|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 29 2012 06:01 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 05:41 AmericanUmlaut wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! I love you, GMarshal. You're pretty late to the party.
Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans 
|
Finland8094 Posts
On May 29 2012 06:14 Iplaythings wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 06:01 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 05:41 AmericanUmlaut wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! I love you, GMarshal. You're pretty late to the party. Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans
I act the way I do because I already made a post about that ban on the same page quoting the post that got him banned:
On May 29 2012 03:11 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! SC2 WoL: 50$ Computer to run WoL on ultra: 1000$ Getting banned: Priceless Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 23:47 VoO wrote:
Nobody literally gives a shit about this. 2 out of 10 games I have obvious maphackers who even admitt using maphack. It doesn't matter because nobody ever got banned using external even if they admit it in the ingame chat. I developed my own maphack, used it and talked about to my opponents without hesitation. Nobody will ever get banned for using a maphack in SC2, that's the reality.
User was banned for this post.
|
On May 29 2012 06:20 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 06:14 Iplaythings wrote:On May 29 2012 06:01 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 05:41 AmericanUmlaut wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! I love you, GMarshal. You're pretty late to the party. Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans I act the way I do because I already made a post about that ban on the same page quoting the post that got him banned: Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 03:11 Cokefreak wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! SC2 WoL: 50$ Computer to run WoL on ultra: 1000$ Getting banned: Priceless On May 28 2012 23:47 VoO wrote:
Nobody literally gives a shit about this. 2 out of 10 games I have obvious maphackers who even admitt using maphack. It doesn't matter because nobody ever got banned using external even if they admit it in the ingame chat. I developed my own maphack, used it and talked about to my opponents without hesitation. Nobody will ever get banned for using a maphack in SC2, that's the reality.
User was banned for this post.
I don't understand you, what's wrong with someone showing their gratitude to mods? Why only one person can comment on a ban?
|
Finland8094 Posts
On May 29 2012 06:37 beetlelisk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 06:20 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 06:14 Iplaythings wrote:On May 29 2012 06:01 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 05:41 AmericanUmlaut wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! I love you, GMarshal. You're pretty late to the party. Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans I act the way I do because I already made a post about that ban on the same page quoting the post that got him banned: On May 29 2012 03:11 Cokefreak wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! SC2 WoL: 50$ Computer to run WoL on ultra: 1000$ Getting banned: Priceless On May 28 2012 23:47 VoO wrote:
Nobody literally gives a shit about this. 2 out of 10 games I have obvious maphackers who even admitt using maphack. It doesn't matter because nobody ever got banned using external even if they admit it in the ingame chat. I developed my own maphack, used it and talked about to my opponents without hesitation. Nobody will ever get banned for using a maphack in SC2, that's the reality.
User was banned for this post. I don't understand you, what's wrong with someone showing their gratitude to mods? Why only one person can comment on a ban?
Well you have a point.But to my defense I'm retardedly drunk at the moment, the time was 6:37 KST when I started typing this, it takes a while to make sure there are no typos.
Also I didn't intend that only one person can comment to a ban, rather I replied to the comment by Iplaythings: Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans
|
On May 29 2012 06:44 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 06:37 beetlelisk wrote:On May 29 2012 06:20 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 06:14 Iplaythings wrote:On May 29 2012 06:01 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 05:41 AmericanUmlaut wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! I love you, GMarshal. You're pretty late to the party. Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans I act the way I do because I already made a post about that ban on the same page quoting the post that got him banned: On May 29 2012 03:11 Cokefreak wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! SC2 WoL: 50$ Computer to run WoL on ultra: 1000$ Getting banned: Priceless On May 28 2012 23:47 VoO wrote:
Nobody literally gives a shit about this. 2 out of 10 games I have obvious maphackers who even admitt using maphack. It doesn't matter because nobody ever got banned using external even if they admit it in the ingame chat. I developed my own maphack, used it and talked about to my opponents without hesitation. Nobody will ever get banned for using a maphack in SC2, that's the reality.
User was banned for this post. I don't understand you, what's wrong with someone showing their gratitude to mods? Why only one person can comment on a ban? Well you have a point.But to my defense I'm retardedly drunk at the moment, the time was 6:37 KST when I started typing this, it takes a while to make sure there are no typos. Also I didn't intend that only one person can comment to a ban, rather I replied to the comment by Iplaythings:
Oh man, drunk posting on TL, something I haven't dared myself to (I might be a little TOO passionate about my opinions then xd)
|
Finland8094 Posts
On May 29 2012 06:53 Iplaythings wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 06:44 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 06:37 beetlelisk wrote:On May 29 2012 06:20 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 06:14 Iplaythings wrote:On May 29 2012 06:01 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 05:41 AmericanUmlaut wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! I love you, GMarshal. You're pretty late to the party. Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans I act the way I do because I already made a post about that ban on the same page quoting the post that got him banned: On May 29 2012 03:11 Cokefreak wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! SC2 WoL: 50$ Computer to run WoL on ultra: 1000$ Getting banned: Priceless On May 28 2012 23:47 VoO wrote:
Nobody literally gives a shit about this. 2 out of 10 games I have obvious maphackers who even admitt using maphack. It doesn't matter because nobody ever got banned using external even if they admit it in the ingame chat. I developed my own maphack, used it and talked about to my opponents without hesitation. Nobody will ever get banned for using a maphack in SC2, that's the reality.
User was banned for this post. I don't understand you, what's wrong with someone showing their gratitude to mods? Why only one person can comment on a ban? Well you have a point.But to my defense I'm retardedly drunk at the moment, the time was 6:37 KST when I started typing this, it takes a while to make sure there are no typos. Also I didn't intend that only one person can comment to a ban, rather I replied to the comment by Iplaythings: Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans Oh man, drunk posting on TL, something I haven't dared myself to (I might be a little TOO passionate about my opinions then xd)
Man drunk posting is the best, just ask JOJO about his recent drunk post
|
On May 29 2012 07:02 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 06:53 Iplaythings wrote:On May 29 2012 06:44 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 06:37 beetlelisk wrote:On May 29 2012 06:20 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 06:14 Iplaythings wrote:On May 29 2012 06:01 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 05:41 AmericanUmlaut wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! I love you, GMarshal. You're pretty late to the party. Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans I act the way I do because I already made a post about that ban on the same page quoting the post that got him banned: On May 29 2012 03:11 Cokefreak wrote:VoO was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-06-26 01:19:55 and had 277 posts.
Reason: Admitting to being a hacker! Even if blizzard doesn't ban you, we will! SC2 WoL: 50$ Computer to run WoL on ultra: 1000$ Getting banned: Priceless On May 28 2012 23:47 VoO wrote:
Nobody literally gives a shit about this. 2 out of 10 games I have obvious maphackers who even admitt using maphack. It doesn't matter because nobody ever got banned using external even if they admit it in the ingame chat. I developed my own maphack, used it and talked about to my opponents without hesitation. Nobody will ever get banned for using a maphack in SC2, that's the reality.
User was banned for this post. I don't understand you, what's wrong with someone showing their gratitude to mods? Why only one person can comment on a ban? Well you have a point.But to my defense I'm retardedly drunk at the moment, the time was 6:37 KST when I started typing this, it takes a while to make sure there are no typos. Also I didn't intend that only one person can comment to a ban, rather I replied to the comment by Iplaythings: Better late than never, you act like there is a run out date on bans Oh man, drunk posting on TL, something I haven't dared myself to (I might be a little TOO passionate about my opinions then xd) Man drunk posting is the best, just ask JOJO about his recent drunk post
more recent than the blog? or are you referring to his heartbearing blog?
|
United States8476 Posts
|
dude, you're killing ESPORTS!
|
Rofl, I read that one. It's easy to tell when a certain user just has a grudge against someone and attacks them baselessly.
|
Monk gets my vote for being an awesome banling.
|
On May 29 2012 10:30 Praetorial wrote:
Monk gets my vote for being an awesome banling.
Who isn't?
M Bison was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-05-27 18:02:04 and had 20 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user.
I hate dumb people who get awesome names banned. Why can't more Polar Bear Underlings learn to use expendable names like TI900 or teedotizbackagainandagain or something?
|
On May 29 2012 11:33 Mobius_1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 10:30 Praetorial wrote:
Monk gets my vote for being an awesome banling. Who isn't? Show nested quote +M Bison was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-05-27 18:02:04 and had 20 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. I hate dumb people who get awesome names banned. Why can't more Polar Bear Underlings learn to use expendable names like TI900 or teedotizbackagainandagain or something?
rofl when I saw that name I actually got the suspicion he was a PBU, it's really a PBU name imo.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On May 29 2012 11:33 Mobius_1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 10:30 Praetorial wrote:
Monk gets my vote for being an awesome banling. Who isn't? Show nested quote +M Bison was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-05-27 18:02:04 and had 20 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. I hate dumb people who get awesome names banned. Why can't more Polar Bear Underlings learn to use expendable names like TI900 or teedotizbackagainandagain or something?
For him the day he was banned from TL was the most important day of his life. For the ABL, it was Tuesday.
|
On May 29 2012 14:38 solidbebe wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 11:33 Mobius_1 wrote:On May 29 2012 10:30 Praetorial wrote:
Monk gets my vote for being an awesome banling. Who isn't? M Bison was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-05-27 18:02:04 and had 20 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. I hate dumb people who get awesome names banned. Why can't more Polar Bear Underlings learn to use expendable names like TI900 or teedotizbackagainandagain or something? rofl when I saw that name I actually got the suspicion he was a PBU, it's really a PBU name imo.
Just a question. If you get permabanned, and then come back maybe years later after learning from your mistakes and maybe growing to become a better person, will you still get banned for being a PBU?
And first time posting in ABL thread! Finally worked up the courage after months of lurking. 
|
On May 29 2012 17:01 imallinson wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 11:33 Mobius_1 wrote:On May 29 2012 10:30 Praetorial wrote:
Monk gets my vote for being an awesome banling. Who isn't? M Bison was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-05-27 18:02:04 and had 20 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. I hate dumb people who get awesome names banned. Why can't more Polar Bear Underlings learn to use expendable names like TI900 or teedotizbackagainandagain or something? For him the day he was banned from TL was the most important day of his life. For the ABL, it was Tuesday.
Does that make Antoine Chun Li?
Dem legs.
@Nohbrows
I reckon you'd be fine as long as you don't be a bad poster. Unless you are teedot/TI/GGNore/Combat/Charliemurphy, who are basically irredeemable.
|
On May 29 2012 04:57 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 04:53 KobraKay wrote:On May 29 2012 04:36 solidbebe wrote:On May 29 2012 04:22 Anacletus wrote:On May 29 2012 03:32 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 03:28 flamewheel wrote:
you guys post a lot wat wat wat Wait....is it possible to be banned in the ABL thread? o.O Then again a series of wat alone probably dont let you meet the criteria for a ban. This thread is really good and has been so for looong :p thanks guys! Did you miss page 1000? Or poor blubb on 997?
Nah I remember the page 1k stuff but I consider that or events leading to that special cases ^^
|
On May 29 2012 17:42 KobraKay wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 04:57 JingleHell wrote:On May 29 2012 04:53 KobraKay wrote:On May 29 2012 04:36 solidbebe wrote:On May 29 2012 04:22 Anacletus wrote:On May 29 2012 03:32 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 03:28 flamewheel wrote:
you guys post a lot wat wat wat Wait....is it possible to be banned in the ABL thread? o.O Then again a series of wat alone probably dont let you meet the criteria for a ban. This thread is really good and has been so for looong :p thanks guys! Did you miss page 1000? Or poor blubb on 997? Nah I remember the page 1k stuff but I consider that or events leading to that special cases ^^
I agree, that was like the time we all got drunk and sang campfire songs then blacked out for 2 days/1 week.
|
Finland8094 Posts
On May 29 2012 17:48 Jisall wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 17:42 KobraKay wrote:On May 29 2012 04:57 JingleHell wrote:On May 29 2012 04:53 KobraKay wrote:On May 29 2012 04:36 solidbebe wrote:On May 29 2012 04:22 Anacletus wrote:On May 29 2012 03:32 Cokefreak wrote:On May 29 2012 03:28 flamewheel wrote:
you guys post a lot wat wat wat Wait....is it possible to be banned in the ABL thread? o.O Then again a series of wat alone probably dont let you meet the criteria for a ban. This thread is really good and has been so for looong :p thanks guys! Did you miss page 1000? Or poor blubb on 997? Nah I remember the page 1k stuff but I consider that or events leading to that special cases ^^ I agree, that was like the time we all got drunk and sang campfire songs then blacked out for 2 days/1 week.
Ohh I got a special mention for my week off.
|
On May 29 2012 17:02 nohbrows wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2012 14:38 solidbebe wrote:On May 29 2012 11:33 Mobius_1 wrote:On May 29 2012 10:30 Praetorial wrote:
Monk gets my vote for being an awesome banling. Who isn't? M Bison was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-05-27 18:02:04 and had 20 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. I hate dumb people who get awesome names banned. Why can't more Polar Bear Underlings learn to use expendable names like TI900 or teedotizbackagainandagain or something? rofl when I saw that name I actually got the suspicion he was a PBU, it's really a PBU name imo. Just a question. If you get permabanned, and then come back maybe years later after learning from your mistakes and maybe growing to become a better person, will you still get banned for being a PBU? And first time posting in ABL thread! Finally worked up the courage after months of lurking.
Yeah, a lot of PBU's (like Blind-rawr :O! ) are allowed back after a while, kind of on probation to see if they've improved.
I guess maybe there's a few exceptions. GG.NoRe and a host of others have had enough chances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
