such an aggressive way.

- Once again, please don't post memes, image macros, gifs, or images with no further content. Please avoid low content posts.

- Please don't post image macros / memes / gifs with no context explanation.

- Seems like an unnecessary thing to say.

- You need to calm down.

On March 08 2017 23:32 opisska wrote:
- While you have a point and BW elitism is annoying, you shouldn't express it in such an aggressive way.

On March 09 2017 16:18 opisska wrote:


Sometimes I think I am mainly Seeker's sandbox to test what all the fancy buttons do