|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 13 2013 22:40 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2013 22:29 Deleuze wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. Wasn't he Jesus Our Savior? Oh, I know that guy. Good thing he's gone at least. Show nested quote +On May 13 2013 22:31 ThomasjServo wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. With a name like Christ the Redeemer, I wouldn't expect much less. I am constantly impressed with the wide array of people in the broader TL community. He did give a caveat, in this very thread last year. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95875¤tpage=1360#27185Bringing it into every little thing though, is a fast track to frown town I agree. With a name like Christ the Redeemer and a posting history to match it, I'm really surprised he's not gone. Heavily biased religion posts are much like biased balance discussion, not necessarily bad in and of themselves, but usually conducive to thread derailing, heated arguments and shit-flinging from both sides, which is really not what we need. :|
I didn't see where you got that first post from at first that thread is a ban minefield in the making. Religion, US and the nature of the internet. 
|
On May 13 2013 23:42 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2013 22:40 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:29 Deleuze wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. Wasn't he Jesus Our Savior? Oh, I know that guy. Good thing he's gone at least. On May 13 2013 22:31 ThomasjServo wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. With a name like Christ the Redeemer, I wouldn't expect much less. I am constantly impressed with the wide array of people in the broader TL community. He did give a caveat, in this very thread last year. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95875¤tpage=1360#27185Bringing it into every little thing though, is a fast track to frown town I agree. With a name like Christ the Redeemer and a posting history to match it, I'm really surprised he's not gone. Heavily biased religion posts are much like biased balance discussion, not necessarily bad in and of themselves, but usually conducive to thread derailing, heated arguments and shit-flinging from both sides, which is really not what we need. :| I didn't see where you got that first post from at first that thread is a ban minefield in the making. Religion, US and the nature of the internet.
Was he the guy that used to quote passages of the Bible in response to posts without any commentary?
|
On May 14 2013 00:33 Deleuze wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2013 23:42 ThomasjServo wrote:On May 13 2013 22:40 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:29 Deleuze wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. Wasn't he Jesus Our Savior? Oh, I know that guy. Good thing he's gone at least. On May 13 2013 22:31 ThomasjServo wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. With a name like Christ the Redeemer, I wouldn't expect much less. I am constantly impressed with the wide array of people in the broader TL community. He did give a caveat, in this very thread last year. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95875¤tpage=1360#27185Bringing it into every little thing though, is a fast track to frown town I agree. With a name like Christ the Redeemer and a posting history to match it, I'm really surprised he's not gone. Heavily biased religion posts are much like biased balance discussion, not necessarily bad in and of themselves, but usually conducive to thread derailing, heated arguments and shit-flinging from both sides, which is really not what we need. :| I didn't see where you got that first post from at first that thread is a ban minefield in the making. Religion, US and the nature of the internet. Was he the guy that used to quote passages of the Bible in response to posts without any commentary?
That may have been that savior guy, Christ the Redeemer was temp banned a few times for doing much the same.
|
May I have a 30 day temp ban, need some time off from TL. Thanks. was inspired somewhat by Stephano...
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On May 14 2013 08:16 nobodywonder wrote:
May I have a 30 day temp ban, need some time off from TL. Thanks. was inspired somewhat by Stephano...
User was temp banned for this post.
Enjoy the TL holiday 
On May 13 2013 22:40 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2013 22:29 Deleuze wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. Wasn't he Jesus Our Savior? Oh, I know that guy. Good thing he's gone at least. Show nested quote +On May 13 2013 22:31 ThomasjServo wrote:On May 13 2013 22:27 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 13 2013 22:24 ThomasjServo wrote:
I don't think so, can't find it in his history. Been temp banned a couple of times, but not permed from what I can tell. Must've been a 90 day or something. :/ I really wish he would stop baiting with religion every thread he posts in. With a name like Christ the Redeemer, I wouldn't expect much less. I am constantly impressed with the wide array of people in the broader TL community. He did give a caveat, in this very thread last year. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95875¤tpage=1360#27185Bringing it into every little thing though, is a fast track to frown town I agree. With a name like Christ the Redeemer and a posting history to match it, I'm really surprised he's not gone. Heavily biased religion posts are much like biased balance discussion, not necessarily bad in and of themselves, but usually conducive to thread derailing, heated arguments and shit-flinging from both sides, which is really not what we need. :|
I kinda want to agree, but then I'm of the opinion that unless he causes some 'proper' trouble, then even overly biased religious posting is 1000x more tolerable than some of the idiots that post and get banned on a daily basis.
After all, though TL is a very closed shop when it comes to religious debate (as it should be, it's not the place for that shit), if someone can chill a bit and post without going too far, then meh leave them be imo.
If others cannot see it that way too, and want to engage in stupid debates, then they will likely suffer the bans, before this dude will.
|
|
|
Some times I wonder if there are genuinely people who are this mentally disoriented to make posts like that or if it's all an elaborate conspiracy to convince us that the human race is beyond saving.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I have to say, I did enjoy reading it.
|
I don't get it, how is that perm-worthy? O_o
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51072 Posts
On May 14 2013 20:36 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
I don't get it, how is that perm-worthy? O_o
if your first post is utter drivel its a perm.
|
On May 14 2013 20:36 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
I don't get it, how is that perm-worthy? O_o
I imagine they just wanted to nip it in the bud.
|
Northern Ireland26967 Posts
I especially enjoyed heyoka's 1 letter riposte
|
IMMABEASTBRUH was just temp banned for 2 days by Waxangel.
That account was created on 2011-11-20 07:08:47 and had 236 posts.
Reason:
On May 14 2013 20:44 IMMABEASTBRUH wrote:
Show nested quote +
No idea what you're talking about but it's fun to see the that played out "i don't care but here's my comment anyways" crap.
stop
Thank you wax. Thank you so much
|
Speaking of great account names...
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51072 Posts
On May 14 2013 20:51 Grovbolle wrote:Show nested quote +IMMABEASTBRUH was just temp banned for 2 days by Waxangel.
That account was created on 2011-11-20 07:08:47 and had 236 posts.
Reason:
On May 14 2013 20:44 IMMABEASTBRUH wrote:
Show nested quote +
No idea what you're talking about but it's fun to see the that played out "i don't care but here's my comment anyways" crap.
stop Thank you wax. Thank you so much
I feel a bit ashamed to have contributed to that ban but to be honest he was so easy.
|
On May 14 2013 20:51 Grovbolle wrote:Show nested quote +IMMABEASTBRUH was just temp banned for 2 days by Waxangel.
That account was created on 2011-11-20 07:08:47 and had 236 posts.
Reason:
On May 14 2013 20:44 IMMABEASTBRUH wrote:
Show nested quote +
No idea what you're talking about but it's fun to see the that played out "i don't care but here's my comment anyways" crap.
stop Thank you wax. Thank you so much
"chances are you're the asshole" indeed. remember him from terrible posting in an lr couple weeks back.
|
On May 14 2013 20:39 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On May 14 2013 20:36 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
I don't get it, how is that perm-worthy? O_o if your first post is utter drivel its a perm.
'Drivel' is subjective. I think he kind of had some points there even if his writing was a bit all over the place. I've seen some featured bloggers on this website put up blogs that were worse (and more self-indulgent) than that. On the other hand he deserves the ban for not putting any breaks in that paragraph.
|
On May 14 2013 22:27 tomatriedes wrote:Show nested quote +On May 14 2013 20:39 BLinD-RawR wrote:On May 14 2013 20:36 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
I don't get it, how is that perm-worthy? O_o if your first post is utter drivel its a perm. 'Drivel' is subjective. I think he kind of had some points there even if his writing was a bit all over the place. I've seen some featured bloggers on this website put up blogs that were worse (and more self-indulgent) than that. On the other hand he deserves the ban for not putting any breaks in that paragraph.
Can we add, "Thou shalt use page breaks," to the TL 10 commandments?
|
On May 14 2013 22:27 tomatriedes wrote:Show nested quote +On May 14 2013 20:39 BLinD-RawR wrote:On May 14 2013 20:36 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
I don't get it, how is that perm-worthy? O_o if your first post is utter drivel its a perm. 'Drivel' is subjective. I think he kind of had some points there even if his writing was a bit all over the place. I've seen some featured bloggers on this website put up blogs that were worse (and more self-indulgent) than that. On the other hand he deserves the ban for not putting any breaks in that paragraph.
Was it a blog post? I can't tell since it's been moved to closed. I assumed it was posted somewhere weird like general.
|
On May 14 2013 20:39 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On May 14 2013 20:36 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
I don't get it, how is that perm-worthy? O_o if your first post is utter drivel its a perm.
I've seen probably dozens if not hundreds of far worse pseudo-intellectual blogs so far... this one didn't even seem so bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
