EPTOn September 09 2010 02:03 Murderotica wrote:
So far it just seems to be rumors afaik
So far it just seems to be rumors afaik
Nope, fanatacist isn't around anymore. :|
The Automated Ban List - Page 135
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Amnesia
United States3818 Posts
Nope, fanatacist isn't around anymore. :| | ||
|
Alou
United States3748 Posts
Can someone ban that Proud Zionist guy? It's like he is here to discuss Israel and not SC2. | ||
|
Amnesia
United States3818 Posts
lmfao | ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
On September 09 2010 07:51 Manifesto7 wrote: Nothing really to discuss (only 5 minutes ago). With Testie still living in his BW world of 2006 he decided to keep flaming iNControl despite having been warned to let it go. Because his flames were not clever and did not include an Xtranormal video, I banned. Doesn't he play LoL or HoL or GaL or some other three letter acronym these days? this is pretty unfair, he took one free shot at inc, and inc replied with the intent to piss him off egg him on, and got one reply. i guess it may be something you have personally against testie. and that warning by ETT must have been before testie's first post on the blog, and as such it must be about the last time testie and inc got into it, which was quite a while ago, unless ETT is clairvoyant, which i won't rule out. | ||
|
Glull
Germany404 Posts
i cant help but notice that something about the testie ban feels... personal. which is understandable since he has 8k posts and some history, but i am not sure if that makes it particularly fair. mentioning the three-letter-acronym game in both comments made about the ban doesnt exactly feel proper either, and is probably the reason i am posting at all. | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
I am a banling on tl.net if you take personal digs at me randomly and completely uncalled for (as he did) they best damn well be funny. His wasn't. So when I replied with something that was nowhere near as mean and in fact completely within "normal" standards of jib jabbing he responded with a rant of really mean shit. So the score was 2 him and 1 me with me being a tl staff member. That can easily = a ban. You can try and reason it all you want with conspiracy theories about it being personal. Chances are in the future if you see the same situation you might be looking at a ban... even with a completely different set of people. | ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
it was mean spirited, sure, but you jabbed him to get that exact type of reaction. it's not a conspiracy theory that you and him have a personal back and forth, however if you had banned him i wouldn't have blinked, and it'd probably be justified. i was just surprised mani would come with a seemingly personal issue with him in your stead, and then throw in a few mean spirited, seemingly uncalled for, jabs of his own. which is why i was wondering if he had anything personal against testie. anyways you ( and the 10 commandments) put it best: you are a staff member, he is a random vet, and this isn't a democracy. | ||
|
H
New Zealand6138 Posts
On September 09 2010 15:50 Etherone wrote: it must be about the last time testie and inc got into it, which was quite a while ago Elephants never forget, man. They never forget. | ||
|
Tabbris
Bangladesh2839 Posts
I personally dont think he has a right to insult players tho. He was good along time ago but all he does now is play HoN. He probably sucks at sc1 and sc2 now. But hey....what do i know | ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27118 Posts
this is pretty unfair, he took one free shot at inc, and inc replied with the intent to piss him off egg him on, and got one reply. I think you have this pretty backwards, did you miss Testie's first post? Testie came in with the intent to piss off, and egg him on. He got one reply! Then he did it again, which is ban worthy. Why should Testie get one free shot in the first place? i was just surprised mani would come with a seemingly personal issue with him in your stead, and then throw in a few mean spirited, seemingly uncalled for, jabs of his own. which is why i was wondering if he had anything personal against testie. What was mean spirited? That I don't remember the game that he plays now? Don't you think it is odd that a guy who doesn't play starcraft comes to a starcraft website to flame those active in the community? That seems mean spirited to me. | ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
| ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27118 Posts
| ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
On September 09 2010 18:08 Manifesto7 wrote: I think you have this pretty backwards, did you miss Testie's first post? Testie came in with the intent to piss off, and egg him on. He got one reply! Then he did it again, which is ban worthy. Why should Testie get one free shot in the first place? What was mean spirited? That I don't remember the game that he plays now? Don't you think it is odd that a guy who doesn't play starcraft comes to a starcraft website to flame those active in the community? That seems mean spirited to me. "Doesn't he play LoL or HoL or GaL or some other three letter acronym these days?" "Maybe he should get the gosuguide to catch up." "Also high school, lol." a guy who doesn't play sc? really? and that's even beside the point you know as well as i do that this is a community that a lot of people became attached to and still browsed daily, even when playing sc was on the back-burner due to sc2 still being years away. not to mention the many that don't play sc2 and still browse/contribute, to this very day. Mani I'm not stupid or clueless, which looks more and more like what you seem to be implying. i just thought the the 2 week ban was a bit unfair, and i know the barbs were unfair, so I came here to state it. I hoped for an answer directly, possibly an explanation at why the barbs for no reason, maybe that was naive. i didn't expect deflections at semantics or whatever assuming my stupidity and/or ignorance. I almost rather you had just said he was a piece of shit maphacker when he was 12. | ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27118 Posts
Mani I'm not stupid or clueless, which looks more and more like what you seem to be implying. i didn't expect deflections at semantics or whatever assuming my stupidity and/or ignorance Time to go nail yourself to that cross. | ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
On September 09 2010 19:03 Manifesto7 wrote: Time to go nail yourself to that cross. im not being a martyr i said it twice because im kind of insulted, and genuinely believe that you were assuming i didnt know wtf i was talking about because of the facetious way you put everything in your reply, rather than addressing any one of my points. which is not what you usually do afaik, and which you continue doing in this reply. you know very well you barbed him multiple times,( even edited one out of the ban later) and then you ask me "What was mean spirited?" ... "Don't you think it is odd that a guy who doesn't play starcraft comes to a starcraft website to flame those active in the community? That seems mean spirited to me." the only way i would even begin to eat this crap is if i had no idea who testie or incontrol was, or TL community for that matter. which will basically lead me to repeating my last post. in short thats pretty much the equivalent of me saying; who the fuck is rekrul, and why does he ever post anywhere considering he doesn't play sc anymore. which as you may know considering who did it actually got someone banned, and as well it should( <3 rek). next thing you know someone is going to quote me and go over fucking punctuation mani i don't have some closet vendetta against you or some martyr syndrome. apparently dealing with the sc2 forums has lead you to assume everyone you don't immediately recognize, is a fucking moron, and tbh it would probably leave me the same way. so how about all this bullshit is put aside, and we a have a direct civil discussion of how in the world the 2 week ban and all those free as barbs were justified? | ||
|
Murderotica
Vatican City State2594 Posts
P.S. There doesn't need to be a justification for banning someone for 2 weeks when they have clearly made an offense and have a history of offenses. People have been permed for less *hint hint*. | ||
|
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
On September 09 2010 19:46 Etherone wrote: next thing you know someone is going to quote me and go over fucking punctuation Okay it seems you are asking for it. That very line is missing a period at the end. You are welcome. | ||
|
Murderotica
Vatican City State2594 Posts
On September 09 2010 20:46 Badjas wrote: Okay it seems you are asking for it. That very line is missing a period at the end. You are welcome. To add onto this, how you type on a forum is the only representation of yourself we have to work off of... If you sound like you are whining about something irrelevant to you, and on top of that your grammar and punctuation are all fucked up, it clearly shows that you didn't care enough to make a proper post. That's how I see it at least. If you didn't put in enough effort for the reader, why should we read and not judge? It's the equivalent of bringing a speech full of slang and run-on sentences to a debate. Just no. | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36370 Posts
| ||
|
thopol
Japan4560 Posts
| ||
| ||
