|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Approximate amount of Yuri on TL just went down by about 74%~
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
On June 23 2012 21:54 tofucake wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 17:51 dAPhREAk wrote:On June 23 2012 17:50 Kipsate wrote:
10k+ spamming poster represent oh look, its a viking. **glares at tofu.... not my fault you're bad
people like him need to be 'educated'
|
On June 23 2012 22:25 nooboon wrote:
I always feel like i come in after everything has hap- Blasterion got permed!?
Same, I'm another person always catching the last beer at the party. >_<
RIP Blasterion
|
On June 23 2012 18:39 Ushio wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 12:48 Sentenal wrote:
And now, 99% of ADT rejoices. This is even better than when he got temp'd for 30 days. hahaha thats cold :/, but he will always be remembered <3 In a good or bad light, that really depends on the person I will remember blasty as the guy who never actually read VN's but blasted through to get CG's. sayonara blasty 
And now, sentenal makes up rubbish again
We did like blast, he was cool, i hope he comes back someday T_T
We need our dose of yuri.
|
On June 23 2012 21:28 NrGmonk wrote:Ok so, here are some classic Belial posts. Keep in mind that these are just the prominent ones I remember. If you really search, you can find a myriad of smaller ones. Keep in mind that I only respond to a few of his posts, as I don't have the time to refute all of them. It takes me about half an hour to write a rebuttal to his posts. Also, keep in mind that I only feel confident to refute his ZvP posts, so he probably has way over 3x the number of terrible posts/responses as this. (He's Zerg, I'm Protoss) These are extremely long reads btw. - This entire thread: Asks a question about a game, I take the time to watch the replay and give him an answer. Then, he tries to ignore all of the advice I just gave him. The rest of the thread is filled with everyone backing me up and telling him he's wrong. Just a terrible experience and discouraged me from responding to [H]Help threads ever again.
- This response: He had a lot of bad history before this, but this singular post was probably one of the most erroneous thing he's ever posted. He says muta into baneling into broodlord is bad; today it is the most common transition from mutalists. He says broodlords are bad: today it is the standard ZvP lategame and they are seen in half of all ZvPs. He says banelings are bad: Banelings these days are gaining immense popularity. The rest of the thread is everyone telling him he's wrong. He also quoted decaf, someone who wrote a guide on mutas, and decaf chimes in, saying he was misquoted and he agrees with everyone else.
- This post and the following discussion: Comes into the thread 70 pages in and claims this strategy is easy to beat. He also eventually shows he doesn't actually know what the strategy is or what we're talking about. As you can imagine, this pissed off everyone who spent this long trying to discuss what to do, including me, some other blue posters, Ranged, and Morrow.
- His most recent fallacies: This, combined with the interest in Belial from this thread, is what inspired/set me off to write this. He still shows a poor understanding of things he tries to sound educated on.
So in summary: - His posts often contain very erroneous information.
- His posts are very long in nature, giving the uniformed(a vast majority of people who visit TL strategy) a sense that he knows what he's talking about.
- He talks about relatively high level stuff, so a vast majority of people can't refute him.
- His posts are extremely long and contain many points each, so it takes a long time to refute him.
- If you try to refute him, he responds with even longer posts, which if you decide to refute again, you waste even more time.
- He's extremely arrogant and condescending in many of his posts.
- He doesn't seem to really get why he's being warned/banned each time, as evidenced by his continuous infractions and his Dark Knight reference.
- He also apparently gives bad advice in the tech support forum: link
As pretty much the only person who's both qualified and willing to refute his often high-falutin sounding nonsense, you can imagine how much this annoys me.
I believe in your summary so I didn't waste my time reading his posts. Thanks for taking your time, I for sure will be wary of this next time I see his posts in the strategy.
|
On June 23 2012 21:28 NrGmonk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Ok so, here are some classic Belial posts. Keep in mind that these are just the prominent ones I remember. If you really search, you can find a myriad of smaller ones. Keep in mind that I only respond to a few of his posts, as I don't have the time to refute all of them. It takes me about half an hour to write a rebuttal to his posts. Also, keep in mind that I only feel confident to refute his ZvP posts, so he probably has way over 3x the number of terrible posts/responses as this. (He's Zerg, I'm Protoss) These are extremely long reads btw. - This entire thread: Asks a question about a game, I take the time to watch the replay and give him an answer. Then, he tries to ignore all of the advice I just gave him. The rest of the thread is filled with everyone backing me up and telling him he's wrong. Just a terrible experience and discouraged me from responding to [H]Help threads ever again.
- This response: He had a lot of bad history before this, but this singular post was probably one of the most erroneous thing he's ever posted. He says muta into baneling into broodlord is bad; today it is the most common transition from mutalists. He says broodlords are bad: today it is the standard ZvP lategame and they are seen in half of all ZvPs. He says banelings are bad: Banelings these days are gaining immense popularity. The rest of the thread is everyone telling him he's wrong. He also quoted decaf, someone who wrote a guide on mutas, and decaf chimes in, saying he was misquoted and he agrees with everyone else.
- This post and the following discussion: Comes into the thread 70 pages in and claims this strategy is easy to beat. He also eventually shows he doesn't actually know what the strategy is or what we're talking about. As you can imagine, this pissed off everyone who spent this long trying to discuss what to do, including me, some other blue posters, Ranged, and Morrow.
- His most recent fallacies: This, combined with the interest in Belial from this thread, is what inspired/set me off to write this. He still shows a poor understanding of things he tries to sound educated on.
So in summary: - His posts often contain very erroneous information.
- His posts are very long in nature, giving the uniformed(a vast majority of people who visit TL strategy) a sense that he knows what he's talking about.
- He talks about relatively high level stuff, so a vast majority of people can't refute him.
- His posts are extremely long and contain many points each, so it takes a long time to refute him.
- If you try to refute him, he responds with even longer posts, which if you decide to refute again, you waste even more time.
- He's extremely arrogant and condescending in many of his posts.
- He doesn't seem to really get why he's being warned/banned each time, as evidenced by his continuous infractions and his Dark Knight reference.
- He also apparently gives bad advice in the tech support forum: link
As pretty much the only person who's both qualified and willing to refute his often high-falutin sounding nonsense, you can imagine how much this annoys me .
So two things -
People say he has contributed - what exactly?
And why isn't he banned from that forum is he is doing such a bad job?
|
On June 24 2012 03:47 McFeser wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 21:28 NrGmonk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Ok so, here are some classic Belial posts. Keep in mind that these are just the prominent ones I remember. If you really search, you can find a myriad of smaller ones. Keep in mind that I only respond to a few of his posts, as I don't have the time to refute all of them. It takes me about half an hour to write a rebuttal to his posts. Also, keep in mind that I only feel confident to refute his ZvP posts, so he probably has way over 3x the number of terrible posts/responses as this. (He's Zerg, I'm Protoss) These are extremely long reads btw. - This entire thread: Asks a question about a game, I take the time to watch the replay and give him an answer. Then, he tries to ignore all of the advice I just gave him. The rest of the thread is filled with everyone backing me up and telling him he's wrong. Just a terrible experience and discouraged me from responding to [H]Help threads ever again.
- This response: He had a lot of bad history before this, but this singular post was probably one of the most erroneous thing he's ever posted. He says muta into baneling into broodlord is bad; today it is the most common transition from mutalists. He says broodlords are bad: today it is the standard ZvP lategame and they are seen in half of all ZvPs. He says banelings are bad: Banelings these days are gaining immense popularity. The rest of the thread is everyone telling him he's wrong. He also quoted decaf, someone who wrote a guide on mutas, and decaf chimes in, saying he was misquoted and he agrees with everyone else.
- This post and the following discussion: Comes into the thread 70 pages in and claims this strategy is easy to beat. He also eventually shows he doesn't actually know what the strategy is or what we're talking about. As you can imagine, this pissed off everyone who spent this long trying to discuss what to do, including me, some other blue posters, Ranged, and Morrow.
- His most recent fallacies: This, combined with the interest in Belial from this thread, is what inspired/set me off to write this. He still shows a poor understanding of things he tries to sound educated on.
So in summary: - His posts often contain very erroneous information.
- His posts are very long in nature, giving the uniformed(a vast majority of people who visit TL strategy) a sense that he knows what he's talking about.
- He talks about relatively high level stuff, so a vast majority of people can't refute him.
- His posts are extremely long and contain many points each, so it takes a long time to refute him.
- If you try to refute him, he responds with even longer posts, which if you decide to refute again, you waste even more time.
- He's extremely arrogant and condescending in many of his posts.
- He doesn't seem to really get why he's being warned/banned each time, as evidenced by his continuous infractions and his Dark Knight reference.
- He also apparently gives bad advice in the tech support forum: link
As pretty much the only person who's both qualified and willing to refute his often high-falutin sounding nonsense, you can imagine how much this annoys me . So two things - People say he has contributed - what exactly? And why isn't he banned from that forum is he is doing such a bad job?
He has contributed a lot of cartoon porn...
|
On June 24 2012 04:38 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On June 24 2012 03:47 McFeser wrote:On June 23 2012 21:28 NrGmonk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Ok so, here are some classic Belial posts. Keep in mind that these are just the prominent ones I remember. If you really search, you can find a myriad of smaller ones. Keep in mind that I only respond to a few of his posts, as I don't have the time to refute all of them. It takes me about half an hour to write a rebuttal to his posts. Also, keep in mind that I only feel confident to refute his ZvP posts, so he probably has way over 3x the number of terrible posts/responses as this. (He's Zerg, I'm Protoss) These are extremely long reads btw. - This entire thread: Asks a question about a game, I take the time to watch the replay and give him an answer. Then, he tries to ignore all of the advice I just gave him. The rest of the thread is filled with everyone backing me up and telling him he's wrong. Just a terrible experience and discouraged me from responding to [H]Help threads ever again.
- This response: He had a lot of bad history before this, but this singular post was probably one of the most erroneous thing he's ever posted. He says muta into baneling into broodlord is bad; today it is the most common transition from mutalists. He says broodlords are bad: today it is the standard ZvP lategame and they are seen in half of all ZvPs. He says banelings are bad: Banelings these days are gaining immense popularity. The rest of the thread is everyone telling him he's wrong. He also quoted decaf, someone who wrote a guide on mutas, and decaf chimes in, saying he was misquoted and he agrees with everyone else.
- This post and the following discussion: Comes into the thread 70 pages in and claims this strategy is easy to beat. He also eventually shows he doesn't actually know what the strategy is or what we're talking about. As you can imagine, this pissed off everyone who spent this long trying to discuss what to do, including me, some other blue posters, Ranged, and Morrow.
- His most recent fallacies: This, combined with the interest in Belial from this thread, is what inspired/set me off to write this. He still shows a poor understanding of things he tries to sound educated on.
So in summary: - His posts often contain very erroneous information.
- His posts are very long in nature, giving the uniformed(a vast majority of people who visit TL strategy) a sense that he knows what he's talking about.
- He talks about relatively high level stuff, so a vast majority of people can't refute him.
- His posts are extremely long and contain many points each, so it takes a long time to refute him.
- If you try to refute him, he responds with even longer posts, which if you decide to refute again, you waste even more time.
- He's extremely arrogant and condescending in many of his posts.
- He doesn't seem to really get why he's being warned/banned each time, as evidenced by his continuous infractions and his Dark Knight reference.
- He also apparently gives bad advice in the tech support forum: link
As pretty much the only person who's both qualified and willing to refute his often high-falutin sounding nonsense, you can imagine how much this annoys me . So two things - People say he has contributed - what exactly? And why isn't he banned from that forum is he is doing such a bad job? He has contributed a lot of cartoon porn...
Nvm!
Lets make him a moderator then.
|
On June 24 2012 04:43 McFeser wrote:Show nested quote +On June 24 2012 04:38 Promethelax wrote:On June 24 2012 03:47 McFeser wrote:On June 23 2012 21:28 NrGmonk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Ok so, here are some classic Belial posts. Keep in mind that these are just the prominent ones I remember. If you really search, you can find a myriad of smaller ones. Keep in mind that I only respond to a few of his posts, as I don't have the time to refute all of them. It takes me about half an hour to write a rebuttal to his posts. Also, keep in mind that I only feel confident to refute his ZvP posts, so he probably has way over 3x the number of terrible posts/responses as this. (He's Zerg, I'm Protoss) These are extremely long reads btw. - This entire thread: Asks a question about a game, I take the time to watch the replay and give him an answer. Then, he tries to ignore all of the advice I just gave him. The rest of the thread is filled with everyone backing me up and telling him he's wrong. Just a terrible experience and discouraged me from responding to [H]Help threads ever again.
- This response: He had a lot of bad history before this, but this singular post was probably one of the most erroneous thing he's ever posted. He says muta into baneling into broodlord is bad; today it is the most common transition from mutalists. He says broodlords are bad: today it is the standard ZvP lategame and they are seen in half of all ZvPs. He says banelings are bad: Banelings these days are gaining immense popularity. The rest of the thread is everyone telling him he's wrong. He also quoted decaf, someone who wrote a guide on mutas, and decaf chimes in, saying he was misquoted and he agrees with everyone else.
- This post and the following discussion: Comes into the thread 70 pages in and claims this strategy is easy to beat. He also eventually shows he doesn't actually know what the strategy is or what we're talking about. As you can imagine, this pissed off everyone who spent this long trying to discuss what to do, including me, some other blue posters, Ranged, and Morrow.
- His most recent fallacies: This, combined with the interest in Belial from this thread, is what inspired/set me off to write this. He still shows a poor understanding of things he tries to sound educated on.
So in summary: - His posts often contain very erroneous information.
- His posts are very long in nature, giving the uniformed(a vast majority of people who visit TL strategy) a sense that he knows what he's talking about.
- He talks about relatively high level stuff, so a vast majority of people can't refute him.
- His posts are extremely long and contain many points each, so it takes a long time to refute him.
- If you try to refute him, he responds with even longer posts, which if you decide to refute again, you waste even more time.
- He's extremely arrogant and condescending in many of his posts.
- He doesn't seem to really get why he's being warned/banned each time, as evidenced by his continuous infractions and his Dark Knight reference.
- He also apparently gives bad advice in the tech support forum: link
As pretty much the only person who's both qualified and willing to refute his often high-falutin sounding nonsense, you can imagine how much this annoys me . So two things - People say he has contributed - what exactly? And why isn't he banned from that forum is he is doing such a bad job? He has contributed a lot of cartoon porn... Nvm! Lets make him a moderator then.
As far as I can tell though thats it, cartoon porn and poorly thought out strategy whine.
Maybe he used to be a good poster and has been living off the dividend since that point?
|
lol at CajunMan, banned due to own report:
Reason:
You've had unnecessarily hostile and condescending replies overall in this thread, then when someone points it out, you report THEM? Thanks for calling attention to yourself so I could notice you.
If you feel people are attacking you, then either respond appropriately, or use the report button then. Don't call them bronze leaguers and tell 'em to 'stfu' and then expect us to be on your side. That's not what the report button is for.
If you ever mis-use the report feature again, OR continue to be aggressive in debates in the future, expect more severe moderation.
|
On June 24 2012 05:55 kerpal wrote:lol at CajunMan, banned due to own report: Show nested quote +
Reason:
You've had unnecessarily hostile and condescending replies overall in this thread, then when someone points it out, you report THEM? Thanks for calling attention to yourself so I could notice you.
If you feel people are attacking you, then either respond appropriately, or use the report button then. Don't call them bronze leaguers and tell 'em to 'stfu' and then expect us to be on your side. That's not what the report button is for.
If you ever mis-use the report feature again, OR continue to be aggressive in debates in the future, expect more severe moderation.
this is why i never report arguments i am involved in. the mods may review the spoilered portions and knock me out as well. but thats because
+ Show Spoiler +Because I'm Bad, I'm Bad-
Come On
(Bad Bad-Really, Really Bad)
You Know I'm Bad, I'm Bad-
You Know It
(Bad Bad-Really, Really Bad)
You Know I'm Bad, I'm Bad-
Come On, You Know
(Bad Bad-Really, Really Bad)
And The Whole World Has To
Answer Right Now
Just To Tell You Once Again,
Who's Bad . . .
|
I actually read 3 of your blogs one day when you were sharing them with me on IRC and this was one of them. It was really good and excellent. I very much so enjoyed the read.
Your ego tends to paradoxically coalesce around your small penis, grating appearance, and comical attempts at humor.
Then this happened. What a fantastic way to exact revenge......I almost want to go create an account and write my opinions on your blogs, some posititivity to weigh out the negativity.
|
On June 24 2012 06:03 Anacletus wrote:I actually read 3 of your blogs one day when you were sharing them with me on IRC and this was one of them. It was really good and excellent. I very much so enjoyed the read. Show nested quote +Your ego tends to paradoxically coalesce around your small penis, grating appearance, and comical attempts at humor. Then this happened. What a fantastic way to exact revenge......I almost want to go create an account and write my opinions on your blogs, some posititivity to weigh out the negativity.
we should all make smurf accounts and say nice things to His Majesty Jolt (who is clearly more than a knight now that he has been promoted)
|
On June 24 2012 02:24 BrTarolg wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 18:39 Ushio wrote:On June 23 2012 12:48 Sentenal wrote:
And now, 99% of ADT rejoices. This is even better than when he got temp'd for 30 days. hahaha thats cold :/, but he will always be remembered <3 In a good or bad light, that really depends on the person I will remember blasty as the guy who never actually read VN's but blasted through to get CG's. sayonara blasty And now, sentenal makes up rubbish again We did like blast, he was cool, i hope he comes back someday T_T We need our dose of yuri.
Apparently you weren't reading IRC when he got banned, and the celebration that followed. Needless to say, him being gone is a good thing. His endless stream of one-liners, his absolute hatred of the "Edit" button that resulted in mountains of double posts of one-liners, his spam of game CGs that he couldn't even read, his constant off-topic "discussions" are finally at an end. And ADT is better off from it.
|
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
Hm. If I combined the posts with my other account definitely not my smurf, I think I come close to 10k. Oh well. I suppose when I get back to LR-ing SC2 I'll quickly hit 10k haha.
|
|
|
On June 24 2012 06:55 beetlelisk wrote:
What is ADT?
Anime Discussion Thread I think.
|
On June 24 2012 06:47 MoonBear wrote:
Hm. If I combined the posts with my other account definitely not my smurf, I think I come close to 10k. Oh well. I suppose when I get back to LR-ing SC2 I'll quickly hit 10k haha.
When your smurf has as many posts as you do how can you tell which one is the smurf???
|
Anime Discussion Thread
Combined with my secret alt account, I have a total post count 25950
|
On June 24 2012 06:59 marttorn wrote:
Anime Discussion Thread
Combined with my secret alt account, I have a total post count 25950
who on earth has 21801 posts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
