|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
i have a question(s)..
Some of these bans I see mods say things like "plus you have a bad post history" "you have a history of making these posts", etc.
Im wondering, when mods go to ban somebody (or even look into their posting history) how is this done? I mean, do you sit there and read through every single post a person has made? How far back do you go? Some of these bans have people with posts into the thousands, do you guys seriously read all 1000 posts? Or do the posts that were warned/temp banned show up as some flag in their history?
Just curious about these things. I'd have to say, if you truly do go through all 1000 posts in a persons posting history, props to you guys! I would never have the patience enough to be a mod here.
|
On January 02 2013 01:17 Ryuhou)aS( wrote:
i have a question(s)..
Some of these bans I see mods say things like "plus you have a bad post history" "you have a history of making these posts", etc.
Im wondering, when mods go to ban somebody (or even look into their posting history) how is this done? I mean, do you sit there and read through every single post a person has made? How far back do you go? Some of these bans have people with posts into the thousands, do you guys seriously read all 1000 posts? Or do the posts that were warned/temp banned show up as some flag in their history?
Just curious about these things. I'd have to say, if you truly do go through all 1000 posts in a persons posting history, props to you guys! I would never have the patience enough to be a mod here.
It's actually really to go into someone's posting history for any TL user.
Ex: your mod history
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Ryuhou)aS(&gb=date&d=
Is completely clean.
Ex: my mod history
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Praetorial&gb=date&d=
Is very not clean
Just enter a name into the search bar and it'll give links to all the places where they were warned/banned or quoted someone who was.
|
Hmm, it seems the page designers were being geniuses when the made this.
And yes, my history is pretty virgin...i think i post like once every 500 times I view TL.
|
Belgium8305 Posts
We have a 'user info' button that gives us a page with general account info and every moderation action that person has received so far, so it's very easy to pick out repeat offenders.
|
On January 02 2013 01:22 Praetorial wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2013 01:17 Ryuhou)aS( wrote:
i have a question(s)..
Some of these bans I see mods say things like "plus you have a bad post history" "you have a history of making these posts", etc.
Im wondering, when mods go to ban somebody (or even look into their posting history) how is this done? I mean, do you sit there and read through every single post a person has made? How far back do you go? Some of these bans have people with posts into the thousands, do you guys seriously read all 1000 posts? Or do the posts that were warned/temp banned show up as some flag in their history?
Just curious about these things. I'd have to say, if you truly do go through all 1000 posts in a persons posting history, props to you guys! I would never have the patience enough to be a mod here. It's actually really to go into someone's posting history for any TL user. Ex: your mod history http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Ryuhou)aS(&gb=date&d=Is completely clean. Ex: my mod history http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Praetorial&gb=date&d=Is very not clean Just enter a name into the search bar and it'll give links to all the places where they were warned/banned or quoted someone who was.
Shit I didnt know about that.
Its kinda fun to search.
I found that zatic was warned for a thread he closed? was that warning just a joke or a error?
|
On January 01 2013 17:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Show nested quote +pallad was just banned by {CC}StealthBlue.
That account was created on 2010-09-07 10:00:13 and had 1713 posts.
Reason: 3 bans 8 warnings, enough is enough. So on that emphasis... does that mean people like me are on thin ice? 
do we know if this guy is working for MoW ?
/e typo
|
On January 01 2013 19:09 p4NDemik wrote:Show nested quote +On January 01 2013 17:40 X3GoldDot wrote:On January 01 2013 17:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote:pallad was just banned by {CC}StealthBlue.
That account was created on 2010-09-07 10:00:13 and had 1713 posts.
Reason: 3 bans 8 warnings, enough is enough. So on that emphasis... does that mean people like me are on thin ice? its also about ratio of posts, you have over 8k lol, he has below 2k big difference there Less about ratio of mod actions to total posts and more about ratio of shit posts to quality posts, factoring the frequency of mod actions. If you post 5k times over the course of a few months and have close to 5 bans and any number of warnings you're living dangerously in much the same fashion as someone who posts maybe 500-1000 times over a few months and gets the same amount of bans/warnings. The severity of the situation in both cases can always be lessened if you generally contribute with quality posts. At least, if one mod has enough and perms you and then we reconsider, you have a better chance of having mods that will see redeeming value in bringing the ban down to a temp.
Hmm, well I've already had a banling call me a "shitty poster" within the last few months... A bad sign for sure.
|
On January 02 2013 02:37 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 01 2013 19:09 p4NDemik wrote:On January 01 2013 17:40 X3GoldDot wrote:On January 01 2013 17:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote:pallad was just banned by {CC}StealthBlue.
That account was created on 2010-09-07 10:00:13 and had 1713 posts.
Reason: 3 bans 8 warnings, enough is enough. So on that emphasis... does that mean people like me are on thin ice? its also about ratio of posts, you have over 8k lol, he has below 2k big difference there Less about ratio of mod actions to total posts and more about ratio of shit posts to quality posts, factoring the frequency of mod actions. If you post 5k times over the course of a few months and have close to 5 bans and any number of warnings you're living dangerously in much the same fashion as someone who posts maybe 500-1000 times over a few months and gets the same amount of bans/warnings. The severity of the situation in both cases can always be lessened if you generally contribute with quality posts. At least, if one mod has enough and perms you and then we reconsider, you have a better chance of having mods that will see redeeming value in bringing the ban down to a temp. Hmm, well I've already had a banling call me a "shitty poster" within the last few months... A bad sign for sure.
My favorite mod comment was "you come across as insufferable with every post." Shitty poster is a little more direct I suppose.
|
On January 02 2013 01:22 Praetorial wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2013 01:17 Ryuhou)aS( wrote:
i have a question(s)..
Some of these bans I see mods say things like "plus you have a bad post history" "you have a history of making these posts", etc.
Im wondering, when mods go to ban somebody (or even look into their posting history) how is this done? I mean, do you sit there and read through every single post a person has made? How far back do you go? Some of these bans have people with posts into the thousands, do you guys seriously read all 1000 posts? Or do the posts that were warned/temp banned show up as some flag in their history?
Just curious about these things. I'd have to say, if you truly do go through all 1000 posts in a persons posting history, props to you guys! I would never have the patience enough to be a mod here. It's actually really to go into someone's posting history for any TL user. Ex: your mod history http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Ryuhou)aS(&gb=date&d=Is completely clean. Ex: my mod history http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Praetorial&gb=date&d=Is very not clean Just enter a name into the search bar and it'll give links to all the places where they were warned/banned or quoted someone who was.
Oh wow. Didn't know about this feature. Lol looks like I'm skating on thin ice too.
|
On January 02 2013 07:35 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2013 01:22 Praetorial wrote:On January 02 2013 01:17 Ryuhou)aS( wrote:
i have a question(s)..
Some of these bans I see mods say things like "plus you have a bad post history" "you have a history of making these posts", etc.
Im wondering, when mods go to ban somebody (or even look into their posting history) how is this done? I mean, do you sit there and read through every single post a person has made? How far back do you go? Some of these bans have people with posts into the thousands, do you guys seriously read all 1000 posts? Or do the posts that were warned/temp banned show up as some flag in their history?
Just curious about these things. I'd have to say, if you truly do go through all 1000 posts in a persons posting history, props to you guys! I would never have the patience enough to be a mod here. It's actually really to go into someone's posting history for any TL user. Ex: your mod history http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Ryuhou)aS(&gb=date&d=Is completely clean. Ex: my mod history http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=for this post[&t=c&f=-1&u=Praetorial&gb=date&d=Is very not clean Just enter a name into the search bar and it'll give links to all the places where they were warned/banned or quoted someone who was. Oh wow. Didn't know about this feature. Lol looks like I'm skating on thin ice too.
It's just learning how to use the search button.
|
Holy shit this asdffdsa guy is freaking insane. He makes a thread looking for feedback on his map and goes buck when he gets it. Thread's pretty entertaining, worth reading if you have a moment :D
Kadaver even tried to be all friendly and rescue him but asdffdsa didnt take the opportunity at all >_>
|
On January 02 2013 08:37 Bibbit wrote:Holy shit this asdffdsa guy is freaking insane. He makes a thread looking for feedback on his map and goes buck when he gets it. Thread's pretty entertaining, worth reading if you have a moment :D Kadaver even tried to be all friendly and rescue him but asdffdsa didnt take the opportunity at all >_>
lols were had. "im going to report you for derailing by thread"--followed by him being banned.
|
Germany25658 Posts
My niceness was not repayed, Evilteletubby didnt even give me the chance to ban him myself 
|
On January 02 2013 08:47 KadaverBB wrote:My niceness was not repayed, Evilteletubby didnt even give me the chance to ban him myself
history repeats itself.
On December 30 2012 19:25 dAPhREAk wrote:
kill stealers are the worst.
|
United States43725 Posts
On January 01 2013 17:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On January 01 2013 17:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote:pallad was just banned by {CC}StealthBlue.
That account was created on 2010-09-07 10:00:13 and had 1713 posts.
Reason: 3 bans 8 warnings, enough is enough. So on that emphasis... does that mean people like me are on thin ice? So if you are on thin ice... does that mean I am dead in the water, posting from a cold grave?
No because no mod is out to get you and you have no real recent mod history. It is all in your head. You're not on thin ice.
|
On January 02 2013 08:51 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On January 01 2013 17:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:On January 01 2013 17:30 MountainDewJunkie wrote:pallad was just banned by {CC}StealthBlue.
That account was created on 2010-09-07 10:00:13 and had 1713 posts.
Reason: 3 bans 8 warnings, enough is enough. So on that emphasis... does that mean people like me are on thin ice? So if you are on thin ice... does that mean I am dead in the water, posting from a cold grave? No because no mod is out to get you and you have no real recent mod history. It is all in your head. You're not on thin ice.
Why do I feel like I've seen this exact same post at least 10 other times
It's like a meta mind fuck.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37064 Posts
On January 02 2013 08:37 Bibbit wrote:Holy shit this asdffdsa guy is freaking insane. He makes a thread looking for feedback on his map and goes buck when he gets it. Thread's pretty entertaining, worth reading if you have a moment :D Kadaver even tried to be all friendly and rescue him but asdffdsa didnt take the opportunity at all >_>
As I was reading this, I pictured a 13 year old kid who was PROUD of the fact that his maps were getting considered for ICCUP and also PROUD of the fact that he had HIS thread up on TEAM LIQUID.
Now. Of course they were HIS maps and HIS thread so he DID NOT WANT the derailing. But as far as he could tell, people were A L W A Y S telling him that something was just wrong.
Now. He seemed to have gotten offended when people were saying things were wrong with his map when that's not what he
was looking for. That thread was to be a TEST MAP thread only. And if people had feedback, he wanted the feedback posted
in the BWMN where no one cares about what they write.
I'll say it a fourth time (he counted wrong, he only said it three times in his thread) he felt that people should NOT DERAIL his thread with useless opinions. Oh and of course, any further stupid opinions and he is going to go get a mod to tell them to stop and ban them from HIS thread.
Thank you Bibbit for that link. I laughed quite a lot 
|
On January 02 2013 08:53 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2013 08:37 Bibbit wrote:Holy shit this asdffdsa guy is freaking insane. He makes a thread looking for feedback on his map and goes buck when he gets it. Thread's pretty entertaining, worth reading if you have a moment :D Kadaver even tried to be all friendly and rescue him but asdffdsa didnt take the opportunity at all >_> As I was reading this, I pictured a 13 year old kid who was PROUD of the fact that his maps were getting considered for ICCUP and also PROUD of the fact that he had HIS thread up on TEAM LIQUID. Now. Of course they were HIS maps and HIS thread so he DID NOT WANT the derailing. But as far as he could tell, people were A L W A Y S telling him that something was just wrong. Now. He seemed to have gotten offended when people were saying things were wrong with his map when that's not what he was looking for. That thread was to be a TEST MAP thread only. And if people had feedback, he wanted the feedback posted in the BWMN where no one cares about what they write. I'll say it a fourth time (he counted wrong, he only said it three times in his thread) he felt that people should NOT DERAIL his thread with useless opinions. Oh and of course, any further stupid opinions and he is going to go get a mod to tell them to stop and ban them from HIS thread. Thank you Bibbit for that link. I laughed quite a lot
i thought the guy was trolling -_-
|
On January 02 2013 08:37 Bibbit wrote:Holy shit this asdffdsa guy is freaking insane. He makes a thread looking for feedback on his map and goes buck when he gets it. Thread's pretty entertaining, worth reading if you have a moment :D Kadaver even tried to be all friendly and rescue him but asdffdsa didnt take the opportunity at all >_>
Ahaha, holy shit that thread took a nosedive as soon as someone posted actual feedback
|
On January 02 2013 08:53 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2013 08:37 Bibbit wrote:Holy shit this asdffdsa guy is freaking insane. He makes a thread looking for feedback on his map and goes buck when he gets it. Thread's pretty entertaining, worth reading if you have a moment :D Kadaver even tried to be all friendly and rescue him but asdffdsa didnt take the opportunity at all >_> As I was reading this, I pictured a 13 year old kid who was PROUD of the fact that his maps were getting considered for ICCUP and also PROUD of the fact that he had HIS thread up on TEAM LIQUID. Now. Of course they were HIS maps and HIS thread so he DID NOT WANT the derailing. But as far as he could tell, people were A L W A Y S telling him that something was just wrong. Now. He seemed to have gotten offended when people were saying things were wrong with his map when that's not what he was looking for. That thread was to be a TEST MAP thread only. And if people had feedback, he wanted the feedback posted in the BWMN where no one cares about what they write. I'll say it a fourth time (he counted wrong, he only said it three times in his thread) he felt that people should NOT DERAIL his thread with useless opinions. Oh and of course, any further stupid opinions and he is going to go get a mod to tell them to stop and ban them from HIS thread. Thank you Bibbit for that link. I laughed quite a lot
Well, you have to agree that it is not very nice to say that something is wrong with his map when it is in fact perfect. Anyone reasonable would see that the map is indeed perfect, and give nice useful feedback like "Oh my god your map is so good, i think it actually ended world hunger and war at the same time through its sheer awesomeness. Also i own Korea and want to buy your map for 73000$." But the problem is that a few haters are stalking him whereever he posts and just derail HIS THREAD with useless comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
