|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On September 09 2013 11:13 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt  . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. hmm you make good points. Hope MoP is listening to you lol. Automatically get the highground in any conversation if you are the nice one ^^ Show nested quote +On September 09 2013 11:03 motbob wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. I looked at the first letter of each line of your post, looking for hidden messages, but I didn't find any. I don't think you looked hard enough Message: II AAAW BBBBOT(bot mistakes at W, should've been M, must need updating) Clearly, he's saying he's a bot :O I guess it explains his mentally unhealthy addiction to this thread :O
OH SHIT
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On September 09 2013 11:22 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2013 11:13 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. hmm you make good points. Hope MoP is listening to you lol. Automatically get the highground in any conversation if you are the nice one ^^ On September 09 2013 11:03 motbob wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. I looked at the first letter of each line of your post, looking for hidden messages, but I didn't find any. I don't think you looked hard enough Message: II AAAW BBBBOT(bot mistakes at W, should've been M, must need updating) Clearly, he's saying he's a bot :O I guess it explains his mentally unhealthy addiction to this thread :O OH SHIT
SHELLBOT'S ALT ACCOUNT :O Please spare me, it was a mistake find 
|
United States97277 Posts
On September 09 2013 11:27 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2013 11:22 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 11:13 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. hmm you make good points. Hope MoP is listening to you lol. Automatically get the highground in any conversation if you are the nice one ^^ On September 09 2013 11:03 motbob wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. I looked at the first letter of each line of your post, looking for hidden messages, but I didn't find any. I don't think you looked hard enough Message: II AAAW BBBBOT(bot mistakes at W, should've been M, must need updating) Clearly, he's saying he's a bot :O I guess it explains his mentally unhealthy addiction to this thread :O OH SHIT SHELLBOTS ALT ACCOUNT :O Please spare us shellbot, it was a mistake. It was so.
Sorry but I'm a 1 account kind of guy
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On September 09 2013 11:27 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2013 11:27 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 11:22 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 11:13 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. hmm you make good points. Hope MoP is listening to you lol. Automatically get the highground in any conversation if you are the nice one ^^ On September 09 2013 11:03 motbob wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. I looked at the first letter of each line of your post, looking for hidden messages, but I didn't find any. I don't think you looked hard enough Message: II AAAW BBBBOT(bot mistakes at W, should've been M, must need updating) Clearly, he's saying he's a bot :O I guess it explains his mentally unhealthy addiction to this thread :O OH SHIT SHELLBOTS ALT ACCOUNT :O Please spare us shellbot, it was a mistake. It was so. Sorry but I'm a 1 account kind of guy
If you say so
+ Show Spoiler +pm me the details, I'll keep your secret 
|
kollin said something mean to me i can't remember what so i can't judge him but MoP needs that little bit of cheer and dare i say it whimsy to break up the monotony that is MoP
|
Forgive me for posting something derogatory about the master himself here in his sacred ground
but honestly this much needed. He is such an immature little turd who doesnt know how to argue, which is a problem because its ALL HE DOES
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51445 Posts
On September 09 2013 04:02 cLAN.Anax wrote:
MoP isn't the poster TL deserves, but he is the poster TL needs.
BatMoP.
please tell me this is a joke.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On September 09 2013 11:30 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2013 11:27 Shellshock wrote:On September 09 2013 11:27 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 11:22 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 11:13 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:42 Firebolt145 wrote:
Read the ban reason. ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. hmm you make good points. Hope MoP is listening to you lol. Automatically get the highground in any conversation if you are the nice one ^^ On September 09 2013 11:03 motbob wrote:On September 09 2013 10:48 SilentchiLL wrote:On September 09 2013 09:28 BigFan wrote:On September 09 2013 07:57 Firebolt145 wrote:On September 09 2013 07:52 BigFan wrote:
[quote]
ya, I read it. Seems his approach to arguing isn't what it should be and he got banned because there are too many reports that relate to it. Did I miss something? lol. Nope. And it's not just arguing. hmm well considering I haven't argued with him before, will give the benefit of the doubt since enough people complained. As a guy who argued with MoP already and has been lurking in this thread for way too long to be mentally healthy I can say that he's not a bad guy. But I can also repeat what I said last time about him when he argued with kollin here, he can be kind of a cunt . Or in a more mature way: he needs to grow up a bit, or atleast learn how to discuss without getting personal in a passive aggressive kind of way. But I believe in MoP, he can do it! Atleast if he takes the ban as motivation to become nicer and not as something he should just be pissed about. I know you'll probably read this MoP, so just remember: Be nice to people on TL, even nicer to people you disagree with. Why you ask? The simple awnser would be: So you don't get banned. But there's a better one. By being nice, you automatically take the moral highground, you don't even have to be right and if the other guy gets passive aggressive or insulting he looks like a complete dick (think of it as the TL variant of Kennigits reverse-trolling in dota). It's all about dem mindgames man. All about dem mindgames. I looked at the first letter of each line of your post, looking for hidden messages, but I didn't find any. I don't think you looked hard enough Message: II AAAW BBBBOT(bot mistakes at W, should've been M, must need updating) Clearly, he's saying he's a bot :O I guess it explains his mentally unhealthy addiction to this thread :O OH SHIT SHELLBOTS ALT ACCOUNT :O Please spare us shellbot, it was a mistake. It was so. Sorry but I'm a 1 account kind of guy If you say so + Show Spoiler +pm me the details, I'll keep your secret
I have all the sauce on Shellbot, except I am sworn to secrecy in exchange forbecause I am an excellent friend
|
This is a travesty. MoP posts so much golden stuff and gets banned for a reatively boring exchange of personal insults with the second most boring guy on TL. This could have been so much better ...
Anyway, I still like MoP's posting - almost invariably when I am happy to see someone spell out some politically incorrect stuff I agree with but couldn't be bothered to write down and then deal with the ensuing shitstorm (it turns out that almost everything on my mind falls in this category, that's why I went to amlost zero posting), it's him.
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/AwuI3Dg.png)
THIS was only a 2-day Nyovne is clearly going soft.
|
Two days was a real bargain
|
On September 09 2013 19:01 Ghanburighan wrote:THIS was only a 2-day Nyovne is clearly going soft.
He edited the post to something more reasonable now - but also edited the ban message it seems? Maybe there will be more to this story.
Also this was a little surprising:
brieN was just temp banned for 2 days by Shellshock.
That account was created on 2011-11-28 10:38:23 and had 79 posts.
Reason: Please show some respect
I was expecting some amusing disrespect towards someone dead, injured or a victim of something horrible, but it is actually from some BW pro with zero results in SC2 retiring ...
On September 09 2013 14:06 brieN wrote:
i like how people care about old players who suck at sc2 still yet dont really care about when good players do....
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Netherlands19141 Posts
On September 09 2013 19:01 Ghanburighan wrote:THIS was only a 2-day Nyovne is clearly going soft.
It's a PM and his first moderation in forever in addition to lacking a moderation history. Doesn't get more mitigating then that and almost did it off with a warning due to the circumstances.
|
On September 09 2013 18:54 opisska wrote:
This is a travesty. MoP posts so much golden stuff and gets banned for a reatively boring exchange of personal insults with the second most boring guy on TL. This could have been so much better ...
Anyway, I still like MoP's posting - almost invariably when I am happy to see someone spell out some politically incorrect stuff I agree with but couldn't be bothered to write down and then deal with the ensuing shitstorm (it turns out that almost everything on my mind falls in this category, that's why I went to amlost zero posting), it's him.
Surely if he actually has an elevated standard he should be judged more harshly instead of more leniently if there is even such a standard to speak of? Something that is politically correct or incorrect is entirely anecdotal to the political atmosphere of localized environments, and is of zero indication to how rational or well reasoned it is. But I understand the need for association with populist counterculture, even if it has no actual ideology of its own and is just fueled by personal dissatisfaction with the status quo, it's the same reason why someone like Hitchens will always be more popularly celebrated by the internet than someone like Chomsky.
If you have to insist to insult someone because you've already made the decision that the other person is necessarily antagonist to your view point, you might as well not say anything at all because by your own mindset it's pointless and you are just doing it as a form of self-indulgence for your own ego.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 09 2013 02:25 brian wrote:
all of them.
ABL does make me giggle sometimes
|
garrett345 was just banned by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2012-08-17 21:01:24 and had 12 posts.
Reason: FOR TRUTH, LOVE, JUSTICE, CHERRIES, FLOWERS AND KOLLIN'S VIRGINITY.
Hahaha.
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51445 Posts
that ban should go straight to the kollin tumblr page.
|
On September 09 2013 19:56 Mithhaike wrote:Show nested quote +garrett345 was just banned by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2012-08-17 21:01:24 and had 12 posts.
Reason: FOR TRUTH, LOVE, JUSTICE, CHERRIES, FLOWERS AND KOLLIN'S VIRGINITY. Hahaha.
Was a bit disappointed it was just a martyr but it did make me think of Nyovne as Vash the Stampede for a second.
+ Show Spoiler [I have strange associative memories.] +
|
On September 09 2013 20:10 BLinD-RawR wrote:
that ban should go straight to the kollin tumblr page.
Isn't tumblr only really used by girls?
...is kollin a girl?
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51445 Posts
On September 09 2013 20:49 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2013 20:10 BLinD-RawR wrote:
that ban should go straight to the kollin tumblr page. Isn't tumblr only really used by girls? ...is kollin a girl?
sirjolt knows the answer to this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://s3.roosterteeth.com/images/BigjakeyT4c6db1e022cd9.jpg)
