EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1847
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On April 19 2013 05:55 KadaverBB wrote: I asked him to do it, found out that the guy didn't actually edit his own post, ppingu did it. And apparently I sniped the ban -.- :o What did he post that was so bad? | ||
|
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
On April 19 2013 06:02 KadaverBB wrote: Made a thread called "I hate burrowed banelings" with one of the really really bad pictures from the Boston Marathon Explosion. Basically it doesn't get much worse. Oh goodness.... >_< Can't believe people are joking about this tragedy. Already. Glad you took care of that thread, Kadaver. Edit: The heck is with that Rossie character? O_o + Show Spoiler [Gross.] + It seems the forum is run by morons with a supplementary, hermaphroditic clittoris that's sensitive only to long-winded and meandering posts strewn with big fuck-off images whose value in humour isn't sufficient to pay for the revolutions of the scroll wheel required by them. | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
edit: Its not just that post either, you can read his thread and watch him go off the deep end. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
edit: nm. you cant quote closed threads. i was going to quote the dozen or so times where he told people to fuck off and not post in his thread if they didnt like it. irony. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
wongfeihung
United States763 Posts
On April 19 2013 07:18 dAPhREAk wrote: i was waiting for his ban. let me prepare something special for y'all. edit: nm. you cant quote closed threads. i was going to quote the dozen or so times where he told people to fuck off and not post in his thread if they didnt like it. irony. Albeit a bit messy, as I didn't bother formatting it, here they are: + Show Spoiler + That thread is poorly named and confusing and has an OP that is convoluted and which few people are likely to read. ------- The "effort" doesn't help anything. This is meant to be a discussion thread. A rambling monster of an OP does nothing but act as a barrier and reduce the readership. Please...enough of this nonsense. If you don't like the subject, don't post at all. ------- You could pretty much say that about any discussion topic on a forum. Economics, politics, science, football...absolutely anything. Once again...if you don't like the topic of discussion, please don't bother to post. ------- If you don't like the topic of discussion, don't bother to post. We don't need another useless post linking to a topic of discussion that (a) isn't the same as mine, and (b) has an OP that doesn't even resemble mine approximately in content or intent. ------- And yet we still have threads about science on this forum. Persist about this and I will report your derails to the moderators. If you don't like the topic of discussion, don't post. It's quite simple. ------- The title is completely different, the present OP is a topic-starter rather than a barrier, and ultimately it isn't even the same topic anyway. If you don't like the thread, don't post. If you think it's such an UNFORGIVABLE and INTOLERABLE waste of precious cyber-space (on a forum with recent topics like "Happy Birthday... tho whom?"), then report it to the moderators. But please, let's have no more of this nonsense. ------- Insecure about your life and who you are as a person? If not...why go into threads posting nothing better than "hur hur, this thread sucks"? Just report it to the fucking moderators if you're really so distressed by my use of cyber-space. He seemed to have a particular disdain for the notion of comparing his thread to the other thread. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On April 19 2013 07:37 wongfeihung wrote: Albeit a bit messy, as I didn't bother formatting it, here they are: + Show Spoiler + That thread is poorly named and confusing and has an OP that is convoluted and which few people are likely to read. ------- The "effort" doesn't help anything. This is meant to be a discussion thread. A rambling monster of an OP does nothing but act as a barrier and reduce the readership. Please...enough of this nonsense. If you don't like the subject, don't post at all. ------- You could pretty much say that about any discussion topic on a forum. Economics, politics, science, football...absolutely anything. Once again...if you don't like the topic of discussion, please don't bother to post. ------- If you don't like the topic of discussion, don't bother to post. We don't need another useless post linking to a topic of discussion that (a) isn't the same as mine, and (b) has an OP that doesn't even resemble mine approximately in content or intent. ------- And yet we still have threads about science on this forum. Persist about this and I will report your derails to the moderators. If you don't like the topic of discussion, don't post. It's quite simple. ------- The title is completely different, the present OP is a topic-starter rather than a barrier, and ultimately it isn't even the same topic anyway. If you don't like the thread, don't post. If you think it's such an UNFORGIVABLE and INTOLERABLE waste of precious cyber-space (on a forum with recent topics like "Happy Birthday... tho whom?"), then report it to the moderators. But please, let's have no more of this nonsense. ------- Insecure about your life and who you are as a person? If not...why go into threads posting nothing better than "hur hur, this thread sucks"? Just report it to the fucking moderators if you're really so distressed by my use of cyber-space. He seemed to have a particular disdain for the notion of comparing his thread to the other thread. yep, thats it. lol. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
| ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
 | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Topic: Take a course on basic statistics Original Message From Rossie: You've made a powerful enemy here today. If I ever see you on ladder, I'm gonna cheese the shit out of you. Majestic. Simply Majestic. | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5080 Posts
On April 19 2013 06:54 cLAN.Anax wrote: Oh goodness.... >_< Can't believe people are joking about this tragedy. Already. Glad you took care of that thread, Kadaver. Edit: The heck is with that Rossie character? O_o + Show Spoiler [Gross.] + It seems the forum is run by morons with a supplementary, hermaphroditic clittoris that's sensitive only to long-winded and meandering posts strewn with big fuck-off images whose value in humour isn't sufficient to pay for the revolutions of the scroll wheel required by them. That's... brilliant. As was his ban. | ||
|
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10405 Posts
MasterOfPuppets, very classy with the racism. PS The phrase is best translated as "Go fuck yourself, bitch." | ||
|
aZealot
New Zealand5447 Posts
On April 19 2013 08:08 Plansix wrote: Rossi PMed me right after his first thread go closed because I made him angry I guess. I responded not to bother me through PM and I just got home to this gem: Topic: Take a course on basic statistics Majestic. Simply Majestic. Hahaha! That is classic. What a nutter. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
Actually, he used so many expressions like + Show Spoiler + "an alarming dearth" "in view of the "brood-infestor" debacle that haunted WoL for the last year it would be counter-intuitive in the extreme." "A rambling monster of an OP does nothing but act as a barrier and reduce the readership. Please...enough of this nonsense. If you don't like the subject, don't post at all." "Utter rubbish -- and special pleading." "This is so obviously bollocks." "forefront of innovation" "Persist about this and I will report your derails to the moderators. If you don't like the topic of discussion, don't post. It's quite simple." "pops out of the woodwork, then you don't bat an eye?" "10 or so Protoss players, who are roughly in that ballpark, independently going through a trough or a slump?" "Fair enough. Reasonable point. Yet prone to being falsified. I hope that if Toss continues to perform this poorly for another month or two, you'll change your tune and make a post to that effect on this forum." "shameless in the wake of the brood-infestor epoch" "Medivac drops aren't more formidable and game-changing than oracles because they cost more. The opinion that improved medivacs are exceptionally powerful in the game is a "random opinion" that I'm spouting." "As for the substantive question...they're not the same topic because the OP in that thread offers a specific theory about why Protoss is limited. The discussion in the thread will by necessity centre on that unique theory. I don't offer any particular theory. I just say I'd like to start a discussion on why Protoss has low representation at the top." "Yeah...it's complete hogwash" that I'd guess that he's a pre-15 year old still learning how to write. I mean, As for the substantive question...they're not the same topic because the OP in that thread offers a specific theory about why Protoss is limited. The discussion in the thread will by necessity centre on that unique theory. centre You'd almost have to be trying to sound so pretentious. Edit: On April 19 2013 07:05 Rossie wrote: Terrible OP. If you have no more claim to fame than being a mid-masters Protoss, it's not a good idea to assume people will be happy to wade through a whole essay written by you. I wouldn't have to say this if it weren't for the fact that a much more lucid discussion thread started by me on a similar topic was closed just a while ago. And I was taken to task for not putting comparable "effort" into my post, i.e. not initiating a thread marked [D] for discussion with an OP that acts as a barrier to discussion. It seems the forum is run by morons with a supplementary, hermaphroditic clittoris that's sensitive only to long-winded and meandering posts strewn with big fuck-off images whose value in humour isn't sufficient to pay for the revolutions of the scroll wheel required by them. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
| ||
