EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1449
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
| ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7918 Posts
On October 14 2012 06:11 sam!zdat wrote: Please don't have children edit: the problem with you is that you don't know when you live edit: what do you mean, treat "history like gospel." I have no idea what that means. User was temp banned for this post. Don't get this ban, to be honest. The guy says he doesn't care about anything that is beyond his life time, and sam answers "please don't have children" which really is a mildly caustic way of saying "how can you say that knowing that your children will live in the world you will leave them". The formulation could have been more elegant, but I hardly see how this is offensive enough to deserve a ban. Also, Sam seems to me like a very good poster. | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:33 Biff The Understudy wrote: Don't get this ban, to be honest. The guy says he doesn't care about anything that is beyond his life time, and sam answers "please don't have children" which really is a mildly caustic way of saying "how can you say that knowing that your children will live in the world you will leave them". The formulation could have been more elegant, but I hardly see how this is offensive enough to deserve a ban. Also, Sam seems to me like a very good poster. He was only saying he thinks 100 years back in history is quite long. How you turn that to he doesn't care what world he leaves his children in is beyond me. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7918 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:44 nihlon wrote: He was only saying he thinks 100 years back in history is quite long. How you turn that to he doesn't care what world he leaves his children in is beyond me. I know, apologies; I expressed myself badly. What I meant is that I think that was Sam's point: if you think that you should think history in terms of 100 years maximum because that's how long you can expect to live, you really are saying that having any long term view about the world is useless because you won't be there anymore. Sam therefore pointed out the fact that with such reasonning, you make little case of your children, grand children etc... At least that's what I understood. | ||
|
See.Blue
United States2673 Posts
On October 14 2012 17:50 RoieTRS wrote: I don't like how the internet is open to homosexuality but so closeminded to anything beyond like bestiality or pedophilia. It is SO closeminded that mentioning the two words in the same sentence gets you banned in most forums. Wtf dude. What prompted that? | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34496 Posts
On October 14 2012 17:50 RoieTRS wrote: I don't like how the internet is open to homosexuality but so closeminded to anything beyond like bestiality or pedophilia. It is SO closeminded that mentioning the two words in the same sentence gets you banned in most forums. Wat. I won't comment on bestiality but paedophilia is taking advantage of children. Homosexuality is a choice by a person, it does in no way take advantage of another person. In a homosexual relationship, both participants are willing. Paedophilia is a completely different thing. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7918 Posts
On October 14 2012 21:43 Firebolt145 wrote: Wat. I won't comment on bestiality but paedophilia is taking advantage of children. Homosexuality is a choice by a person, it does in no way take advantage of another person. In a homosexual relationship, both participants are willing. Paedophilia is a completely different thing. Really depends, in fact. Depends of the story you talk about and about the point of view. Thinking that an absolutely genuine love story with a young teenager and an adult cannot exist would really be misknowing human nature and love in general. There have been some scandals of "pedophilia" where you could absolutely argue that it was more of a legitimate love story than most of what you see between consenting adults. Of course, then there is the old pervert who rapes little girls. The problem is that what we call "pedophilia" doesn't make any difference between both. It is a social norm, just like homosexuality a hundred years ago. You can argue it is a necessary one, it doesn't change its arbitrary nature. And yes, there is a huge taboo and a rather hysterical social stigma against the very idea that you don't need to be 16 to be in love and loved, to have sexual desires, and so on. | ||
|
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On October 14 2012 22:37 Biff The Understudy wrote: Really depends, in fact. Depends of the story you talk about and about the point of view. Thinking that an absolutely genuine love story with a young teenager and an adult cannot exist would really be misknowing human nature and love in general. There have been some scandals of "pedophilia" where you could absolutely argue that it was more of a legitimate love story than most of what you see between consenting adults. Of course, then there is the old pervert who rapes little girls. The problem is that what we call "pedophilia" doesn't make any difference between both. It is a social norm, just like homosexuality a hundred years ago. You can argue it is a necessary one, it doesn't change its arbitrary nature. And yes, there is a huge taboo and a rather hysterical social stigma against the very idea that you don't need to be 16 to be in love and loved, to have sexual desires, and so on. Please man. Don't open this can of worms. I don't know what you're trying to achieve with this argument ... a world where we can joke about or practices bestiality and pedophilia freely? What ever it is you trying to say, it ain't worth it. LOL. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7918 Posts
On October 14 2012 23:06 Defacer wrote: Please man. Don't open this can of worms. I don't know what you're trying to achieve with this argument ... a world where we can joke about or practices bestiality and pedophilia freely? What ever it is you trying to say, it ain't worth it. LOL. I'm answering Firebolt, because is argument homosexuality = fine, since nobody is hurt, while pedophilia is not because it is taking advantage of a child is simplistic, since what we call "pedophilia" puts in the same bag a love story between a 35 years old woman and a 13 old boy (and yes, it does exist), or the crimes of an old pervert raping little girls. Pedophilia, like homosexuality, is a social norm. Social norms are essentially arbitrary. After that, you joke about what you want, I was not discussing any of that. | ||
monk
United States8476 Posts
| ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7918 Posts
On October 14 2012 23:17 monk. wrote: Really isn't the place to discuss this. If your post isn't relatively light-hearted in nature, chances are, you shouldn't be posting here. Yes, I know, I'm sorry, I shouldn't have reacted to Firebolt's point since that was off topic. Apologies. | ||
|
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On October 14 2012 23:15 Biff The Understudy wrote: I'm answering Firebolt, because is argument homosexuality = fine, since nobody is hurt, while pedophilia is not because it is taking advantage of a child is simplistic, since what we call "pedophilia" puts in the same bag a love story between a 35 years old woman and a 13 old boy (and yes, it does exist), or the crimes of an old pervert raping little girls. Pedophilia, like homosexuality, is a social norm. Social norms are essentially arbitrary. After that, you joke about what you want, I was not discussing any of that. You know, more than 50 Tibetan monks set themselves on fire in the past year in protest. There are god-knows-how-many political prisoners and dissidents out there in China, who are guilty of nothing but criticizing their government openly and freely. Trying to discuss the merits and misconceptions of pedophilia online isn't just a first world problem, it's a first world problem only super-duper-uber-nerds-that-have-been-up-too late think is a problem. Don't bother man. Spend your brain power on something else. | ||
|
nooboon
2602 Posts
I assume that there is a faster way of making smurf email accounts because i can't imagine a person spending an entire day making emails accounts to troll forums. | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
On October 15 2012 00:58 nooboon wrote: Most likely that sdgdvdfvrtersdv,sdgsdgggrsdgdsg,sdgsdsdgsdgsdgsdg,skilaunglaf, and Skilaunglaff all belong to the same person. I assume that there is a faster way of making smurf email accounts because i can't imagine a person spending an entire day making emails accounts to troll forums. 10 minute mail is one really easy example, just refresh the page and tadah, new email address. | ||
|
Tamburlaine
Canada288 Posts
On October 14 2012 03:27 Orek wrote: Is there a way to find out in which thread people get banned? Automated Ban List thread doesn't give where the ban comes from. Whenever I see an interesting ban reason, I want to find the thread to get the context, but it takes some effort to find it. Why not list the thread as well as reason so that we know what mistakes we should avoid? Closest thing to that that I know of is this greasemonkey script. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
-Joined - Friday, 31st of December 2010 so brave. On October 15 2012 07:39 Tamburlaine wrote: Closest thing to that that I know of is this greasemonkey script. https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&as_q=user was banned for this post&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=d&as_sitesearch=teamliquid.net&as_occt=any&safe=off&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights= https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&tbs=qdr:d&q="user was banned" for this post site:teamliquid.net&oq="user was banned" for this post site:teamliquid.net&gs_l=serp.12...2213.5465.0.6893.2.2.0.0.0.0.45.87.2.2.0.les;..0.0...1c.1.pcT6OUnMF7E&pbx=1&bpcl=35277026&biw=1920&bih=979&cad=cbv&sei=jE17UP22AebC0QWA9oCQCA#hl=en&lr=&safe=off&tbs=qdr:d&sclient=psy-ab&q="user was temp banned for this post" site:teamliquid.net&oq="user was temp banned for this post" site:teamliquid.net&gs_l=serp.3...6212.8458.1.8963.15.10.5.0.0.0.58.467.10.10.0.les;..0.0...1c.1.nSoi5JN_9tE&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=bfc1d69311b06b8e&bpcl=35277026&biw=1920&bih=979 not perfect but im too much of a hipster for addons yo. On October 14 2012 17:50 RoieTRS wrote: I don't like how the internet is open to homosexuality but so closeminded to anything beyond like bestiality or pedophilia. It is SO closeminded that mentioning the two words in the same sentence gets you banned in most forums. beastiality is just raping an animal, an animal cant give consent, and even if it appears to do so the definition of domesticated is that it submits to you so yeee.. i think thats enough of that. | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10344 Posts
On October 15 2012 08:21 dArkko wrote: Hi mates, i got an annoying and non understandable temp BAN for my previous post because i said i think it is as strange to make a gay player thread as making a jew or muslim player thread. Well even if i did not change my mind about this thread i would like to apologize if i disturbed anyone of ur gay player community. I let you enjoy this fashion player girl and boys ! c u fag friends User was temp banned for this post. That was 2 days after he posted this in the same thread: On October 12 2012 17:39 dArkko wrote: You Really feel you need/WanT to find other gays in a game ? That's seem weird to me. I will create a jew player thread :x Fuck i hate clannishness User was temp banned for this post. I'm no psychologist, but clearly, clearly, this isn't working out. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
Edit: You missed some of his shit mdj | ||
|
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On October 15 2012 08:35 turdburgler wrote: beastiality is just raping an animal, an animal cant give consent, and even if it appears to do so the definition of domesticated is that it submits to you so yeee.. i think thats enough of that. LOL. Oh turd. | ||
|
rUiNati0n
United States1155 Posts
 | ||
| ||
