|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On October 14 2012 04:38 Epishade wrote:I had to post a user in here that made me laugh. I'll do it with pictures. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/0Ef7g.jpg) So his name is animefreak15. From that we know he probably likes to watch anime. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ZbYz7.jpg) Here we see that his posting is almost exclusive to the anime discussion thread, with 1 exception, the 10 Commandments thread. Surely he must have deviated from anime discussion in that thread, right? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/mqEn5.jpg) Lol.
isnt that what the anime discussion forum is for? inflating your post count? same with lr threads and the kpop thread?
|
On October 14 2012 04:51 arb wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 04:38 Epishade wrote:I had to post a user in here that made me laugh. I'll do it with pictures. So his name is animefreak15. From that we know he probably likes to watch anime. Here we see that his posting is almost exclusive to the anime discussion thread, with 1 exception, the 10 Commandments thread. Surely he must have deviated from anime discussion in that thread, right? Lol. isnt that what the anime discussion forum is for? inflating your post count? same with lr threads and the kpop thread?
LOL but this guy was like next level spamming.
Hope he learns his lesson this time around.
|
Unnamed was just temp banned for 1 week by R1CH. That account was created on 2010-12-16 03:10:14 and had 148 posts. Reason: Show nested quote +Pedophilia and homosexuality are both perversions and people in gaming community are joking about the latter all the time. I dislike such a hypocrisy morality as much as I dislike perversions.
Wow, I'm surprised that's all he got.
|
On October 14 2012 06:11 sam!zdat wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 06:10 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 06:07 sam!zdat wrote:On October 14 2012 06:06 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 06:03 WolfintheSheep wrote:On October 14 2012 05:58 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 05:57 sam!zdat wrote:On October 14 2012 05:55 Nyovne wrote:
Patent law and patent pools might be the source of this kind of 'unethical' corporate behavior though. But then again, nothing new under the sun there. Well, in fact, intellectual property is quite new under the sun. It's not. Beethoven raged about piracy many years ago, of people copying his manuscript. There were even no recordings back then!! Yes...that's the point. The only thing Beethoven could do was rage, because Intellectual Property as a legal concept was non-existent. It was pushed through at his time, so...... By the way, I consider 100 years to be quite old, especially when things like computing science as a field did not exist until 50 years ago. If you think 100 years is old you have lost the ability to think historically. That is the problem. 100 years is nothing. Nothing at all. 100 years is everything, unless you live longer than that. There are people out there that argues 1000 year traditions are somehow relevant, I am not one of those people. Please don't have children edit: the problem with you is that you don't know when you live edit: what do you mean, treat "history like gospel." I have no idea what that means. User was temp banned for this post.
Oops. Looks like he crossed a line. See you soon Sammy.
Sometimes there are posts on TL so ridiculous that the only response possible is an insult. Best to not respond at all. It can be so difficult though. 
|
On October 14 2012 06:34 jdseemoreglass wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On October 14 2012 06:11 sam!zdat wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 06:10 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 06:07 sam!zdat wrote:On October 14 2012 06:06 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 06:03 WolfintheSheep wrote:On October 14 2012 05:58 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 05:57 sam!zdat wrote:On October 14 2012 05:55 Nyovne wrote:
Patent law and patent pools might be the source of this kind of 'unethical' corporate behavior though. But then again, nothing new under the sun there. Well, in fact, intellectual property is quite new under the sun. It's not. Beethoven raged about piracy many years ago, of people copying his manuscript. There were even no recordings back then!! Yes...that's the point. The only thing Beethoven could do was rage, because Intellectual Property as a legal concept was non-existent. It was pushed through at his time, so...... By the way, I consider 100 years to be quite old, especially when things like computing science as a field did not exist until 50 years ago. If you think 100 years is old you have lost the ability to think historically. That is the problem. 100 years is nothing. Nothing at all. 100 years is everything, unless you live longer than that. There are people out there that argues 1000 year traditions are somehow relevant, I am not one of those people. Please don't have children edit: the problem with you is that you don't know when you live edit: what do you mean, treat "history like gospel." I have no idea what that means. User was temp banned for this post. Oops. Looks like he crossed a line. See you soon Sammy. Sometimes there are posts on TL so ridiculous that the only response possible is an insult. Best to not respond at all. It can be so difficult though.
Yeah. :/ Only a 2 day though, the mods understand I guess.
|
On October 14 2012 06:34 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 06:11 sam!zdat wrote:On October 14 2012 06:10 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 06:07 sam!zdat wrote:On October 14 2012 06:06 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 06:03 WolfintheSheep wrote:On October 14 2012 05:58 achan1058 wrote:On October 14 2012 05:57 sam!zdat wrote:On October 14 2012 05:55 Nyovne wrote:
Patent law and patent pools might be the source of this kind of 'unethical' corporate behavior though. But then again, nothing new under the sun there. Well, in fact, intellectual property is quite new under the sun. It's not. Beethoven raged about piracy many years ago, of people copying his manuscript. There were even no recordings back then!! Yes...that's the point. The only thing Beethoven could do was rage, because Intellectual Property as a legal concept was non-existent. It was pushed through at his time, so...... By the way, I consider 100 years to be quite old, especially when things like computing science as a field did not exist until 50 years ago. If you think 100 years is old you have lost the ability to think historically. That is the problem. 100 years is nothing. Nothing at all. 100 years is everything, unless you live longer than that. There are people out there that argues 1000 year traditions are somehow relevant, I am not one of those people. Please don't have children edit: the problem with you is that you don't know when you live edit: what do you mean, treat "history like gospel." I have no idea what that means. User was temp banned for this post. Oops. Looks like he crossed a line. See you soon Sammy. Sometimes there are posts on TL so ridiculous that the only response possible is an insult. Best to not respond at all. It can be so difficult though.
Could not agree more, we'll see ya soon David Foster Wallace bro.
|
Netherlands19141 Posts
On October 14 2012 06:03 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Show nested quote +Unnamed was just temp banned for 1 week by R1CH. That account was created on 2010-12-16 03:10:14 and had 148 posts. Reason: Pedophilia and homosexuality are both perversions and people in gaming community are joking about the latter all the time. I dislike such a hypocrisy morality as much as I dislike perversions. Wow, I'm surprised that's all he got.
Why? Technically he is correct. They are both types of human behavior which differentiate from what is considered normal (from a biological perspective). The way he expressed himself though and the implications and insinuations made while doing so were the offense in casu here. After all, they cannot be compared in the absolute by any stretch of the imagination if you have any moral compass. Then again, this is from my modern western point of view. There are quite a few countries and cultures on our planet who vastly disagree with me and find that having sex with children under 12, let alone with individuals who haven't reached the age of 18 yet is infinately more preferable then having relations with someone of the same sex.
Luckily for me TL is a modern and Western cultured community and that is the standard by which we hold our users.
|
On October 14 2012 07:36 Nyovne wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 06:03 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Unnamed was just temp banned for 1 week by R1CH. That account was created on 2010-12-16 03:10:14 and had 148 posts. Reason: Pedophilia and homosexuality are both perversions and people in gaming community are joking about the latter all the time. I dislike such a hypocrisy morality as much as I dislike perversions. Wow, I'm surprised that's all he got. Why? Technically he is correct. They are both types of human behavior which differentiate from what is considered normal (from a biological perspective). The way he expressed himself though and the implications and insinuations made while doing so were the offense in casu here. After all, they cannot be compared in the absolute by any stretch of the imagination if you have any moral compass. Then again, this is from my modern western point of view. There are quite a few countries and cultures on our planet who vastly disagree with me and find that having sex with children under 12, let alone with individuals who haven't reached the age of 18 yet is infinately more preferable then having relations with someone of the same sex. Luckily for me TL is a modern and Western cultured community and that is the standard by which we hold our users.
I'm not griping, or petitioning for anything. I guess commented because I hate when those two are compared. My mother does it all the time (as with tons of other people I regretfully must work with). "If they legalize gay marriage, why not just let the pedos marry little boys?" Displaced anger on my end, here.
|
On October 14 2012 07:49 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 07:36 Nyovne wrote:On October 14 2012 06:03 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Unnamed was just temp banned for 1 week by R1CH. That account was created on 2010-12-16 03:10:14 and had 148 posts. Reason: Pedophilia and homosexuality are both perversions and people in gaming community are joking about the latter all the time. I dislike such a hypocrisy morality as much as I dislike perversions. Wow, I'm surprised that's all he got. Why? Technically he is correct. They are both types of human behavior which differentiate from what is considered normal (from a biological perspective). The way he expressed himself though and the implications and insinuations made while doing so were the offense in casu here. After all, they cannot be compared in the absolute by any stretch of the imagination if you have any moral compass. Then again, this is from my modern western point of view. There are quite a few countries and cultures on our planet who vastly disagree with me and find that having sex with children under 12, let alone with individuals who haven't reached the age of 18 yet is infinately more preferable then having relations with someone of the same sex. Luckily for me TL is a modern and Western cultured community and that is the standard by which we hold our users. I'm not griping, or petitioning for anything. I guess commented because I hate when those two are compared. My mother does it all the time (as with tons of other people I regretfully must work with). "If they legalize gay marriage, why not just let the pedos marry little boys?" Displaced anger on my end, here.
Maybe you should instead question the reasons for your own anger instead of focusing on their intolerance. That's all I'm gonna say because I don't want to derail this thread.
Regarding the ban, I don't know... Not everyone is born in a modern western culture, and banning people because they aren't seems a little odd, they can't help the opinions they hold. Also, to say the standard is a modern Western cultured community is a little misleading, since there are many people in modern Western culture who hold the same exact opinions. Not sure whether it does more to bring down the quality of discussion to let them speak, or whether it does them better good to hear people respond towards their opinions outside of a ban. Guess I just favor a more liberal freedom of speech than the ten commandments advocate.
|
On October 14 2012 08:07 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 07:49 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On October 14 2012 07:36 Nyovne wrote:On October 14 2012 06:03 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Unnamed was just temp banned for 1 week by R1CH. That account was created on 2010-12-16 03:10:14 and had 148 posts. Reason: Pedophilia and homosexuality are both perversions and people in gaming community are joking about the latter all the time. I dislike such a hypocrisy morality as much as I dislike perversions. Wow, I'm surprised that's all he got. Why? Technically he is correct. They are both types of human behavior which differentiate from what is considered normal (from a biological perspective). The way he expressed himself though and the implications and insinuations made while doing so were the offense in casu here. After all, they cannot be compared in the absolute by any stretch of the imagination if you have any moral compass. Then again, this is from my modern western point of view. There are quite a few countries and cultures on our planet who vastly disagree with me and find that having sex with children under 12, let alone with individuals who haven't reached the age of 18 yet is infinately more preferable then having relations with someone of the same sex. Luckily for me TL is a modern and Western cultured community and that is the standard by which we hold our users. I'm not griping, or petitioning for anything. I guess commented because I hate when those two are compared. My mother does it all the time (as with tons of other people I regretfully must work with). "If they legalize gay marriage, why not just let the pedos marry little boys?" Displaced anger on my end, here. Maybe you should instead question the reasons for your own anger instead of focusing on their intolerance. That's all I'm gonna say because I don't want to derail this thread. Regarding the ban, I don't know... Not everyone is born in a modern western culture, and banning people because they aren't seems a little odd, they can't help the opinions they hold. Not sure whether it does more to bring down the quality of discussion to let them speak, or whether it does them better good to hear people respond towards their opinions outside of a ban. Guess I just favor a more liberal freedom of speech.
I already said why it made me angry. I guess that little shot would have worked if my feelings and motives were not already transparent.
|
On October 14 2012 07:36 Nyovne wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 06:03 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Unnamed was just temp banned for 1 week by R1CH. That account was created on 2010-12-16 03:10:14 and had 148 posts. Reason: Pedophilia and homosexuality are both perversions and people in gaming community are joking about the latter all the time. I dislike such a hypocrisy morality as much as I dislike perversions. Wow, I'm surprised that's all he got. Why? Technically he is correct. They are both types of human behavior which differentiate from what is considered normal (from a biological perspective). The way he expressed himself though and the implications and insinuations made while doing so were the offense in casu here. After all, they cannot be compared in the absolute by any stretch of the imagination if you have any moral compass. Then again, this is from my modern western point of view. There are quite a few countries and cultures on our planet who vastly disagree with me and find that having sex with children under 12, let alone with individuals who haven't reached the age of 18 yet is infinately more preferable then having relations with someone of the same sex. Luckily for me TL is a modern and Western cultured community and that is the standard by which we hold our users.
from his post history (which is quite good) it looks like it's an Ukrainian fellow so there is no cultural divide which legitimate this, tho technically speaking he's true and it's an intelligent way to bring the debate about homosexuality on favorable ground if you're against it.
|
On October 14 2012 08:07 meditech wrote:
bhuuhu end of the world is coming TheLosingOne most overated SC2 person ever first time in life he dosent out the tornament and adavance to next staq whith first place :D
glhf TheLosingOne fanboys but remeber GD dosent invite ANNY BEST FOREGINER like Nerchio/Stephano/Titan/Frear etc.... but players who give him extra wievers like ,,superstar,, without forms like thorzain/mana/elfi?/ and other wanna be nightend
User was banned for this post.
BOOM!! (not a bad username, though; shame it's now wasted....)
+ Show Spoiler +And with that, I've made my 500th a tribute to Nazgul.
|
On October 13 2012 18:05 paralleluniverse wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 05:59 Falling wrote:
The great difficultly with dvorak was whenever he joined in, the quality of discourse completely plummeted. But there was rarely one post that was just atrocious. It's more of a collective whole which feels a little less concrete when moderating. Smugly antagonistic/ condescending might be how to describe it. But somehow he could just walk the line between being moderated and not. But the entire thread degenerates in the meantime.
But the guy really couldn't stand being 30 day banned and wanted me to pass on his individual arguments to people in the politics thread so he could continue the debate by proxy. And then he had the nerve to constantly pm me on different people that should be moderated in the politics thread- until I tired of it and disabled his pm'ing until his temp ban was over. Don't know if he got a chance to use it again before he got perm'd. I've frequently post on the US Election thread, I've even replied to dvorakftw on many occasions. I disagree with virtually everything he has said. But you should not be banning people for forcefully disagreeing with others in what is mostly a liberal refuge. What happened to Silidons?
The primary issue I had with dvorakftw is that he argued for the sake of arguing. Even frivolous details, he would harp about. This would degrade the discussion and make it go in circles. And he was the most condescending poster in the thread.
There was one point that he posted a picture of Jay-Z's bar or club. He seemed to want to discuss Obama and his elitist friends. Really? Is that an election issue now?
I'm all for fun having fun in that thread but it was getting to the point that he was a constant distraction. He's like that kid in the back of the class that is annoying on purpose so he can get attention.
|
On October 14 2012 09:40 Defacer wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 18:05 paralleluniverse wrote:On October 11 2012 05:59 Falling wrote:
The great difficultly with dvorak was whenever he joined in, the quality of discourse completely plummeted. But there was rarely one post that was just atrocious. It's more of a collective whole which feels a little less concrete when moderating. Smugly antagonistic/ condescending might be how to describe it. But somehow he could just walk the line between being moderated and not. But the entire thread degenerates in the meantime.
But the guy really couldn't stand being 30 day banned and wanted me to pass on his individual arguments to people in the politics thread so he could continue the debate by proxy. And then he had the nerve to constantly pm me on different people that should be moderated in the politics thread- until I tired of it and disabled his pm'ing until his temp ban was over. Don't know if he got a chance to use it again before he got perm'd. I've frequently post on the US Election thread, I've even replied to dvorakftw on many occasions. I disagree with virtually everything he has said. But you should not be banning people for forcefully disagreeing with others in what is mostly a liberal refuge. What happened to Silidons? The primary issue I had with dvorakftw is that he argued for the sake of arguing. Even frivolous details, he would harp about. This would degrade the discussion and make it go in circles. And he was the most condescending poster in the thread. There was one point that he posted a picture of Jay-Z's bar or club. He seemed to want to discuss Obama and his elitist friends. Really? Is that an election issue now? I'm all for fun having fun in that thread but it was getting to the point that he was a constant distraction. He's like that kid in the back of the class that is annoying on purpose so he can get attention.
He had a lot of crappy throwaway posts, but he also had a lot of long-winded well argued posts that clearly took time and effort. I really don't know much about dvorak's history, I've only seen his posts the past couple weeks so I could be missing how bad he was. But I do think there is a tendency to combine the irritation from the quality of posting with the irritation from the opposing opinion itself into an exaggerated response. Of course, I'm biased in this regard because I think some bans detract more from the discussion than allowing controversial opinions to be expressed. Perhaps being in the minority on so many issues on this site has forced me to develop a greater tolerance or something, because I never feel the anger and frustration a lot of people exhibit towards some posters they disagree with.
|
On October 14 2012 09:53 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 09:40 Defacer wrote:On October 13 2012 18:05 paralleluniverse wrote:On October 11 2012 05:59 Falling wrote:
The great difficultly with dvorak was whenever he joined in, the quality of discourse completely plummeted. But there was rarely one post that was just atrocious. It's more of a collective whole which feels a little less concrete when moderating. Smugly antagonistic/ condescending might be how to describe it. But somehow he could just walk the line between being moderated and not. But the entire thread degenerates in the meantime.
But the guy really couldn't stand being 30 day banned and wanted me to pass on his individual arguments to people in the politics thread so he could continue the debate by proxy. And then he had the nerve to constantly pm me on different people that should be moderated in the politics thread- until I tired of it and disabled his pm'ing until his temp ban was over. Don't know if he got a chance to use it again before he got perm'd. I've frequently post on the US Election thread, I've even replied to dvorakftw on many occasions. I disagree with virtually everything he has said. But you should not be banning people for forcefully disagreeing with others in what is mostly a liberal refuge. What happened to Silidons? The primary issue I had with dvorakftw is that he argued for the sake of arguing. Even frivolous details, he would harp about. This would degrade the discussion and make it go in circles. And he was the most condescending poster in the thread. There was one point that he posted a picture of Jay-Z's bar or club. He seemed to want to discuss Obama and his elitist friends. Really? Is that an election issue now? I'm all for fun having fun in that thread but it was getting to the point that he was a constant distraction. He's like that kid in the back of the class that is annoying on purpose so he can get attention. He had a lot of crappy throwaway posts, but he also had a lot of long-winded well argued posts that clearly took time and effort. I really don't know much about dvorak's history, I've only seen his posts the past couple weeks so I could be missing how bad he was. But I do think there is a tendency to combine the irritation from the quality of posting with the irritation from the opposing opinion itself into an exaggerated response. Of course, I'm biased in this regard because I think some bans detract more from the discussion than allowing controversial opinions to be expressed. Perhaps being in the minority on so many issues on this site has forced me to develop a greater tolerance or something, because I never feel the anger and frustration a lot of people exhibit towards some posters they disagree with.
In a way, it's kind of ironic that dvorakftw got banned from the US Election thread because of his fundamental inability to understand the online politics of TL and discussion threads.
For every substantive point he made, there were a myriad of unprovoked insults, put-downs, troll-links and general acts of douchery that wouldn't be tolerated in online or real life. After a certain point, you tune guys like that out.
I've been insulted by a lot of people, and in turn insulted others in that thread ... the difference was that it happened when I or someone else deserved it. dvorakftw was always in some kind of aggro mode. I don't think his ban will detract from the amount of controversy or diversity of opinions in that thread at all. There are still plenty of mature, intelligent posters in there for me to disagree with, all of whom I feel are superior to dvorakftw. dvorakftw isn't fit to carry their nutsacks.
|
So many angry bans for people being horrible people to each other that are completely unrelated to actual games recently. What happened.
|
On October 14 2012 16:37 Caihead wrote:
So many angry bans for people being horrible people to each other that are completely unrelated to actual games recently. What happened.
StarCraft 2
|
On October 14 2012 07:36 Nyovne wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 06:03 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Unnamed was just temp banned for 1 week by R1CH. That account was created on 2010-12-16 03:10:14 and had 148 posts. Reason: Pedophilia and homosexuality are both perversions and people in gaming community are joking about the latter all the time. I dislike such a hypocrisy morality as much as I dislike perversions. Wow, I'm surprised that's all he got. Why? Technically he is correct. They are both types of human behavior which differentiate from what is considered normal (from a biological perspective). The way he expressed himself though and the implications and insinuations made while doing so were the offense in casu here. After all, they cannot be compared in the absolute by any stretch of the imagination if you have any moral compass. Then again, this is from my modern western point of view. There are quite a few countries and cultures on our planet who vastly disagree with me and find that having sex with children under 12, let alone with individuals who haven't reached the age of 18 yet is infinately more preferable then having relations with someone of the same sex. Luckily for me TL is a modern and Western cultured community and that is the standard by which we hold our users.
'Considered normal from a biological perspective' seems to me to be contamination of science by certain parts of public opinion. Homosexuality and pedosexuality are both biologically as well as socially vested sexual orientations. They are less, and a lot less, frequent than heterosexuality, but claiming them to be 'not normal' is equally illogical as claiming red hair or green eye colour to be so as well.
|
I don't like how the internet is open to homosexuality but so closeminded to anything beyond like bestiality or pedophilia. It is SO closeminded that mentioning the two words in the same sentence gets you banned in most forums.
User was warned for this post
|
On October 14 2012 17:50 RoieTRS wrote:
I don't like how the internet is open to homosexuality but so closeminded to anything beyond like bestiality or pedophilia. It is SO closeminded that mentioning the two words in the same sentence gets you banned in most forums.
This is ABL why are you posting this here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
