|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On November 20 2012 15:00 dAPhREAk wrote:i am not even going to say anything. i am just going to post and bold/underline. Show nested quote +NeMeSiS3 was just banned by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2012-02-03 15:33:26 and had 2969 posts.
Reason: Calling the entire realm of Christian faiths a cult is just the straw that broke the camels back. The mods are tired of seeing your user name in the title of reported posts. Other posters are frustrated. I can only assume you're tired of hearing from us as well.
After 23 moderator actions in less than a year and countless borderline posts its time for all parties involved to admit you are not compatible with the environment we are trying to cultivate here. Don't get me wrong though, if this was a break-up, the rationale would be "Its not us, its you." Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 05:28 KwarK wrote:On November 07 2012 05:22 dAPhREAk wrote:why would you refer to the mormon church as a cult in a ban reason? time and time again, this site has shown itself to be so religiously intolerant. it blows my mind. ayaz2810 was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-09-14 10:46:32 and had 490 posts.
Reason: You got a pass on the first comment because it's obviously a cult. That's not even debatable. Despite the cultist calling for your blood I ignored his protests and let your post stand. However you then decided to pursue the argument and try to defend yourself in the topic, even though you got no moderator action for the original comment. You have previous temp bans for starting off topic religion arguments, keep doing it and they'll just get longer.
Also you don't get any points for "But, I'm not going to have a theological debate in the election thread.". Don't say you're not going to do it, don't do it. I banned the guy for doing off topic insulting your religion and I'm getting flak for it? Maybe get thicker skin, it's not like you don't worship Jesus, that makes you cultists.
How does KwarK worm his way out of this?
|
On November 20 2012 15:00 dAPhREAk wrote:i am not even going to say anything. i am just going to post and bold/underline. Show nested quote +NeMeSiS3 was just banned by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2012-02-03 15:33:26 and had 2969 posts.
Reason: Calling the entire realm of Christian faiths a cult is just the straw that broke the camels back. The mods are tired of seeing your user name in the title of reported posts. Other posters are frustrated. I can only assume you're tired of hearing from us as well.
After 23 moderator actions in less than a year and countless borderline posts its time for all parties involved to admit you are not compatible with the environment we are trying to cultivate here. Don't get me wrong though, if this was a break-up, the rationale would be "Its not us, its you." Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 05:28 KwarK wrote:On November 07 2012 05:22 dAPhREAk wrote:why would you refer to the mormon church as a cult in a ban reason? time and time again, this site has shown itself to be so religiously intolerant. it blows my mind. ayaz2810 was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-09-14 10:46:32 and had 490 posts.
Reason: You got a pass on the first comment because it's obviously a cult. That's not even debatable. Despite the cultist calling for your blood I ignored his protests and let your post stand. However you then decided to pursue the argument and try to defend yourself in the topic, even though you got no moderator action for the original comment. You have previous temp bans for starting off topic religion arguments, keep doing it and they'll just get longer.
Also you don't get any points for "But, I'm not going to have a theological debate in the election thread.". Don't say you're not going to do it, don't do it. I banned the guy for doing off topic insulting your religion and I'm getting flak for it? Maybe get thicker skin, it's not like you don't worship Jesus, that makes you cultists.
What the heck!?!?! What goes on in here? The darkness of the Ban Chat Thread...getting down to the truth...
Digging beneath the wastes...
Etc.
To think that there's 1500 pages of this, lol. Adios! Back to the land of the living (that cheesecake recipe gets me every time).
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 20 2012 15:00 dAPhREAk wrote:i am not even going to say anything. i am just going to post and bold/underline. Show nested quote +NeMeSiS3 was just banned by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2012-02-03 15:33:26 and had 2969 posts.
Reason: Calling the entire realm of Christian faiths a cult is just the straw that broke the camels back. The mods are tired of seeing your user name in the title of reported posts. Other posters are frustrated. I can only assume you're tired of hearing from us as well.
After 23 moderator actions in less than a year and countless borderline posts its time for all parties involved to admit you are not compatible with the environment we are trying to cultivate here. Don't get me wrong though, if this was a break-up, the rationale would be "Its not us, its you." Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 05:28 KwarK wrote:On November 07 2012 05:22 dAPhREAk wrote:why would you refer to the mormon church as a cult in a ban reason? time and time again, this site has shown itself to be so religiously intolerant. it blows my mind. ayaz2810 was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-09-14 10:46:32 and had 490 posts.
Reason: You got a pass on the first comment because it's obviously a cult. That's not even debatable. Despite the cultist calling for your blood I ignored his protests and let your post stand. However you then decided to pursue the argument and try to defend yourself in the topic, even though you got no moderator action for the original comment. You have previous temp bans for starting off topic religion arguments, keep doing it and they'll just get longer.
Also you don't get any points for "But, I'm not going to have a theological debate in the election thread.". Don't say you're not going to do it, don't do it. I banned the guy for doing off topic insulting your religion and I'm getting flak for it? Maybe get thicker skin, it's not like you don't worship Jesus, that makes you cultists. Bring it up in feedback, not here.
|
I think the logical deduction here is that kwark is not an n-1 straw burdened camel
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES50790 Posts
JohnChoi was just banned by heyoka.
That account was created on 2007-12-19 13:22:28 and had 388 posts.
Reason: Requested.
but but but....why?
|
JohnChoi was just banned by heyoka.
That account was created on 2007-12-19 13:22:28 and had 388 posts.
Reason: Requested.
??????????????
|
On November 20 2012 17:39 Gamegene wrote:Show nested quote +JohnChoi was just banned by heyoka.
That account was created on 2007-12-19 13:22:28 and had 388 posts.
Reason: Requested. ??????????????
Who's JohnChoi?
|
On November 20 2012 17:35 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +
JohnChoi was just banned by heyoka.
That account was created on 2007-12-19 13:22:28 and had 388 posts.
Reason: Requested.
but but but....why?
Oh my goodness  whyyy...?
|
On November 20 2012 17:40 Azera wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 17:39 Gamegene wrote:JohnChoi was just banned by heyoka.
That account was created on 2007-12-19 13:22:28 and had 388 posts.
Reason: Requested. ?????????????? Who's JohnChoi?
He does stuff for SSL as far as I know.
|
On November 20 2012 17:49 Caihead wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 17:40 Azera wrote:On November 20 2012 17:39 Gamegene wrote:JohnChoi was just banned by heyoka.
That account was created on 2007-12-19 13:22:28 and had 388 posts.
Reason: Requested. ?????????????? Who's JohnChoi? He does stuff for SSL as far as I know.
Right. Thanks!
|
United States43902 Posts
On November 20 2012 15:00 dAPhREAk wrote:i am not even going to say anything. i am just going to post and bold/underline. Show nested quote +NeMeSiS3 was just banned by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2012-02-03 15:33:26 and had 2969 posts.
Reason: Calling the entire realm of Christian faiths a cult is just the straw that broke the camels back. The mods are tired of seeing your user name in the title of reported posts. Other posters are frustrated. I can only assume you're tired of hearing from us as well.
After 23 moderator actions in less than a year and countless borderline posts its time for all parties involved to admit you are not compatible with the environment we are trying to cultivate here. Don't get me wrong though, if this was a break-up, the rationale would be "Its not us, its you." Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 05:28 KwarK wrote:On November 07 2012 05:22 dAPhREAk wrote:why would you refer to the mormon church as a cult in a ban reason? time and time again, this site has shown itself to be so religiously intolerant. it blows my mind. ayaz2810 was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-09-14 10:46:32 and had 490 posts.
Reason: You got a pass on the first comment because it's obviously a cult. That's not even debatable. Despite the cultist calling for your blood I ignored his protests and let your post stand. However you then decided to pursue the argument and try to defend yourself in the topic, even though you got no moderator action for the original comment. You have previous temp bans for starting off topic religion arguments, keep doing it and they'll just get longer.
Also you don't get any points for "But, I'm not going to have a theological debate in the election thread.". Don't say you're not going to do it, don't do it. I banned the guy for doing off topic insulting your religion and I'm getting flak for it? Maybe get thicker skin, it's not like you don't worship Jesus, that makes you cultists.
Check like six posts above yours in the same topic.
On November 20 2012 13:59 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 13:34 ControlMonkey wrote:
Complaining about Kwark is the road to permabanville. He and I agreed on a few things, the post Pandemic referred to in the ban is similar to ones I've made, albeit without the awful posting history and mod history on my part.
|
AgentChaos was just banned by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2011-07-03 01:03:56 and had 4563 posts.
Reason: This was your last banreason:
Reason: Your posting is consistently shit and you have a long moderation history. Shape up or get out.
You didn't just not shape up, you actually got worse again. It is depressing when confronted with users who are the embodiment of negativity, complaints, insults and intollerance. I wonder how you function in every day life with such an attitude and behavior towards your fellow man.
Haaaaaaleluja Nyovne, my hero - Seriously the worst poster ever, insanely passively agressive on anything and everything
Thank you, thank you, thank you for that
|
LegendOfZelda was just banned by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2012-11-21 00:36:58 and had 0 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user
Damnit! Am I the only one that is upset about this screen name being wasted...also a bit upset that I never tried to claim it?! =)
|
I am surprised that it wasn't taken, But I am happy that it is gone. I find usernames like that to obnoxious to look at, so I am more then happy to see it gone.
|
On November 21 2012 01:29 JackDragon wrote:
I am surprised that it wasn't taken, But I am happy that it is gone. I find usernames like that to obnoxious to look at, so I am more then happy to see it gone.
I agree with this, having a name like LegendOfZelda would suck even though the franchise is awesome. Its not a surprise to me a name like that wasnt taken.
|
|
|
|
|
Osteriet was just temp banned for 1 week by ToKoreaWithLove.
That account was created on 2011-11-28 22:09:27 and had 109 posts.
Reason:
haha i can see i awoke the retards. Have fun gentlemen. You lack the intellect to take this discussion anywhere meaningful.
Ok third retard shows its face. Thought we could have ourselves a nice debate, but you come rushing in and drool on the floor. You have no clue do you? Nevermind go talk to the two other imbeciles.
Take a break and calm down. If you have time between trying to sound smart and pretending to be better than everyone else google "how to discuss anything like an adult".
Turns out, this is not the best advice TKWL could have given.
Firstly, there are, in google's own words No results found for "how to discuss anything like an adult".
So let us see what we get without qoutes:
1. advice on step-parenting - not very usefull
2. and 3. "how not to look like a child" - mostly generic motivational jibberish, not specific to discussion
4. an autism/asperger's forum - maybe relevant, but also slightly insluting
5. dressing website - irelevant if not in a pictures thread
6. quick tips for escort customers - definitely insulting, yet probably the most helpful
7. Six Steps to Help Your Adult Child Move Out Of The House - very unlikely for a poster on TL to have an adult child
8. climate change talk - very unlikely for the poster's behaviour to be a result of climate change
9. "Furry to Furry - an Adult Furry Community". - hilariously insulting
10. MLP:FIM on wikipedia. - would not dare to comment on this on TL, but probably helpful only for posting in a specific thread
In concluding remarks, the whole first page of result is a disaster, thus I rate then ban reason as "not very helpful".
|
Norway10161 Posts
Terribly, terribly sorry. He will probably send me an indignant pm about that.
|
Lol, I Googled that too. First result was page 2 of a column entitled "Obamacare Killing Jobs?" X-D
Nah. TKWL perming trolls. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
