|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On October 11 2012 05:59 Falling wrote:
The great difficultly with dvorak was whenever he joined in, the quality of discourse completely plummeted. But there was rarely one post that was just atrocious. It's more of a collective whole which feels a little less concrete when moderating. Smugly antagonistic/ condescending might be how to describe it. But somehow he could just walk the line between being moderated and not. But the entire thread degenerates in the meantime.
But the guy really couldn't stand being 30 day banned and wanted me to pass on his individual arguments to people in the politics thread so he could continue the debate by proxy. And then he had the nerve to constantly pm me on different people that should be moderated in the politics thread- until I tired of it and disabled his pm'ing until his temp ban was over. Don't know if he got a chance to use it again before he got perm'd.
the real question is did you do his posting for him?
|
Canada11372 Posts
On October 11 2012 11:40 turdburgler wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 05:59 Falling wrote:
The great difficultly with dvorak was whenever he joined in, the quality of discourse completely plummeted. But there was rarely one post that was just atrocious. It's more of a collective whole which feels a little less concrete when moderating. Smugly antagonistic/ condescending might be how to describe it. But somehow he could just walk the line between being moderated and not. But the entire thread degenerates in the meantime.
But the guy really couldn't stand being 30 day banned and wanted me to pass on his individual arguments to people in the politics thread so he could continue the debate by proxy. And then he had the nerve to constantly pm me on different people that should be moderated in the politics thread- until I tired of it and disabled his pm'ing until his temp ban was over. Don't know if he got a chance to use it again before he got perm'd. the real question is did you do his posting for him?
Heavens no. I warned him a couple times that I didn't want a running commentary of the US thread for 30 days and then shut off the tap when it wouldn't stop.
|
Anyone notice that around the 200s is when most posters begin to rake in the bans? I don't know, I feel like that's the time when the perms are most generally handed out. Is there a way a mod could figure out what the average post count of permed users is?
|
On October 11 2012 11:54 CyDe wrote:
Anyone notice that around the 200s is when most posters begin to rake in the bans? I don't know, I feel like that's the time when the perms are most generally handed out. Is there a way a mod could figure out what the average post count of permed users is?
im pretty sure the average ban post count is 1.
On October 11 2012 11:43 Falling wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 11:40 turdburgler wrote:On October 11 2012 05:59 Falling wrote:
The great difficultly with dvorak was whenever he joined in, the quality of discourse completely plummeted. But there was rarely one post that was just atrocious. It's more of a collective whole which feels a little less concrete when moderating. Smugly antagonistic/ condescending might be how to describe it. But somehow he could just walk the line between being moderated and not. But the entire thread degenerates in the meantime.
But the guy really couldn't stand being 30 day banned and wanted me to pass on his individual arguments to people in the politics thread so he could continue the debate by proxy. And then he had the nerve to constantly pm me on different people that should be moderated in the politics thread- until I tired of it and disabled his pm'ing until his temp ban was over. Don't know if he got a chance to use it again before he got perm'd. the real question is did you do his posting for him? Heavens no. I warned him a couple times that I didn't want a running commentary of the US thread for 30 days and then shut off the tap when it wouldn't stop.
you should direct him to reddit.com/r/politics
that shits great! said no one ever.
|
On October 11 2012 11:57 turdburgler wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 11:54 CyDe wrote:
Anyone notice that around the 200s is when most posters begin to rake in the bans? I don't know, I feel like that's the time when the perms are most generally handed out. Is there a way a mod could figure out what the average post count of permed users is? im pretty sure the average ban post count is 1.
To be precise, it's the mode. Definitely not the mean, and probably not the median.
Congrats to the Dota2 key thread.
|
United States7481 Posts
0 posts has way more bans than 1 post
|
On October 11 2012 12:02 Antoine wrote:
0 posts has way more bans than 1 post
someone should make a graph.
|
You gotta wonder, though, what the worst bans/posts ratio is in an active user.
|
On October 11 2012 12:05 JingleHell wrote:
You gotta wonder, though, what the worst bans/posts ratio is in an active user.
finally, something i can win!
|
Well, I mean, as with average lifespan, you have to shave off the infant mortality and that sort of thing to get an accurate expectancy. I'm talking about besides the people that are spam bots or PBUs. Which I know is a huge portion of people, but I mean the users that didn't join this site to be deliberately malicious, right off the bat.
|
omg
what is this.. I don't even O_O
On October 11 2012 12:02 Antoine wrote:
0 posts has way more bans than 1 post
but are there enough zero post bans to compensate for all the high post bans? I'd expect the average to still be at least like 2 digits
|
Bisutopia19299 Posts
On October 11 2012 12:02 Antoine wrote:
0 posts has way more bans than 1 post
Yeah, but those are all perma bans I would presume. What if we just talk temp bans?
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES50585 Posts
|
Yacobs was just temp banned for 2 days by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2010-03-23 22:22:12 and had 197 posts.
Reason: When taking a moment to go through your contributions to our Dota2 Strategy forum I can not but conclude that your contributions are consistently of a level under our expectations. Making simply incorrect statements and sensationalist thread titles would have been cause for a warning and a serious PM about this behavior. The flaming that was discovered in your post history however sealed the deal. Take two days off and consider this a strong incentive to increase your posting quality in the Dota 2 section of teamliquid.net.
Created a really bad Dota2 thread here, defending a really bad strategy and also stated flaming others, myself included for telling him to stop posting like flamewheel.
On October 11 2012 22:38 Yacobs wrote:Don't tell me what to do, internet tough guy. No it's not. When someone says "X is the best item," it's pretty obvious they're not including standard consumables that are basically a necessity. User was temp banned for this post.
The best part is flamewheel comes in later and double-posts like a boss.
|
He quad posted 
|
Bisutopia19299 Posts
On October 12 2012 02:21 Praetorial wrote:He quad posted
Is quad post the most? When need a book of records for meaningless things on TL.
|
|
|
|
|
On October 12 2012 02:21 Praetorial wrote:He quad posted
O.o I'm blind. Can't count 3 and 4..
On a related note, Heyoka rocks at moderating the Dota2 forums! Sent him 2 PMs, resulted in 1 ban and 1 closed thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
